Bad blocking from the backup center.anyone watching the game? i see he had a huge TD. then i saw that Manning got sacked. was that bad pass pro from Wilson?
Nicks made a sick one handed catch on this play. It was his only catch but he played strong and earned at least 3 defensive pass interference calls against Kyle Wilson.Unfortunately missed the game until now while out at a BBQ. Then again, since Sehorn, I try to avoid this game.
Other than the great run by Wilson (have to love this guys upside and medium to long term prospects), any key observations? How long was the 1st team in, and what was the RB split.
Also, how did Nicks look and how many snaps/looks did Reuben get with he first team?
TIA
Seriously? We all knew he could drop 84 yard runs like I drop a deuce? You've been around these boards too long for me to doubt your intelligence, but I have to ask. Have you been drinking? Smoking crack? "We all knew he could bust off an 84 yarder, but until he shows me he can push one in from 1 yard, he just isn't that special." I need you to sober up and come back to this thread and comment again, because that stuff you just said was ridiculous.It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
Calm down Clown. I was being a bit sensationalistic. My point is, we all knew Wilson was a home run threat. But 84 yard runs aren't going to happen consistently. And if Coughlin gives Andre Brown all the goal line work, it's going to keep Wilson's value down from where it could be. That was my point. Now how about you? Everything ok at home? You seem a bit uptight.Seriously? We all knew he could drop 84 yard runs like I drop a deuce? You've been around these boards too long for me to doubt your intelligence, but I have to ask. Have you been drinking? Smoking crack? "We all knew he could bust off an 84 yarder, but until he shows me he can push one in from 1 yard, he just isn't that special." I need you to sober up and come back to this thread and comment again, because that stuff you just said was ridiculous.It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
I agree. I think he ceiling is around RB10 if he doesn't get the goalline stuff. If he does get it, his ceiling is much higher.Calm down Clown. I was being a bit sensationalistic. My point is, we all knew Wilson was a home run threat. But 84 yard runs aren't going to happen consistently. And if Coughlin gives Andre Brown all the goal line work, it's going to keep Wilson's value down from where it could be. That was my point.Now how about you? Everything ok at home? You seem a bit uptight.Seriously? We all knew he could drop 84 yard runs like I drop a deuce? You've been around these boards too long for me to doubt your intelligence, but I have to ask. Have you been drinking? Smoking crack? "We all knew he could bust off an 84 yarder, but until he shows me he can push one in from 1 yard, he just isn't that special." I need you to sober up and come back to this thread and comment again, because that stuff you just said was ridiculous.It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
Not saying it will change Browns role, but he hasn't been producing much in short yardage situations so far this offseason.It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
Giants have been terrible at short yardage for years, even when the starters have been healthy. From the looks of it, they might rely more on Eli's arm in short yardage than the RB's if things don't improve.Not saying it will change Browns role, but he hasn't been producing much in short yardage situations so far this offseason.It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
Yeah, there might have been some alcohol involved in that post. Sorry, buddy. Just another example of never drinking and posting!Calm down Clown. I was being a bit sensationalistic. My point is, we all knew Wilson was a home run threat. But 84 yard runs aren't going to happen consistently. And if Coughlin gives Andre Brown all the goal line work, it's going to keep Wilson's value down from where it could be. That was my point.Now how about you? Everything ok at home? You seem a bit uptight.Seriously? We all knew he could drop 84 yard runs like I drop a deuce? You've been around these boards too long for me to doubt your intelligence, but I have to ask. Have you been drinking? Smoking crack? "We all knew he could bust off an 84 yarder, but until he shows me he can push one in from 1 yard, he just isn't that special." I need you to sober up and come back to this thread and comment again, because that stuff you just said was ridiculous.It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
