Dallas punches New England in the mouth (1 Viewer)

[greenline]

the "quote" around your "analysis" is because I still don't think you watched the game.

 

[daveandken]

the "quote" around your "analysis" is because I still don't think you watched the game.

OK, in that case, I don't think you watched it either. Thanks for adding to this discussion with your opinion of whether I watched the game. Its definitely a valid point that needs to be told. Keep us updated on any other posters who you *think* didnt watch either. I need a comprehensive list for my cheat sheet for next week.

 

[twitch]

New England was winning that game 20-0 at the half. I mean my god, youre up 20-0 playing and coaching against a former friend, coach and colleague who's mere coaching life is literally at risk this year. Romeo wasnt just some schmoe to these guys. The last thing they were trying to do was pile on and beat that team 40-0. read between the lines every once in a while.

If they intentionally let up, then they are crazy. Anything can happen in this league.

sure can....like New England picking up Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas in the same offseason. Thanks for pointing that out. I didnt say they let up. But prior to that 3rd quarter after leading 20-0 at the half, New England had scored a point in 38 consecutive quarters. again, 38 straight quarters of scoring. they didnt score in the 3rd, but scored 14 in the 4th to secure the win. think about it. nobody's crazy. but nobody's stupid here either.

 

[daveandken]

New England was winning that game 20-0 at the half. I mean my god, youre up 20-0 playing and coaching against a former friend, coach and colleague who's mere coaching life is literally at risk this year. Romeo wasnt just some schmoe to these guys. The last thing they were trying to do was pile on and beat that team 40-0. read between the lines every once in a while.

If they intentionally let up, then they are crazy. Anything can happen in this league.

sure can....like New England picking up Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas in the same offseason. Thanks for pointing that out. I didnt say they let up. But prior to that 3rd quarter after leading 20-0 at the half, New England had scored a point in 38 consecutive quarters. again, 38 straight quarters of scoring. they didnt score in the 3rd, but scored 14 in the 4th to secure the win. think about it. nobody's crazy. but nobody's stupid here either.

You didn't say they let up? So they were not trying to pile on but they were not letting up?You can't have it both ways.And by the way, did you not read that I agree with you that the Pats will win?Geez, you guys just can't get enough. Its gotta be hyperbole - Pats are the best team EVER!Not saying they are a bad team, not saying they arent the BEST in the NFL right now. Just saying that the Browns win was not impressive. Its my opinion based on watching the game.

 

[greenline]

New England was winning that game 20-0 at the half. I mean my god, youre up 20-0 playing and coaching against a former friend, coach and colleague who's mere coaching life is literally at risk this year. Romeo wasnt just some schmoe to these guys. The last thing they were trying to do was pile on and beat that team 40-0. read between the lines every once in a while.

If they intentionally let up, then they are crazy. Anything can happen in this league.

sure can....like New England picking up Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas in the same offseason. Thanks for pointing that out. I didnt say they let up. But prior to that 3rd quarter after leading 20-0 at the half, New England had scored a point in 38 consecutive quarters. again, 38 straight quarters of scoring. they didnt score in the 3rd, but scored 14 in the 4th to secure the win. think about it. nobody's crazy. but nobody's stupid here either.

You didn't say they let up? So they were not trying to pile on but they were not letting up?You can't have it both ways.And by the way, did you not read that I agree with you that the Pats will win?Geez, you guys just can't get enough. Its gotta be hyperbole - Pats are the best team EVER!Not saying they are a bad team, not saying they arent the BEST in the NFL right now. Just saying that the Browns win was not impressive. Its my opinion based on watching the game.

I was never talking about Dallas with you. I never thought about your opinion of them in tems of all time. I was strictly talking about the CLE. Maybe we should move it to the the game thread.

 

[ChrisHenrysDD]

New England was winning that game 20-0 at the half. I mean my god, youre up 20-0 playing and coaching against a former friend, coach and colleague who's mere coaching life is literally at risk this year. Romeo wasnt just some schmoe to these guys. The last thing they were trying to do was pile on and beat that team 40-0. read between the lines every once in a while.

