What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

CJ Anderson (1 Viewer)

I'm so tempted to cut this bum purely out of spite, but then I would never forgive myself if Hillman got hurt and Anderson started rattling off a string of 29-yard games.

 
I guess Bloom has DEN RB CJ Anderson ranked high and he was asked why and he explains by saying he is over a toe injury which is something I did not know but suspected. He also states the Broncos are re-evaluating their backfield because they are going to have to run more now due to QB Peyton Manning having an injured foot and tops it off by saying that CJ is playing better than Hillman.

Good stuff and information that CJ owners or people needing a RB and were targeting CJ Anderson would probably like to know.

-------------

.fantasyjohnny ‏@fantasyjohnny 3h3 hours ago

@SigmundBloom why so high on cj anderson?

.Sigmund Bloom ‏@SigmundBloom 3h3 hours ago

Sigmund Bloom Retweeted fantasyjohnny

1) over toe inj

2) DEN said re-evaling RB1

3) DEN need to run more w Peyton hobbled

4) CJ outplayed Hillman wk8/9
Hmmm...

 
I guess Bloom has DEN RB CJ Anderson ranked high and he was asked why and he explains by saying he is over a toe injury which is something I did not know but suspected. He also states the Broncos are re-evaluating their backfield because they are going to have to run more now due to QB Peyton Manning having an injured foot and tops it off by saying that CJ is playing better than Hillman.

Good stuff and information that CJ owners or people needing a RB and were targeting CJ Anderson would probably like to know.

-------------

.fantasyjohnny ‏@fantasyjohnny 3h3 hours ago @SigmundBloom why so high on cj anderson?

.Sigmund Bloom ‏@SigmundBloom 3h3 hours ago

Sigmund Bloom Retweeted fantasyjohnny

1) over toe inj

2) DEN said re-evaling RB1

3) DEN need to run more w Peyton hobbled

4) CJ outplayed Hillman wk8/9
Hmmm...
Reading this killed me. I sat Langford because of this "intell." Yeah yeah the shirt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You know, I don't think Bloom's call was terrible even though we saw the results in that game. He definitely goes out on a limb far more often than Dodds and Tremblay and it bites him, but Peyton Manning killed this team today, not CJ. They barely had the ball in the game because it was interception after interception or just a 3-and-out.

 
I guess Bloom has DEN RB CJ Anderson ranked high and he was asked why and he explains by saying he is over a toe injury which is something I did not know but suspected. He also states the Broncos are re-evaluating their backfield because they are going to have to run more now due to QB Peyton Manning having an injured foot and tops it off by saying that CJ is playing better than Hillman.

Good stuff and information that CJ owners or people needing a RB and were targeting CJ Anderson would probably like to know.

-------------

.fantasyjohnny ‏@fantasyjohnny 3h3 hours ago @SigmundBloom why so high on cj anderson?

.Sigmund Bloom ‏@SigmundBloom 3h3 hours ago

Sigmund Bloom Retweeted fantasyjohnny

1) over toe inj

2) DEN said re-evaling RB1

3) DEN need to run more w Peyton hobbled

4) CJ outplayed Hillman wk8/9
Hmmm...
Reading this killed me. I sat Langford because of this "intell." Yeah yeah the shirt.
I know it's not what you want to hear, but YOUR opinion is just as good as anyone. We're all experts... doesn't matter if you get paid to share your thoughts or not.

 
Well, the $76 bought him. Rolling him out this week. Fingers crossed.
I lost L Bell who started alongside D Martin. This week it is D Martin and F Gore or CJ Anderson. Anderson is pegged in right now and I think he has a very good game as well.
Dropped in a $200 buy in league yesterday, firing my entire remaining $76 FAAB at him. I hope to hell that wasn't a fluke. Could win me this league after losing Le'Veon.

And yes, I will keep you posted.
Kinda in the same boat. Dropped this week by an impatient owner. I'm no. 3 on our waiver wire next week. Hope to pick him up to replace Bell as well.
Fascinating stuff guys keep it comin.
I'm glad to see you're interested. I'm starting him this week over free agent acquisition Pierre Thomas. I have Forsett and Charcandrick on byes, so I had to start Thomas alongside DeAngelo if I hadn't won CJ. Now, I'm starting CJ and D-Will. Will post my score Sunday and Monday so you'll know how I'm doing.
I'm super excited for you. Spending your entire FAAB on a Denver RB is the stuff of legends.
Thanks. If it pays off, I think it will be. I tried shopping Eli Manning for Jeremy Hill to a guy who's 5 deep at RB and doesn't even flex Hill. He has recently productive but definitely iffy options at QB (Hoyer and Tyrod) but he laughed me out of the room. I really had no choice. I need this week's game to stay in the running for a first round bye and couldn't risk a goose egg from Thomas. Nothing else on the wire of note, down to the Darkwas and Chris Thompsons of the world. I'm deep at QB and WR so I was saving my FAAB to take a shot at an RB. I might have waited to see if another top back went down and then snagged his backup but with the immediate need this week, I had to make a move. Two of the other teams jockeying for playoff position with me both had $75 remaining, so I had to empty the tank to ensure I got him.
:thumbup:

