What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Christine Michael (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think at one point this was a real FBG thread, long ago, so I'm guessing this was done early, but what are the comps on his size, speed, agility? I think it's the size that really has people dew eyed because ideally he's a classic big back. It would be nice to see actual data in here. This thread has the feel of last year's Gordon thread. We know Gordon has the goods but being a football player is so much more.
At combine Michael ran a 4.54 and Randle a 4.63 though the former is bigger.
Only 3 RBs in the last 17 years have had a better SPARQ score than CMike.
I have seen references to SPARQ scores, but I have never really spent any time researching it, so I am curious:

Who were the 3 RBs with better scores?

How accurate are SPARQ scores in predicting success in the NFL?

 
I think at one point this was a real FBG thread, long ago, so I'm guessing this was done early, but what are the comps on his size, speed, agility? I think it's the size that really has people dew eyed because ideally he's a classic big back. It would be nice to see actual data in here. This thread has the feel of last year's Gordon thread. We know Gordon has the goods but being a football player is so much more.
At combine Michael ran a 4.54 and Randle a 4.63 though the former is bigger.
Only 3 RBs in the last 17 years have had a better SPARQ score than CMike.
I have seen references to SPARQ scores, but I have never really spent any time researching it, so I am curious:Who were the 3 RBs with better scores?

How accurate are SPARQ scores in predicting success in the NFL?
Dude is :moneybag: in PPSq leagues.

 
This is it for Christine. He needs to pop here when he gets in the game. I think he's capable but he's also capable of fumbling on his first carry and we never see him again. LOLOLOL

 
This is it for Christine. He needs to pop here when he gets in the game. I think he's capable but he's also capable of fumbling on his first carry and we never see him again. LOLOLOL
I think the thread blows up more from a 1st carry fumble than if Randle, DMC, and Dunbar were exclusively taken hostage by ISIS on the way to the stadium today.

 
If active, what's the over/under on pages this thread grows by today?

Been stashing CMike in dynasty for years. I'd figure his packages would be short yardage and GL to start.

 
There's also an anti-Randle strain in here. There was a flurry if pro-McFadden feeling before Michael was traded too. It really seemed questionable who would be the starter. But if course as it happened Randle was indeed the man as earlier suspected.

Another issue: the Cowboys do not have a good enough defense. They need to be a team with great defense that runs it 35+ times a game. They are not that. Weeden plus their patchwork receiving corps makes playing keep-up nearly impossible, that wouldn't change with Michael, so even if he were to take over as predicted, what do you get? A guy that comes out on passing downs for Dunbar, which will be frequent, plus ceding time to Randle and McFadden, instead of Randle's situation which is just McFadden. The best case scenario for 2015 is owning Randle and the status quo.

Murray wasn't just about Murray becoming a great back. It was all Murray all the time. At its best the 2015 situation with Michael taking over is a muddle. Dynasty owners would have a lot to look forward to in 2015 though.
When they get Hardy, Gregory, and McClain back, that will change.

 
Can't wait for his 3 carries for 6 yards but the Michael supporters saying how good he looks.
The purpose of this post is....? Hope FBG Moderator gives this guy a vacation.
We should probably leave that to the moderators. From my experience bagger is good people, but I agree that post was unnecessary (I kind of feel the same way about your username btw).

 
Full blown RBBC now? Wasn't before with Randle getting majority and DMC as COP back.

But now? Smells like committee spirit.

 
Things are crowded now while things are getting sorted, but anything not covered by Dunbar's role is up for grabs.

Personally, I don't think McFadden has a horse in this race. I'd recommend using the current confusion as a buying opportunity for whoever one thinks will win the current Randle/Michael competition.

 
What stinks is small package of plays might mean just short yardage. I mean he can convert and get the job done but it's not exactly a role to show his stuff (if he even has any).

 
What stinks is small package of plays might mean just short yardage. I mean he can convert and get the job done but it's not exactly a role to show his stuff (if he even has any).
Perhaps, but I don't think Dallas wants to dress 4 RBs all year. Even if it's not this game, Michael will get his chance to show what he can do in a less limited role.

 
What stinks is small package of plays might mean just short yardage. I mean he can convert and get the job done but it's not exactly a role to show his stuff (if he even has any).
Baby steps. He isn't supplanting anyone today. And he may never supplant anyone at all.

 
Can't wait for his 3 carries for 6 yards but the Michael supporters saying how good he looks.
lol
Do we also get to take away his 3 best runs?
Says the nervous Randle owner.
Nope, try again.Amazingly in 12 leagues I own him in none. Pretty miraculous, actually.
146 posts in this thread ????

Yea ...I smell BS !!!
LOL jurb posts 146 times in all the threads. It's not indicative of who he owns.

 
Can't wait for his 3 carries for 6 yards but the Michael supporters saying how good he looks.
lol
Do we also get to take away his 3 best runs?
Says the nervous Randle owner.
Nope, try again.Amazingly in 12 leagues I own him in none. Pretty miraculous, actually.
146 posts in this thread ????Yea ...I smell BS !!!
Where is rule that you can only post in threads you own the player?
 
Can't wait for his 3 carries for 6 yards but the Michael supporters saying how good he looks.
lol
Do we also get to take away his 3 best runs?
Says the nervous Randle owner.
Nope, try again.Amazingly in 12 leagues I own him in none. Pretty miraculous, actually.
146 posts in this thread ????Yea ...I smell BS !!!
Where is rule that you can only post in threads you own the player?
Me smells more BS!!!

 
Can't wait for his 3 carries for 6 yards but the Michael supporters saying how good he looks.
lol
Do we also get to take away his 3 best runs?
Says the nervous Randle owner.
Nope, try again.Amazingly in 12 leagues I own him in none. Pretty miraculous, actually.
146 posts in this thread ????Yea ...I smell BS !!!
Where is rule that you can only post in threads you own the player?
Me smells more BS!!!
I'd suggest being more careful where you step.
 
I just got done watching all of his 2014 touches..I want to say the hype is justified. I decided to roster him just so I can come in here and pick a fight when I'm having a bad day.
Thanks for joining the party even though your analysis of Rawls ruined my day.
I'm starting Rawls this week in several places so apparently it didn't ruin my day. :D
I'm considering this too.

This is it for Christine. He needs to pop here when he gets in the game. I think he's capable but he's also capable of fumbling on his first carry and we never see him again. LOLOLOL
I don't believe that. He started practicing for the first time this week. Think they will give him a few weeks.

 
Can't wait for his 3 carries for 6 yards but the Michael supporters saying how good he looks.
lol
Do we also get to take away his 3 best runs?
Says the nervous Randle owner.
Nope, try again.Amazingly in 12 leagues I own him in none. Pretty miraculous, actually.
I own him in 9 out of my 8 leagues.
i find your math intriguing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top