If they intentionally let up, then they are crazy. Anything can happen in this league.

sure can....like New England picking up Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas in the same offseason. Thanks for pointing that out. I didnt say they let up. But prior to that 3rd quarter after leading 20-0 at the half, New England had scored a point in 38 consecutive quarters. again, 38 straight quarters of scoring. they didnt score in the 3rd, but scored 14 in the 4th to secure the win. think about it. nobody's crazy. but nobody's stupid here either.

You didn't say they let up? So they were not trying to pile on but they were not letting up?You can't have it both ways.And by the way, did you not read that I agree with you that the Pats will win?Geez, you guys just can't get enough. Its gotta be hyperbole - Pats are the best team EVER!Not saying they are a bad team, not saying they arent the BEST in the NFL right now. Just saying that the Browns win was not impressive. Its my opinion based on watching the game.

What exactly would you deem an "impressive" win over the Browns? I'm curious.

 

[twitch]

New England was winning that game 20-0 at the half. I mean my god, youre up 20-0 playing and coaching against a former friend, coach and colleague who's mere coaching life is literally at risk this year. Romeo wasnt just some schmoe to these guys. The last thing they were trying to do was pile on and beat that team 40-0. read between the lines every once in a while.

If they intentionally let up, then they are crazy. Anything can happen in this league.

sure can....like New England picking up Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas in the same offseason. Thanks for pointing that out. I didnt say they let up. But prior to that 3rd quarter after leading 20-0 at the half, New England had scored a point in 38 consecutive quarters. again, 38 straight quarters of scoring. they didnt score in the 3rd, but scored 14 in the 4th to secure the win. think about it. nobody's crazy. but nobody's stupid here either.

You didn't say they let up? So they were not trying to pile on but they were not letting up?You can't have it both ways.

And by the way, did you not read that I agree with you that the Pats will win?

Geez, you guys just can't get enough. Its gotta be hyperbole - Pats are the best team EVER!

Not saying they are a bad team, not saying they arent the BEST in the NFL right now. Just saying that the Browns win was not impressive. Its my opinion based on watching the game.

let up? never said it. and yes, you can still play hard without piling on. Belichick and Crennel coached together for a long time. I couldnt care less whether they beat them by 3 or 30. Whether or not the win was impressive, I honestly couldnt care less. But if youre not a NE fan, I wouldnt expect you to really understand.

 

[greenline]

the "quote" around your "analysis" is because I still don't think you watched the game.

OK, in that case, I don't think you watched it either. Thanks for adding to this discussion with your opinion of whether I watched the game. Its definitely a valid point that needs to be told. Keep us updated on any other posters who you *think* didnt watch either. I need a comprehensive list for my cheat sheet for next week.

Everything you say SOUNDS like someone who didn't watch the game, man. I don't know what to tell you. All you keep saying is 27-17 in the 4th with 6 mins to play. You felt like after CLE was trailing 27-10 and they added a TD, suddenly the game is in jeopardy? 10 pts? Two scores and you DON'T have the ball?Well, regardless, the Pats while in danger of not beating the Browns ran almost all of the clock off and were comfortable with a 10 pt lead. Why didn't NE kick a FG then on 4th down in the CLE red zone? Why did they go for it on 4th? If your worried you can't win the game don't you make it a 13 pt lead? So you thought CLE was going to score twice in less than 1 minute?

 

[daveandken]

Everything you say SOUNDS like someone who didn't watch the game, man. I don't know what to tell you. All you keep saying is 27-17 in the 4th with 6 mins to play. You felt like after CLE was trailing 27-10 and they added a TD, suddenly the game is in jeopardy? 10 pts? Two scores and you DON'T have the ball?Well, regardless, the Pats while in danger of not beating the Browns ran almost all of the clock off and were comfortable with a 10 pt lead. Why didn't NE kick a FG then on 4th down in the CLE red zone? Why did they go for it on 4th? If your worried you can't win the game don't you make it a 13 pt lead? So you thought CLE was going to score twice in less than 1 minute?