Same with my rebuttal. Sorry Bud. I violated my post-midnight on weekends posting rule. Good luck this season.Yeah, there might have been some alcohol involved in that post. Sorry, buddy. Just another example of never drinking and posting!Calm down Clown. I was being a bit sensationalistic. My point is, we all knew Wilson was a home run threat. But 84 yard runs aren't going to happen consistently. And if Coughlin gives Andre Brown all the goal line work, it's going to keep Wilson's value down from where it could be. That was my point.Now how about you? Everything ok at home? You seem a bit uptight.Seriously? We all knew he could drop 84 yard runs like I drop a deuce? You've been around these boards too long for me to doubt your intelligence, but I have to ask. Have you been drinking? Smoking crack? "We all knew he could bust off an 84 yarder, but until he shows me he can push one in from 1 yard, he just isn't that special." I need you to sober up and come back to this thread and comment again, because that stuff you just said was ridiculous.It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
 
 I hear you. You'd think being on these boards for more than a decade, I would know better!Same with my rebuttal. Sorry Bud. I violated my post-midnight on weekends posting rule. Good luck this season.Yeah, there might have been some alcohol involved in that post. Sorry, buddy. Just another example of never drinking and posting!Calm down Clown. I was being a bit sensationalistic. My point is, we all knew Wilson was a home run threat. But 84 yard runs aren't going to happen consistently. And if Coughlin gives Andre Brown all the goal line work, it's going to keep Wilson's value down from where it could be. That was my point.Now how about you? Everything ok at home? You seem a bit uptight.Seriously? We all knew he could drop 84 yard runs like I drop a deuce? You've been around these boards too long for me to doubt your intelligence, but I have to ask. Have you been drinking? Smoking crack? "We all knew he could bust off an 84 yarder, but until he shows me he can push one in from 1 yard, he just isn't that special." I need you to sober up and come back to this thread and comment again, because that stuff you just said was ridiculous.It would excite me more to see him score on a one yard run. We all knew he could do that. If Brown isn't vultering all of his goal line carries, Wilson could be a top 5-8 back.
with the same number of touches, it would be the other way aroundSo is Wilson Doug Martin lite this year?
It's going to be difficult for the NY Giants' coaching staff to justify keeping Wilson off the field if he keeps making explosive plays. 84 yard TD runs, 20 yard rips, making people miss on receptions, etc.with the same number of touches, it would be the other way aroundSo is Wilson Doug Martin lite this year?
Nicely played, sir. Nicely played.His pass protection on that run was awful
Agreed. Especially if Eli continues to struggle. They are going to need to get some explosive plays some how and if they can't do it on Eli's arm, they certainly aren't going to rely on Brown. I view Brown as a safety blanket of sorts for Coughlin but with every big play from Wilson, the grip on the blanket loosens a bit more.I would think Wilson owners would be feeling even more confident these days. Kid is special, and I think there is little chance he doesn't get 65-70% of the work this year. Too good to bench unless he needs the rest.
I'm pretty confident (95%) that neither guy ran in the 4.3's at the combine. I remember being a bit disappointed when I saw Wilson's numbers and I remember thinking that Brown had good speed for a bigger, power back. And Oakland would have drafted both of these guys had they done so.So if we're being completely honest here... it seems that either NFL.com is posting slower speeds for both players or NFLdrafts.com is posting faster speeds for both players. Cause NFLdrafts shows Wilson with a 4.38 and Brown with a 4.37. While NFL.com shows both with a 4.49. Either way 40 times mean nothing to me as they're always ALL over the place for players. Watch game tape, it's very clear that when WIlson breaks through the front 7 nobody is catching him. I don't care if his 40 speed shows as 4.1 or 5.9 on tape and in game he's one of the fastest guys on the field. Brown doesn't have this same game breaking speed on tape.I really don't recall which site I saw the times I just remember being surprised that Brown ran faster than WilsonAccording to http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/andre-brown?id=71225, Brown ran a 4.49 in the 40.I would guess that he might not be faster since the Achilles injury but Brown ran a faster 40 time at the combine than Wilson.What? Brown is faster than Wilson???He's probably a thicker Javid Best, all hype brief flashes and whole lot of nothing. Don't be like the rest of the Wilson worshipers and ignore the guy next to him that's faster, 20 pounds heavier with better hands... especially in non-ppr. Let someone else in your league figure it out.I have no idea what to make of Wilson, one minute I like him and the next I am down. I am pretty sure in my big money league, I am going to be faced with a decision to draft him at a decent value have no clue what to do. Can anyone that has followed him closely give me a brief final thought on him? This thread is really long and off the rails at times.
