wadegarrett
FFA Legend™
Fallerjw said:Tecumseh said:PAY THE MAN!!!!!!!!!11111111EIN!![]()

Fallerjw said:Tecumseh said:PAY THE MAN!!!!!!!!!11111111EIN!![]()

Out of contention for Suh and Berry, probably. Who do you target at #5?so the Browns are picking 5th as of right now, right?![]()
As a COMPLETELY unbiased third party, I have to disagree. I think Mr. Cribbs would be far happier returning kicks in, say, the NFC Central.Or Pittsburgh.Fallerjw said:Tecumseh said:PAY THE MAN!!!!!!!!!11111111EIN!![]()
![]()
not sure, but i know it's someone who's starting to approach reasonable money for a guy who's hasn't done a damn thing in the NFL yet.and if they get a couple more wins, so much the better.Out of contention for Suh and Berry, probably. Who do you target at #5?so the Browns are picking 5th as of right now, right?![]()
I'm in the same camp right now. Beat Oakland, and pull one out against Jacksonville, and that ends the season with 4 straight wins. Something I thought was not even remotely possible. It has to give them a better shot at landing some decent free agents. They also end up in a range of reasonable salaries for the first round pick, like you said.not sure, but i know it's someone who's starting to approach reasonable money for a guy who's hasn't done a damn thing in the NFL yet.and if they get a couple more wins, so much the better.Out of contention for Suh and Berry, probably. Who do you target at #5?so the Browns are picking 5th as of right now, right?![]()
I could get on board with a Right Tackle. It seems like there will be several first round type OT's in the draft. Other players that interest me, not necessarily at pick 5:McClainBrandon GrahamTaylor Mays?Dez BryantGolden Tate - later in the firstBobcat10 said:Assuming Berry and Suh are off the board, and we are picking around 5, I'd love to see Rolando McClain on the board. Roll Tide!
Wouldn't both me at all. Looks like there should be 2-3 OTs worthy of top 10 selections.Mays and Tate will be good later 1st rounders.I could get on board with a Right Tackle. It seems like there will be several first round type OT's in the draft. Other players that interest me, not necessarily at pick 5:Bobcat10 said:Assuming Berry and Suh are off the board, and we are picking around 5, I'd love to see Rolando McClain on the board. Roll Tide!
McClain
Brandon Graham
Taylor Mays?
Dez Bryant
Golden Tate - later in the first
You guys want no part of Taylor Mays, he's the king of taking bad angles.I could get on board with a Right Tackle. It seems like there will be several first round type OT's in the draft. Other players that interest me, not necessarily at pick 5:Bobcat10 said:Assuming Berry and Suh are off the board, and we are picking around 5, I'd love to see Rolando McClain on the board. Roll Tide!
McClain
Brandon Graham
Taylor Mays?
Dez Bryant
Golden Tate - later in the first
VERYBobcat10 said:Assuming Berry and Suh are off the board, and we are picking around 5, I'd love to see Rolando McClain on the board. Roll Tide!
He's the on-field director of the defense this team sorely needs.I agree. I'm glad that Holmgren is on board early so he can hire his GM and scouting department. I kind of hope they keep Mangini on board for the time being. It appears that the team is improving, and that most of the guys left are buying into what Mangini is selling. I also like watching the Browns have success running the ball. It's been a while since we've seen that, and if they can shore up that right side of the offensive line via the draft, and maybe draft a future replacement for Steinbach, then this team should be able to have a lot of success running the ball for quite some time.Since they have 11 draft picks (I think) they can wheel and deal on draft day. Move back in the 1st if their guy will be there later, move up in other rounds to get a particular guy. Whatever players they have targeted, if there are any (without moving up in the 1st or giving up their 2011 1st) they should be able to get. Accumulate some future draft picks like the Pats do or just draft 10+ players. All kinds of options.
i think this will be their primary focus right now.some people might be expecting an evaluation on the coach right away, but that shouldn't happen for a while.I agree. I'm glad that Holmgren is on board early so he can hire his GM and scouting department. I kind of hope they keep Mangini on board for the time being. It appears that the team is improving, and that most of the guys left are buying into what Mangini is selling. I also like watching the Browns have success running the ball. It's been a while since we've seen that, and if they can shore up that right side of the offensive line via the draft, and maybe draft a future replacement for Steinbach, then this team should be able to have a lot of success running the ball for quite some time.Since they have 11 draft picks (I think) they can wheel and deal on draft day. Move back in the 1st if their guy will be there later, move up in other rounds to get a particular guy. Whatever players they have targeted, if there are any (without moving up in the 1st or giving up their 2011 1st) they should be able to get. Accumulate some future draft picks like the Pats do or just draft 10+ players. All kinds of options.
