What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[DYNASTY] 2009 Top 12 Rookie Rankings (1 Viewer)

I do think that Harvin is a bit of a risk because he always seems to be dinged up, and it's always his legs that are dinged, which doesn't work well for a speed WR. Even if he ends up working out well in the pros, I could see him being a bit of a fantasy headache as the guy who plays well for 4 weeks, then tweaks an ankle, sits out two weeks and then rushes back only to play gimpy for 4 more weeks and be unproductive while the ankle continues to heal up.
:football: The next Reggie Bush?
I like that comparison. Harvin is not quite the prospect coming out of college that Reggie was but Reggie was an extremely special prospect coming out. If Harvin can stay healthy in the NFL then he could accomplish more than Reggie on the NFL level.
 
carry over from the draft stock thread, what're your opinions of Jeremy Maclin? I've seen him play a lot and like the kid, who would you compare him to?

 
Pre offseason top 12 PPR rankings

1 Michael Crabtree

2 Shady McCoy

3 Percy Harvin

4 Jeremy Maclin

5 Sam Bradford

6 CJ Spiller

7 Shonn Greene

8 Donald Brown

9 Knowshon Moreno

10 Beanie Wells

11 Kenny Britt

12 Hakeem Nicks

The year of the WR. :football:

 
Route running really isn't that complicated. If you're a phenomenal athlete with great speed, great quickness, a smooth stride, and great football talent then you can run routes. Once again, I'd point to Eddie Royal. Not a very accomplished college WR, but had all the physical and football skills needed to play the position at the pro level. Harvin is cut from the same cloth. To me, he's actually one of the less enigmatic prospects in this class. I think I have a pretty good idea of what he'll be in the NFL.
It's kind of ironic that guys like Ginn got hung around here because he wasn't a polished route runner and yet Harvin gets a free pass. Ginn proved a LOT more as a WR in college too.
I don't think Ginn and Harvin have much in common aside from speed.Ginn is a lanky long strider with built up speed. In terms of body type and playing style, he's a lot closer to Troy Williamson than he is to Percy Harvin (but with much better hands). Long, loping stride and a very thin frame. He might have the best top speed of any WR in the NFL, but his game is pure speed and he really isn't built to operate in the short area. Harvin is thicker with shorter legs and a smoother stride. I think he has a lot more potential as a route runner. When I watch him play, I don't see Ted Ginn at all. I see traces of Eddie Royal and Santana Moss: shorter WRs who have the lateral quickness and choppy steps to run all the underneath routes with precision.
I'm not saying that Harvin and Ginn play alike.... I'm saying that Ginn proved a lot more as a WR in college than Harvin. If you don't see that than I don't even see how it's worth debating. Ginn was a top 10 pick because of it. Harvin will not be.
 
carry over from the draft stock thread, what're your opinions of Jeremy Maclin? I've seen him play a lot and like the kid, who would you compare him to?
Right now, I'd compare him to Johnnie Lee Higgins......supreme big-play threat with plenty of room, as well as potential, for growth as a WR.In the long run, I'd compare him to a bigger DeSean Jackson as I believe he will quickly improve his route-running as D-Jax has and become his team's #1 WR option, which is what I don't believe Higgins will ever achieve yet DeSean already has, IMO, and Maclin will be someday.....
 
