Ministry of Pain
Footballguy
Falcons appear like they are involved in low scoring games and the Colts are still a factor in the AFC South
Seems like a strange line
Go!
Seems like a strange line
Go!
Yes sirWithout Pittman or Moss, they need to feed a healthy JT
Josh Downs blows up today.Atlanta must-win today, think they get the job done. Losing Pittman will hurt Indy.
Atl 23-17
Is that six field goals for Matt Gay? I need to get kicker right this week and he’s my guy right now.Falcons a home favorite.
"There's no place like home for the holidays..."
Atlanty- 26
Indy- 18
IMO you go with the Colts because of their defense and running game. I don't think it will be a good fantasy game for anyone, except possibly Taylor and the Atlanta RBs. I'm hoping Downs has a big game, but I certainly wouldn't count on it. I wouldn't play any of the ATL receivers or TEs.This is by far the weirdest line of the week. I've been scratching my head at it. It started -2.5 for the Colts and has gone all the way to -3 for the Falcons. Heinicke is a definite upgrade over Ridder but a 5 point swing? Plus Colts had an extra day of rest. What is it that Vegas sees that we don't?
Logic would say take the Colts. Everyone is betting the colts heavy (almost 90% of the tickets and 75% of the money). So Vegas would stand to lose big with this line. That's why it doesn't make sense.IMO you go with the Colts because of their defense and running game. I don't think it will be a good fantasy game for anyone, except possibly Taylor and the Atlanta RBs. I'm hoping Downs has a big game, but I certainly wouldn't count on it. I wouldn't play any of the ATL receivers or TEs.This is by far the weirdest line of the week. I've been scratching my head at it. It started -2.5 for the Colts and has gone all the way to -3 for the Falcons. Heinicke is a definite upgrade over Ridder but a 5 point swing? Plus Colts had an extra day of rest. What is it that Vegas sees that we don't?
So you're saying the fix is in?Logic would say take the Colts. Everyone is betting the colts heavy (almost 90% of the tickets and 75% of the money). So Vegas would stand to lose big with this line. That's why it doesn't make sense.IMO you go with the Colts because of their defense and running game. I don't think it will be a good fantasy game for anyone, except possibly Taylor and the Atlanta RBs. I'm hoping Downs has a big game, but I certainly wouldn't count on it. I wouldn't play any of the ATL receivers or TEs.This is by far the weirdest line of the week. I've been scratching my head at it. It started -2.5 for the Colts and has gone all the way to -3 for the Falcons. Heinicke is a definite upgrade over Ridder but a 5 point swing? Plus Colts had an extra day of rest. What is it that Vegas sees that we don't?
It’s probably one of the least bet games volume wise.Logic would say take the Colts. Everyone is betting the colts heavy (almost 90% of the tickets and 75% of the money). So Vegas would stand to lose big with this line. That's why it doesn't make sense.IMO you go with the Colts because of their defense and running game. I don't think it will be a good fantasy game for anyone, except possibly Taylor and the Atlanta RBs. I'm hoping Downs has a big game, but I certainly wouldn't count on it. I wouldn't play any of the ATL receivers or TEs.This is by far the weirdest line of the week. I've been scratching my head at it. It started -2.5 for the Colts and has gone all the way to -3 for the Falcons. Heinicke is a definite upgrade over Ridder but a 5 point swing? Plus Colts had an extra day of rest. What is it that Vegas sees that we don't?
Plus Atlanta came out firing so we could have a shootout and the RB1 spot in Indy today might need multiple TDs and chunk plays to stay aheadIt’s probably one of the least bet games volume wise.Logic would say take the Colts. Everyone is betting the colts heavy (almost 90% of the tickets and 75% of the money). So Vegas would stand to lose big with this line. That's why it doesn't make sense.IMO you go with the Colts because of their defense and running game. I don't think it will be a good fantasy game for anyone, except possibly Taylor and the Atlanta RBs. I'm hoping Downs has a big game, but I certainly wouldn't count on it. I wouldn't play any of the ATL receivers or TEs.This is by far the weirdest line of the week. I've been scratching my head at it. It started -2.5 for the Colts and has gone all the way to -3 for the Falcons. Heinicke is a definite upgrade over Ridder but a 5 point swing? Plus Colts had an extra day of rest. What is it that Vegas sees that we don't?
JT owners have to like to see the 6 Carries already.
The Indy D can turn any game into a shootoutPlus Atlanta came out firing so we could have a shootout and the RB1 spot in Indy today might need multiple TDs and chunk plays to stay aheadIt’s probably one of the least bet games volume wise.Logic would say take the Colts. Everyone is betting the colts heavy (almost 90% of the tickets and 75% of the money). So Vegas would stand to lose big with this line. That's why it doesn't make sense.IMO you go with the Colts because of their defense and running game. I don't think it will be a good fantasy game for anyone, except possibly Taylor and the Atlanta RBs. I'm hoping Downs has a big game, but I certainly wouldn't count on it. I wouldn't play any of the ATL receivers or TEs.This is by far the weirdest line of the week. I've been scratching my head at it. It started -2.5 for the Colts and has gone all the way to -3 for the Falcons. Heinicke is a definite upgrade over Ridder but a 5 point swing? Plus Colts had an extra day of rest. What is it that Vegas sees that we don't?
JT owners have to like to see the 6 Carries already.
No Pittman limits that pass attack.
They’ve been good for weeksThe Indy D can turn any game into a shootoutPlus Atlanta came out firing so we could have a shootout and the RB1 spot in Indy today might need multiple TDs and chunk plays to stay aheadIt’s probably one of the least bet games volume wise.Logic would say take the Colts. Everyone is betting the colts heavy (almost 90% of the tickets and 75% of the money). So Vegas would stand to lose big with this line. That's why it doesn't make sense.IMO you go with the Colts because of their defense and running game. I don't think it will be a good fantasy game for anyone, except possibly Taylor and the Atlanta RBs. I'm hoping Downs has a big game, but I certainly wouldn't count on it. I wouldn't play any of the ATL receivers or TEs.This is by far the weirdest line of the week. I've been scratching my head at it. It started -2.5 for the Colts and has gone all the way to -3 for the Falcons. Heinicke is a definite upgrade over Ridder but a 5 point swing? Plus Colts had an extra day of rest. What is it that Vegas sees that we don't?
JT owners have to like to see the 6 Carries already.
No Pittman limits that pass attack.
Rushing D has been. I think today is a good test with Heineke instead of Ridder. Thr offense is too one-dimensional with Ridder.They’ve been good for weeksThe Indy D can turn any game into a shootoutPlus Atlanta came out firing so we could have a shootout and the RB1 spot in Indy today might need multiple TDs and chunk plays to stay aheadIt’s probably one of the least bet games volume wise.Logic would say take the Colts. Everyone is betting the colts heavy (almost 90% of the tickets and 75% of the money). So Vegas would stand to lose big with this line. That's why it doesn't make sense.IMO you go with the Colts because of their defense and running game. I don't think it will be a good fantasy game for anyone, except possibly Taylor and the Atlanta RBs. I'm hoping Downs has a big game, but I certainly wouldn't count on it. I wouldn't play any of the ATL receivers or TEs.This is by far the weirdest line of the week. I've been scratching my head at it. It started -2.5 for the Colts and has gone all the way to -3 for the Falcons. Heinicke is a definite upgrade over Ridder but a 5 point swing? Plus Colts had an extra day of rest. What is it that Vegas sees that we don't?
JT owners have to like to see the 6 Carries already.
No Pittman limits that pass attack.
They think so...or so it seems.Was high on Alec Pierce, is he just not good at football?