You are missing the point. Did you watch the MNF game?The Cowboys were down by 8 (turned out to be two scores even though it could technically be one), WITHOUT the ball with less than 6 minutes left. Two scores and you don't have the ball. If the Browns were out of it at that point, then so were the Cowboys. And evidently the Cowboys were not.Did I think that CLE would stop NE and score twice with only 6 minutes? No.Did I KNOW they wouldn't? No. The same way I didn't know the Cowboys wouldn't.

 

[ChrisHenrysDD]

the "quote" around your "analysis" is because I still don't think you watched the game.

OK, in that case, I don't think you watched it either. Thanks for adding to this discussion with your opinion of whether I watched the game. Its definitely a valid point that needs to be told. Keep us updated on any other posters who you *think* didnt watch either. I need a comprehensive list for my cheat sheet for next week.

Everything you say SOUNDS like someone who didn't watch the game, man. I don't know what to tell you. All you keep saying is 27-17 in the 4th with 6 mins to play. You felt like after CLE was trailing 27-10 and they added a TD, suddenly the game is in jeopardy? 10 pts? Two scores and you DON'T have the ball?Well, regardless, the Pats while in danger of not beating the Browns ran almost all of the clock off and were comfortable with a 10 pt lead. Why didn't NE kick a FG then on 4th down in the CLE red zone? Why did they go for it on 4th? If your worried you can't win the game don't you make it a 13 pt lead? So you thought CLE was going to score twice in less than 1 minute?

There was not one point in this entire game where the Patriots were in any danger of losing, not one, not for a second. In the NFL, that alone counts as "impressive" in my book. If he doesn't find that "impressive" I have no idea what he wants to happen? 71-0 college style beating perhaps?

 

[twitch]

Everything you say SOUNDS like someone who didn't watch the game, man. I don't know what to tell you. All you keep saying is 27-17 in the 4th with 6 mins to play. You felt like after CLE was trailing 27-10 and they added a TD, suddenly the game is in jeopardy? 10 pts? Two scores and you DON'T have the ball?Well, regardless, the Pats while in danger of not beating the Browns ran almost all of the clock off and were comfortable with a 10 pt lead. Why didn't NE kick a FG then on 4th down in the CLE red zone? Why did they go for it on 4th? If your worried you can't win the game don't you make it a 13 pt lead? So you thought CLE was going to score twice in less than 1 minute?

You are missing the point. Did you watch the MNF game?The Cowboys were down by 8 (turned out to be two scores even though it could technically be one), WITHOUT the ball with less than 6 minutes left. Two scores and you don't have the ball. If the Browns were out of it at that point, then so were the Cowboys. And evidently the Cowboys were not.Did I think that CLE would stop NE and score twice with only 6 minutes? No.Did I KNOW they wouldn't? No. The same way I didn't know the Cowboys wouldn't.

that just doesnt make sense. Youre comparing Dallas coming back against Buffalo to Cleveland coming back against New England? Im just shaking my head to that thought.

 

[greenline]

Everything you say SOUNDS like someone who didn't watch the game, man. I don't know what to tell you. All you keep saying is 27-17 in the 4th with 6 mins to play. You felt like after CLE was trailing 27-10 and they added a TD, suddenly the game is in jeopardy? 10 pts? Two scores and you DON'T have the ball?Well, regardless, the Pats while in danger of not beating the Browns ran almost all of the clock off and were comfortable with a 10 pt lead. Why didn't NE kick a FG then on 4th down in the CLE red zone? Why did they go for it on 4th? If your worried you can't win the game don't you make it a 13 pt lead? So you thought CLE was going to score twice in less than 1 minute?

You are missing the point. Did you watch the MNF game?The Cowboys were down by 8 (turned out to be two scores even though it could technically be one), WITHOUT the ball with less than 6 minutes left. Two scores and you don't have the ball. If the Browns were out of it at that point, then so were the Cowboys. And evidently the Cowboys were not.Did I think that CLE would stop NE and score twice with only 6 minutes? No.Did I KNOW they wouldn't? No. The same way I didn't know the Cowboys wouldn't.

