M
mojorizin
Guest
Hopefully we can stop talking about that stiff Lelie. Watts, to this point in the preseason is everything that chump is NOT.
Hey I took alot of crap last year on this board. I said Portis would be gone and Q would start because Shanahan wouldn't let Portis be a ##### that he is. And I was laughed off the board. But who's getting the last laugh now? :rotflmao:Bro, I'm on your side and all but you're really getting sickening now.Take your foot off of our throats please.Oh yeah and QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ looks good again! Where's Pony Boy???
Lelie is SOOOO overrated.Is he any better than former Bronco first round bust: Marcus Nash ?!?!?Watts is going to have to step up, because I don't see Lelie doing it.
guess they were WRONG lol!NFL.com is predicting the future lol1-3-DEN 3 (5:31) W.McGahee up the middle to DEN 1 for 2 yards (R.Hayward, D.Williams). Play Challenged by BUF and REVERSED. W.McGahee up the middle for 3 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Yep, Henry will definitely have a new address next year providing that Willis stays healthy. One place he will NOT be is Miami. Buffalo would never be that stupid.lol @ the camera crew immediately panning to get T. Henry's reaction when McGahee punched it in. :rotflmao:
:rotflmao: GB reminders why I don't hang out in the Shark PoolWatts looks so impressive. Every bad throw that I have seen come his way, he has caught. He seems to adjust to the ball with ease. Barring injury, Watts will be a top 15 WR in 2005!!!
I believe it was the 2nd teamwas the McGahee TD against the first team defense or 2nd team defense?
Being the best fantasy football magazine is really not that much to brag about...Fantasy Football Index is the "Bible" of Fantasy Football Magazines.... my ####!
Watts has a chance to replace Lelie NEXT WEEK.McG looked pretty good, and it is apparent to me he will be the feature back in Buffalo next year. But, he ran against the second string D. There us stuff there it get excited about, for sure. The next two preseason games will tell more towards how much he'll eat into Henry this year.Hearst came in to replace Q, I don't recall seeing Anderson in at all, but NFL.com reports one carry. I'd say it is clear that Anderson is not being taken seriously for a starting role, but he is being given more work than last year. Droughs is handling the fullback role solo very well - catches and blocks better than Anderson did last year.Hearst had one nice run where he squirted through what appeared to be no hole, and two runs where he looked like a 33 year old back - all those runs were versus the Bills' 2nd string D. In all, my impression is that Quentin now has a stranglehold on the starting job - the RB is asked to run off tackle in this offense - one cut either inside or out - and Griffin's cuts are cleaner, crisper, and he has more burst to the outside to make defenders miss. He averaged nearly 5/carry versus the Bills' first string, which is pretty darned good.is it preposterous to think that Watts has a chance to supplant Lelie during the year? Lelie hasn't really shown me much and I know Shanny wasn't happy with his year last year.
W. McGahee 8 for 24 and 1 td
T. Henry 6 for 6
McGahee owners should be getting excited!
Henry owners should trade for McGahee now, before his stock goes up more than Henry.
1st team defense vs. 2nd team defense - Henry had no holes against the first team Denver D.I wouldn't get too carried away. One ran against a good 1st team defense and the other ran against the backups. McGahee looked pretty good but nothing to supplant Henry as the starter.
W. McGahee 8 for 24 and 1 td
T. Henry 6 for 6
McGahee owners should be getting excited!
Henry owners should trade for McGahee now, before his stock goes up more than Henry.
That's a virtual impossibility for McGahee backers - the hype machine will be in full force this evening and tomorrow.- see how many "21" Jerseys were in the crowd versus "20"?- hear how loud the crowd was when McG came in?That wil be a year long battle from the Buffalo media and fans that they want more McG.I wouldn't get too carried away.
The question is why?DJ Williams(another rookie) put McGahee on his back once and then even falling sideways, kept him out of the endzone.
W. McGahee 8 for 24 and 1 td
T. Henry 6 for 6
McGahee owners should be getting excited!
Henry owners should trade for McGahee now, before his stock goes up more than Henry.
3 YPC...yipee!!!
W. McGahee 8 for 24 and 1 td
T. Henry 6 for 6
McGahee owners should be getting excited!
Henry owners should trade for McGahee now, before his stock goes up more than Henry.

I have to wonder if we're watching the same game. I don't see anywhere near the burst he had at UM. I see a guy with excellent vision, but he's running "cautiously" in my estimation. That's all to be expected, however. It is his first full organized game since the injury.There's that burst. Willis is literally looking better on every carry. He's getting more & more confident.![]()
W. McGahee 13 carries 58 yards 1 TDLongest run - 16 yards3 YPC...yipee!!!
W. McGahee 8 for 24 and 1 td
T. Henry 6 for 6
McGahee owners should be getting excited!