I'll tryI have a couple of questions about the Browns:
1. How many times has a team started the season 1-11, then won their last 4?![]()
2. What will they do with Jerome Harrison? For some reason coaches have been reluctant to let him be the main ball carrier, but all he's ever done is produce when given the chance. Do they keep him around? Do they give him a shot as the RB1 next season? I don't think he's under contract past this season. Does anyone have contract status for all teams in the league? I can't find a good link. I'd try to resign him as Jamal is gone and who knows what we have in James Davis. That still leaves a spot open for a free agent or early draft pick. Then again, we do have the labor agreement issue to deal with and how that impacts free agents.
3. Who are some candidates for the GM position? I would assume they have some people in mind, but has anybody heard any rumors? I've heard the most buzz about Will Lewis (Sea director of player personnel) and Reggie McKenzie (GB co-director of football operations) from Reghi and various newspaper/internet reports. Then also John Schneider (other GB co-director of football operations) and Lake Dawson (Ten director of pro personnel). Basically, somebody that Holmgren has ties to would be a safe bet.
4. Do they keep Mangini around for a 2nd season? My guess is he will be booted...unless Holmgren has his eyes set on Gruden for the 2011 season. Sure would be tough to fire a guy if they win 4 straight to end the year though.
5. Now that their running game seems to be coming around (I know it's against the Chiefs and Raiders), do they take a serious look at bringing in a new QB next year, or did BQ do enough to "earn" the job? I'm still firmly against drafting a QB early in the draft.
So Mangini's earned it or not in your book? Tough to say for me. I respect that he's hung in there and players have not quit on him...at least the players that are playing. Some are essentially playing for their careers though. I'm just not sure wins against Pitt/KC/Oak make up for all the ineptness earlier. It's definitely not fair to give a new coach only one season, but if he's not what Holmgren wants I don't want Holmgren to wait and waste another year.After listening to Holmgren at the presser today I didn't get much of an indication on his direction with Mangini. Just when you thought Mangini was a lame duck by Holmgren's words he quickly shifted to the other side, and vice versa. I think much of the decision will come down to Mangini and what he wants. Does he want to answer to two people? He essentially was given the keys Holmgren now has a year ago and he brought in a GM he figured he could easily control.1.![]()
2. the CBA will not be signed, so Harrison will be ours for one more season. I think we should offer him a 3 yr deal that's easy to get out of after 2 if he's not performing, if he declines let him walk at 28.5 yrs old after 2010, for better or worse. Regardless I hope our RB's entering camp are Harrison-Davis-round 5+ draft pick-Chris Jennings/free agent, it's not a position to concern ourselves with until 2011, there are too many other holes to fill. The only way I'll retract my opinion is if a top RB falls further than he should and we can get him in round 2 or 3.
3.![]()
4. He'll be back, between a lockout possibility in 2011 and Mangini showing progress in December he's earned it. The only way he gets booted is if Holmgren has his eyes dead set on a guy or two and they say they'll take the job.
5. DA will be cut, we'll need a 3rd QB, and I haven't heard anything about that guy (Bartel?) since Mangini came to town, so we'll add a 3rd QB and I hope it's through the draft...I also hope, like RB, unless a steal falls to round 3 I don't want one until round 5 or later. Quinn deserves another year, unlike Mangini, possibly more.
