Because you don't go for 2 until you absolutely have to. You miss it and you're playing catch-up. Ideally, you play it so you don't need to.And why in the world did Dallas not go for 2 after their last td?
G-men doing the exact opposite of the Frankman.Time is the enemy of the Cowboys, Giants need to run the ball and stop passing it around everywhere. Kill the clock and give the D a break, AND FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STOP HURRYING UP.
Gotta challenge that catch
Hey, when Dante Pettis gets his hands on the ball you just assume he caught it. His vacuum hands are known throughout the NFL locker rooms.Should have challenged that catch.
That's a big assumption that they make the 2-point conversion. The way this offense had looked? Yeah...If only Dallas needed a FG...
The point was if Mccarthy had challenged that catch it was much less likely they make the fg to go up 4. So now dallas would just need a fg to take the lead and not need a td.That's a big assumption that they make the 2-point conversion.
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/791893-dallas-at-ny-giants-1544/?do=findComment&comment=23169515The point was if Mccarthy had challenged that catch it was much less likely they make the fg to go up 4. So now dallas would just need a fg to take the lead and not need a td.
Lol. This is so NFC east.
He wanted the TD. Shades of Herm Edwards.Did he really get a first down and then just fumble the ball?
It sure looked like Dallas recovered
Take back everything I said about him being reliable lolOMG Gallman are you kidding me?
He knocked it out of his own hand.OMG Gallman are you kidding me?