Henry owners should trade for McGahee now, before his stock goes up more than Henry.![]()
:rotflmao: I hate this forum.
W. McGahee 8 for 24 and 1 td
T. Henry 6 for 6
McGahee owners should be getting excited!
Henry owners should trade for McGahee now, before his stock goes up more than Henry.
W. McGahee 8 for 24 and 1 td
T. Henry 6 for 6
McGahee owners should be getting excited!
Henry owners should trade for McGahee now, before his stock goes up more than Henry.

Yes, I'm watching the same game. The particular run I'm talking about he did have very good burst. The announcers mentioned his "acceleration" on the same play. It would be better if we all forgot about Henry vs. McGahee & just evaluated how each one looks (granted, Henry had very few chances).I have to wonder if we're watching the same game. I don't see anywhere near the burst he had at UM. I see a guy with excellent vision, but he's running "cautiously" in my estimation. That's all to be expected, however. It is his first full organized game since the injury.There's that burst. Willis is literally looking better on every carry. He's getting more & more confident.![]()
Yes, I'm watching the same game. The particular run I'm talking about he did have very good burst. The announcers mentioned his "acceleration" on the same play. It would be better if we all forgot about Henry vs. McGahee & just evaluated how each one looks (granted, Henry had very few chances).I have to wonder if we're watching the same game. I don't see anywhere near the burst he had at UM. I see a guy with excellent vision, but he's running "cautiously" in my estimation. That's all to be expected, however. It is his first full organized game since the injury.There's that burst. Willis is literally looking better on every carry. He's getting more & more confident.![]()
That is what preseason is all about judging how players look.I don't believe I even mentioned Henry.Yes, I'm watching the same game. The particular run I'm talking about he did have very good burst. The announcers mentioned his "acceleration" on the same play. It would be better if we all forgot about Henry vs. McGahee & just evaluated how each one looks (granted, Henry had very few chances).I have to wonder if we're watching the same game. I don't see anywhere near the burst he had at UM. I see a guy with excellent vision, but he's running "cautiously" in my estimation. That's all to be expected, however. It is his first full organized game since the injury.There's that burst. Willis is literally looking better on every carry. He's getting more & more confident.![]()
) But if Griffin progresses throughout the preseason like he did from last week to this week, I think DEN will have a decent RB in the backfield for them.I'm not talking about you. There's a lot of people that get into the war of the RBs thing, though. Some people are against one or the other & it envolves into something it shouldn't. I see it a lot with Griffin & the other Denver RBs &, of course, with Henry/McGahee.Like I said, I believe it's better to stay cool & evaluate the situation as it progresses. Disagreements are fine, but it doesn't need to get out of control (like I sometimes see). My .02, anyway.I don't believe I even mentioned Henry.Yes, I'm watching the same game. The particular run I'm talking about he did have very good burst. The announcers mentioned his "acceleration" on the same play. It would be better if we all forgot about Henry vs. McGahee & just evaluated how each one looks (granted, Henry had very few chances).I have to wonder if we're watching the same game. I don't see anywhere near the burst he had at UM. I see a guy with excellent vision, but he's running "cautiously" in my estimation. That's all to be expected, however. It is his first full organized game since the injury.There's that burst. Willis is literally looking better on every carry. He's getting more & more confident.![]()
I don't think most people are saying that McGahee is going to take the job right away. The point is that Henry has risk, which Henry supporters don't seem to want to admit.McGahee is going to share some of the load with Henry, and if the Buffalo brass feels he gives them a better chance to win games then it is possible that McGahee will get the majority of those carries. They don't have to show any loyalty to Henry, even he knows his days as a Bill are numbered. He won't accept anything but being a feature back, as evidenced by his #####ing and moaning in the press this past week. That combined with the fact that the Buffalo staff says that both are going to get work seems to imply to me that Henry will not be happy.If Henry keeps up his #####ing it will make it that much easier for Buffalo to work McGahee in more extensively throughout the year. Even if Henry learns to keep his mouth shut once Buffalo falls out of contention McGahee will get the bulk of the work IMO.I think Henry is a very solid RB, it just sucks for him that if McGahee is healthy he is more talented and has the ability to become elite, something Henry doesn't have.I don't get how people feel there is no way that McGahee will significantly effect Henry's numbers, at least at some point this season.Buffalo out of contention = McGahee getting the bulk of workEven if Buffalo is in contention it isn't too far fetched to think that McGahee could take over.Henry = tons of risk this year, and i'm not basing it at all on tonights game, he's had a ton of risk all offseason.I still don't think Henry owners should sweat it. At least not right away. If McGahee takes over I think it will have to be by injury because I don't think they will give him the full load that fast. They did give him a good load tonight and tested that knee.