AwesomeAuger
Footballguy
shake did you contact Nate that it was his pick? We were on such a roll in terms of pace.
If CJ Spiller is 1 dimensional, who the heck is 2 dimensional?We are talking about skill set or production? You can't go by one season. Spiller and Cobb are somewhat one dimensional regardless of their production.Was there another RB (other than ADP and Spiller) who averaged 6.0 YPC last season? Because I didn't see one. Only 4 RBs had more receiving yards, and they all had more targets.Yeah I don't agree at all on Spiller or Cobb. They offer skills that ubiquitous. Without naming names I think both are easily replaced.
I PMed himshake did you contact Nate that it was his pick? We were on such a roll in terms of pace.
James LaurinitisIf CJ Spiller is 1 dimensional, who the heck is 2 dimensional?We are talking about skill set or production? You can't go by one season. Spiller and Cobb are somewhat one dimensional regardless of their production.

He just texted me, said he will be a few minutes.I PMed himshake did you contact Nate that it was his pick? We were on such a roll in terms of pace.
I think Spiller could be a good pick and will probably be a great RB over the next few years. That said, he hasn't showed that he can be a bellweather back over time.Was there another RB (other than ADP and Spiller) who averaged 6.0 YPC last season? Because I didn't see one. Only 4 RBs had more receiving yards, and they all had more targets.Yeah I don't agree at all on Spiller or Cobb. They offer skills that ubiquitous. Without naming names I think both are easily replaced.
James LaurinitisIf CJ Spiller is 1 dimensional, who the heck is 2 dimensional?We are talking about skill set or production? You can't go by one season. Spiller and Cobb are somewhat one dimensional regardless of their production.![]()

why is Laurinitis such a bad pick? There are others at his position I prefer, but why is he the laughing stock?James LaurinitisIf CJ Spiller is 1 dimensional, who the heck is 2 dimensional?We are talking about skill set or production? You can't go by one season. Spiller and Cobb are somewhat one dimensional regardless of their production.![]()
I was just making a point that Laurinitis is not the dynamic type of player that Spiller is. He's an above-average MLB at best IMO. He gets tackle numbers but any starting MLB in a 4-3 will do that.why is Laurinitis such a bad pick? There are others at his position I prefer, but why is he the laughing stock?
Agreed...personally, I would rather see commentary and opinions (as long as its respectful) than a draft where no one is talking.I just want to point out that while you all can see that I am very opinionated on players I do not mean to offend anyone with my commentary. I have great respect for you all and hope you are all having as great a time with this as I am.![]()
I said Cobb is not a real life top ten wr. You replied that sure he is because he was 11th in some sites rankings. So I then pointed out Fitz was prob not even in that top ten. Implying don't use 2012 rankings.Right. I'm not even sure why Fitzgerald was brought up. Fitzgerald is an amazing WR who had a terrible year. Maybe he was a little frustrated with his QB situation as well over all these years and maybe he gave up a little in 2012. I hope for his sake that AZ gets a real QB this offseason.If anything, Cobb compares most to Percy Harvin, and I don't think anyone said anything about that pick. He's the example of how Cobb could be used as a #1.
Same here.Agreed...personally, I would rather see commentary and opinions (as long as its respectful) than a draft where no one is talking.I just want to point out that while you all can see that I am very opinionated on players I do not mean to offend anyone with my commentary. I have great respect for you all and hope you are all having as great a time with this as I am.![]()
I just want to point out that while you all can see that I am very opinionated on players I do not mean to offend anyone with my commentary. I have great respect for you all and hope you are all having as great a time with this as I am.![]()
Absolutely agree. Would be no fun if everyone agreed. Although the Flacco stuff is starting to piss me off 
I'm not sure using Fitzgerald as your only example to discount a site's rankings is any more logical. These aren't 2012 rankings I'm talking about. These are rankings of players' stats from 2012. Fitzgerald had a bad year in 2012 and you can say that it was because he had terrible QBs. So maybe his 2012 stats aren't an indication of his skill. That does not mean that Cobb's 2012 aren't an indication of his skill, however. Sure, he had a great situation. But anyone who watches his film can see that he is talented. If I'm drafting for the future I would value him highly because he has shown talent and he is very very young. Maybe not top 10 (because I like size in my outside receivers), but if I'm looking for a slot guy or building an offense like the Patriots a few years back that features the slot a lot, he's at the top of my list.I said Cobb is not a real life top ten wr. You replied that sure he is because he was 11th in some sites rankings. So I then pointed out Fitz was prob not even in that top ten. Implying don't use 2012 rankings.Right. I'm not even sure why Fitzgerald was brought up. Fitzgerald is an amazing WR who had a terrible year. Maybe he was a little frustrated with his QB situation as well over all these years and maybe he gave up a little in 2012. I hope for his sake that AZ gets a real QB this offseason.If anything, Cobb compares most to Percy Harvin, and I don't think anyone said anything about that pick. He's the example of how Cobb could be used as a #1.
I was starting to get my hopes up that he'd last to 3.32. Good pick.On this team im going offense so Skins select Vernon Davis. Great receiving TE and great blocker. Very hard nosed football player who imo fits great with Ben and ADP.
If you might not be around you can send someone a list to take the best player still available at your spot.What do you mean by lists?
Exactly, like a predraftIf you might not be around you can send someone a list to take the best player still available at your spot.What do you mean by lists?
Excellent pick. 9 sacks from your MLB is sick.3.18 Cardinals select Daryl Washington, MLB
same here..except i dont respect any of you and believe you to all be horrible human beings.I just want to point out that while you all can see that I am very opinionated on players I do not mean to offend anyone with my commentary. I have great respect for you all and hope you are all having as great a time with this as I am.![]()
I didn't get anything.Just sent a pre-draft for the Dallas 3.22 8ebok24.
If you PM me your number I will text you. or if you PM me your (2 player) list I can pick for you.I'm on deck and ready for my pick, if I don't pick 5 minutes after the 3.19, can I get a text?
Well warrior, you said you checked the board constantly.......
Last Active :Today, 07:51 PMCurrently:Not online