Route running really isn't that complicated. If you're a phenomenal athlete with great speed, great quickness, a smooth stride, and great football talent then you can run routes. Once again, I'd point to Eddie Royal. Not a very accomplished college WR, but had all the physical and football skills needed to play the position at the pro level. Harvin is cut from the same cloth. To me, he's actually one of the less enigmatic prospects in this class. I think I have a pretty good idea of what he'll be in the NFL.
It's kind of ironic that guys like Ginn got hung around here because he wasn't a polished route runner and yet Harvin gets a free pass. Ginn proved a LOT more as a WR in college too.
I don't think Ginn and Harvin have much in common aside from speed.Ginn is a lanky long strider with built up speed. In terms of body type and playing style, he's a lot closer to Troy Williamson than he is to Percy Harvin (but with much better hands). Long, loping stride and a very thin frame. He might have the best top speed of any WR in the NFL, but his game is pure speed and he really isn't built to operate in the short area. Harvin is thicker with shorter legs and a smoother stride. I think he has a lot more potential as a route runner. When I watch him play, I don't see Ted Ginn at all. I see traces of Eddie Royal and Santana Moss: shorter WRs who have the lateral quickness and choppy steps to run all the underneath routes with precision.
I'm not saying that Harvin and Ginn play alike.... I'm saying that Ginn proved a lot more as a WR in college than Harvin. If you don't see that than I don't even see how it's worth debating. Ginn was a top 10 pick because of it. Harvin will not be.
Ginn didn't prove much at all as a WR in college, he ran almost exclusively deep posts, flys, and screens. He was just that much faster than college talent.Just because someone is a top 10 pick doesn't mean they're a top 10 talent, see (as mentioned previously) Troy Williamson. It's been widely speculated no one outside of the Miami front office that season had Ginn even close to the top 10. There's a reason for that. He's not.
 
Route running really isn't that complicated. If you're a phenomenal athlete with great speed, great quickness, a smooth stride, and great football talent then you can run routes. Once again, I'd point to Eddie Royal. Not a very accomplished college WR, but had all the physical and football skills needed to play the position at the pro level. Harvin is cut from the same cloth.

To me, he's actually one of the less enigmatic prospects in this class. I think I have a pretty good idea of what he'll be in the NFL.
It's kind of ironic that guys like Ginn got hung around here because he wasn't a polished route runner and yet Harvin gets a free pass. Ginn proved a LOT more as a WR in college too.
I don't think Ginn and Harvin have much in common aside from speed.Ginn is a lanky long strider with built up speed. In terms of body type and playing style, he's a lot closer to Troy Williamson than he is to Percy Harvin (but with much better hands). Long, loping stride and a very thin frame. He might have the best top speed of any WR in the NFL, but his game is pure speed and he really isn't built to operate in the short area.

Harvin is thicker with shorter legs and a smoother stride. I think he has a lot more potential as a route runner. When I watch him play, I don't see Ted Ginn at all. I see traces of Eddie Royal and Santana Moss: shorter WRs who have the lateral quickness and choppy steps to run all the underneath routes with precision.
I'm not saying that Harvin and Ginn play alike.... I'm saying that Ginn proved a lot more as a WR in college than Harvin. If you don't see that than I don't even see how it's worth debating. Ginn was a top 10 pick because of it. Harvin will not be.
Ginn didn't prove much at all as a WR in college, he ran almost exclusively deep posts, flys, and screens. He was just that much faster than college talent.Just because someone is a top 10 pick doesn't mean they're a top 10 talent, see (as mentioned previously) Troy Williamson. It's been widely speculated no one outside of the Miami front office that season had Ginn even close to the top 10. There's a reason for that. He's not.
Not true in the least. It was true until Ginns final season of college which I can only assume you didn't watch then... It was widely accepted that Ginn was a top 15 pick everywhere outside of this message board.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pre offseason top 12 PPR rankings1 Michael Crabtree2 Shady McCoy3 Percy Harvin4 Jeremy Maclin5 Sam Bradford6 CJ Spiller7 Shonn Greene8 Donald Brown9 Knowshon Moreno10 Beanie Wells11 Kenny Britt12 Hakeem NicksThe year of the WR. ;)
Interesting rankings. I'll try my hand at the top 16, IMO...1 Knowshon Moreno2 LeSean McCoy3 Michael Crabtree4 Beanie Wells5 Jeremy Maclin6 Matt Stafford7 Darrius Heyward-Bey8 Shonn Greene9 Percy Harvin10 Sam Bradford11 Marc Sanchez 12 Kenny Britt13 Donald Brown14 CJ Spiller15 Hakeem Nicks 16 Jermaine Gresham
 
I'll be writing the first Bloom 100 after the ultimate draft road trip concludes (about a month), but I'll say early that Moreno and McCoy look like natural RBs to me and have top notch instincts and good enough tools. Greene is a legit NFL power back, I'm less sure about Brown. Maclin could be scary good because unlike most of the all-around playmaker types to come out of college, he's got great size, too. Crabtree's a stone cold stud, as close to a sure thing as there is in this class. Wells reminds me of Mendenhall - terrific size and initial burst combo, but I dont like the instincts and pad level. Spiller could be Steve Slaton, could be Leon Washington, all depends on who drafts him, and their plans for him.