Well, I think NE did know so they did what they did. You should contact the team and suggest scoring on that drive. Regardless, Cleveland was never really in the game. Your original post implied NE couldn't put them away and let them hang around to which I responded that the Browns were never really hanging anyway. You are comparing apples and oranges by trying to apply the circumstances of the two games.

 

[daveandken]

There was not one point in this entire game where the Patriots were in any danger of losing, not one, not for a second. In the NFL, that alone counts as "impressive" in my book. If he doesn't find that "impressive" I have no idea what he wants to happen? 71-0 college style beating perhaps?

Sorry I think they should have won been up by more than 10 at the end based on the pedistool they have been put on around here.And please stop responding to my posts. Your 'reading comprehension' crap in the other thread was enough to show your bias.If you don't like what I have to say, then please put me on ignore. It won't hurt my ego, trust me.

 

[daveandken]

You are comparing apples and oranges by trying to apply the circumstances of the two games.

This is where we disagree. Down 2 scores, with 6 minutes left. What is different?

 

[twitch]

You are comparing apples and oranges by trying to apply the circumstances of the two games.

This is where we disagree. Down 2 scores, with 6 minutes left. What is different?

here's the simple explanation. Dallas>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cleveland.New England>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Buffalo. Belichick>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jauron.

 

[massmarauder]

Some stats for the "Patriots aren't even the team to beat" argument:

Offense

Points/G:

1. New England Patriots

2. Dallas Cowboys

3. Indianapolis Colts

Yds/G

1. Dallas Cowboys

2. New England Patriots

3. Indianapolis Colts

Passing Yd/G

2. Dallas Cowboys

4. New England Patriots

6. Indianapolis Colts

Rushing Yd/G

3. New England Patriots

5. Indianapolis Colts

7. Dallas Cowboys

Defense(all numbers against)

Points/G

3. New England Patriots

10. Indianapolis Colts

13. Dallas Cowboys

Yd/G

2. New England Patriots

6. Indianapolis Colts

8. Dallas Cowboys

Pass Yd/G

4. Indianapolis Colts

6. New England Patriots

12. Dallas Cowboys

Rush Yd/G

5. New England Patriots

7. Dallas Cowboys

16. Indianapolis Colts

So, add them up, and you've got the following:

Patriots - Offense 10, Defense 16

Colts - 17, 20

Cowboys - 12, 42

Or an average of:

Patriots - 2.5, 4

Colts - 4.25, 5

Cowboys - 3, 10.25

Patriots are statistically the best team in football. (waits for the inevitable "BUT LOOK WHO THEY PLAYED AND LOOK WHO THE COWBOYS PLAYED" scream)

Its going to be a difficult game for the Patriots, but I think they will eke out a win.

 

[greenline]

There was not one point in this entire game where the Patriots were in any danger of losing, not one, not for a second. In the NFL, that alone counts as "impressive" in my book. If he doesn't find that "impressive" I have no idea what he wants to happen? 71-0 college style beating perhaps?

Sorry I think they should have won been up by more than 10 at the end based on the pedistool they have been put on around here.And please stop responding to my posts. Your 'reading comprehension' crap in the other thread was enough to show your bias.If you don't like what I have to say, then please put me on ignore. It won't hurt my ego, trust me.

WHAT?? Did you just say you based your opinion on the outcome of this game by the opinion of a message board? Games are played on the field, not in the Shark Pool. And yes, Cleveland down 10 vs. NE and Dallas down 10 vs BUF is different. Different teams, different schemes, different coaches, different personnel, different circumstances.

 

[massmarauder]

I actually looked at the teams the Pats and the Boys played against, and they're similar:

Bills and Dolphins, teams in common.

Pats - Chargers, Bengals, Browns

Cowboys - Bears, Giants, Rams

The Patriots played the Chargers when the Chargers were still considered one of the power teams in the AFC. The Pats shut down the high powered offense, and ran roughshod over the weaker D.

The Cowboys played the Bears when the Bears were still considered one of the power teams in the NFC. The Boys shut don the weaker offense, and ran roughshod over the high powered D.

The Patriots played a high power offensive team in the Bengals that simply could not keep up with the Patriots' D, and could not stop the Patriots' O from scoring.