Wilson ran 4.49
Brown ran 4.37
According to http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=89855&draftyear=2012&genpos=RB, Wilson ran a 4.38 in the 40.
Not sure where you got your data, but would be interested to see your sources.
Here are a few sites with the times I posted though
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=11382&draftyear=2009&genpos=rb
http://nflcombineresults.com/playerpage.php?f=Andre&l=Brown&i=8149
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/david-wilson?id=2533035
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/david-wilson?id=2533035
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1081507-david-wilson-combine-explosive-rbs-big-day-will-shoot-him-up-draft-boards
Point is: some people are better at combine numbers and some people are better at actual in game performance. The in game performance is what actually matters in both fantasy and real football.
The brain trust of the SP is absolutely adamant that there is no such thing as being injury prone though. So Andre Brown, Hakeem Nicks, Miles Austin, Darren McFadden, Ryan Mathews...these guys are no more prone to injury than, say Chris Johnson or Roddy White.Time Kibitzer said:The thing about Brown is that history tells us he's all but certain to get injured at some point this season for an extended period, like he has in every single one of his prior 4 NFL seasons. So even if Andre Brown starts the season as the 3rd down back and goal line back, Wilson's all but assuredly going to get an opportunity to be the team's bell cow back at some point in this season, only question is whether or not he takes full advantage of the opportunity.
 
 I am pretty sure that Wilson would have scored on the 2nd and Goal from the 4 the other night. There was a hole and Brown was just way to slow to hit it. I think Torrain would have scored also he was hitting the holes hardBrown has been struggling a bit in short yardage situations this preseason. All that talk about Brown being the definite goal line guy may be premature and presumptuous. We'll see come week 1.
It's football ... They are all prone to injury. Was Stevie Brown injury prone? Is he now?The brain trust of the SP is absolutely adamant that there is no such thing as being injury prone though. So Andre Brown, Hakeem Nicks, Miles Austin, Darren McFadden, Ryan Mathews...these guys are no more prone to injury than, say Chris Johnson or Roddy White.Time Kibitzer said:The thing about Brown is that history tells us he's all but certain to get injured at some point this season for an extended period, like he has in every single one of his prior 4 NFL seasons. So even if Andre Brown starts the season as the 3rd down back and goal line back, Wilson's all but assuredly going to get an opportunity to be the team's bell cow back at some point in this season, only question is whether or not he takes full advantage of the opportunity.

I think that Wilson's value will continue to increase over the season. I want to know who will be in the game when the score is close and there is 5 minutes left on the clock. Also, what happens the next time Andre Brown gets a dinger and misses a few games?Brown has been struggling a bit in short yardage situations this preseason. All that talk about Brown being the definite goal line guy may be premature and presumptuous. We'll see come week 1.
Ignore the "it's football' because that variable applies to all players. Yes, some players have bad luck but there are also injury prone players. Why does Chris Johnson stay healthy as a small runner? He has the quick twitch ability to duck the heaviest impacts. The bodies and minds of players are different and these are the variables to look at when it comes to the "injury prone" label.It's football ... They are all prone to injury. Was Stevie Brown injury prone? Is he now?The brain trust of the SP is absolutely adamant that there is no such thing as being injury prone though. So Andre Brown, Hakeem Nicks, Miles Austin, Darren McFadden, Ryan Mathews...these guys are no more prone to injury than, say Chris Johnson or Roddy White.Time Kibitzer said:The thing about Brown is that history tells us he's all but certain to get injured at some point this season for an extended period, like he has in every single one of his prior 4 NFL seasons. So even if Andre Brown starts the season as the 3rd down back and goal line back, Wilson's all but assuredly going to get an opportunity to be the team's bell cow back at some point in this season, only question is whether or not he takes full advantage of the opportunity.

