In terms of this album and his earlier work I agree. But I think some of his 80s stuff does sound a little dated (“Lawyers In Love”, etc.)His singing has aged well. He doesn't sound dated or dull.
I'm here. "Doctor My Eyes" would likely be in a top 200 list of all-time singles for me.Jackson Browne is more of a "hits" guy for me than one I would buy albums by, but he certainly has some songs I really like.
I didn't comment on the Dire Straits. I liked some of those songs, but never really got into them as a band. Always thought Money for Nothing wasn't as great as others did.
He is in that category of artists who are revered by fellow musicians on a level that is not matched by their commercial success.Have always respected his songwriting chops, but never was a big fan of him as a performer
He played at our college when he toured for that album - you couldn't escape it.I like all of the songs on Running on Empty. It reminds me of college. A friend of mine used to play this album a lot during the wee hours of the morning. "Running on Empty" is my favorite song on the album.
I'm the exact opposite. I typically cannot stomach the "lite-FM, sitting in a dentist's waiting room" type of rock that Browne and the Eagles (gawd I hate the Eagles) play. And yet I love Jackson Browne. This is an excellent record.Jackson Browne is a guy that should be in my wheelhouse but I just never really got into him.
Hey I know. I didn’t write that, but I do remember reading it and I think whoever introduced her at at the Grammys that year actually said it.
Same. The acoustic version of you outta know is the only one on my play list, looking over the rest of the songs I have no real desire to consider adding any of the others. So I'll forget about her again for (probably) years by the time you add a new album tomorrow.My own reaction, which is that I liked some of the songs but otherwise had no strong feelings one way or the other, was less popular.
The quote was comparing Jagged Little Pill to "Tapestry" a 1971 release by Carole King in terms of the impact it had on the music industry by a female solo artist.Count me among the "absolutely hated it" folk.
Chili Peppers were heavily involved, which I find disappointing and hold against them in terms of songwriting.
Just an annoying album with annoying vocals and terrible use of vocabulary, given that she doesn't understand the meaning of "irony," as has been pointed out a million times and then rebutted a million times. This was not the tapestry of the '90s. The tapestry of the '90s happened in hip hop and punk. This might be the pop music of the nineties, which leads me to question the pop sensibilities of the nineties. Argh.
Ahhh, I see. That makes sense. It would explain a lot, though King was much more accomplished as a songwriter and performer.The quote was comparing Jagged Little Pill to "Tapestry" a 1971 release by Carole King in terms of the impact it had on the music industry by a female solo artist.
Not that anybody cares, but apparently according to set lists this did not happen.Meh. I did seen her as part of the Bridge School Benefits one year and she debuted Uninvited which I recall liking.
I'm sure to be the only one in this forum who thinks that insults JLP, but i learned long ago to keep my feeling that Tapestry is the most insipid record of my era largely under wraps.Calling it the Tapestry of the 1990s is minimizing
I agree with this assessment. When I first heard it, I thought it was pretty powerful stuff. That effect has waned over time, but I still enjoy it. I own it and will still play it on occasion. I was only 3 or 4 years old when King's Tapestry came out, so I can't really speak to its impact at the time of release, but it had a hell of a run on the charts. The songs from Tapestry have endured the test of time. I do not see from Morissette's album following in those footsteps.JLP was brash enough, catchy enough, hot enough, cool enough, special enough, accessible enough to announce "we're here" for the other female artists and made a lot of careers possible.
It was before my time, but right there with you.I'm sure to be the only one in this forum who thinks that insults JLP, but i learned long ago to keep my feeling that Tapestry is the most insipid record of my era largely under wraps.
I mean, how long does it take to endure the test of time?I agree with this assessment. When I first heard it, I thought it was pretty powerful stuff. That effect has waned over time, but I still enjoy it. I own it and will still play it on occasion. I was only 3 or 4 years old when King's Tapestry came out, so I can't really speak to its impact at the time of release, but it had a hell of a run on the charts. The songs from Tapestry have endured the test of time. I do not see from Morissette's album following in those footsteps.
I agree. That album has nearly half a dozen singles that still get airplay. It has endured.I mean, how long does it take to endure the test of time?
Agreed. I would say the same for Scarecrow, which contains my favorite tune of his ("Rain On The Scarecrow").I think Uh-Huh is actually more well-rounded and has a slightly greater number of recognizable/commercial hits and is thus arguably a better album overall.
Make another trip back to Bloomington Indiana...you'll hear it several times a day.If I never hear "Jack and Diane" again, it will be too soon.
There’s no way “chili dog” is not a euphemism.Make another trip back to Bloomington Indiana...you'll hear it several times a day.
I could afford maybe a couple albums around holidays, etc. This one definitely made the cutI bought this album as a kid and was a part of my regular rotation. It brings back some great memories.