Even less likely then.10 games left.Lot of things can happen, and there are 9 more on the schedule.
Injuries, game of inches, etc - it’s really hard to do. Even harder with 1 more game. I voted 0-25%
9-0 would be very difficult.
Possible, but very unlikely.
Wait…..more than Patriots fans? Nonsense.If there was one fan base that I hope never gets to benefit from a fully undefeated season it would be Eagles fans. Good God we would have to hear about THAT until the end of time......
1a and 1b?Wait…..more than Patriots fans? Nonsense.If there was one fan base that I hope never gets to benefit from a fully undefeated season it would be Eagles fans. Good God we would have to hear about THAT until the end of time......
1A and 1a1a and 1b?Wait…..more than Patriots fans? Nonsense.If there was one fan base that I hope never gets to benefit from a fully undefeated season it would be Eagles fans. Good God we would have to hear about THAT until the end of time......
Fifty years later and we still hear about the '72 Dolphins.If there was one fan base that I hope never gets to benefit from a fully undefeated season it would be Eagles fans. Good God we would have to hear about THAT until the end of time......
If there was one fan base that I hope never gets to benefit from a fully undefeated season it would be Eagles fans. Good God we would have to hear about THAT until the end of time......
Dolphins were the better team. Miami makes the superbowl that year (Lucky pats turnovers) and Marino gets his ring.I never thought that the Bears in 1985 would lose a game with that dominant defense (one of the best of all time). But sometimes the ball just doesn't bounce your way.......like what happened to the Bears when they visited Marino in MIA, they were 12-0 at the time.
So it's less than 25%.
I'm not arguing that the Dolphins were the better team . . . but the Fins had 6 turnovers against the Pats in the AFCCG. Marino barely completed 40% of his passes and had a passer rating in the 50's. Add in that NE rushed for 250+ yards, and I can't say that the Pats were lucky to win. Miami didn't play well and didn't deserve to win (which is why they lost by 17). Unfortunate for Miami fans.Dolphins were the better team. Miami makes the superbowl that year (Lucky pats turnovers) and Marino gets his ring.I never thought that the Bears in 1985 would lose a game with that dominant defense (one of the best of all time). But sometimes the ball just doesn't bounce your way.......like what happened to the Bears when they visited Marino in MIA, they were 12-0 at the time.
So it's less than 25%.
That AFCC game was weird Miami had beaten the pats twice that year and I think they took them lightly that day and it cost them a chance at a ring. A lot of unforced errors by Miami. As for Chicago: Miami had their number. Marino's release (and Dwight Stephenson) negated the 46 Defense and the Marks' Brothers were at the height of their powers. Dolphin's D in 85 was no slouch either.I'm not arguing that the Dolphins were the better team . . . but the Fins had 6 turnovers against the Pats in the AFCCG. Marino barely completed 40% of his passes and had a passer rating in the 50's. Add in that NE rushed for 250+ yards, and I can't say that the Pats were lucky to win. Miami didn't play well and didn't deserve to win (which is why they lost by 17). Unfortunate for Miami fans.Dolphins were the better team. Miami makes the superbowl that year (Lucky pats turnovers) and Marino gets his ring.I never thought that the Bears in 1985 would lose a game with that dominant defense (one of the best of all time). But sometimes the ball just doesn't bounce your way.......like what happened to the Bears when they visited Marino in MIA, they were 12-0 at the time.
So it's less than 25%.
Let's say MIA did beat NE . . . not sure the Bears would have 4 TOs in the rematch, and by that point the CHI defense was on a mission (allowed under 200 yards 7 times after the midpoint of the season). Put another way, the Dolphins in their regular season game against CHI scored almost as many points (38) as the Bears allowed the rest of the season (43 points in 6 games). Can't predict a game that never happened, but I doubt the Dolphins would pile on 38 points against the Bears had they met in the SB like they did in the first game. CHI forced 20 turnovers with 26 sacks in their last 5 games. They were flat out mauling teams.