Possible. With the Giants terrible track record of being able to punch it in on short yardage, perhaps the smaller RB that gets lost behind the line will be more effective than the bigger back.I am pretty sure that Wilson would have scored on the 2nd and Goal from the 4 the other night. There was a hole and Brown was just way to slow to hit it. I think Torrain would have scored also he was hitting the holes hardBrown has been struggling a bit in short yardage situations this preseason. All that talk about Brown being the definite goal line guy may be premature and presumptuous. We'll see come week 1.
Hasn't totally been determined yet, but he's been largely off KR duty since preseason started. Undoubtedly due to his role in the running game.Do we know if Wilson will be returning kicks? I'd rather him not, if he's on my fantasy team.
Discussed here.Do we know if Wilson will be returning kicks? I'd rather him not, if he's on my fantasy team.
This would be a huge benefit for Wilson. Most of us have never doubted Wilson's ability, but rather what his actual role this year would be. To say it for about the thousanth time, if he is limited in 3rd Down and Goal Lines, the ceiling really is limited and talk of "elite" and "top 5" or even must into the top 10 becomes tough to see.Brown has been struggling a bit in short yardage situations this preseason. All that talk about Brown being the definite goal line guy may be premature and presumptuous. We'll see come week 1.
For me at least, the threat is not the split, but the role. If Brown continues to get 3rd down and GL, that really limits Wilson fantasy wise. Moreso than going from a 60/40 split to a 70/30 or something like that.Brown is proving to be less of a threat than I thought he'd be. I still think we're looking at 66/33 on the early down work, favoring Wilson, with Brown getting 3rd and GL work. It makes sense for the Giants to keep their homerun hitter hitting homeruns, and not taking a bigger beating that he needs to.
I'd agree. But I think it could have proven to be more than simply role. I think the "leash" is tighter depending on who the backup is. Right now, it looks like Wilson gives them a much better chance to win games. Where a fumble or missed block could have been really damning, the Giants might be more willing to take the bad with the good, when the backup is so much less effective.For me at least, the threat is not the split, but the role. If Brown continues to get 3rd down and GL, that really limits Wilson fantasy wise. Moreso than going from a 60/40 split to a 70/30 or something like that.Brown is proving to be less of a threat than I thought he'd be. I still think we're looking at 66/33 on the early down work, favoring Wilson, with Brown getting 3rd and GL work. It makes sense for the Giants to keep their homerun hitter hitting homeruns, and not taking a bigger beating that he needs to.
I could have it wroing, but IIRC when Tiki first became a feature back, Ron Dayne was supposed to be the goal line guy, but obviously he sucked and Tiki was the do it all guy. Tiki starting developing fumbilitis, and after being drafted, Jacbos getting that role. But Jacobs, after one year with 15 TDs wasn't very adept at the stripe and Tiki became the goal line guy again. Then Tiki retired.Going back to Tiki's great years, do fellow Giants fans recall how he was used at the goaline. I know it was not his job primarily, but I do believe he got some looks there.
I took him at 2.14 in a 15-team league, which is pick# 29. Translates to 3.5 in a 12-teamer, and 3.9 in a 10-teamer.Is 3.03 In A 10 Team A Reach?
It's not a reach if you don't think he'll be there at 4.08. Do up a mock factoring in your other owner's tendencies/protected players. Sometimes you have to reach a little to get your guy.Is 3.03 In A 10 Team A Reach?
Even as a Wilson owner, I recognize that Brown remains very much a threat. We FBGs can debate it until the cows come home, but it only matters what Coughlin thinks/does and he seems committed to somewhat of a timeshare.Andre Brown supporters are suddenly pretty quiet lol. Maybe they are finally starting to realise how silly the idea is/was that Brown is a real threat to Wilson.
