What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Could the best college team beat a CFL team? (1 Viewer)

Could the best college team beat a CFL team?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
The worst team in the CFL would beat the best NCAA anytime, any place, with either set of rules. It wouldn't be close. Anyone who would argue differently simply doesn't know what they are talking about.

 
The worst team in the CFL would beat the best NCAA anytime, any place, with either set of rules. It wouldn't be close. Anyone who would argue differently simply doesn't know what they are talking about.
Compelling argument.
 
The worst team in the CFL would beat the best NCAA anytime, any place, with either set of rules. It wouldn't be close. Anyone who would argue differently simply doesn't know what they are talking about.
:lmao: So the worst CFL team from last year would work over the USC team with Reggie Bush, Matt Leinart, Dwayne Jarrett, LenDale White, that cokehead lineman, etc etc?

:s: please.

 
I've never seen more clueless posts on this board before. The major difference between the NFL and CFL players is size. Talented players in College that the NFL didn't even bother evaluating because of height or weight get picked up by CFL teams. Example, look up who broke Terry Bradshaw's school records at Louisiana Tech.

Players from College or NFLE may be a better fit for the NFL's game. However on talent alone the CFL is superior.

 
What field, ball and rules are they using?
Normal rules. Not the goofy rules they play up norf.
Well that changes everything then.Put in on the CFL field with their big ball and their rules and the college teams will lose.
:shrug: But that's not really football though is it?

And I still think even with the CFL rules it would be close. Nobody could guard Bush or Young in the CFL.
Way to have a good discussion :thumbup: CFL isn't football, any college team could beat a CFL team with their rules. Good job buddy. ####### ######.

With NFL rules, it would be close. CFL players have played on NFL fields before and know how it is. The college team doesn't know how CF is. Field is larger and longer, there are more players on the field, the ball is not the same. Punt and kick returns rules are not the same, etc.

IMO with NFL rules, it'd be close. Most CFL players were really good in college, they were just too small for the NFL. With CFL rules, it's not the same thing. The CFL team would beat that team. The running game is not close as important in the CFL and wide receivers make a lot of difference. College wides would have problems running their routes.

NFL rules = close

CFL rules = CFL team wins

 
:lmao: at all the canucks getting bent out of shape.

don't worry mounties, your game is still better than the arena league. barely.

 
What field, ball and rules are they using?
Normal rules. Not the goofy rules they play up norf.
Well that changes everything then.Put in on the CFL field with their big ball and their rules and the college teams will lose.
:shrug: But that's not really football though is it?

And I still think even with the CFL rules it would be close. Nobody could guard Bush or Young in the CFL.
CFL is not real football? Please define what real football is.Two different games, but a CFL team is build on defense and is a passing game more than NFL ball. It would not happen - so why discuss it?
College/NFL rules is football.Arena and CFL are variations of the true game but field goals from your own end zone and running forward before the ball is hiked and 20 yard endzones are derived to garner interest due to the inferior talent on the field.

Who says it won't happen?
You might want to check your facts. IIRC, the Canadian version of the game has been played about as long as the American version. In fact, some of our Canadian friends can correct me on this, but wasn't last season the 75th Grey Cup?
93rd Grey Cup. And the first "football" game was played between McGill College (in Montreal) and Harvard.
 
No, the college team would not have a chance.

CFL teams are essentailly the "minor leagues" of the NFL, even though the NFL doesn't use them as such.

That means that when the NFL teams take roughly the top 270-280 from each college class, the CFL and the AFL divvy up roughly the rest of the talent - from the most talented players left in the pool from all colleges at all levels.

Then you do that over 8-10 years and build veterans with more strength, knowledge, and game savvy while adding these rookies each year.

There's no way, even with the most elite college teams, that they can replenish from the crop of high school players, with only 5 years of carry over experience on younger, less experienced players and come close to matching the collective level of athletes playing in the CFL. On a on-on-one comparison, colleges may have the edge with some of the elite athletes. As a team, there's no way that college teams stand up to CFL teams.

The claim that the elite college teams could compete with CFL teams just isn't logical, and can be plainly seen when one looks at the logistics.
CFL is the minor leagues? Actually that is NFLE.CFL is for people who do not have the talent to play in the NFL. I doubt less than 1% of the CFL players ever sniff the NFL.
Wrong. It's for small players that would have difficulty to express their talent in the NFL. In the CFL, they have more space.
 
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.

 
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams. 

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few. 

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game.  Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.
 
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams. 

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few. 

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game.  Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.
Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.
 
Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.
can't be that complex. not like usc would need to pass anyway. that line and running game would control the entire game.
 
Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.
can't be that complex. not like usc would need to pass anyway. that line and running game would control the entire game.
Why can't it be complex?
 
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.
You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.
can't be that complex. not like usc would need to pass anyway. that line and running game would control the entire game.
The CFL only has 2 downs before you have to punt....you can't solely rely on the running game.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.
You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?
I would take the WR's at USC right now or the WR's at Mia 5 yrs ago vs those CFL DBs any day of the week!
 