I will say this is shaping up to a nice class of receiving TEs, with or without Gresham - Coffman, Casey, Beckum, and Pettigrew all have the chance to be impact players in an NFL passing offense.

I am going to be watching a ton of tape on all of these guys over the next 4 months, refining my thoughts, but those are my first impressions from watching them in entertainment mode as opposed to scouting mode over the course of this season.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What would you say might be the 5 most WR needy NFL teams heading into the draft? I know the FA crop is pretty slim pickings, so most teams with questionmarks will probably have to address them via the draft.

 
TheBradyBunch said:
What would you say might be the 5 most WR needy NFL teams heading into the draft? I know the FA crop is pretty slim pickings, so most teams with questionmarks will probably have to address them via the draft.
From the top of my head:SeahawksBuccaneersBrownsRaidersJacksonville
 
TheBradyBunch said:
What would you say might be the 5 most WR needy NFL teams heading into the draft? I know the FA crop is pretty slim pickings, so most teams with questionmarks will probably have to address them via the draft.
From the top of my head:SeahawksBuccaneersBrownsRaidersJacksonville
Browns depends on Braylon and KW2. You can add the Titans, but they'll never draft a WR in the 1st anyway. Teams I suspect may draft a WR early:GiantsBearsJaguars49ersSeahawks
 
-OZ- said:
carry over from the draft stock thread, what're your opinions of Jeremy Maclin? I've seen him play a lot and like the kid, who would you compare him to?
I like him. He has very good speed, he's a pretty fluid runner, and he shows some solid natural WR skills. I have him ranked as a top 3 WR in this class and I think he's a justifiable gamble almost anywhere in the first round of a PPR rookie draft. I would compare him to Chad Johnson in terms of skill set, body type, and playing style.
 
I have to agree with everyone hear saying not to sleep on Donald Brown. I go to school with the guy and am pretty close friends with a few kids on the team and they have nothing bad to say about him at all. As has already been said, the guy is a workout warrior and can put up 600+ in squats and squats the most on the team. He will do great in the combine for any strength numbers and if he can put up 4.45 or lower in the 40 then he won't be a sleeper anymore.
squat and bench numbers don't mean much to me really. What I see on the field is a decent runner, but not someone who has enough of the "it" factor to have staying power in the NFL. He does many things good, but not much is great about his game. To continue to be a factor year in and year out in the NFL you have to have an aspect or two about you that are great.
Take this with a grain of salt because I don't watch college football at all (I'm just playing Devil's Advocate here) but isn't this the exact same thing people were saying about Matt Forte at this time last year? Again I'm not comparing Forte directly to Brown but I'm just saying that people were saying that he did everything OK and nothing great. Now Forte could flame out next year (like Anthony Thomas) but I'm just throwing this out there to generate more discussion on Brown and the other second tier RBs.Edited to add...Situation & opportunity (along with talent) also play a big part in rookie RB production. If Brown ends up as the clear cut starter for whoever drafts him then I think his value jumps like Fotre's did right after the draft.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
jurb26 said:
MAC_32 said:
jurb26 said:
Route running really isn't that complicated. If you're a phenomenal athlete with great speed, great quickness, a smooth stride, and great football talent then you can run routes. Once again, I'd point to Eddie Royal. Not a very accomplished college WR, but had all the physical and football skills needed to play the position at the pro level. Harvin is cut from the same cloth.