 
You know, I don't think Bloom's call was terrible even though we saw the results in that game. He definitely goes out on a limb far more often than Dodds and Tremblay and it bites him, but Peyton Manning killed this team today, not CJ. They barely had the ball in the game because it was interception after interception or just a 3-and-out.
Yeah but Hillman got all the reps until Anderson had TWO carries in the fourth quarter. This was a completely blown assessment.

 
You know, I don't think Bloom's call was terrible even though we saw the results in that game. He definitely goes out on a limb far more often than Dodds and Tremblay and it bites him, but Peyton Manning killed this team today, not CJ. They barely had the ball in the game because it was interception after interception or just a 3-and-out.
Yeah but Hillman got all the reps until Anderson had TWO carries in the fourth quarter. This was a completely blown assessment.
Not that Bloom needs my defense, but I think his assessment of the situation was on. Anderson seemed to be over his toe injury, Denver apparently said to be re-evaluating their run game, they should have run more with Peyton injured/performing like he is, and Anderson did outplay Hillman in the last couple of week leading into this game.

All this seemed to point to an increased role for Anderson. Seemed to be a logical process with a reasonable conclusion and a good assessment.

It was the result that didn't pan out which happened in a situation with unpredictable elements (coaching decisions, game flow, etc...).

 
You know, I don't think Bloom's call was terrible even though we saw the results in that game. He definitely goes out on a limb far more often than Dodds and Tremblay and it bites him, but Peyton Manning killed this team today, not CJ. They barely had the ball in the game because it was interception after interception or just a 3-and-out.
Yeah but Hillman got all the reps until Anderson had TWO carries in the fourth quarter. This was a completely blown assessment.
Not that Bloom needs my defense, but I think his assessment of the situation was on. Anderson seemed to be over his toe injury, Denver apparently said to be re-evaluating their run game, they should have run more with Peyton injured/performing like he is, and Anderson did outplay Hillman in the last couple of week leading into this game.

All this seemed to point to an increased role for Anderson. Seemed to be a logical process with a reasonable conclusion and a good assessment.

It was the result that didn't pan out which happened in a situation with unpredictable elements (coaching decisions, game flow, etc...).
Honestly, Bloom's assessment made a ton of sense. I was ready to drop Hillman after the last couple of weeks since Anderson was outplaying him.

 
Fantasy football is a crapshoot, I wouldn't blame any "expert" for any advice since the idea of being a fantasy football expert is ridiculous to begin with. But my problem is the evaluation of talent.

Last year one of the "experts" said Falcons running back Devonta Freeman was just a "guy" and that effected my drafting of him this year. WRONG! I don't know who said it but I read it on here....

Anyway, I don't mind missing on opportunities to play, but I do when it comes to evaluation talent and opportunity.

 
Fantasy football is a crapshoot, I wouldn't blame any "expert" for any advice since the idea of being a fantasy football expert is ridiculous to begin with. But my problem is the evaluation of talent.

Last year one of the "experts" said Falcons running back Devonta Freeman was just a "guy" and that effected my drafting of him this year. WRONG! I don't know who said it but I read it on here....

Anyway, I don't mind missing on opportunities to play, but I do when it comes to evaluation talent and opportunity.
There ya go.

The fact that none of these "experts" ever agree on anything should tell you all you need to know.

 
I didn't watch the game and I know Peyton was crap, but I still didn't understand why the near 50/50 split went away. Even when one running back has been outperforming the other, it has been close 60/40 or 50/50 it seems. Hillman just kept getting plugged in and outcarried him 11-2.

I even thought maybe they'd plug in CJ when the win was out of hand to pick up some garabge yardage, but Hillman stayed in.

Just further proof that this guy can't be trusted. I think I've started him every week. Ha.