I think he looked at this team preseason and said to himself I can't win with these guys and this ship needs blown up, which was given Lerner's seal of approval. I don't think Mangini expected it to be as bad as it was midseason, but I do think he thought it would be more bad than good, but that this was best for the long term success of the franchise. He doesn't have his guys, this team has some of the worst talent in the league...but it's being built. Some of the talent problems are on Mangini, but more of them can be put on the prior regime. Mangini did pretty well in New York acquiring talent, getting his guys, I want to see what he does with them next year.That said, I'm with you in that if Holmgren wants to go in another direction I want him to do it now and not drag his feet for a year playing wait and see. If he doesn't believe in Mangini then he's got to go, the front office needs to be on the same page and that's something that hasn't been the case for a very, very long time unfortunately.So Mangini's earned it or not in your book? Tough to say for me. I respect that he's hung in there and players have not quit on him...at least the players that are playing. Some are essentially playing for their careers though. I'm just not sure wins against Pitt/KC/Oak make up for all the ineptness earlier. It's definitely not fair to give a new coach only one season, but if he's not what Holmgren wants I don't want Holmgren to wait and waste another year.After listening to Holmgren at the presser today I didn't get much of an indication on his direction with Mangini. Just when you thought Mangini was a lame duck by Holmgren's words he quickly shifted to the other side, and vice versa. I think much of the decision will come down to Mangini and what he wants. Does he want to answer to two people? He essentially was given the keys Holmgren now has a year ago and he brought in a GM he figured he could easily control.1.![]()
2. the CBA will not be signed, so Harrison will be ours for one more season. I think we should offer him a 3 yr deal that's easy to get out of after 2 if he's not performing, if he declines let him walk at 28.5 yrs old after 2010, for better or worse. Regardless I hope our RB's entering camp are Harrison-Davis-round 5+ draft pick-Chris Jennings/free agent, it's not a position to concern ourselves with until 2011, there are too many other holes to fill. The only way I'll retract my opinion is if a top RB falls further than he should and we can get him in round 2 or 3.
3.![]()
4. He'll be back, between a lockout possibility in 2011 and Mangini showing progress in December he's earned it. The only way he gets booted is if Holmgren has his eyes dead set on a guy or two and they say they'll take the job.
5. DA will be cut, we'll need a 3rd QB, and I haven't heard anything about that guy (Bartel?) since Mangini came to town, so we'll add a 3rd QB and I hope it's through the draft...I also hope, like RB, unless a steal falls to round 3 I don't want one until round 5 or later. Quinn deserves another year, unlike Mangini, possibly more.
I think at minimum they need to take a long, hard look at the coaches on the offensive side of the ball. Specifically the QB & WR coaches, as well as the offensive coordinator. They are dead last in passing yards per game, and it's not even close. The next closest team averages 20 more yards per game. They have the fewest 1st downs passing in the league.I think he looked at this team preseason and said to himself I can't win with these guys and this ship needs blown up, which was given Lerner's seal of approval. I don't think Mangini expected it to be as bad as it was midseason, but I do think he thought it would be more bad than good, but that this was best for the long term success of the franchise. He doesn't have his guys, this team has some of the worst talent in the league...but it's being built. Some of the talent problems are on Mangini, but more of them can be put on the prior regime. Mangini did pretty well in New York acquiring talent, getting his guys, I want to see what he does with them next year.That said, I'm with you in that if Holmgren wants to go in another direction I want him to do it now and not drag his feet for a year playing wait and see. If he doesn't believe in Mangini then he's got to go, the front office needs to be on the same page and that's something that hasn't been the case for a very, very long time unfortunately.So Mangini's earned it or not in your book? Tough to say for me. I respect that he's hung in there and players have not quit on him...at least the players that are playing. Some are essentially playing for their careers though. I'm just not sure wins against Pitt/KC/Oak make up for all the ineptness earlier. It's definitely not fair to give a new coach only one season, but if he's not what Holmgren wants I don't want Holmgren to wait and waste another year.After listening to Holmgren at the presser today I didn't get much of an indication on his direction with Mangini. Just when you thought Mangini was a lame duck by Holmgren's words he quickly shifted to the other side, and vice versa. I think much of the decision will come down to Mangini and what he wants. Does he want to answer to two people? He essentially was given the keys Holmgren now has a year ago and he brought in a GM he figured he could easily control.1.![]()
2. the CBA will not be signed, so Harrison will be ours for one more season. I think we should offer him a 3 yr deal that's easy to get out of after 2 if he's not performing, if he declines let him walk at 28.5 yrs old after 2010, for better or worse. Regardless I hope our RB's entering camp are Harrison-Davis-round 5+ draft pick-Chris Jennings/free agent, it's not a position to concern ourselves with until 2011, there are too many other holes to fill. The only way I'll retract my opinion is if a top RB falls further than he should and we can get him in round 2 or 3.