I am always in favor of looking back at things decades later to see if my memory of things is different now vs. what I saw back then. In this case, it's not. Here's the tale of the tape between the MIA and CHI defenses in the 1985 season:That AFCC game was weird Miami had beaten the pats twice that year and I think they took them lightly that day and it cost them a chance at a ring. A lot of unforced errors by Miami. As for Chicago: Miami had their number. Marino's release (and Dwight Stephenson) negated the 46 Defense and the Marks' Brothers were at the height of their powers. Dolphin's D in 85 was no slouch either.I'm not arguing that the Dolphins were the better team . . . but the Fins had 6 turnovers against the Pats in the AFCCG. Marino barely completed 40% of his passes and had a passer rating in the 50's. Add in that NE rushed for 250+ yards, and I can't say that the Pats were lucky to win. Miami didn't play well and didn't deserve to win (which is why they lost by 17). Unfortunate for Miami fans.Dolphins were the better team. Miami makes the superbowl that year (Lucky pats turnovers) and Marino gets his ring.I never thought that the Bears in 1985 would lose a game with that dominant defense (one of the best of all time). But sometimes the ball just doesn't bounce your way.......like what happened to the Bears when they visited Marino in MIA, they were 12-0 at the time.
So it's less than 25%.
Let's say MIA did beat NE . . . not sure the Bears would have 4 TOs in the rematch, and by that point the CHI defense was on a mission (allowed under 200 yards 7 times after the midpoint of the season). Put another way, the Dolphins in their regular season game against CHI scored almost as many points (38) as the Bears allowed the rest of the season (43 points in 6 games). Can't predict a game that never happened, but I doubt the Dolphins would pile on 38 points against the Bears had they met in the SB like they did in the first game. CHI forced 20 turnovers with 26 sacks in their last 5 games. They were flat out mauling teams.
I'm a diehard Birds fan and I endorse this message.If there was one fan base that I hope never gets to benefit from a fully undefeated season it would be Eagles fans. Good God we would have to hear about THAT until the end of time......
That AFCC game was weird Miami had beaten the pats twice that year and I think they took them lightly that day and it cost them a chance at a ring. A lot of unforced errors by Miami. As for Chicago: Miami had their number. Marino's release (and Dwight Stephenson) negated the 46 Defense and the Marks' Brothers were at the height of their powers. Dolphin's D in 85 was no slouch either.I'm not arguing that the Dolphins were the better team . . . but the Fins had 6 turnovers against the Pats in the AFCCG. Marino barely completed 40% of his passes and had a passer rating in the 50's. Add in that NE rushed for 250+ yards, and I can't say that the Pats were lucky to win. Miami didn't play well and didn't deserve to win (which is why they lost by 17). Unfortunate for Miami fans.Dolphins were the better team. Miami makes the superbowl that year (Lucky pats turnovers) and Marino gets his ring.I never thought that the Bears in 1985 would lose a game with that dominant defense (one of the best of all time). But sometimes the ball just doesn't bounce your way.......like what happened to the Bears when they visited Marino in MIA, they were 12-0 at the time.
So it's less than 25%.
Let's say MIA did beat NE . . . not sure the Bears would have 4 TOs in the rematch, and by that point the CHI defense was on a mission (allowed under 200 yards 7 times after the midpoint of the season). Put another way, the Dolphins in their regular season game against CHI scored almost as many points (38) as the Bears allowed the rest of the season (43 points in 6 games). Can't predict a game that never happened, but I doubt the Dolphins would pile on 38 points against the Bears had they met in the SB like they did in the first game. CHI forced 20 turnovers with 26 sacks in their last 5 games. They were flat out mauling teams.
i put 25-49% but my exact guess is 26.458%
Division rivals are always tricky in these spots. If they are having a bad season, they will still bring the A Game in this spot.
You may not be wrong.Division rivals are always tricky in these spots. If they are having a bad season, they will still bring the A Game in this spot.
Agreed. But I'll be honest, I thought it would be the Giants or Cowboys that got them.
Commanders were definitely the unexpected upset, no doubt.Division rivals are always tricky in these spots. If they are having a bad season, they will still bring the A Game in this spot.
Agreed. But I'll be honest, I thought it would be the Giants or Cowboys that got them.
Definitely surprising top 3 upset so far this year, but I still think Indy over KC is the biggest WTF upset IMO.Commanders were definitely the unexpected upset, no doubt.Division rivals are always tricky in these spots. If they are having a bad season, they will still bring the A Game in this spot.
Agreed. But I'll be honest, I thought it would be the Giants or Cowboys that got them.
I think Chicago winning in Foxboro is top-3.Definitely surprising top 3 upset so far this year, but I still think Indy over KC is the biggest WTF upset IMO.Commanders were definitely the unexpected upset, no doubt.Division rivals are always tricky in these spots. If they are having a bad season, they will still bring the A Game in this spot.
Agreed. But I'll be honest, I thought it would be the Giants or Cowboys that got them.
Texans, Commanders, Colts, Packers - 0 losses here -----------------------------> looks like I gave them too much credit. Or Heineke is a beast.
Titans, Giants, Bears, Cowboys, Saints, Giants - 2-3 losses here