What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Denarius Moore - CIncinnatti Bengals (1 Viewer)

What does MASSRAIDER think? I thought Moore would stay the number one?

Another reason you can't get too excited about a rookie that blows up when the other receivers are hurt.

No doubt he has talent but they are a running team and looks like DHB is finally playing like their number one. The Randy Moss comparisons are not accurate...or the commitment to the big play just isn't there.
well he played the most snaps of any wr, 51 to dhb's 48, so its not like he was relegated. the problem is that hes either not getting open or campbell is not inclined to find him. the injured players coming back did not cut into his playing time at all, and its actually increased.
I think what it is, is that opposing defenses are so scared of Moore's big play ability, that coverage is always rolled to him. This leaves things open for McFadden, DHB, Shillens, Murphy, Ford, Boss, Hagan. Jackson likes having him on the field, even just as a decoy.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Defenses are gameplanning against Denarius freakin' Moore and that's opening holes for DARREN MCFADDEN?

Just try to say that out loud without laughing.

I defenses are gameplanning against Bernard Berrian over in Minnesota too, leaving things wide open for Peterson?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'McBokonon said:
'Sarnoff said:
How's his matchup this week vs CLE?
The Browns will have Joe Haden on him and likely take him down with a tranquilizer dart, as well.
Haden plays lcb and stays there. He will be playing up against the right wide receiver. Do Oaklands wr's stay on a particular side or do they switch around? DHB played lwr on his td.
 
'The Man With No Name said:
How's his matchup this week vs CLE?
The Browns will have Joe Haden on him and likely take him down with a tranquilizer dart, as well.
Haden plays lcb and stays there. He will be playing up against the right wide receiver. Do Oaklands wr's stay on a particular side or do they switch around? DHB played lwr on his td.
From what I recall of the NE game, I saw Moore lining up on the right most of the time, coupled with Campbell seeming to look only middle-left(DHB) most of the day.
 
according to pff, denarius plays on the right and dhb on the left. this is in-line with dhb being the starter and every down wr, while moore comes in on 2 wr sets.

 
'The Man With No Name said:
How's his matchup this week vs CLE?
The Browns will have Joe Haden on him and likely take him down with a tranquilizer dart, as well.
Haden plays lcb and stays there. He will be playing up against the right wide receiver. Do Oaklands wr's stay on a particular side or do they switch around? DHB played lwr on his td.
They move around.
DHB was on the left for every snap he was on the field the last three weeks.
 
'The Man With No Name said:
How's his matchup this week vs CLE?
The Browns will have Joe Haden on him and likely take him down with a tranquilizer dart, as well.
Haden plays lcb and stays there. He will be playing up against the right wide receiver. Do Oaklands wr's stay on a particular side or do they switch around? DHB played lwr on his td.
this is no longer true. also he may not even play this week.
 
'The Man With No Name said:
How's his matchup this week vs CLE?
The Browns will have Joe Haden on him and likely take him down with a tranquilizer dart, as well.
Haden plays lcb and stays there. He will be playing up against the right wide receiver. Do Oaklands wr's stay on a particular side or do they switch around? DHB played lwr on his td.
They move around.
DHB was on the left for every snap he was on the field the last three weeks.
Then he wasn't in when Moore had passes thrown his way on the left. I just watched the game last night. Moore moves around. It's actually not surprising that Bey doesn't. That would really confuse his hand eye coordination, asking him to turn to his left ot track teh ball after turning to his right all year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'The Man With No Name said:
How's his matchup this week vs CLE?
The Browns will have Joe Haden on him and likely take him down with a tranquilizer dart, as well.
Haden plays lcb and stays there. He will be playing up against the right wide receiver. Do Oaklands wr's stay on a particular side or do they switch around? DHB played lwr on his td.
They move around.
DHB was on the left for every snap he was on the field the last three weeks.
Then he wasn't in when Moore had passes thrown his way on the left. I just watched the game last night. Moore moves around. It's actually not surprising that Bey doesn't. That would really confuse his hand eye coordination, asking him to turn to his left ot track teh ball after turning to his right all year.
Or, they possibly have twins left formations in the playbook?
 
Oakland is a power run offense.

