Yeah. Poll is fla\/\/ed.possibly the most poorly worded poll evah
non-NATO so no duty to defend
I have issues with any country that tries to invade another country ( that we consider our friends)and install their puppet regime.I don't even consider Russia an enemy. They have their own #### they deal with that doesn't really affect us day to day. The only time there's conflict is when it comes to the elites money. Then it's a squabble over who gets what.
None of this affects us regular people. So if we have to send any troops over there to die for another meaningless conflict that doesn't protect the US in anyway, heads need to roll.
Unless the US is the one installing a puppet regime. A good one that we can trust. Then it’s all cool. Hi Pinochet!I have issues with any country that tries to invade another country ( that we consider our friends)and install their puppet regime.
Yeah. Poll is fla\/\/ed.
I would say that the United States has a moral imperative to defend democracies against repressive authoritarian states.
possibly the most poorly worded poll evah
non-NATO so no duty to defend
there are two questions, 1) morality and 2) "America's interests".Just curious why you’d frame based on morality? Isn’t the question strategic interest? Would you answer differently if that were the question?
Glad we haven't done as much of that lately. Seems like Russia is.Unless the US is the one installing a puppet regime. A good one that we can trust. Then it’s all cool. Hi Pinochet!
It's interesting that the OP's question was on the basis of morality, versus say what's best for the nation and the world from a geopolitical stability perspective.The growing isolationist sentiment in this country, particularly among conservatives, is very depressing to me.
Honestly, not sure why this is interesting unless you mean in a "wonder why they care about this morality thing all of a sudden" kind of way, and even then it's rather obvious, no?It's interesting that the OP's question was on the basis of morality, versus say what's best for the nation and the world from a geopolitical stability perspective.
lazyike said:I have issues with any country that tries to invade another country ( that we consider our friends)and install their puppet regime.
If you stand for nothing, what'll you fall for?I’m the lone undecided and it’s because I need more information before I could decide. I think it’s way too complicated to give a yes/no at the moment.
The US won’t even defend its own borders. Why would we try to defend The borders of Ukraine.
We have an obligation to try. And not just a moral one but a legal one as well.I don’t think we have a moral obligation to right every moral wrong around the world.
I guess it depends on what "help defend" means. Speak out, take a stand, sure. Send our troops - no way...at least, not under our flag.We have an obligation to try. And not just a moral one but a legal one as well.
The United States signed both the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as the Atlantic Charter. Indeed, we participated heavily in the writing of all three documents, which serve as foundation for international law. In addition, at the War Crimes Trials in Nuremberg and Tokyo following the Second World War, the USA set down the principles that is supposed to guide moral behavior in international affairs.
We are never morally obligated to go to war or use force to right any act of international immorality. But we ARE obligated to speak out, to take a stand, to help as much as we can.
Good points. I’m interpreting the question as defending militarily.We are never morally obligated to go to war or use force to right any act of international immorality. But we ARE obligated to speak out, to take a stand, to help as much as we can.
I mean they can just to point to the US if that was what they wanted to do.The Commish said:Moral obligation? No...
Cultural obligation? Absolutely.....
THE problem that's been at the heart of this conflict is the battle over whether democracy works or not. Russia has a vested interest in showing that it doesn't. That is at the core of everything we see from them. If one believes it's anything else (like money or geography etc) you haven't dug deep enough to understand the forces and motivations at work.
https://youtu.be/QiZwWp9K9g0I am curious as to where you stand with the USA's actions in regards to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Why? We’ve screwed up dozens of other nations with our manipulation under the guise of fighting communism or “nation building.”The growing isolationist sentiment in this country, particularly among conservatives, is very depressing to me.
Not arguing with you, just asking the question, how much of that is due to us (US) inserting ourselves into so many conflicts since, say Vietnam, when we didn't need to? I think we do have a bit of a reputation out in the international community. We've also had our fingers in the innerworkings of Ukraine for a bit so maybe other countries are looking at this and thinking, it's your baby, you handle it.Moral? No way (IMO).