3.![]()
4. He'll be back, between a lockout possibility in 2011 and Mangini showing progress in December he's earned it. The only way he gets booted is if Holmgren has his eyes dead set on a guy or two and they say they'll take the job.
5. DA will be cut, we'll need a 3rd QB, and I haven't heard anything about that guy (Bartel?) since Mangini came to town, so we'll add a 3rd QB and I hope it's through the draft...I also hope, like RB, unless a steal falls to round 3 I don't want one until round 5 or later. Quinn deserves another year, unlike Mangini, possibly more.
Tell that to Tim Couch and David Carr. Chris Palmer killed them both.I think one point that hasn't been mentioned enough is that the Browns are OLD. I'm more worried about the GM, Scouting Department, etc. than Mangini at this point. With having 11 picks, a successful 2010 draft could go a long way towards building a foundation. Mangini is not going anywhere for the time being, so Holmgren can worry about him later. And let's face it, coaches are important, but not near as important as young talent.
Eric Mangini's eventual fate shouldn't overshadow some positive results from the Cleveland Browns' 2009 season: Terry PlutoBy Terry Pluto, The Plain DealerDecember 28, 2009, 6:31PMCLEVELAND, Ohio -- Scribbles after Eric Mangini's Monday press conference...1. From the moment it appeared that Mike Holmgren would be the new Browns president, it was obvious to every member of the coaching staff that they are a long shot to return. The odds are a high-profile and Hall of Fame-caliber coach will bring in his own guy to run the team on the field. That's what usually happens when a new czar arrives in town. But to the credit of Eric Mangini and his staff, it has not affected their work. All season, they had been telling the players about the need to ignore distractions and do their jobs, and the coaches have modeled that behavior in this three-game winning streak.2. It's no secret that I have been a supporter of Mangini. I have been very critical of his draft, especially how he handled the second round. The hiring of George Kokinis was a total mess, because it left the team without a general manager. These are not small mistakes, but they also are something that can be fixed with Holmgren's hiring, assuming he wants to keep Mangini.3. Even if Mangini is fired, Holmgren can thank the coach for bringing in some desperately needed discipline. He also made some difficult personnel moves that will make life easier for next year's coach. Jamal Lewis was finished, and Mangini's only mistake was not following his instincts to cut him in training camp. Braylon Edwards had no interest in Mangini's approach, and other than 2007, Edwards has been an underachiever. In four games with the Browns this season, he had 10 catches -- 2.5 per game. For the Jets, it's 33 catches in 11 games -- 3.0. He has four touchdown catches, eight drops and he's simply another receiver.4. I keep hearing from some fans and media members that Edwards is "an impact player." That was true in only 2007. In 2006, 2008 and 2009 -- his other three full, non-injury seasons -- he's averaged 54 catches and four TDs. It was his 2007 Pro Bowl season that was a fluke, not how he's played for most of his career.5. While in a grumpy mood, if I hear one more time about the $1,700 fine for not paying for a bottle of water -- I swear, I'll scream. The guilty party was Edwards. The massive fine came after he ignored several warnings from coaches and broke numerous team rules. Finally, the coaches decided to send a message to Edwards and the rest of the team -- and suddenly, players discovered they could pay for their incidentals when they check out of hotels and also parked in their assigned spots in the training complex lot.6. I've heard the Browns' last three victories dismissed by some critics because the opponents were Oakland and Kansas City, along with the slumping Steelers. It's like some people think this is the 2007 Browns, who were 10-6. That team was the anomaly. The Browns were 4-12, 10-6, 4-12, 6-10, 4-12 and 5-11 in the previous six years. Losing has stuck to this franchise like a wad of bubble gum to the bottom of a shoe. Any victory is significant, because there have been so few.7. Yes, Kansas City (3-12) is a bad team. But I will never take away style points for beating a bad team. Oakland had won three of five, beating Cincinnati, Pittsburgh and Denver, before losing to the Browns Sunday. That 13-6 victory over a Pittsburgh team that supposedly quit? Well, the Steelers have beaten Green Bay and Baltimore in their last two games. The point is, a win is a win in the NFL, especially for a team that has lost so much.8. While still in the grumpy mood, remember when the agents for some players (and the players themselves) complained about the coaches making them practice in the bad weather? Yes, there is a risk of injury. But games are played in bad weather, and the Browns are 3-0 in December. Could it be that those practices in the wind, rain and snow are paying off?9. After being ranked in the top five for most penalties during the Romeo Crennel years, the Browns rank 30th this season. Rarely do you see them flagged for illegal motion, or the defense jumping offside. They rarely use timeouts because they can't get off a play in time. They don't get called for many personal fouls or stupid taunting penalties. Most games, they know like they know what they want to do -- even when they lack the talent to get it done.10. None of this makes the Browns a playoff team next year. But when Holmgren looks at the roster, he'll find young, talented players in Joshua Cribbs, Joe Thomas, Jerome Harrison, Alex Mack and perhaps a few others. He'll also take over a team that has had a complete attitude transformation for the better, and that's the start to building a winner.