The Cowboys played a high power offensive team in the Giants that simply could not keep up with the Cowboys' D and could not stop the Cowboys O from scoring.

Don't know how to compare the Browns and the Rams, other than that the Browns are a little bit better, I think.

 

[greenline]

I actually looked at the teams the Pats and the Boys played against, and they're similar: Bills and Dolphins, teams in common. Pats - Chargers, Bengals, BrownsCowboys - Bears, Giants, RamsThe Patriots played the Chargers when the Chargers were still considered one of the power teams in the AFC. The Pats shut down the high powered offense, and ran roughshod over the weaker D. The Cowboys played the Bears when the Bears were still considered one of the power teams in the NFC. The Boys shut don the weaker offense, and ran roughshod over the high powered D.The Patriots played a high power offensive team in the Bengals that simply could not keep up with the Patriots' D, and could not stop the Patriots' O from scoring. The Cowboys played a high power offensive team in the Giants that simply could not keep up with the Cowboys' D and could not stop the Cowboys O from scoring. Don't know how to compare the Browns and the Rams, other than that the Browns are a little bit better, I think.

That's pretty good. Although I still think everything in the NFC is weak. It's the National League in baseball.

 

[texasheat]

Everything you say SOUNDS like someone who didn't watch the game, man. I don't know what to tell you. All you keep saying is 27-17 in the 4th with 6 mins to play. You felt like after CLE was trailing 27-10 and they added a TD, suddenly the game is in jeopardy? 10 pts? Two scores and you DON'T have the ball?

Well, regardless, the Pats while in danger of not beating the Browns ran almost all of the clock off and were comfortable with a 10 pt lead.

Why didn't NE kick a FG then on 4th down in the CLE red zone? Why did they go for it on 4th? If your worried you can't win the game don't you make it a 13 pt lead?

So you thought CLE was going to score twice in less than 1 minute?

You are missing the point. Did you watch the MNF game?The Cowboys were down by 8 (turned out to be two scores even though it could technically be one), WITHOUT the ball with less than 6 minutes left. Two scores and you don't have the ball. If the Browns were out of it at that point, then so were the Cowboys. And evidently the Cowboys were not.

Did I think that CLE would stop NE and score twice with only 6 minutes? No.

Did I KNOW they wouldn't? No. The same way I didn't know the Cowboys wouldn't.

that just doesnt make sense. Youre comparing Dallas coming back against Buffalo to Cleveland coming back against New England? Im just shaking my head to that thought.

No, he is comparing the possibility not the probability. There is a difference.

 

[Phlash]

The Cowboys played a high power offensive team in the Giants that simply could not keep up with the Cowboys' D and could not stop the Cowboys O from scoring.

This statement is false for two reasons. The Giants are not a high power offensive team, and the Cowboy's D got lit up by Eli Manning of all people.

 

[phthalatemagic]

Some stats for the "Patriots aren't even the team to beat" argument:OffensePoints/G:1. New England Patriots2. Dallas Cowboys3. Indianapolis ColtsYds/G1. Dallas Cowboys2. New England Patriots3. Indianapolis ColtsPassing Yd/G2. Dallas Cowboys4. New England Patriots6. Indianapolis ColtsRushing Yd/G3. New England Patriots5. Indianapolis Colts7. Dallas CowboysDefense(all numbers against)Points/G3. New England Patriots10. Indianapolis Colts13. Dallas CowboysYd/G2. New England Patriots6. Indianapolis Colts8. Dallas CowboysPass Yd/G4. Indianapolis Colts6. New England Patriots12. Dallas CowboysRush Yd/G5. New England Patriots7. Dallas Cowboys16. Indianapolis ColtsSo, add them up, and you've got the followingatriots - Offense 10, Defense 16Colts - 17, 20Cowboys - 12, 42Or an average ofatriots - 2.5, 4Colts - 4.25, 5Cowboys - 3, 10.25Patriots are statistically the best team in football. (waits for the inevitable "BUT LOOK WHO THEY PLAYED AND LOOK WHO THE COWBOYS PLAYED" scream)Its going to be a difficult game for the Patriots, but I think they will eke out a win.

