You know this really is an important point that perhaps we’re not emphasiIng enough. People keep talking about a duty to the Constitution, but the Constitution does provide elections for President every 4 years, and there is a very good argument to be made that whether or not Trump deserves to be in office is an issue that should be left to the voters. If the Mueller report had come out in October of 2020, is there anyone here who would argue that impeachment proceedings should begin then, a month away from the vote? I seriously doubt it. The only reason we’re discussing this now is that we have a year and a half before the election- and yet, due to a variety of factors the election is already upon us in practical terms; the first Presidential debate is little over a month away.
Aside from the politics vs constitution argument - which really I think is the biggest political debate in the US in at least a dozen years - there are a couple other issues affecting things.
1. Trump keeps doing it. He is obstructing right now. He is not cooperating with Congress. He is ignoring his constitutional duties, to Congress, to national security, to the people, to the Constitution itself. - This isn't going to get better, it's going to get worse. And if you don't push back on this guy he will just keep pushing himself. He will frame the debate. He will kick the chair from under you. He may even try to charge law enforcement officials, press, politicians, who knows. - I'm not sure that people respect you (speaking generally) if you don't stand up for yourself, even if you're in the right, and on that point I mean the voters especially the lesser informed ones.
2. Don't overestimate Trump's political skills. And the man is deteriorating in office even if you accept that yeah he worked hard on the campaign trail in 2016, because he did. However this point you make about impeachment creeping up at or around the election misses the mark.
- This won't be well received, but I give you Hillary as one example. She first got a demand for Foia in early 2013. If she had just told State the truth and dealt with it then it likely would have been an issue but not much of one and been long in the past by the election. It happened again in March 2015, the summer of 2015, spring of 2016. Fight, struggle, dissemble. If she had just dealt with the problem all that #### in June, July, October 2016 would not have happened. Politically it was incredibly stupid.
- Here's another - Nixon. Instead of just giving those tinpot burglars up in 72 he fought and struggled and well lo and behold he fumbled into turning over records and all the rest of it and August of 1974 - 3 months before elections - he had to cave. The GOP had historic losses. And the GOP canned him because they were trying to stop the bleeding if nothing else.
As Trump wrestles with this more information and testimony will come out and it will end up hurting him. If it happens just before the election that's his fault and it wouldn't help him, it would hurt him, and I say that as someone who generally says politics shouldn't matter, but that's in response to your point about timing.
***
I say this with all due respect to guys like Ghost and AAA and I realize I get kind of academic at times. There are obviously independent and committed voters alike who may not want to go this route and I agree that needs to be respected. I totally think that needs to be part of the equation, but there will be no second bites at the apple and it could have lasting, negative impacts for our country. But that also cuts both ways and I acknowledge that.