What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Could LaDainian Tomlinson be the bust of 03? (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Im hoping I can replace Brooks with LT2 at my QB position ... gonna have to re-read my rules and regs
This is rather funny after last nights game. The announcers even said there was a QB controversy brewing in SD :hophead:
 
What's next? Rehashing "Ryan Leaf should be chosen before Manning" posts? I know, you would but the board wasn't alive back then.

 
BUMP -HOW SILLY DO SOME OF YOU FEEL NOW!

I tend to agree with that. Tomlinson seems to be more in the mold of an Eddie George, lacking the game-breaking ability of a Holmes or Portis, and I think everything just went right for him last year.
Wow! Talk about stating the EXACT OPPOSITE of reality!!!LT absolutely is a game breaker. He is not in the mould of Eddie George. He is fast, quick, elusive, AND powerful. You simply have no clue what you are talking about. I don't know how to say that more diplomatically.KC and Denver have two of the best O-lines in the NFL, and SD has one of the worst. KC and Denver have above average passing attacks, and SD is below average. Put LT in KC's or Denver's backfield and he would be the #1 RB in football no questions asked. Put Priest or Portis in SD's backfield and they will NOT be top 5 RBs and probably will be outright busts.LT is flat out better than Priest and Portis on talent alone. He is a special back, and comparing him to Eddie George is just ignorant.
GREAT POST....LT is definitely more talented than Holmes and Portis....I have NO doubt that he will be a top 5 back this year and for many years to come. Anybody that "claims" they didnt have him in their preseason top 5 is a MORON....Gimmie a break
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top