 
Fantasy football is a crapshoot, I wouldn't blame any "expert" for any advice since the idea of being a fantasy football expert is ridiculous to begin with. But my problem is the evaluation of talent.

Last year one of the "experts" said Falcons running back Devonta Freeman was just a "guy" and that effected my drafting of him this year. WRONG! I don't know who said it but I read it on here....

Anyway, I don't mind missing on opportunities to play, but I do when it comes to evaluation talent and opportunity.
Fantasy football is a hobby/game that, once you have been playing it past the first season you play, you really should do yourself a favor and stop reading/listening to "experts".

In the beginning, sure —learn the game and listen to their logic path on why they say what they say, but if you've been playing fantasy for 10 years or something and you are still hanging on every word of any FF expert, you're silly. You've been around long enough to read the tea leaves in the same exact fashion and make your own decisions.

In today's media, there aren't any experts that are going to drop any insider info on you that changes anything AND puts you in a position where you're going to be in a very small group of people that know that information because word spreads like wild fire when useful information DOES pop up and everyone has access to it.

You can very, very seldom ever listen to a fantasy expert when trying to decide if a guy like Freeman is "just a guy" or not because these people live, breathe, and eat all info from a fantasy perspective. They aren't trained to evaluate NFL talent and how it will be used in real life. If you've played fantasy for 10+ years, you likely have every bit as much experience in eyeballing what will work as anyone else. We're all "experts" to that standard level.

I have honestly found that the past 3-4 years have been BY FAR the most successful ones I have had in fantasy and it really became simple: I stopped listening to what 1,000 experts had to say and I started thinking of players as something beyond robots that you just plug in. The more I pay attention to them as real people and the teams' real needs and coaching tendencies (and stop following three month long hype trains on every rookie that enters the league), the much better I am at seeing the forest for the trees.

 
Fantasy football is a crapshoot, I wouldn't blame any "expert" for any advice since the idea of being a fantasy football expert is ridiculous to begin with. But my problem is the evaluation of talent.

Last year one of the "experts" said Falcons running back Devonta Freeman was just a "guy" and that effected my drafting of him this year. WRONG! I don't know who said it but I read it on here....

Anyway, I don't mind missing on opportunities to play, but I do when it comes to evaluation talent and opportunity.
If fantasy football was a crapshoot, most leagues wouldnt be dominated by the same handful of teams year after year.

 
Fantasy football is a crapshoot, I wouldn't blame any "expert" for any advice since the idea of being a fantasy football expert is ridiculous to begin with. But my problem is the evaluation of talent.

Last year one of the "experts" said Falcons running back Devonta Freeman was just a "guy" and that effected my drafting of him this year. WRONG! I don't know who said it but I read it on here....

Anyway, I don't mind missing on opportunities to play, but I do when it comes to evaluation talent and opportunity.
If fantasy football was a crapshoot, most leagues wouldnt be dominated by the same handful of teams year after year.
40% skill, 60% injury/luck...

As for cj, I congratulate the owners who sold high after packer game, I can't see osweiler making the o line play any better. Your better off with a high end backup rb stash at this point than cj

 
You know, I don't think Bloom's call was terrible even though we saw the results in that game. He definitely goes out on a limb far more often than Dodds and Tremblay and it bites him, but Peyton Manning killed this team today, not CJ. They barely had the ball in the game because it was interception after interception or just a 3-and-out.
Who ever said CJ killed the team? That wouldn't be possible. He wasn't on the field.

Basically the CJ rep this year is on par with C-Mike.

Game flow did not affect CJ. He was not in the game plan at all. That seems crazy to me because I thought he was the better receiver (at least coming into the season). So a game where his is down and Peyton can't throw over 10 would suit him well.

 
Everyone is overreacting, AGAIN, to a single game that was god awful on every level.

CJ has been splitting carries with Hillman over the last few weeks and outperforming Hillman. He's built like an every down back. Hillman isn't.

Occam's Razor says Hillman is simply healthier RIGHT NOW than CJ is. Who knows what happened leading up to this week's game. Maybe he tweaked something we didn't hear about. Maybe his toe injury resurfaced.

But I think we all know what didn't happen: Hillman asserting himself as a better back.

A healthier back, maybe. But better? Not under even circumstances.

I'm holding. He'll be healthy at some point. He'll have a healthy QB at some point. And he'll produce under those circumstances.

 
Broncos lost their OLT in training camp.

They lost their backup rookie OLT days prior to trade deadline.

They attempted but failed to land perrenial Pro Bowl OLT because Elway demanded Browns 3rd round pick instead of taking 5th round pick in 2016.