What about this oneefending Super Bowl Champions: Indianapolis ColtsThat's a pretty good stat.

 

[massmarauder]

The Cowboys played a high power offensive team in the Giants that simply could not keep up with the Cowboys' D and could not stop the Cowboys O from scoring.

This statement is false for two reasons. The Giants are not a high power offensive team, and the Cowboy's D got lit up by Eli Manning of all people.

You're right, of course. I was stretching the point a little there. All in all, I'd consider the Bengals and the Giants about the same quality, though.

 

[twitch]

Everything you say SOUNDS like someone who didn't watch the game, man. I don't know what to tell you. All you keep saying is 27-17 in the 4th with 6 mins to play. You felt like after CLE was trailing 27-10 and they added a TD, suddenly the game is in jeopardy? 10 pts? Two scores and you DON'T have the ball?

Well, regardless, the Pats while in danger of not beating the Browns ran almost all of the clock off and were comfortable with a 10 pt lead.

Why didn't NE kick a FG then on 4th down in the CLE red zone? Why did they go for it on 4th? If your worried you can't win the game don't you make it a 13 pt lead?

So you thought CLE was going to score twice in less than 1 minute?

You are missing the point. Did you watch the MNF game?The Cowboys were down by 8 (turned out to be two scores even though it could technically be one), WITHOUT the ball with less than 6 minutes left. Two scores and you don't have the ball. If the Browns were out of it at that point, then so were the Cowboys. And evidently the Cowboys were not.

Did I think that CLE would stop NE and score twice with only 6 minutes? No.

Did I KNOW they wouldn't? No. The same way I didn't know the Cowboys wouldn't.

that just doesnt make sense. Youre comparing Dallas coming back against Buffalo to Cleveland coming back against New England? Im just shaking my head to that thought.

No, he is comparing the possibility not the probability. There is a difference.

 

[massmarauder]

What about this oneefending Super Bowl Champions: Indianapolis ColtsThat's a pretty good stat.

No, its meaningless after kickoff day 1 of the 2007 season. Still, nice try. I consider the "Dallas beat a 9-0, eventual SB champion Indy Colts last year" a much better stat, it shows the powerful home field advantage that Dallas has, even if, again, that was last year, and completely different teams than this year.

 

[eom]

ok, this thread was a joke before last night's game, but after that embarrassment it's just spam.

I would like to add one thing, though ---- cle sucked last year, frye, sux, and now cle pretty much has the suck label tattooed on them.

well, that suck team has beaten cincy and baltimore this year.

so, exactly which teams in the afc do the pats have to blow out that don't suck, if the chargers, cleveland, and cincy suck so badly?

I'll start the list for you:

indy....

?

?

dallas was damn lucky to escape buffalo alive, for christsake.

I don't even think they have any first string starters left at this point, and they weren't that great before the injuries.

 

[{Syrus}]

ok, this thread was a joke before last night's game, but after that embarrassment it's just spam.

You are the most immature person in thsi thread. God forbid one 5-0 team playing at home be able to beat another 5-0 team, yeah that's a complete joke to think that. The best thing about this situation its that it gets going to get settled on the field in a matter of days. Who cares about Buffalo and Cleveland anymore. This will be settled on the field. I just hope Pats fans don't go into hiding after the game and come get their crow served up nice and cold.

 

[Ghost Rider]

ok, this thread was a joke before last night's game, but after that embarrassment it's just spam.

You are the most immature person in thsi thread.

In the entire forum, actually. I am guessing the classy Patriots fans here (there are some, believe it or not! ) cringe every time this guy posts about the Patriots. God bless the Ignore function. :X

 

[Big Daddy Kane]

ok, this thread was a joke before last night's game, but after that embarrassment it's just spam.I would like to add one thing, though ---- cle sucked last year, frye, sux, and now cle pretty much has the suck label tattooed on them.well, that suck team has beaten cincy and baltimore this year.so, exactly which teams in the afc do the pats have to blow out that don't suck, if the chargers, cleveland, and cincy suck so badly?I'll start the list for you:indy....??dallas was damn lucky to escape buffalo alive, for christsake.I don't even think they have any first string starters left at this point, and they weren't that great before the injuries.