So you disagree with him about Mangini bringing some much needed discipline to the team?Terry Pluto is just about unreadable. I always come away from a Pluto column feeling like he'd much rather being covering Hollywood socialites. Its so much gossip and opinion mixed with some weak analysis. Ok, so he thinks the 2007 team was the anomaly. But he defends that view by reciting the records over the past 6 years? I could do that. A 9 year old could do that. He's paid for this dreck?"Losing has stuck to this franchise like a wad of bubble gum to the bottom of a shoe". Great info, there.
The Browns have 11 draft picks, but its not like they've loaded up on first rounders. They've got an extra 3rd, which is ok, but 2 extra 5th and an extra 6th. 5th and 6th round picks are more like lotto tickets than anything else. You can't expect them to "go a long way towards building a foundation" with those picks.On average about three 5th round picks pan out every year from what I can tell:2006:5.07 49ers - DE Parys Haralson5.13 Ravens - S Dawan Landry5.26 Bears - DE Mark Anderson2007:5.05 Cardinals - WR Steve Breaston5.16 Giants - TE Kevin Boss5.25 Eagles - TE Brent Celek5.30 Bears - S Kevin Payne2008:5.14 Cardinals - RB Tim Hightower5.29 Saints - LG Carl Nicks2009:5.04 Bears - Johnny KnoxA majority of 5th round picks get waived without fanfare. Many others hang on as backups for a few years.On average about 1 of the 32 players selected in the 5th is a bona-fide pro bowl talent. Since the Texans joined the NFL in 2002, the only pro-bowlers in the 5th are DE Trent Cole (Eagles 5.10 in 2005)RB Michael Turner (Chargers 5.22 in 2004)DE Robert Mathis (Colts 5.03 in 2003)LS Ryan Pontbriand (Browns 5.07 in 2003)P Mike Scifres (Chargers 5.14 in 2003)C Dan Koppen (Patriots 5.28 in 2003)DE Aaron Kampman (Vikings 5.21 in 2002)There were no pro bowlers taken in the fifth since 2005.I think one point that hasn't been mentioned enough is that the Browns are OLD. I'm more worried about the GM, Scouting Department, etc. than Mangini at this point. With having 11 picks, a successful 2010 draft could go a long way towards building a foundation. Mangini is not going anywhere for the time being, so Holmgren can worry about him later. And let's face it, coaches are important, but not near as important as young talent.
LOL That's another good one. Gee, I think just everyone knew that Romeo Crennel was a player's coach and that Mangini was a disciplinarian. Way to go stating the obvious, Pluto.So you disagree with him about Mangini bringing some much needed discipline to the team?Terry Pluto is just about unreadable. I always come away from a Pluto column feeling like he'd much rather being covering Hollywood socialites. Its so much gossip and opinion mixed with some weak analysis. Ok, so he thinks the 2007 team was the anomaly. But he defends that view by reciting the records over the past 6 years? I could do that. A 9 year old could do that. He's paid for this dreck?"Losing has stuck to this franchise like a wad of bubble gum to the bottom of a shoe". Great info, there.