To me, he's actually one of the less enigmatic prospects in this class. I think I have a pretty good idea of what he'll be in the NFL.
It's kind of ironic that guys like Ginn got hung around here because he wasn't a polished route runner and yet Harvin gets a free pass. Ginn proved a LOT more as a WR in college too.
I don't think Ginn and Harvin have much in common aside from speed.Ginn is a lanky long strider with built up speed. In terms of body type and playing style, he's a lot closer to Troy Williamson than he is to Percy Harvin (but with much better hands). Long, loping stride and a very thin frame. He might have the best top speed of any WR in the NFL, but his game is pure speed and he really isn't built to operate in the short area.

Harvin is thicker with shorter legs and a smoother stride. I think he has a lot more potential as a route runner. When I watch him play, I don't see Ted Ginn at all. I see traces of Eddie Royal and Santana Moss: shorter WRs who have the lateral quickness and choppy steps to run all the underneath routes with precision.
I'm not saying that Harvin and Ginn play alike.... I'm saying that Ginn proved a lot more as a WR in college than Harvin. If you don't see that than I don't even see how it's worth debating. Ginn was a top 10 pick because of it. Harvin will not be.
Ginn didn't prove much at all as a WR in college, he ran almost exclusively deep posts, flys, and screens. He was just that much faster than college talent.Just because someone is a top 10 pick doesn't mean they're a top 10 talent, see (as mentioned previously) Troy Williamson. It's been widely speculated no one outside of the Miami front office that season had Ginn even close to the top 10. There's a reason for that. He's not.
Not true in the least. It was true until Ginns final season of college which I can only assume you didn't watch then... It was widely accepted that Ginn was a top 15 pick everywhere outside of this message board.
I live in the middle of Buckeye country, I get every single one of their games crammed down my throat, that year was no exception. The vast majority around here did not think he was a 1st round pick. I visit other boards and read similar opinions there. Some scouting agencies thought he was a 1st round pick, others did not. Only Miami thought he was a top 10 talent, at least that's what I've been led to believe.
 
TheBradyBunch said:
What would you say might be the 5 most WR needy NFL teams heading into the draft? I know the FA crop is pretty slim pickings, so most teams with questionmarks will probably have to address them via the draft.
From the top of my head:SeahawksBuccaneersBrownsRaidersJacksonville
Browns depends on Braylon and KW2. You can add the Titans, but they'll never draft a WR in the 1st anyway.
Good one.
 
jurb26 said:
MAC_32 said:
jurb26 said:
Route running really isn't that complicated. If you're a phenomenal athlete with great speed, great quickness, a smooth stride, and great football talent then you can run routes. Once again, I'd point to Eddie Royal. Not a very accomplished college WR, but had all the physical and football skills needed to play the position at the pro level. Harvin is cut from the same cloth.

To me, he's actually one of the less enigmatic prospects in this class. I think I have a pretty good idea of what he'll be in the NFL.
It's kind of ironic that guys like Ginn got hung around here because he wasn't a polished route runner and yet Harvin gets a free pass. Ginn proved a LOT more as a WR in college too.
I don't think Ginn and Harvin have much in common aside from speed.Ginn is a lanky long strider with built up speed. In terms of body type and playing style, he's a lot closer to Troy Williamson than he is to Percy Harvin (but with much better hands). Long, loping stride and a very thin frame. He might have the best top speed of any WR in the NFL, but his game is pure speed and he really isn't built to operate in the short area.