Getcha popcorn ready.

 

[Bad_Mo]

The last MNF game was a heck of a game to watch.

Bottom line, however, is that the best team in the NFC severely struggled against a very average AFC team. NE wins this game easily, IMO. The Cowboys are the 5th best team in the league - at best.

 

[{Syrus}]

The last MNF game was a heck of a game to watch. NE wins this game easily, IMO. The Cowboys are the 5th best team in the league - at best.

At best, you're completely wrong.

 

[eom]

I just hope Pats fans don't go into hiding after the game and come get their crow served up nice and cold.

put up the sig or shut up.after the game I think I'll be adding to mine one way or the other....

 

[-Crippler-]

what a dumb thread

 

[{Syrus}]

I just hope Pats fans don't go into hiding after the game and come get their crow served up nice and cold.

put up the sig or shut up.after the game I think I'll be adding to mine one way or the other....

Sig bets are worthless, put some money up on the game. Otherwise go home. I'll put money on Dallas, say $100. You taking my bet? Or shut up.

 

[{Syrus}]

6 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

4 Members: fred_1_15301, {Syrus}, eom, Real Man of Genius

Let's see what lame excuse he comes up with not to take my bet.

 

[eom]

yeah, I'm betting money w/some anonymous goof on the net.

your virtual hundred bucks is worthless, and just your excuse to weasel out of an actual internet bet.

believe it or not, I can actually bet real money OFF the net, what I can't get off the net is the satisfaction of you acknowledging brady as your master.

sig + av -- put up or shut up.

if you need the hundred so bad, get a job.

edit ps

you're not gettin' points.

 

[{Syrus}]

yeah, I'm betting money w/some anonymous goof on the net.your virtual hundred bucks is worthless, and just your excuse to weasel out of an actual internet bet.believe it or not, I can actually bet real money OFF the net, what I can't get off the net is the satisfaction of you acknowledging brady as your master.sig + av -- put up or shut up.if you need the hundred so bad, get a job.edit psyou're not gettin' points.

That's what I thought. Time for you to shut up.

 

[eom]

oh no --- that's what I thought.......

 

[Big Daddy Kane]

edit psyou're not gettin' points.

Hilarious. We've gone form the Pats are the best teamin the NFL and will destroy Dallas handedly, to not even giving points, haha. Losing confidence by the day eom??

 

[eom]

no confidence lost --- this is a bet about which is the better team and I'm not having some guy cash in on how great dallas is because they only just barely lost to the mighty pats.

use a little common sense.

doesn't matter as there is no way either of you boys aficionados are going to do more than yap.

 

[Big Daddy Kane]

just barely lost to the mighty pats.

You're not even making sense anymore and are now contradicting your original position that the Pats are going to destroy Dallas. A "mighty Pats" won't allow Dallas to "just barely [lose]" and if you're not confident about that then you need to reevaluate your definition of what a "mighty" football team is. At this point, you're afraid of the 6-7 point spread. Seems to me you aren't all so confident in your Pats, that's about the most truthful thing you've suggested in this entire thread. Congrats.

 

[eom]

seems to me you've now gone from expecting a win, to hoping your team can come w/i a td ---- I guess that'd be victory to most dallas fans right now.

not getting blown out.

that is a loser's mentality.

 

[simmonjm]

The last MNF game was a heck of a game to watch.Bottom line, however, is that the best team in the NFC severely struggled against a very average AFC team. NE wins this game easily, IMO. The Cowboys are the 5th best team in the league - at best.

So does that mean the Cards are the 3rd best team in the league because they beat the Steelers who a majority think are the 3rd best team in the AFC? What now im confused because you said was the Cowboys were the best team in the NFC?

 

[Phlash]

I just hope Pats fans don't go into hiding after the game and come get their crow served up nice and cold.

put up the sig or shut up.after the game I think I'll be adding to mine one way or the other....