To be fair, he isn't really being paid to discuss quantum physics here.LOL That's another good one. Gee, I think just everyone knew that Romeo Crennel was a player's coach and that Mangini was a disciplinarian. Way to go stating the obvious, Pluto.So you disagree with him about Mangini bringing some much needed discipline to the team?Terry Pluto is just about unreadable. I always come away from a Pluto column feeling like he'd much rather being covering Hollywood socialites. Its so much gossip and opinion mixed with some weak analysis. Ok, so he thinks the 2007 team was the anomaly. But he defends that view by reciting the records over the past 6 years? I could do that. A 9 year old could do that. He's paid for this dreck?"Losing has stuck to this franchise like a wad of bubble gum to the bottom of a shoe". Great info, there.
I would just suggest bgp not read Terry then. This was one of his shoot from the hip articles imo. He doesn't get very deep in them. He still has main messages built in there and they're not what is being blasted above. I will say Pluto dumbs down his stuff sometimes too much (like how many times does he has to define OPS when talking about it?), and even I get sick of him sometimes, but I can live with that as there are alot of people that need it in this area. Terry >>>>> Roger.To be fair, he isn't really being paid to discuss quantum physics here.LOL That's another good one. Gee, I think just everyone knew that Romeo Crennel was a player's coach and that Mangini was a disciplinarian. Way to go stating the obvious, Pluto.So you disagree with him about Mangini bringing some much needed discipline to the team?Terry Pluto is just about unreadable. I always come away from a Pluto column feeling like he'd much rather being covering Hollywood socialites. Its so much gossip and opinion mixed with some weak analysis. Ok, so he thinks the 2007 team was the anomaly. But he defends that view by reciting the records over the past 6 years? I could do that. A 9 year old could do that. He's paid for this dreck?"Losing has stuck to this franchise like a wad of bubble gum to the bottom of a shoe". Great info, there.
he's a lot more enjoyable to read than your negative bs all the time.but i guess that's why you're posting on a message board and Pluto is getting paid to write for a newspaper.LOL That's another good one. Gee, I think just everyone knew that Romeo Crennel was a player's coach and that Mangini was a disciplinarian. Way to go stating the obvious, Pluto.So you disagree with him about Mangini bringing some much needed discipline to the team?Terry Pluto is just about unreadable. I always come away from a Pluto column feeling like he'd much rather being covering Hollywood socialites. Its so much gossip and opinion mixed with some weak analysis. Ok, so he thinks the 2007 team was the anomaly. But he defends that view by reciting the records over the past 6 years? I could do that. A 9 year old could do that. He's paid for this dreck?"Losing has stuck to this franchise like a wad of bubble gum to the bottom of a shoe". Great info, there.
Thanks for proving my point. You just mentioned two QB's that were abused because they had limited talent around them, especially on the offensive line.Tell that to Tim Couch and David Carr. Chris Palmer killed them both.I think one point that hasn't been mentioned enough is that the Browns are OLD. I'm more worried about the GM, Scouting Department, etc. than Mangini at this point. With having 11 picks, a successful 2010 draft could go a long way towards building a foundation. Mangini is not going anywhere for the time being, so Holmgren can worry about him later. And let's face it, coaches are important, but not near as important as young talent.
If Dallas and Washington hang on, the Browns would be tied for the longest winning streak to end the year.4 in a row baby!that was pretty cold out there today, but it was a fun game.

He's no Brian Windhorst but he's the best we've got for Browns writing so far as I know. Or do you have someone better? For God's sake I hope you don't say Grossi, Cabot, or Patty Mac.Terry Pluto is just about unreadable. I always come away from a Pluto column feeling like he'd much rather being covering Hollywood socialites. Its so much gossip and opinion mixed with some weak analysis. Ok, so he thinks the 2007 team was the anomaly. But he defends that view by reciting the records over the past 6 years? I could do that. A 9 year old could do that. He's paid for this dreck?"Losing has stuck to this franchise like a wad of bubble gum to the bottom of a shoe". Great info, there.
You can scheme to compensate for those shortfalls. You can't scheme your way out of poor coaching.That being said, I do not consider Mangini to be a bad coach, and I definitely want him back next year.Thanks for proving my point. You just mentioned two QB's that were abused because they had limited talent around them, especially on the offensive line.Tell that to Tim Couch and David Carr. Chris Palmer killed them both.I think one point that hasn't been mentioned enough is that the Browns are OLD. I'm more worried about the GM, Scouting Department, etc. than Mangini at this point. With having 11 picks, a successful 2010 draft could go a long way towards building a foundation. Mangini is not going anywhere for the time being, so Holmgren can worry about him later. And let's face it, coaches are important, but not near as important as young talent.