Harvin is thicker with shorter legs and a smoother stride. I think he has a lot more potential as a route runner. When I watch him play, I don't see Ted Ginn at all. I see traces of Eddie Royal and Santana Moss: shorter WRs who have the lateral quickness and choppy steps to run all the underneath routes with precision.
I'm not saying that Harvin and Ginn play alike.... I'm saying that Ginn proved a lot more as a WR in college than Harvin. If you don't see that than I don't even see how it's worth debating. Ginn was a top 10 pick because of it. Harvin will not be.
Ginn didn't prove much at all as a WR in college, he ran almost exclusively deep posts, flys, and screens. He was just that much faster than college talent.Just because someone is a top 10 pick doesn't mean they're a top 10 talent, see (as mentioned previously) Troy Williamson. It's been widely speculated no one outside of the Miami front office that season had Ginn even close to the top 10. There's a reason for that. He's not.
Not true in the least. It was true until Ginns final season of college which I can only assume you didn't watch then... It was widely accepted that Ginn was a top 15 pick everywhere outside of this message board.
I live in the middle of Buckeye country, I get every single one of their games crammed down my throat, that year was no exception. The vast majority around here did not think he was a 1st round pick. I visit other boards and read similar opinions there. Some scouting agencies thought he was a 1st round pick, others did not. Only Miami thought he was a top 10 talent, at least that's what I've been led to believe.
Well, I don't want to turn this thread into a Ginn thread. This topic has been covered enough in other threads. We can agree to disagree.
 
jurb26 said:
MAC_32 said:
jurb26 said:
Route running really isn't that complicated. If you're a phenomenal athlete with great speed, great quickness, a smooth stride, and great football talent then you can run routes. Once again, I'd point to Eddie Royal. Not a very accomplished college WR, but had all the physical and football skills needed to play the position at the pro level. Harvin is cut from the same cloth.

To me, he's actually one of the less enigmatic prospects in this class. I think I have a pretty good idea of what he'll be in the NFL.
It's kind of ironic that guys like Ginn got hung around here because he wasn't a polished route runner and yet Harvin gets a free pass. Ginn proved a LOT more as a WR in college too.
I don't think Ginn and Harvin have much in common aside from speed.Ginn is a lanky long strider with built up speed. In terms of body type and playing style, he's a lot closer to Troy Williamson than he is to Percy Harvin (but with much better hands). Long, loping stride and a very thin frame. He might have the best top speed of any WR in the NFL, but his game is pure speed and he really isn't built to operate in the short area.

Harvin is thicker with shorter legs and a smoother stride. I think he has a lot more potential as a route runner. When I watch him play, I don't see Ted Ginn at all. I see traces of Eddie Royal and Santana Moss: shorter WRs who have the lateral quickness and choppy steps to run all the underneath routes with precision.
I'm not saying that Harvin and Ginn play alike.... I'm saying that Ginn proved a lot more as a WR in college than Harvin. If you don't see that than I don't even see how it's worth debating. Ginn was a top 10 pick because of it. Harvin will not be.
Ginn didn't prove much at all as a WR in college, he ran almost exclusively deep posts, flys, and screens. He was just that much faster than college talent.Just because someone is a top 10 pick doesn't mean they're a top 10 talent, see (as mentioned previously) Troy Williamson. It's been widely speculated no one outside of the Miami front office that season had Ginn even close to the top 10. There's a reason for that. He's not.
Not true in the least. It was true until Ginns final season of college which I can only assume you didn't watch then... It was widely accepted that Ginn was a top 15 pick everywhere outside of this message board.
I live in the middle of Buckeye country, I get every single one of their games crammed down my throat, that year was no exception. The vast majority around here did not think he was a 1st round pick. I visit other boards and read similar opinions there. Some scouting agencies thought he was a 1st round pick, others did not. Only Miami thought he was a top 10 talent, at least that's what I've been led to believe.
Looking back through google for a few minutes I could not find a single mock draft that had Ginn going in the top 10.I found several that had him not in the 1st round at all.

 
jurb26 said:
MAC_32 said:
jurb26 said:
Route running really isn't that complicated. If you're a phenomenal athlete with great speed, great quickness, a smooth stride, and great football talent then you can run routes. Once again, I'd point to Eddie Royal. Not a very accomplished college WR, but had all the physical and football skills needed to play the position at the pro level. Harvin is cut from the same cloth.