Oakland is going to run, screen to RB, run, run, play action pass, then run again.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but if you are looking for any WR in Oakland to consistently produce you need to look elsewhere. The power run offense will setup good weeks for the WR, but only one at a time and far and few between. It will be DHB one week, Ford the following, and Chaz the next; a then hell even Hagan and Muphy will have their day.

If you happen to start one and hit their hot week, you are lucky an sell high.

If you want to take a flier look at a high powered passing offense.

 
^^^^^

No offense but you may be missing out on this one.

Like some of these Raiders homers have been saying (and I've been watching all their games too b/c I'm a DMC owner), DHB has been starting to show it CONSISTENTLY. He looks like he finally "gets it" or the game started "slowing down" for him. He's attacking the ball in the air. And they definitely throw to him CONSISTENTLY.

I too thought it was going to be D. Moore earlier in the year since he was showing so much promise in camps and then came out gang busters early on. But the sneaky play here is DHB. I think he could close out the year putting up low end WR1 numbers. :shock: :shock: :shock:

 
I am a big DHB fan but you are going overboard with the WR1 stuff . . .

like many others have mentioned, its a run first offense, and usually you arent a WR1 in those types of offenses unless you are a great talent - at best, DHB is a good receiver . . .

i think he's a WR3 the rest of the way, but no more . . .

 
What does MASSRAIDER think? I thought Moore would stay the number one?

Another reason you can't get too excited about a rookie that blows up when the other receivers are hurt.

No doubt he has talent but they are a running team and looks like DHB is finally playing like their number one. The Randy Moss comparisons are not accurate...or the commitment to the big play just isn't there.
well he played the most snaps of any wr, 51 to dhb's 48, so its not like he was relegated. the problem is that hes either not getting open or campbell is not inclined to find him. the injured players coming back did not cut into his playing time at all, and its actually increased.
I think what it is, is that opposing defenses are so scared of Moore's big play ability, that coverage is always rolled to him. This leaves things open for McFadden, DHB, Shillens, Murphy, Ford, Boss, Hagan. Jackson likes having him on the field, even just as a decoy.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Defenses are gameplanning against Denarius freakin' Moore and that's opening holes for DARREN MCFADDEN?

Just try to say that out loud without laughing.

I defenses are gameplanning against Bernard Berrian over in Minnesota too, leaving things wide open for Peterson?
the funniest part is that these people actually believe what they are typing . . .

no DC cares about DHB or Moore right now, they want to stop McFadden . . .

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am a big DHB fan but you are going overboard with the WR1 stuff . . . like many others have mentioned, its a run first offense, and usually you arent a WR1 in those types of offenses unless you are a great talent - at best, DHB is a good receiver . . .i think he's a WR3 the rest of the way, but no more . . .
He has put up WR1 numbers for two straight weeks now......just saying.
 
I am a big DHB fan but you are going overboard with the WR1 stuff . . . like many others have mentioned, its a run first offense, and usually you arent a WR1 in those types of offenses unless you are a great talent - at best, DHB is a good receiver . . .i think he's a WR3 the rest of the way, but no more . . .
He has put up WR1 numbers for two straight weeks now......just saying.
it doesn't follow that he will do it every week . . . he is (hopefully) rounding into a decent receiver - but still he has stone hands and he has issues adjusting to the ball in the air . . . if he's even a WR3 the rest of the way, then he's made strides since the beginning of the year . . .
 
I did say LOW END WR1 and that it would be shocking :shock: :shock: :shock: but not impossible. I don't even think the fact that it's a run first offense will hold him back. But Campbell's accuracy might.

 
I agree you can speculate wildly because the Raiders are scoring points, but there is no one on this forum who is going to pick a single Raider WR and stick to that player (start them every week) and benefit in the regular season or the fantasy playoffs.

If you disagree with me call the WR now and let's see how consistent they are week in week out. You can't take 16 yard games from your starting WR and win your league. If you are going to reach at WR go for a homerun, not a spot starter.

 
Snap Count for Week 5 (courtesy of Football Focus)Moore 46DHB 45Ford 23Schillens 15 or 16Hagan 16 or 15
I think this is an accurate portrayal of the pecking order for snaps unless/until one of the three lower guys makes more noise. Only one seriously in contention to do that is Ford IMO. Moore got crappy looks this past weekend. It'll happen from Campbell. Probably again this year.
 
