Compelling argument.The worst team in the CFL would beat the best NCAA anytime, any place, with either set of rules. It wouldn't be close. Anyone who would argue differently simply doesn't know what they are talking about.
The worst team in the CFL would beat the best NCAA anytime, any place, with either set of rules. It wouldn't be close. Anyone who would argue differently simply doesn't know what they are talking about.
 So the worst CFL team from last year would work over the USC team with Reggie Bush, Matt Leinart, Dwayne Jarrett, LenDale White, that cokehead lineman, etc etc?
 So the worst CFL team from last year would work over the USC team with Reggie Bush, Matt Leinart, Dwayne Jarrett, LenDale White, that cokehead lineman, etc etc?Way to have a good discussionWell that changes everything then.Put in on the CFL field with their big ball and their rules and the college teams will lose.Normal rules. Not the goofy rules they play up norf.What field, ball and rules are they using?But that's not really football though is it?
And I still think even with the CFL rules it would be close. Nobody could guard Bush or Young in the CFL.
 CFL isn't football, any college team could beat a CFL team with their rules. Good job buddy. ####### ######.
 CFL isn't football, any college team could beat a CFL team with their rules. Good job buddy. ####### ######.93rd Grey Cup. And the first "football" game was played between McGill College (in Montreal) and Harvard.You might want to check your facts. IIRC, the Canadian version of the game has been played about as long as the American version. In fact, some of our Canadian friends can correct me on this, but wasn't last season the 75th Grey Cup?College/NFL rules is football.Arena and CFL are variations of the true game but field goals from your own end zone and running forward before the ball is hiked and 20 yard endzones are derived to garner interest due to the inferior talent on the field.CFL is not real football? Please define what real football is.Two different games, but a CFL team is build on defense and is a passing game more than NFL ball. It would not happen - so why discuss it?Well that changes everything then.Put in on the CFL field with their big ball and their rules and the college teams will lose.Normal rules. Not the goofy rules they play up norf.What field, ball and rules are they using?But that's not really football though is it?
And I still think even with the CFL rules it would be close. Nobody could guard Bush or Young in the CFL.
Who says it won't happen?
Wrong. It's for small players that would have difficulty to express their talent in the NFL. In the CFL, they have more space.CFL is the minor leagues? Actually that is NFLE.CFL is for people who do not have the talent to play in the NFL. I doubt less than 1% of the CFL players ever sniff the NFL.No, the college team would not have a chance.
CFL teams are essentailly the "minor leagues" of the NFL, even though the NFL doesn't use them as such.
That means that when the NFL teams take roughly the top 270-280 from each college class, the CFL and the AFL divvy up roughly the rest of the talent - from the most talented players left in the pool from all colleges at all levels.
Then you do that over 8-10 years and build veterans with more strength, knowledge, and game savvy while adding these rookies each year.
There's no way, even with the most elite college teams, that they can replenish from the crop of high school players, with only 5 years of carry over experience on younger, less experienced players and come close to matching the collective level of athletes playing in the CFL. On a on-on-one comparison, colleges may have the edge with some of the elite athletes. As a team, there's no way that college teams stand up to CFL teams.
The claim that the elite college teams could compete with CFL teams just isn't logical, and can be plainly seen when one looks at the logistics.
It's for small players that would have difficulty to express their talent in the NFL.

This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
can't be that complex. not like usc would need to pass anyway. that line and running game would control the entire game.Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.
Why can't it be complex?can't be that complex. not like usc would need to pass anyway. that line and running game would control the entire game.Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.
You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
The CFL only has 2 downs before you have to punt....you can't solely rely on the running game.can't be that complex. not like usc would need to pass anyway. that line and running game would control the entire game.Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.
I would take the WR's at USC right now or the WR's at Mia 5 yrs ago vs those CFL DBs any day of the week!You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I play midget football (2 years of midget. Second year of midget and beginning of cegep football = HS) with the CFL rules and we already use blitz and many formations. We do have many schemes and a few audibles depending of the situation.Honest question: How complex are CFL defenses? If they are anything close to NFL defenses with blitz schemes and audibles, then you're totally wrong.I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
A professional CFL player? Sure.You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
I think the OP asked about both Tex and UCS playing a CFL team.With all this talk about USC, it seems some people have forgotten that they lost the Rose Bowl. Keep in mind that USC couldn't beat Texas before you start talking about them beating a CFL team. So when answering "Could the best college team beat a CFL team?" you should be talking about how Texas matches up, not the trojans.
Even after the draft, where every single player from USC besides Deuce slid the USC hype still has no bounds. That team lost to Texas, needed a miricle to beat ND and really didn't have an overly impressive draft class, yet it's still rah, rah Trojans, they were so talented. Fall for the hype much?
But USC won the previous two years as well. A team that won two years in a row and then lost on the last play of the game is probably a better candidate than Texas, but I think Texas could beat a CFL team as could Ohio State.Those 3 teams could go 3-0 against any CFL team. Any time any where.With all this talk about USC, it seems some people have forgotten that they lost the Rose Bowl. Keep in mind that USC couldn't beat Texas before you start talking about them beating a CFL team. So when answering "Could the best college team beat a CFL team?" you should be talking about how Texas matches up, not the trojans.
Even after the draft, where every single player from USC besides Deuce slid the USC hype still has no bounds. That team lost to Texas, needed a miricle to beat ND and really didn't have an overly impressive draft class, yet it's still rah, rah Trojans, they were so talented. Fall for the hype much?
I think the OP asked about both Tex and UCS playing a CFL team.With all this talk about USC, it seems some people have forgotten that they lost the Rose Bowl. Keep in mind that USC couldn't beat Texas before you start talking about them beating a CFL team. So when answering "Could the best college team beat a CFL team?" you should be talking about how Texas matches up, not the trojans.
Even after the draft, where every single player from USC besides Deuce slid the USC hype still has no bounds. That team lost to Texas, needed a miricle to beat ND and really didn't have an overly impressive draft class, yet it's still rah, rah Trojans, they were so talented. Fall for the hype much?
 We don't need to focus on the Trojans.  We can look solely at Texas.
 We don't need to focus on the Trojans.  We can look solely at Texas.I bet you've never seen a CFL game. ######. CFL is a passing league. CFL DBs see much more action than NCAA DBs and have been playing for longer. If they played with CFL rules, it wouldn't be close.A professional CFL player? Sure.You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
Pac 10 DBs see plenty of action.I would bet that a team like Oregon would be an even match for a CFL team. And USC beat Oregon really bad at Oregon.I bet you've never seen a CFL game. ######. CFL is a passing league. CFL DBs see much more action than NCAA DBs and have been playing for longer. If they played with CFL rules, it wouldn't be close.A professional CFL player? Sure.You think a NCAA WR can get open versus a professional DB that plays in a league that is basically based on the passing game?I would bet scrilla that Leinart or Young would tear up the CFL defenses with their respective collegiate teams.This is certainly a very interesting debate. The QB position would be the NCAA's major weakness since it takes so long to develop. However, many college RBs come in and are instantly among the NFLs best, so I have to think that the Bush/White combo would be a huge advantage for USC against any CFL team. Overall I'd say this:CFL Rules: CFL team wins by 14Although I am not a CFL fan I still have to go with the CFL over NCAA teams.
How many rookies come in and make an impact in the NFL in their first year? There are very few.
It takes time for these rookies to catch up to the pro game. Now there is a difference from the NFL and CFL, but the CFL teams are pros with experience which I will take over young guys with talent that may or may not be good down the road.
NCAA Rules: Close game that could go either way.
 