To me, he's actually one of the less enigmatic prospects in this class. I think I have a pretty good idea of what he'll be in the NFL.
It's kind of ironic that guys like Ginn got hung around here because he wasn't a polished route runner and yet Harvin gets a free pass. Ginn proved a LOT more as a WR in college too.
I don't think Ginn and Harvin have much in common aside from speed.Ginn is a lanky long strider with built up speed. In terms of body type and playing style, he's a lot closer to Troy Williamson than he is to Percy Harvin (but with much better hands). Long, loping stride and a very thin frame. He might have the best top speed of any WR in the NFL, but his game is pure speed and he really isn't built to operate in the short area.

Harvin is thicker with shorter legs and a smoother stride. I think he has a lot more potential as a route runner. When I watch him play, I don't see Ted Ginn at all. I see traces of Eddie Royal and Santana Moss: shorter WRs who have the lateral quickness and choppy steps to run all the underneath routes with precision.
I'm not saying that Harvin and Ginn play alike.... I'm saying that Ginn proved a lot more as a WR in college than Harvin. If you don't see that than I don't even see how it's worth debating. Ginn was a top 10 pick because of it. Harvin will not be.
Ginn didn't prove much at all as a WR in college, he ran almost exclusively deep posts, flys, and screens. He was just that much faster than college talent.Just because someone is a top 10 pick doesn't mean they're a top 10 talent, see (as mentioned previously) Troy Williamson. It's been widely speculated no one outside of the Miami front office that season had Ginn even close to the top 10. There's a reason for that. He's not.
Not true in the least. It was true until Ginns final season of college which I can only assume you didn't watch then... It was widely accepted that Ginn was a top 15 pick everywhere outside of this message board.
I live in the middle of Buckeye country, I get every single one of their games crammed down my throat, that year was no exception. The vast majority around here did not think he was a 1st round pick. I visit other boards and read similar opinions there. Some scouting agencies thought he was a 1st round pick, others did not. Only Miami thought he was a top 10 talent, at least that's what I've been led to believe.
Looking back through google for a few minutes I could not find a single mock draft that had Ginn going in the top 10.I found several that had him not in the 1st round at all.
I did one search and the very 1st link has Ginn mocked to St. L at 13 overall....Link

The 2nd one has him at 9 to Mia...

Link

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!

McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.

Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?

Crabtree - hard to argue with that production. System is one thing, but those stats are insane. And he looks good.

I have 1.03 and 1.04 and I'm hoping Moreno and Wells go ahead of me. I'd like to choose between McCoy, Crabtree, and Greene. 2 of those three would make me happy.

 
The 2nd one has him at 9 to Mia...

Link
You mean to tell me that the guy that did that mock draft got every single pick correct?HINT: you were looking at the left column, which is draft results. The mock draft is in the right column, where Ginn went 19th.

 
The 2nd one has him at 9 to Mia...

Link
You mean to tell me that the guy that did that mock draft got every single pick correct?HINT: you were looking at the left column, which is draft results. The mock draft is in the right column, where Ginn went 19th.
:kicksrock: You're right. I guess that really tells you how much time I spent looking for these. So within a matter of 30 seconds I found 2 in which was my first search in which he was not outside the top 20 and yet you struggled to find many where he was even in the 1st round... Like I said, Ginn was a guy that was projected to be around the 1st half of the 1st round. Again, there are several threads covering Ginn so I'll leave it at this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The 2nd one has him at 9 to Mia...

Link
You mean to tell me that the guy that did that mock draft got every single pick correct?HINT: you were looking at the left column, which is draft results. The mock draft is in the right column, where Ginn went 19th.
:popcorn: You're right. I guess that really tells you how much time I spent looking for these. So within a matter of 30 seconds I found 2 in which was my first search in which he was not outside the top 20 and yet you struggled to find many where he was even in the 1st round... Like I said, Ginn was a guy that was projected to be around the 1st half of the 1st round. Again, there are several threads covering Ginn so I'll leave it at this.
I think you misread my post. I said I couldn't find any where he went in the top 10, and that several also had him out of the 1st round entirely.
 
