What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Coughlin > Belichick (1 Viewer)

Come on....... if Coughlin doesn't make the playoffs he's fired from the Giants.

Now he's better than the best coach in our era?

Sorry, great game by the Giants but no way is Coughlin a better coach than Belichik.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Belichik the GM is not giving Belichik the Coach enough talent...holding the Giants to 19 offensive points was a freakin' miracle...

 
Come on....... if Coughlin doesn't make the playoffs he's fired from the Giants.Now he's better than the best coach in our era?Sorry, great game by the Giants but no way is Coughlin a better coach than Belichik.
Coughlin has won 2 SBs with so-so talent and has beaten Belichick twice in the big game. How do you figure he is less of a coach?
 
Enough said
Good post.funny how everyone said Gruden won with Dungys guys, but no one ever says BB won with Parcells' guys....And Coughlin didnt need to cheat to win..which apparently BB does, being 0-2 in SB's since spygate...
Let me see if I understand you correctly...Coughlin's team beats Belichik's team by less than 7 points in the Superbowl, yet Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?Just checkin'...
 
I actually have a ton of respect for coughlin and the giants, and I have all along.

but I'm pretty sure faking injuries to stop the other team's drive is cheating.

not that he's the only guy in the nfl to do it.

 
Hey Godsbrother,

I say Belichick's better because I'm looking at his entire career, not just the two games in the SB. Coughlin has done a great job, masterful actually the years the Giants made their runs. I just think Belichick's the master at getting the most out of his players. I think he's the best in the league at it and probably 2nd to Lombardi in that area. Not to say Coughlin didn't get the most out of his team down the stretch this year. I'm not slighting Coughlin, he's one if the most underrated coaches in the league, but I think Belichick is the greatest coach in his era and he's proved it with his consistency. He's been in 8 SBs as coach or head coach, that's no accident.

 
Look at what Coughlin did with Jacksonville. Then look at what he did with the Giants. He's insanely underrated as a coach.

And no, he wasn't getting fired this year no matter what. A lot of fans were calling for his head, but I never heard word one from the Giants that he was on thin ice. To fire someone, there has to be someone you think is better out there, and that never happened in the Giants braintrust.

I don''t think Belichick wants to see Coughlin on the opposite sideline again. I don't think Coughlin cares who is on the opposite sideline. That says all I need to know.

 
Enough said
Good post.funny how everyone said Gruden won with Dungys guys, but no one ever says BB won with Parcells' guys....And Coughlin didnt need to cheat to win..which apparently BB does, being 0-2 in SB's since spygate...
Idk if im blind with rage right now, but I cant understand what is being said here, the sarcasm might be too thick.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Before Tom Brady, Belichick had five losing seasons out of six. None since.
Brady himself tonight credited Belichik with his own success. You can't just say that Belichik is riding on the coattails of Brady. Belichik is a widely respected coach who has a ton of success and his team still performed at a high level when Brady was lost for the season due to injury.But, haters gotta hate, I guess.
 
Before Tom Brady, Belichick had five losing seasons out of six. None since.
Brady himself tonight credited Belichik with his own success. You can't just say that Belichik is riding on the coattails of Brady. Belichik is a widely respected coach who has a ton of success and his team still performed at a high level when Brady was lost for the season due to injury.But, haters gotta hate, I guess.
I wish the Pats could have cheated during this game and squeezed out another undeserved win so I wouldn't have to read this drivel..
 
Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?
:goodposting: you nailed it..
The debating skills are strong in this one.
IKR, unique quality of the hater. "Things I say are facts because I said so, there is no objectivism, there is only what I believe and everyone else is wrong"Kinda makes me wish Tebow wasnt such a nice guy, so I could know what its like to say someone has absolutely no positive qualities.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?
:goodposting: you nailed it..
The debating skills are strong in this one.
Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion.. You're only retort was "everybody is doing it" but you have yet to prove that assertion..
And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.
 
Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?
:goodposting: you nailed it..
The debating skills are strong in this one.
Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion..
And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.
3 SB wins while cheating, ZERO since...And I don't have to prove that everyone wasn't doing it, because everyone wasn't proven and/or penalized for doing it.. You claim everyone was doing it, so the burden of proof is on you..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Before Tom Brady, Belichick had five losing seasons out of six. None since.
Brady himself tonight credited Belichik with his own success. You can't just say that Belichik is riding on the coattails of Brady. Belichik is a widely respected coach who has a ton of success and his team still performed at a high level when Brady was lost for the season due to injury.But, haters gotta hate, I guess.
I don't say it. His win/loss record does.
 
Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?
:goodposting: you nailed it..
The debating skills are strong in this one.
Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion..
And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.
3 SB wins while cheating, ZERO since...And I don't have to prove that everyone wasn't doing it, because everyone wasn't prooven and/or penalized for doing it.. You claim everyone was doing it, so the burden of proof is on you..
Maybe if you keep repeating it I will change my opinion without any proof or valid argument... lmfao - are you 12?
 
Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?
:goodposting: you nailed it..
The debating skills are strong in this one.
Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion..
And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.
3 SB wins while cheating, ZERO since...And I don't have to prove that everyone wasn't doing it, because everyone wasn't prooven and/or penalized for doing it.. You claim everyone was doing it, so the burden of proof is on you..
Maybe if you keep repeating it I will change my opinion without any proof or valid argument... lmfao - are you 12?
I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..

It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..

It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.
Like "everyone was/is doing it"?

Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..

It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.
Like "everyone was/is doing it"?

Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.
Whats the price of redemption these days? Does it even matter? Why even fine them and take draft picks if they werent sufficient?
 
Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?
:goodposting: you nailed it..
The debating skills are strong in this one.
Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion.. You're only retort was "everybody is doing it" but you have yet to prove that assertion..
And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.
Is there a single thread in the Shark Pool that you haven't crapped this drivel in?
 
Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?
:goodposting: you nailed it..
The debating skills are strong in this one.
Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion.. You're only retort was "everybody is doing it" but you have yet to prove that assertion..
And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.
Is there a single thread in the Shark Pool that you haven't crapped this drivel in?
Its only the two that I have ever even mentioned it in, do you read threads that arent about hating on the pats?
 
I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..

It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.
Like "everyone was/is doing it"?

Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.
Whats the price of redemption these days? Does it even matter? Why even fine them and take draft picks if they werent sufficient?
Prove that you can win one without cheating

 
Enough said
This is the OPs original post?Since I'm still fairly new, do I to take this thread and site seriously after a post like this?Oh and for those who cannot count in this thread, 3 is better than 2.
I was just having a little fun with all of the "Belichick is a Genius" folks but seriously Coughlin is every bit the coach that Belichick is.And the last time I checked 0 SB losses is > 2 SB losses. :P
 
Coughlin <<<<< BB

Coughlin's not had anywhere near the continued regular and post season success as BB. BB is a scoundrel and a rat and lots of reason to hate him, I get this. I am sure that there are others (like his protoge's) who have cheated or tried to cheat, but don't have his success. Notice how nobody is talking up the Giants "dynasty" even they won two of the last 5 games. They are considered the lil guys that could. The Patriots during their run had a number of #1 seed teams and were generally the bullies on the block. The Giants? Always in the mix, but never a clear frontrunner even in their own division. The only reasonable explanation is BB has mad talent. Objectively, you have to give BB his due. Like him or hate him. Post Parcells era, he is THE coach of his generation. And if you took a serious poll and weeded out the haters, this wouldn't be close.

 
I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..

It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.
Like "everyone was/is doing it"?

Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.
Whats the price of redemption these days? Does it even matter? Why even fine them and take draft picks if they werent sufficient?
Prove that you can win one without cheating
Every post you make until you go away quietly you will see this.
I have video proof of cheating.

 
I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..

It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.
Like "everyone was/is doing it"?

Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.
 
Before Tom Brady, Belichick had five losing seasons out of six. None since.
Brady himself tonight credited Belichik with his own success. You can't just say that Belichik is riding on the coattails of Brady. Belichik is a widely respected coach who has a ton of success and his team still performed at a high level when Brady was lost for the season due to injury.But, haters gotta hate, I guess.
I wish the Pats could have cheated during this game and squeezed out another undeserved win so I wouldn't have to read this drivel..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY26rgd4apsWow if your only argument was about them cheating, what does this video do to you?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top