"In our interests" is a whole other question, but as a tax paying American (and one who cares about our troops, like I'm sure everyone else here does)....it pisses me off that pretty much every other country is willing to just take a backseat and let us handle it.
Plenty of other countries that could send in troops and dissuade a Russian attack. But most of them wont because they know America will foot the bill.
Not arguing with you, just asking the question, how much of that is due to us (US) inserting ourselves into so many conflicts since, say Vietnam, when we didn't need to? I think we do have a bit of a reputation out in the international community. We've also had our fingers in the innerworkings of Ukraine for a bit so maybe other countries are looking at this and thinking, it's your baby, you handle it.
Don't know, just spitballing![]()
That depends on the nation and the effort put into the building.Why? We’ve screwed up dozens of other nations with our manipulation under the guise of fighting communism or “nation building.”
Immigration is a great thing. Truly great.
Nation building? Not so much.
I actually was thinking more in terms of joining other nations in sanctions, negotiations, military aid and support. I don't feel we enter Ukraine and defend militarily.Good points. I’m interpreting the question as defending militarily.
When an international crime occurs, we absolutely have a moral and legal obligation to do these things, though the levels of sanctions and military aid are more fluid and depending on our national interests.I actually was thinking more in terms of joining other nations in sanctions, negotiations, military aid and support.
I feel like this is an opportunity but I'm also about 100% sure we won't. And not to the extent we say "good luck, you're on your own" more along the lines of we work with our allies in the area and make a go of it and for once, not being the lead. Let Poland or France lead, it's their backyard. Won't happen but I'd like to see Mr. Diplomat do some trick diplomat #### rather than send our troops into a shooting war with Russia.100% agree that in some respects...we brought this on ourselves. And maybe Ukraine is a unique situation. But I have a hunch that this scenario will continue to play out in plenty places where we DONT have previous involvement....until we say no more.
I'm trying to think of really any countries outside of those two who would be considered a success? Germany maybe? Good dig, if you had asked me I wouldn't' have even come up with those.That depends on the nation and the effort put into the building.
On my list of greatest political figures I just named Douglas MacArthur. He is responsible for the creation of modern Japan and South Korea. Those two states, who are our allies and have served us well in trade and friendship, would not exist if America hadn’t created them.
Hyperbole much?Should the US sit back and watch innocent men, women and children that live in an allied country be slaughtered? If it were me, and my family, would I want help or left to be murdered?
It’s not an easy task for sure. BUT- in the recent cases of Iraq and Afghanistan we had the obligation to try. If we weren’t willing to try we shouldn’t have invaded those nations. Once you invade you have obligations.I'm trying to think of really any countries outside of those two who would be considered a success? Germany maybe? Good dig, if you had asked me I wouldn't' have even come up with those.
Yea agree but those two examples are whole other discussions.It’s not an easy task for sure. BUT- in the recent cases of Iraq and Afghanistan we had the obligation to try. If we weren’t willing to try we shouldn’t have invaded those nations. Once you invade you have obligations.
I think we have an obligation to do what Biden is doing: warn Putin against invasion, sanction Russia if he does.Yea agree but those two examples are whole other discussions.
So saying that, you think we have an obligation in Ukraine? If so, how much and what kind of obligation? Obviously different situation then above.
Feel like a social studies teacher saying there is only one question on the test...with seven parts.
Agree. So here's a question, China & Russia have been awful chummy lately. Even before I listened to the podcast I linked upthread I thought there was a better than average chance that if/when Russia invades Ukraine, China launches against Taiwan. What do we do? And how do we keep the world from becoming a charcoal briquette in the process?But Ukraine is not the issue that concerns me. Taiwan is. We have told Taiwan in the past that if China invades we will go to war. Will we? Should we? That’s a far more difficult question than Ukraine.
This is a question that I do not have a good answer to.Agree. So here's a question, China & Russia have been awful chummy lately. Even before I listened to the podcast I linked upthread I thought there was a better than average chance that if/when Russia invades Ukraine, China launches against Taiwan. What do we do? And how do we keep the world from becoming a charcoal briquette in the process?