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?Crabtree - hard to argue with that production. System is one thing, but those stats are insane. And he looks good.I have 1.03 and 1.04 and I'm hoping Moreno and Wells go ahead of me. I'd like to choose between McCoy, Crabtree, and Greene. 2 of those three would make me happy.
what dont you get about moreno? led the SEC in rushing and has excellent pass catchin skills. I have 1.02 & .03 in adraft. praying that wells goes #1 and I can get Moreno and Crabtree
 
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?Crabtree - hard to argue with that production. System is one thing, but those stats are insane. And he looks good.I have 1.03 and 1.04 and I'm hoping Moreno and Wells go ahead of me. I'd like to choose between McCoy, Crabtree, and Greene. 2 of those three would make me happy.
what dont you get about moreno? led the SEC in rushing and has excellent pass catchin skills. I have 1.02 & .03 in adraft. praying that wells goes #1 and I can get Moreno and Crabtree
Good question. Just watching highlights, I didn't see anything jump out at me. I didn't see "it". McCoy gets me excited. Moreno must have talent to lead the SEC in rushing. Maybe that makes him a very safe pick. He'll probably be a very solid player. I just didn't sense that he is going to be elite - not that should be held against him. I'll definitely watch him more, though I sense there is very little chance that he'll slide to 1.03 unless he lands in a bad situation. I think he'll be 1.01.
 
What's the thought process used when selecting NFL comparisons? Some of them I can see or understand why you chose a certain NFL stud, but the two I'm whiffing on are Bradford (Manning) and Wells (Forte).

 
What's the thought process used when selecting NFL comparisons? Some of them I can see or understand why you chose a certain NFL stud, but the two I'm whiffing on are Bradford (Manning) and Wells (Forte).
I usually try to compare prospects to players with a similar body type and playing style. I agree that Forte isn't a good comparison for Wells. Bradford's dominance in a major conference, accuracy, height, and lack of mobility remind me of Manning. His throwing motion is quite a bit different though.
 
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.
I like those three. They're probably my top three backs in some order. Moreno has good quicks, instincts, and toughness. He runs low with good hip swivel. About the only thing that worries me is his lack of speed. He won't be a big play threat in the NFL.
Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?
Not a chance, IMO. He's purely a WR for NFL purposes.
 
What's the thought process used when selecting NFL comparisons? Some of them I can see or understand why you chose a certain NFL stud, but the two I'm whiffing on are Bradford (Manning) and Wells (Forte).
I usually try to compare prospects to players with a similar body type and playing style. I agree that Forte isn't a good comparison for Wells. Bradford's dominance in a major conference, accuracy, height, and lack of mobility remind me of Manning. His throwing motion is quite a bit different though.
Thanks. I was just asking to see if there was something you saw in them that I was missing.
 
EBF said:
gheemony said:
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.
I like those three. They're probably my top three backs in some order. Moreno has good quicks, instincts, and toughness. He runs low with good hip swivel. About the only thing that worries me is his lack of speed. He won't be a big play threat in the NFL.
Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?
Not a chance, IMO. He's purely a WR for NFL purposes.
Harvin is a lot more like Reggie than he is like Chris Johnson IMO. Chris Johnson is unique because he runs well up the middle for his size (can often break through a lineman's first hit), and when he gets past the line he's so dangerous. Harvin is strong but he's light and goes down easy on contact. I don't see the ability to run through the small creases in interior lines in the NFL, except for an occasional draw play. But he's a very shifty runner with good vision and runs more like a RB than a WR when he gets past the line and he functions very well in space. So he does have RB skills except he can't move a pile at all. If they move him around, give him the ball on pitches, they can take advantage of his real skills. So while he LOOKS physically more like CJ3, he PLAYS more like Reggie Bush from what I've seen. I see him as a very talented tweener who could be a stud if used correctly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EBF said:
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
What worries me about Wells is that he will turn into the current Larry Johnson very quickly. Yes, he may have a couple great years of 1500+ yds rushing and double digit TDs, but his lack of abilities in the passing game, both catching and in protection, will make him a two down back early, and make him worthless once he loses speed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EBF said:
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
What worries me about Wells is that he will turn into the current Larry Johnson very quickly. Yes, he may have a couple great years of 1500+ yds rushing and double digit TDs, but his lack of abilities in the passing game, both catching and in protection, will make him a two down back early, and make him worthless once he loses speed.
The bigger worry is that he appears to not have the ability (unlike Portis or Westbrook) to play through injuries. i just don't see him as a 'gamer'.
 