Sig bets are worthless, put some money up on the game. Otherwise go home. I'll put money on Dallas, say $100. You taking my bet? Or shut up.

$100? Easy money, I'll take NEHow can I be sure that you aren't going to back out once NE wins? PM me please for further details on how you can guarantee you have the money - I guarantee I do.

 

[{Syrus}]

seems to me you've now gone from expecting a win, to hoping your team can come w/i a td ---- I guess that'd be victory to most dallas fans right now.not getting blown out.that is a loser's mentality.

How quickly you back off your stance that the Patriots are mighty and will crush Dallas as soon as money is mentioned. In other words, you're just another Pats fan full of hot air that talks the talk, but won't walk the walk. This Dallas team is a better team than the one that beat the undefeated Indianapolis Colts last year, oh yeah the Colts who sent the Patsies home in the playoffs. Can't wait for Tom Brady head hangin' low on hiw way back to Foxboro after Sundays game.

 

[simmonjm]

yeah, I'm betting money w/some anonymous goof on the net.your virtual hundred bucks is worthless, and just your excuse to weasel out of an actual internet bet.believe it or not, I can actually bet real money OFF the net, what I can't get off the net is the satisfaction of you acknowledging brady as your master.sig + av -- put up or shut up.if you need the hundred so bad, get a job.edit psyou're not gettin' points.

I will be willing to do a sig bet with ya. If the Cowboys win outright here is your sig"The 2007 Patriots are significantly over hyped in every facet of the game. It was crazy talk to even suggest the Patriots had a shot at going undefeated. I was guilty of hyperbole when describing the Patriots during their 5-0 win streak but since going to Dallas I have learned my lesson and realize the Patriots are classless known cheaters and are quite simply not that good. A first round loss in the playoffs would be a successful season for any Pats fan. I heart Tony Romo."

 

[{Syrus}]

I just hope Pats fans don't go into hiding after the game and come get their crow served up nice and cold.

put up the sig or shut up.after the game I think I'll be adding to mine one way or the other....

Sig bets are worthless, put some money up on the game. Otherwise go home. I'll put money on Dallas, say $100. You taking my bet? Or shut up.

$100? Easy money, I'll take NEHow can I be sure that you aren't going to back out once NE wins? PM me please for further details on how you can guarantee you have the money - I guarantee I do.

Did I offer you the bet? No. That bet is for eom, which he dodged.

 

[eom]

Did I offer you the bet? No. That bet is for eom, which he dodged.

hahahahahaha...now look who's dodging!didn't think anybody would take your charity, did you?hey --- whoever it was that's taking your money had better run a credit check.

 

[eom]

I will be willing to do a sig bet with ya. If the Cowboys win outright here is your sig"The 2007 Patriots are significantly over hyped in every facet of the game. It was crazy talk to even suggest the Patriots had a shot at going undefeated. I was guilty of hyperbole when describing the Patriots during their 5-0 win streak but since going to Dallas I have learned my lesson and realize the Patriots are classless known cheaters and are quite simply not that good. A first round loss in the playoffs would be a successful season for any Pats fan. I heart Tony Romo."

done and done, sir.but I'm not in dallas....also, av's --- I'll find you one that's not pornographic.probably brady's rugged countenance.your sig will read "I am Tom Brady's 8itch!"and here's the catch............if you win, I will keep these until dallas loses a game.when I win, you will keep yours until the final second of the next pats loss.nice to see at least one dallas fan w/a little testicular fortitude.

 

[ChrisHenrysDD]

There was not one point in this entire game where the Patriots were in any danger of losing, not one, not for a second. In the NFL, that alone counts as "impressive" in my book. If he doesn't find that "impressive" I have no idea what he wants to happen? 71-0 college style beating perhaps?

Sorry I think they should have won been up by more than 10 at the end based on the pedistool they have been put on around here.And please stop responding to my posts. Your 'reading comprehension' crap in the other thread was enough to show your bias.If you don't like what I have to say, then please put me on ignore. It won't hurt my ego, trust me.

Fair enough, Dave and/or Ken. And I agree, I am totally biased towards idiots.P.S. You make baby spelling and baby diction cry.