Elite?3.21 Cincinnati Bengals select Michael Crabtree, WR
I went back and forth a lot on this pick, but Crabtree was the last man standing in my short list of young elite receivers.
Agreed. He's a good receiver but I wouldn't put him at the Calvin/Green level.Did anybody get Meecrob's pre-draft list?Elite?3.21 Cincinnati Bengals select Michael Crabtree, WR
I went back and forth a lot on this pick, but Crabtree was the last man standing in my short list of young elite receivers.
I think so. He wasn't targetted as much as most #1s normally are. But out of his 118 targets he caught 85 balls. That is a 72% catch rate and higher than any receiver in the league with 100+ targets not named Randall Cobb. So even though his QBs were a (now) journeyman QB and a pseudo-rookie, he was able to catch almost everything thrown his way. When throwing to him, his QBs had a 119.5 QB rating (4th best of all receivers), compared to only 84.9 when throwing to Moss.Unlike Cobb, he had a 6.4 YAC/rec, which is good for 2nd in the league of those with 100+ targets. This tells me he can make plays with the ball in his hands, despite not being known as a burner. Add this to him being a big, strong outside receiver and yeah, I'd say he's elite.Elite?I went back and forth a lot on this pick, but Crabtree was the last man standing in my short list of young elite receivers.
Semantics.I don't know....I try to save the terms like "elite" for the Calvins and AJs.
CalvinAJJulioDezHarvinD ThomasI don't know....I try to save the terms like "elite" for the Calvins and AJs.
Happy now?3.21 Cincinnati Bengals select Michael Crabtree, WR
I went back and forth a lot on this pick, but Crabtree was the last man standing in my short list of top young receivers.
he's a good blocker & as this is supposed to represent "real football" , thats a good thingCrabtree isn't "elite" but he's a darn good receiver. I have no problems with the pick.