Snap Count for Week 5 (courtesy of Football Focus)Moore 46DHB 45Ford 23Schillens 15 or 16Hagan 16 or 15
I think this is an accurate portrayal of the pecking order for snaps unless/until one of the three lower guys makes more noise. Only one seriously in contention to do that is Ford IMO. Moore got crappy looks this past weekend. It'll happen from Campbell. Probably again this year.
nice call on those who thought Moore would start over Ford . . . I don't have the exact number but it looks like the Raiders ran about 60 plays, so Moore and DHB are still sitting about 25% of the time . . .
 
'duaneok66 said:
Snap Count for Week 5 (courtesy of Football Focus)Moore 46DHB 45Ford 23Schillens 15 or 16Hagan 16 or 15
If you look at it, this could be one of the better receiving corps (1-5) in the NFL. I'm not a huge fan of DHB (although I just picked him up on waivers in my dynasty league) but if Schillens is health I could see them all contributing on a regular basis. By the way, the sneak play isn't DHB he just came off 2 nice games. The sneaky play is Hagan. However, given the snaps, I think any of these guys could put up a big game.Full disclosure, I own DHB and Moore.
 
'duaneok66 said:
'LawFitz said:
'duaneok66 said:
Snap Count for Week 5 (courtesy of Football Focus)Moore 46DHB 45Ford 23Schillens 15 or 16Hagan 16 or 15
I think this is an accurate portrayal of the pecking order for snaps unless/until one of the three lower guys makes more noise. Only one seriously in contention to do that is Ford IMO. Moore got crappy looks this past weekend. It'll happen from Campbell. Probably again this year.
nice call on those who thought Moore would start over Ford . . . I don't have the exact number but it looks like the Raiders ran about 60 plays, so Moore and DHB are still sitting about 25% of the time . . .
too many mouths to feed with Schillens and Ford in (both highly touted WRs when they first joined OAK too), I'm out of this Packers situation. FWIW redraft league.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'duaneok66 said:
'LawFitz said:
'duaneok66 said:
Snap Count for Week 5 (courtesy of Football Focus)Moore 46DHB 45Ford 23Schillens 15 or 16Hagan 16 or 15
I think this is an accurate portrayal of the pecking order for snaps unless/until one of the three lower guys makes more noise. Only one seriously in contention to do that is Ford IMO. Moore got crappy looks this past weekend. It'll happen from Campbell. Probably again this year.
nice call on those who thought Moore would start over Ford . . . I don't have the exact number but it looks like the Raiders ran about 60 plays, so Moore and DHB are still sitting about 25% of the time . . .
too many mouths to feed with Schillens and Ford in (both highly touted WRs when they first joined OAK too), I'm out of this Packers situation. FWIW redraft league.
Plus Murphy will be back this week or next and will be getting more snaps than Schilens or Hagan
 
After watching the Raiders-Texans game on NFL Replay, I'm in the camp that says Campbell is the biggest problem here. Moore did get his shots in this game, including a beautifully caught ball about two feet out-of-bounds b/c of an inaccurate pass and a just missed big play on a pretty good call late in the game when a running out the clock philosophy was expected. I'm got both Ford and Moore stashed on my team and having a tough time figuring out who to ditch b/c I'd like to pick up Crabtree. Ford got his looks in this game too. The emergence of DHB is making this situation too complicated.

 
And the downside of carrying only 3 wr's - I get to start Moore this weekend!
I'm right there witya. I've taken 2 zeros this season starting D. Moore this year, and yet I can't ignore he's absolutely the best wideout on the team, still getting the most snaps and still getting a high share of targets. I am definitely starting him in one league, and am waffling on starting him in the other. I guess I am either a glutton for punishment or am insanely, religously loyal to D. Moore's talent and upside. :football:
 
Pretty good article on the issue at hand here...