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.
Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.
I play midget football (2 years of midget. Second year of midget and beginning of cegep football = HS) with the CFL rules and we already use blitz and many formations. We do have many schemes and a few audibles depending of the situation.
 
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams. 

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few. 

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game.  Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.
You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?
A professional CFL player? Sure.
 
With all this talk about USC, it seems some people have forgotten that they lost the Rose Bowl. Keep in mind that USC couldn't beat Texas before you start talking about them beating a CFL team. So when answering "Could the best college team beat a CFL team?" you should be talking about how Texas matches up, not the trojans.

Even after the draft, where every single player from USC besides Deuce slid the USC hype still has no bounds. That team lost to Texas, needed a miricle to beat ND and really didn't have an overly impressive draft class, yet it's still rah, rah Trojans, they were so talented. Fall for the hype much?

 
With all this talk about USC, it seems some people have forgotten that they lost the Rose Bowl. Keep in mind that USC couldn't beat Texas before you start talking about them beating a CFL team. So when answering "Could the best college team beat a CFL team?" you should be talking about how Texas matches up, not the trojans.

Even after the draft, where every single player from USC besides Deuce slid the USC hype still has no bounds. That team lost to Texas, needed a miricle to beat ND and really didn't have an overly impressive draft class, yet it's still rah, rah Trojans, they were so talented. Fall for the hype much?
I think the OP asked about both Tex and UCS playing a CFL team.
 
With all this talk about USC, it seems some people have forgotten that they lost the Rose Bowl. Keep in mind that USC couldn't beat Texas before you start talking about them beating a CFL team. So when answering "Could the best college team beat a CFL team?" you should be talking about how Texas matches up, not the trojans.

Even after the draft, where every single player from USC besides Deuce slid the USC hype still has no bounds. That team lost to Texas, needed a miricle to beat ND and really didn't have an overly impressive draft class, yet it's still rah, rah Trojans, they were so talented. Fall for the hype much?
But USC won the previous two years as well. A team that won two years in a row and then lost on the last play of the game is probably a better candidate than Texas, but I think Texas could beat a CFL team as could Ohio State.Those 3 teams could go 3-0 against any CFL team. Any time any where.

 
With all this talk about USC, it seems some people have forgotten that they lost the Rose Bowl. Keep in mind that USC couldn't beat Texas before you start talking about them beating a CFL team. So when answering "Could the best college team beat a CFL team?" you should be talking about how Texas matches up, not the trojans.

Even after the draft, where every single player from USC besides Deuce slid the USC hype still has no bounds. That team lost to Texas, needed a miricle to beat ND and really didn't have an overly impressive draft class, yet it's still rah, rah Trojans, they were so talented. Fall for the hype much?
I think the OP asked about both Tex and UCS playing a CFL team.
:goodposting: We don't need to focus on the Trojans. We can look solely at Texas.

Vince Young would have 300+ total yards and 4 TDs even throwing the ball like a chicken.

 
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.
You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?
A professional CFL player? Sure.
I bet you've never seen a CFL game. ######. CFL is a passing league. CFL DBs see much more action than NCAA DBs and have been playing for longer. If they played with CFL rules, it wouldn't be close.
 
Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams. 

How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few. 

It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game.  Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14

NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.
You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?
A professional CFL player? Sure.
I bet you've never seen a CFL game. ######. CFL is a passing league. CFL DBs see much more action than NCAA DBs and have been playing for longer. If they played with CFL rules, it wouldn't be close.
Pac 10 DBs see plenty of action.I would bet that a team like Oregon would be an even match for a CFL team. And USC beat Oregon really bad at Oregon.

 
BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

:confused:
This is ridiculous. You've never seen a CFL game and you say that Oregon would beat a CFL team...They'd probably beat the Ottawa Renegades but there's no way they'd beat the Alouettes.
 
BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

:confused:
This is ridiculous. You've never seen a CFL game and you say that Oregon would beat a CFL team...They'd probably beat the Ottawa Renegades but there's no way they'd beat the Alouettes.
No, I said Oregon would be an even match.
 
BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

:confused:
:lmao: And you are talking like you know the skill level in the CFL. LOL.
I know it is inferior to the NFL and NFLE. Since the majority of major college programs go to the NFL or NFLE, by definition these players are better.
 
BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

:confused:
:lmao: And you are talking like you know the skill level in the CFL. LOL.
I know it is inferior to the NFL and NFLE. Since the majority of major college programs go to the NFL or NFLE, by definition these players are better.
Yes, but you do not know to what degree it is lesser, thats the problem. Your scenario is about as plausible as the Top CIS/NCAA hockey team beating an AHL hockey team....it won't happen.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here are four WRs on the CFL team I follow that you guys will recognize:

Martay Jenkins

Scotty Anderson

Terrance Wilkins

Jermaine Copeland (NFLE Standout)

These are not even the best four WRs on the team, and the team does not have the best WRs in the league...but five or six years out of college I think AS A GROUP you'd have to give them the nod over any college group.