 This is ridiculous. You've never seen a CFL game and you say that Oregon would beat a CFL team...They'd probably beat the Ottawa Renegades but there's no way they'd beat the Alouettes.BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

No, I said Oregon would be an even match.This is ridiculous. You've never seen a CFL game and you say that Oregon would beat a CFL team...They'd probably beat the Ottawa Renegades but there's no way they'd beat the Alouettes.BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

 And you are talking like you know the skill level in the CFL.  LOL.
 And you are talking like you know the skill level in the CFL.  LOL.I know it is inferior to the NFL and NFLE. Since the majority of major college programs go to the NFL or NFLE, by definition these players are better.BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

And you are talking like you know the skill level in the CFL. LOL.
Yes, but you do not know to what degree it is lesser, thats the problem. Your scenario is about as plausible as the Top CIS/NCAA hockey team beating an AHL hockey team....it won't happen.I know it is inferior to the NFL and NFLE. Since the majority of major college programs go to the NFL or NFLE, by definition these players are better.BTW, why would I want to see a CFL game?

And you are talking like you know the skill level in the CFL. LOL.
I know this was supposed to impress the NCAA backers, but I highly doubt it did. I know it didn't for me. I have seen the CFL play and know the talent level VERY well.Here are four WRs on the CFL team I follow that you guys will recognize:
Martay Jenkins
Scotty Anderson
Terrance Wilkins
Jermaine Copeland (NFLE Standout)
The best college team is capable of beating an NFL team.

Thanks ########at all the canucks getting bent out of shape.
don't worry mounties, your game is still better than the arena league. barely.
You're right, but it doesn't seem like much of a debate:This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.
Yes    [ 71 ] 	 ** [65.14%]No  [ 38 ]  ** [34.86%]
Of course not, with ######s like bagger that have never seen a CFL game but still vote yet.You're right, but it doesn't seem like much of a debate:This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.
Code:Yes [ 71 ] ** [65.14%]No [ 38 ] ** [34.86%]
Touche!Of course not, with ######s like bagger that have never seen a CFL game but still vote yet.You're right, but it doesn't seem like much of a debate:This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.
Code:Yes [ 71 ] ** [65.14%]No [ 38 ] ** [34.86%]

Editted for accuracyUSC/Miami alums are just that - paid to play football and they work at their career. As for CFL football - maybe a dozen players play to move up to the next level, the rest are there because they love the game and ultimately their skill level would suck - even in a match-up against the USC/Miami teams.
And you're forgetting coaching. The CFL players are so poorly coached that they have no concept of how to play together. Seriously, watch a game. You'll get a kick out of it.I think you guys are overplaying the idea of talent. Talent counts for something, sure, but teamwork counts for more. A team that has been playing together for up to 10 years (CFL) will best any college team.
Its so a Canadian game actually has some component of being Canadian. The CHL also limits import players, and thats because the league is primarily for Canadians. The United States has 297 million people, while Canada has 32 million. Based on just numbers, of course the US is going to have a lot better football players than Canada.There is a reason they limit "import" players, because if they didn't they'd all be imports.
Who was talking about Fresno State?Read the poll question so you don't look foolish.This thread is hysterical. I really doubt any CFL team would struggle to beat Fresno State in 100 games. There are alot of NCAA standouts who can't cut it in the CFL. This debate is fueled by ignorance.
