B-Deep
Footballguy
there's a marked difference between PITA and loosing us money by alentating a large part of our fanbase and playersI understand what you are saying and it's a legitimate point, but it's too much of a gray area for me. He hasn't broken the law. As abhorrent as racism is, it's not illegal.see the point is if people deal with it the way you say, it hurts the other other ownersIsn't a forced sale a form of confiscation?i don't think anyone wants his franchise confiscated, that would imply taken from him. I think they want to force him to sell, which will net him a very nice sum of money for his asset. Perhaps that is still not what some people want to happen, but it is a distinction i think should be noted
if someone does simply want his team taken from him without fair market compensation they are in an extremist minority
The way to deal with this is to protest outside of games, stop buying tickets and merchandise, good players leaving via free agency etc.. It's a little unsettling the amount of people who want to impose their will because they disagree with this mans speech.
which is why those owners MAY have a basis to say, listen, your issues cannot hurt our teams and our league
magic johnson can say this man should not be an owner, that is his right, but he cannot make it happen. The other owners perhaps can. I do not think they have a moral obligation to let this man continue to own an NBA team and drag the league down if they think that is what will happen
Mark Cuban is kind of a PITA for the league... would you support the other owners ousting him? Where is the line drawn? What about the Ricketts family have some ties to right wingers and the tea party? Some would argue that could hurt business in a liberal city like Chicago. I just think it's a slippery slope and we should do everything possible to support free speech rights especially when that speech occurred in a private setting and was illegally recorded.
your comparison is not valid because there is nothing inherently abhorrent about being right wing and it would not cost the same money or draw the same ire. We can what if the other way too. What if he had come out at a pressed and said black nba players should not be paid? What if he said he hates america and wishes Osama Bin Laden had won? Is your position no matter what he does to damage the league and the other owners they have no right to try and get him to leave? 1 owner can push the lague down and they have some moral obligation to watch their own businesses suffer and do nothing?
In the end he is in a unique spot as an owner of 1/30th of the nba. 29 other owners have rights too.