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/10/09/3970197/whos-no-1-raiders-count-equally.html

"I think when you look through our stats, the ball is spread around to pretty much everybody," he said. "I think that's good for your team, I think it's good for your offense, and it makes it hard for a defense lock in on just one guy."
Bottom line: As I and a few others have said earlier, there is no true WR1 on the Raiders. It's a run-first offense, with DMC as the focal point in the running game and passing game. It's really not that complicated. In the "real world" the fluid situation of the WR unit is working for them (sort of, Campbell's accuracy as of late has been an issue) but for FF purposes its a weekly crap shoot. I wouldn't be starting any of them unless I was weak at WR and dealing with injuries, bye weeks, etc. Your basically at the mercy of Hue Jax's playcalling and Campbell's reads and accuracy. Its going to be a weekly guessing game. There's no debating Moore's talent, he's a great WR to have stashed in a dynasty league, but if you're looking for a WR play in a redraft this year I'd avoid the OAK WRs unless you have room on your roster to stash DHB, Moore or Ford and give it the "wait and see" approach to see if one of those guys can emerge and be consistent on a weekly basis.
 
FWIW.. I'm watching a replay of the OAK/HOU game right now and I forgot about Ford dropping a sure TD pass at the end of the 1st half that eventually 3 plays later led to DHB's TD catch.. It could have easily been Ford's "breakout game" and DHB would have had an average game... Great for the Raiders, but what a nightmare for fantasy purposes!

 
I've watched a lot of the Raiders games this season. In the Bills game, Moore looked great with the ball in the air. In the Texans game, he looked lost. In one game, he attacked the ball in the air, in the other he couldn't seem to locate it soon enough. He looks like he has potential.

DHB is who we thought he was. He doesn't look like a different receiver to me this year. He simply looks like he's getting more opportunities. Maybe as his confidence grows, so will his production, for now though I'm not buying. Without the fluky busted tackle TD last week, his numbers don't look that great. He's a short route runner without much YAC skills in eyes. Maybe he''ll prove me wrong. The targets are there though.

I drafted Ford btw, and I'll be dropping soon if his chances don't increase. I'm just not seeing the same fire from him that he showed last year. Last year he attacked the ball like Steve Smith. I haven't seen any of that this year. Maybe it's his hammy?

Schilens doesn't look as explosive as I remember. Injuries catching up to him? He looks like a slow, large possession tight end out there.

Still lots to be figured out in Oakland in my opinion.

 
I've watched a lot of the Raiders games this season. In the Bills game, Moore looked great with the ball in the air. In the Texans game, he looked lost. In one game, he attacked the ball in the air, in the other he couldn't seem to locate it soon enough. He looks like he has potential. DHB is who we thought he was. He doesn't look like a different receiver to me this year. He simply looks like he's getting more opportunities. Maybe as his confidence grows, so will his production, for now though I'm not buying. Without the fluky busted tackle TD last week, his numbers don't look that great. He's a short route runner without much YAC skills in eyes. Maybe he''ll prove me wrong. The targets are there though. I drafted Ford btw, and I'll be dropping soon if his chances don't increase. I'm just not seeing the same fire from him that he showed last year. Last year he attacked the ball like Steve Smith. I haven't seen any of that this year. Maybe it's his hammy?Schilens doesn't look as explosive as I remember. Injuries catching up to him? He looks like a slow, large possession tight end out there. Still lots to be figured out in Oakland in my opinion.
I disagree about Moore. I'll give you that being a rookie, I'm sure he runs the wrong routes at times and gets lost occassionally. But the two deep balls that were thrown to him were off target. On the first one, he made an incredible leaping catch, reminiscent of the Bills game, but Campbell led him out of bounds. The second one, Campbell just over threw him, but he did have a step on the defender.
 
I've watched a lot of the Raiders games this season. In the Bills game, Moore looked great with the ball in the air. In the Texans game, he looked lost. In one game, he attacked the ball in the air, in the other he couldn't seem to locate it soon enough. He looks like he has potential.

DHB is who we thought he was. He doesn't look like a different receiver to me this year. He simply looks like he's getting more opportunities. Maybe as his confidence grows, so will his production, for now though I'm not buying. Without the fluky busted tackle TD last week, his numbers don't look that great. He's a short route runner without much YAC skills in eyes. Maybe he''ll prove me wrong. The targets are there though.

I drafted Ford btw, and I'll be dropping soon if his chances don't increase. I'm just not seeing the same fire from him that he showed last year. Last year he attacked the ball like Steve Smith. I haven't seen any of that this year. Maybe it's his hammy?

Schilens doesn't look as explosive as I remember. Injuries catching up to him? He looks like a slow, large possession tight end out there.

