Godsbrother
Footballguy
Enough said
Last edited by a moderator:
Preach brother, preach!Enough said
Good post.funny how everyone said Gruden won with Dungys guys, but no one ever says BB won with Parcells' guys....And Coughlin didnt need to cheat to win..which apparently BB does, being 0-2 in SB's since spygate...Enough said
Coughlin has won 2 SBs with so-so talent and has beaten Belichick twice in the big game. How do you figure he is less of a coach?Come on....... if Coughlin doesn't make the playoffs he's fired from the Giants.Now he's better than the best coach in our era?Sorry, great game by the Giants but no way is Coughlin a better coach than Belichik.
So-So talent ehh...Coughlin has won 2 SBs with so-so talent and has beaten Belichick twice in the big game. How do you figure he is less of a coach?Come on....... if Coughlin doesn't make the playoffs he's fired from the Giants.Now he's better than the best coach in our era?Sorry, great game by the Giants but no way is Coughlin a better coach than Belichik.
Let me see if I understand you correctly...Coughlin's team beats Belichik's team by less than 7 points in the Superbowl, yet Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?Just checkin'...Good post.funny how everyone said Gruden won with Dungys guys, but no one ever says BB won with Parcells' guys....And Coughlin didnt need to cheat to win..which apparently BB does, being 0-2 in SB's since spygate...Enough said
Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?
Idk if im blind with rage right now, but I cant understand what is being said here, the sarcasm might be too thick.Good post.funny how everyone said Gruden won with Dungys guys, but no one ever says BB won with Parcells' guys....And Coughlin didnt need to cheat to win..which apparently BB does, being 0-2 in SB's since spygate...Enough said
Look at what Coughlin did with Jacksonville. .
The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
Brady himself tonight credited Belichik with his own success. You can't just say that Belichik is riding on the coattails of Brady. Belichik is a widely respected coach who has a ton of success and his team still performed at a high level when Brady was lost for the season due to injury.But, haters gotta hate, I guess.Before Tom Brady, Belichick had five losing seasons out of six. None since.
I wish the Pats could have cheated during this game and squeezed out another undeserved win so I wouldn't have to read this drivel..Brady himself tonight credited Belichik with his own success. You can't just say that Belichik is riding on the coattails of Brady. Belichik is a widely respected coach who has a ton of success and his team still performed at a high level when Brady was lost for the season due to injury.But, haters gotta hate, I guess.Before Tom Brady, Belichick had five losing seasons out of six. None since.
IKR, unique quality of the hater. "Things I say are facts because I said so, there is no objectivism, there is only what I believe and everyone else is wrong"Kinda makes me wish Tebow wasnt such a nice guy, so I could know what its like to say someone has absolutely no positive qualities.The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion..The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion.. You're only retort was "everybody is doing it" but you have yet to prove that assertion..The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
3 SB wins while cheating, ZERO since...And I don't have to prove that everyone wasn't doing it, because everyone wasn't proven and/or penalized for doing it.. You claim everyone was doing it, so the burden of proof is on you..And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion..The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
I don't say it. His win/loss record does.Brady himself tonight credited Belichik with his own success. You can't just say that Belichik is riding on the coattails of Brady. Belichik is a widely respected coach who has a ton of success and his team still performed at a high level when Brady was lost for the season due to injury.But, haters gotta hate, I guess.Before Tom Brady, Belichick had five losing seasons out of six. None since.
Maybe if you keep repeating it I will change my opinion without any proof or valid argument... lmfao - are you 12?3 SB wins while cheating, ZERO since...And I don't have to prove that everyone wasn't doing it, because everyone wasn't prooven and/or penalized for doing it.. You claim everyone was doing it, so the burden of proof is on you..And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion..The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..Maybe if you keep repeating it I will change my opinion without any proof or valid argument... lmfao - are you 12?3 SB wins while cheating, ZERO since...And I don't have to prove that everyone wasn't doing it, because everyone wasn't prooven and/or penalized for doing it.. You claim everyone was doing it, so the burden of proof is on you..And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion..The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Like "everyone was/is doing it"?Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..