Agree with your list for sure. I'd add a play making safety if possible. Cribbs and Harrison deserve to be paid. Daboll must go.Priority #1 - pay CribbsPriority #2 - offer Harrison a 'good' contract, by 'good' I mean good for both sides, one in which we can get out of before he turns 30Priority #3 - bring back Mangini, Ryan, and Seely. The rest? Whatever Holmgren decides, except for Daboll, who must go.Priority #4 - identify offseason needs, and they are big WR, play making LB, and a significant improvement on the right side of the o line. Get them. We have other holes (mostly on the defense), but those are the 3 biggest.Quinn should start week 1 with a WR corps of Massaquoi, Robiskie, Stuckey, and to be determined 4th WR, Evan Moore and Robert Royal at TE, and an RB stable of Jerome Harrison, James Davis, Chris Jennings, and some guy drafted in day 2.This may not win the division, but it would at least keep us in contention until December.
Except that Holmgren is not the Browns GM. Holmgren will hire a GM in the coming weeks.I feel bad for Mangini - Given the circumstances, He might have just had the best season he could have had.... He got rid of the dead wood and instilled a winning attitude... He drafts well and set himself up for this next year to be a big stepping stone with another good draft and some FA additions... He just might be a better GM than Holmgren....
I do agree that most 5th rounders don't amount to much, but you don't need pro-bowlers at every position in order to build a foundation. The information you listed is nice, but have you researched how many 5th rounders are on rosters? There's nothing wrong with having a decent back-up guard, or a quality nickel corner who can return punts. I also think it's still a bit early to decide that only one 5th round player has panned out from the 2009 class...... I could argue the same for the 2008 class, but at least those guys have played two years. I might be a bit excited and overstating the importance of this draft, but let's face it, we don't have much else to look forward to...... As far as the draft, I think the Browns will move a few of those picks come draft day. They can move up, down, trade for future picks/players, etc. The new GM will have some flexibility with this draft.The Browns have 11 draft picks, but its not like they've loaded up on first rounders. They've got an extra 3rd, which is ok, but 2 extra 5th and an extra 6th. 5th and 6th round picks are more like lotto tickets than anything else. You can't expect them to "go a long way towards building a foundation" with those picks.On average about three 5th round picks pan out every year from what I can tell:2006:5.07 49ers - DE Parys Haralson5.13 Ravens - S Dawan Landry5.26 Bears - DE Mark Anderson2007:5.05 Cardinals - WR Steve Breaston5.16 Giants - TE Kevin Boss5.25 Eagles - TE Brent Celek5.30 Bears - S Kevin Payne2008:5.14 Cardinals - RB Tim Hightower5.29 Saints - LG Carl Nicks2009:5.04 Bears - Johnny KnoxA majority of 5th round picks get waived without fanfare. Many others hang on as backups for a few years.On average about 1 of the 32 players selected in the 5th is a bona-fide pro bowl talent. Since the Texans joined the NFL in 2002, the only pro-bowlers in the 5th are DE Trent Cole (Eagles 5.10 in 2005)RB Michael Turner (Chargers 5.22 in 2004)DE Robert Mathis (Colts 5.03 in 2003)LS Ryan Pontbriand (Browns 5.07 in 2003)P Mike Scifres (Chargers 5.14 in 2003)C Dan Koppen (Patriots 5.28 in 2003)DE Aaron Kampman (Vikings 5.21 in 2002)There were no pro bowlers taken in the fifth since 2005.I think one point that hasn't been mentioned enough is that the Browns are OLD. I'm more worried about the GM, Scouting Department, etc. than Mangini at this point. With having 11 picks, a successful 2010 draft could go a long way towards building a foundation. Mangini is not going anywhere for the time being, so Holmgren can worry about him later. And let's face it, coaches are important, but not near as important as young talent.
I agree, and I'm on board. I hope he stays.I've really come around with regards to Mangini. I think you keep him.
Look at the Jets this year.
#1 rushing offense
#1 total defense
#1 defense in points given up
#1 defense in yards given up
This was the team Mangini put together. I think he's putting the pieces together for this in Cleveland right now, and I'd love to have a smash mouth team like that.