Still lots to be figured out in Oakland in my opinion.
I disagree about Moore. I'll give you that being a rookie, I'm sure he runs the wrong routes at times and gets lost occassionally. But the two deep balls that were thrown to him were off target. On the first one, he made an incredible leaping catch, reminiscent of the Bills game, but Campbell led him out of bounds. The second one, Campbell just over threw him, but he did have a step on the defender.
Do you own Moore? Your view seemed biased. I watched the whole game, and although Campbell made some bad throws, many were catchable with the right adjustments. Moore didn't seem to attack the ball the same way he did against Buffalo. I'm not down on the kid, trust me. He looks like Oakland's best true WR. He looks very talented, and if he continues to be a hard worker could develop into something special. Right now though, he's still learning to be an NFL player. Ford also looked very talented last year, but doesn't seem to be the same player he was last year. I think his hammy is bothering him, but he also looks lost. He had an ugly drop last week. DHB has done nothing to impress me thus far. I'm not buying, althogh I think he may be a decent #3 WR for fantasy teams the rest of the way on opportunities alone.

That said, with Campbell at the helm, I'm not sure there will be a consistent #1 threat produced by the Raiders at WR this year. Moore, DHB and Ford will all have some big games, but will probably be on many people's benches when it happens. They will be too inconsistent to start beyond bye weeks.

 
I've watched a lot of the Raiders games this season. In the Bills game, Moore looked great with the ball in the air. In the Texans game, he looked lost. In one game, he attacked the ball in the air, in the other he couldn't seem to locate it soon enough. He looks like he has potential.

DHB is who we thought he was. He doesn't look like a different receiver to me this year. He simply looks like he's getting more opportunities. Maybe as his confidence grows, so will his production, for now though I'm not buying. Without the fluky busted tackle TD last week, his numbers don't look that great. He's a short route runner without much YAC skills in eyes. Maybe he''ll prove me wrong. The targets are there though.

I drafted Ford btw, and I'll be dropping soon if his chances don't increase. I'm just not seeing the same fire from him that he showed last year. Last year he attacked the ball like Steve Smith. I haven't seen any of that this year. Maybe it's his hammy?

Schilens doesn't look as explosive as I remember. Injuries catching up to him? He looks like a slow, large possession tight end out there.

Still lots to be figured out in Oakland in my opinion.
I disagree about Moore. I'll give you that being a rookie, I'm sure he runs the wrong routes at times and gets lost occassionally. But the two deep balls that were thrown to him were off target. On the first one, he made an incredible leaping catch, reminiscent of the Bills game, but Campbell led him out of bounds. The second one, Campbell just over threw him, but he did have a step on the defender.
Do you own Moore? Your view seemed biased. I watched the whole game, and although Campbell made some bad throws, many were catchable with the right adjustments. Moore didn't seem to attack the ball the same way he did against Buffalo. I'm not down on the kid, trust me. He looks like Oakland's best true WR. He looks very talented, and if he continues to be a hard worker could develop into something special. Right now though, he's still learning to be an NFL player. Ford also looked very talented last year, but doesn't seem to be the same player he was last year. I think his hammy is bothering him, but he also looks lost. He had an ugly drop last week. DHB has done nothing to impress me thus far. I'm not buying, althogh I think he may be a decent #3 WR for fantasy teams the rest of the way on opportunities alone.

That said, with Campbell at the helm, I'm not sure there will be a consistent #1 threat produced by the Raiders at WR this year. Moore, DHB and Ford will all have some big games, but will probably be on many people's benches when it happens. They will be too inconsistent to start beyond bye weeks.
Yeah I own Moore, I also own DHB and Campbell in a dynasty league with very deep rosters (Campbell is my QB3 behind Newton and Eli and only started Moore once against the Jets and haven't started DHB yet)and I'm also a Raider fan, so yeah I'm biased but I want them ALL to perform well. I don't pretend to be an expert in the intricasies of being and NFL QB and WR but according to Dan Fouts (like him or not, knows a heck of a lot more about QBing than anyone on here) blamed that one particular pass play where Moore caught the ball out of bounds on Campbell. I do agree with you about Ford though, I think he's the most overrated of the 3.. Of coarse, he's the one I don't own :rolleyes:
 
There should be no problem at all putting up numbers today with Haden out. If Moore Moore doesn't produce today, he's droppable.

Oaktown needs a legit QB.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top