It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Whats the price of redemption these days? Does it even matter? Why even fine them and take draft picks if they werent sufficient?Like "everyone was/is doing it"?Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..
It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.
Is there a single thread in the Shark Pool that you haven't crapped this drivel in?And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion.. You're only retort was "everybody is doing it" but you have yet to prove that assertion..The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
Its only the two that I have ever even mentioned it in, do you read threads that arent about hating on the pats?Is there a single thread in the Shark Pool that you haven't crapped this drivel in?And you've yet to prove that the video taping of signals had: Any effect on the game, any effect on the Patriots success (if so how much), that everyone wasnt doing it and if it had any effect on any prior game/season.Whats to debate? Before being caught cheating, 3 SB rings*, after... 0-2... And they lost tonight which sparks this discussion.. You're only retort was "everybody is doing it" but you have yet to prove that assertion..The debating skills are strong in this one.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..
Coughlin was never on the hot seat this year. The only whispers of Coughlin being fired were by talking heads and people like yourself.Come on....... if Coughlin doesn't make the playoffs he's fired from the Giants.
This is the OPs original post?Since I'm still fairly new, do I to take this thread and site seriously after a post like this?Oh and for those who cannot count in this thread, 3 is better than 2.Enough said
Prove that you can win one without cheatingWhats the price of redemption these days? Does it even matter? Why even fine them and take draft picks if they werent sufficient?Like "everyone was/is doing it"?Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..
It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.
fixedThis is the OPs original post?Since I'm still fairly new, do I to take this thread and site seriously after a post like this?Enough said
Oh and for those who cannot count in this thread, 3* ring by way of cheating is not better than 2.
I was just having a little fun with all of the "Belichick is a Genius" folks but seriously Coughlin is every bit the coach that Belichick is.And the last time I checked 0 SB losses is > 2 SB losses.This is the OPs original post?Since I'm still fairly new, do I to take this thread and site seriously after a post like this?Oh and for those who cannot count in this thread, 3 is better than 2.Enough said
Fixedlast I checked, 3* while cheating < 2 the honest way
I have been waiting for you to attempt this type of post.So ready for crow?Fixedlast I checked, 3* while cheating < 2 the honest way
Every post you make until you go away quietly you will see this.Prove that you can win one without cheatingWhats the price of redemption these days? Does it even matter? Why even fine them and take draft picks if they werent sufficient?Like "everyone was/is doing it"?Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..
It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.
fixedThis is the OPs original post?Since I'm still fairly new, do I to take this thread and site seriously after a post like this?Enough said
Oh and for those who cannot count in this thread, 3* ring by way of cheating is not better than 2.
Like "everyone was/is doing it"?Im the one being condescending, you're the one who keeps repeating something that is common knowledge to everyone, then making grandiose claims that no one has ever proved.I don't have to prove they cheated, the NFL already has. And I don't have to prove there was some advantage gained by cheating, because it's obvious that if there was no advantage gained, they wouldn't have risked breaking the rules..
It's obvious from the tone of your argument that your opinion doesn't carry much weight.. Why should I worry about changing it?
Once you're found guilty of cheating, the burden of clearing your name is on you.. Anyone else is justified in doubting you because you're a proven cheater.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY26rgd4apsWow if your only argument was about them cheating, what does this video do to you?I wish the Pats could have cheated during this game and squeezed out another undeserved win so I wouldn't have to read this drivel..Brady himself tonight credited Belichik with his own success. You can't just say that Belichik is riding on the coattails of Brady. Belichik is a widely respected coach who has a ton of success and his team still performed at a high level when Brady was lost for the season due to injury.But, haters gotta hate, I guess.Before Tom Brady, Belichick had five losing seasons out of six. None since.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY26rgd4apsI think that covers every post of yours which states Coughlin does it without cheating.Belichik is an inferior coach who needs to cheat to win?you nailed it..