And as noted, professional CFL DBs shut these guys down on a much bigger field. The talent is there, just not the size. And EVERY player is a PRO, not just seven or eight.

CFL Wins.

 
Here are four WRs on the CFL team I follow that you guys will recognize:

Martay Jenkins

Scotty Anderson

Terrance Wilkins

Jermaine Copeland (NFLE Standout)
I know this was supposed to impress the NCAA backers, but I highly doubt it did. I know it didn't for me. I have seen the CFL play and know the talent level VERY well.
 
This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.

 
This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.
You're right, but it doesn't seem like much of a debate:
Code:
Yes    [ 71 ] 	 ** [65.14%]No  [ 38 ]  ** [34.86%]
;)
 
This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.
You're right, but it doesn't seem like much of a debate:
Code:
Yes    [ 71 ] 	 ** [65.14%]No  [ 38 ]  ** [34.86%]
;)
Of course not, with ######s like bagger that have never seen a CFL game but still vote yet.
 
This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.
You're right, but it doesn't seem like much of a debate:
Code:
Yes    [ 71 ] 	 ** [65.14%]No  [ 38 ]  ** [34.86%]
;)
Of course not, with ######s like bagger that have never seen a CFL game but still vote yet.
Touche! :thumbup:
 
USC/Miami alums are just that - paid to play football and they work at their career. As for CFL football - maybe a dozen players play to move up to the next level, the rest are there because they love the game and ultimately their skill level would suck - even in a match-up against the USC/Miami teams.
Editted for accuracy
 
I lived in Toronto for awhile. I have been to CFL games. Because it is a bigger field, speed is king. Bush and Young would be the fastest players on the field. Young would never even have to throw a pass. He could just drop back, find a hole and go. How would they stop him from getting a first down? The LB's in the CFL are painfully slow.

And some of you are right, the CFL is lacking in size. A big receiver like Dwayne Jarrett would DOMINATE the CFL DB's. They could not contend with his size. The USC or Texas DB's would have a tough time as well because of the rules differences. However, how would the CFL team contend with the pass rush of the NCAA team?

I think it is an interesting debate but the NCAA team would have more talent on the field. Would they win? Most times I would say yes.

 
I think you guys are overplaying the idea of talent. Talent counts for something, sure, but teamwork counts for more. A team that has been playing together for up to 10 years (CFL) will best any college team.

 
This poll is a joke. How in the world did 44 people vote no? Last year's USC team would have beaten a CFL team by 50.

Seriously, the people that voted no, have you ever watched a CFL game before? I've watched many....as a joke. It's not football, it's a bunch of doofuses running around running around with a pigskin. We often gather as friends to watch the games constant fumbles and floaters and laugh, because the poor play is so much fun to watch. You get those fumbles that bounce around 15 times before someone gets a clean scoop, you get punters trying to fake a punt on their own and then when they realize they can't they just spike the ball, you get those floaters that hang up in the air so long 8 guys are under it by the time it finally comes down hail marry style....on 1st and 10 with 9 minutes left in the first quarter. I don't mean to sound harsh but I was just so astonished to actually see a bunch of "no" votes here.

Seriously, watch a couple games. There is a fumble about every 3 plays, and the defenses break down so hard it's almost worse than the ducks that QBs often throw that look like they're playing in a hurricane. I remember one defensive play in particular where a guy ran a quick slant from the slot and took it 60 yards straight up the middle for a touchdown without a single defender ever even appearing on the screen, and they didn't even blitz on the play. No defenders on screen, that means no one within even 15 yards, where were they????

Usually, if it's not the defense breaking down it's the offense. QBs often have balls get away from them that go floating into the air as if he were throwing into some combination of a hurricane and a blizzard.

We actually had a chat with some sports betting high rollers in Vegas about how impossible it is to set odds for the CFL games, because there's no way to predict how those 23 fumbles that occur every game will bounce.

There's your occasional hidden gem, a la Doug Flutie. But for the most part the teams are so far from NFL players that a group of future NFLers like USC would demolish them.

I would go much further than to say the best college team could beat a CFL team...that one's easy. I would say every ranked collegiate team could beat a CFL team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is a reason they limit "import" players, because if they didn't they'd all be imports.

LAUNCH

 
I think you guys are overplaying the idea of talent. Talent counts for something, sure, but teamwork counts for more. A team that has been playing together for up to 10 years (CFL) will best any college team.
And you're forgetting coaching. The CFL players are so poorly coached that they have no concept of how to play together. Seriously, watch a game. You'll get a kick out of it.
 
There is a reason they limit "import" players, because if they didn't they'd all be imports.
Its so a Canadian game actually has some component of being Canadian. The CHL also limits import players, and thats because the league is primarily for Canadians. The United States has 297 million people, while Canada has 32 million. Based on just numbers, of course the US is going to have a lot better football players than Canada.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.
Who was talking about Fresno State?Read the poll question so you don't look foolish.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top