Peyton Manning gets injured next game.

Injury worsens and so does his game.

Peyton was fading before the year began as the story leaked of nerve damage in his hands but the injury to his foot was the straw that broke the camel's back so he gets the hook.

Broncos went from undefeated to having lost all games since the point they lost their second OLT.

Just a guess but I think that has had an adverse effect on both the passing game and the running game.

 
Fantasy football is a crapshoot, I wouldn't blame any "expert" for any advice since the idea of being a fantasy football expert is ridiculous to begin with. But my problem is the evaluation of talent.

Last year one of the "experts" said Falcons running back Devonta Freeman was just a "guy" and that effected my drafting of him this year. WRONG! I don't know who said it but I read it on here....

Anyway, I don't mind missing on opportunities to play, but I do when it comes to evaluation talent and opportunity.
Fantasy football is a hobby/game that, once you have been playing it past the first season you play, you really should do yourself a favor and stop reading/listening to "experts".In the beginning, sure —learn the game and listen to their logic path on why they say what they say, but if you've been playing fantasy for 10 years or something and you are still hanging on every word of any FF expert, you're silly. You've been around long enough to read the tea leaves in the same exact fashion and make your own decisions.

In today's media, there aren't any experts that are going to drop any insider info on you that changes anything AND puts you in a position where you're going to be in a very small group of people that know that information because word spreads like wild fire when useful information DOES pop up and everyone has access to it.

You can very, very seldom ever listen to a fantasy expert when trying to decide if a guy like Freeman is "just a guy" or not because these people live, breathe, and eat all info from a fantasy perspective. They aren't trained to evaluate NFL talent and how it will be used in real life. If you've played fantasy for 10+ years, you likely have every bit as much experience in eyeballing what will work as anyone else. We're all "experts" to that standard level.

I have honestly found that the past 3-4 years have been BY FAR the most successful ones I have had in fantasy and it really became simple: I stopped listening to what 1,000 experts had to say and I started thinking of players as something beyond robots that you just plug in. The more I pay attention to them as real people and the teams' real needs and coaching tendencies (and stop following three month long hype trains on every rookie that enters the league), the much better I am at seeing the forest for the trees.
Shutout, you are 100% right and I am going to post this in my own personal journal LOL!

I watched Langford play last Monday and my eyes told me that this kid was a great player in all phases. Then, I read Bloom's take on Anderson and I also thought that Langford had to go to saint Louis and play the vaunted Ram D and I talked myself into playing a guy that I KNEW was inferior. My fault. And I knew better.

 
On the bright side Peyton was benched and may stay there the rest of the season. This could be a boost for the whole offense, however it might be too little too late. I'm not going to trust CJ until I see a good game first.

 
On the bright side Peyton was benched and may stay there the rest of the season. This could be a boost for the whole offense, however it might be too little too late. I'm not going to trust CJ until I see a good game first.
You raise a good point. With Osweiler in there (and I think we will), will we see a dedicated return to the Kubiak run-oriented system that we saw in BAL, HOU? Do we think that Hillman will hold up under that kind of workload?

One thing that I did see with CJ in limited action yesterday... twice he turnstiled blitzers on their way to Manning. If I saw it, everyone saw it, so...

 
Last year one of the "experts" said Falcons running back Devonta Freeman was just a "guy" and that effected my drafting of him this year. WRONG! I don't know who said it but I read it on here....
Funny...one reason I keyed in on Freeman as potential value was seeing an "expert" here tout him as likely to hold off Coleman and remain the primary back. After doing a little checking myself on his history and past performance, I drafted him and am pleased.

I for one prefer experts who will go out on a limb with their predictions, as long as they back them up with sound reasoning that I can choose to agree or disagree with. Much more useful to have a guy like Bloom say "I like CJ over Hillman ROS because a, b, c and d" than just have a bunch of people all ranking Hillman > CJA because of year-to-date stats.

Just take the "expert" views as additional data points and make your own decision. I bought the CJ logic...still think the reasoning was sound, even if the results didn't go as predicted this time.

 
With SDs D against the run this year both CJ and Hillman should be $$$$ ¥¥¥¥ or ££££ next week

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Own him in 5 leagues. Started him in zero. Seems to finally be back...but can we trust him going forward???????

 
Just like Lacy, CJ Anderson thrives during these cold, grinding months. Even Jeremy Hill looked better. Time to break out the snow plows if you own them!!!

Anderson

Lacy

Hill

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top