EBF said:
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
What worries me about Wells is that he will turn into the current Larry Johnson very quickly. Yes, he may have a couple great years of 1500+ yds rushing and double digit TDs, but his lack of abilities in the passing game, both catching and in protection, will make him a two down back early, and make him worthless once he loses speed.
The bigger worry is that he appears to not have the ability (unlike Portis or Westbrook) to play through injuries. i just don't see him as a 'gamer'.
I made the same comments about Wells in the other thread. There is definitely doubts about his ability to play with pain, but again, my biggest worry is his lack of ability in the passing game, both protection and catching, which will likely make him a two down back.
 
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.
I like those three. They're probably my top three backs in some order.

Moreno has good quicks, instincts, and toughness. He runs low with good hip swivel. About the only thing that worries me is his lack of speed. He won't be a big play threat in the NFL.

Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?
Not a chance, IMO. He's purely a WR for NFL purposes.

It's funny you say this because they were talking about him on PTI today and Kornheiser kept referring to him as a RB. Is this just Kornheiser being his usual idiot self, or is he likely to be viewed as and/or drafted as a RB by the NFL community? If he ends up being dubbed a RB, that will obviously put a major dent in his fantasy value, so let's hope he is considered a WR. If he is a WR, and assumes a Bush-like role in the offense he winds up in, where he gets 15 or so touches per game, he could be fantasy gold.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We heard some scuttlebutt on the Shrine Game sidelines that Wells scares most NFL scouts/teams and right now they are hesitant to invest a high pick in him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.
I like those three. They're probably my top three backs in some order.

Moreno has good quicks, instincts, and toughness. He runs low with good hip swivel. About the only thing that worries me is his lack of speed. He won't be a big play threat in the NFL.

Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?
Not a chance, IMO. He's purely a WR for NFL purposes.

It's funny you say this because they were talking about him on PTI today and Kornheiser kept referring to him as a RB. Is this just Kornheiser being his usual idiot self, or is he likely to be viewed as and/or drafted as a RB by the NFL community? If he ends up being dubbed a RB, that will obviously put a major dent in his fantasy value, so let's hope he is considered a WR. If he is a WR, and assumes a Bush-like role in the offense he winds up in, where he gets 15 or so touches per game, he could be fantasy gold.
I don't see him playing more than a handful of snaps at RB in the NFL.
 
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.
I like those three. They're probably my top three backs in some order.

Moreno has good quicks, instincts, and toughness. He runs low with good hip swivel. About the only thing that worries me is his lack of speed. He won't be a big play threat in the NFL.

Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?
Not a chance, IMO. He's purely a WR for NFL purposes.

It's funny you say this because they were talking about him on PTI today and Kornheiser kept referring to him as a RB. Is this just Kornheiser being his usual idiot self, or is he likely to be viewed as and/or drafted as a RB by the NFL community? If he ends up being dubbed a RB, that will obviously put a major dent in his fantasy value, so let's hope he is considered a WR. If he is a WR, and assumes a Bush-like role in the offense he winds up in, where he gets 15 or so touches per game, he could be fantasy gold.
I don't see him playing more than a handful of snaps at RB in the NFL.
Do most people involved in the whole scouting/draft process feel the same way? Is Kornheiser just dumber than I thought he was? Or are people split?
 
It's funny you say this because they were talking about him on PTI today and Kornheiser kept referring to him as a RB. Is this just Kornheiser being his usual idiot self, or is he likely to be viewed as and/or drafted as a RB by the NFL community? If he ends up being dubbed a RB, that will obviously put a major dent in his fantasy value, so let's hope he is considered a WR. If he is a WR, and assumes a Bush-like role in the offense he winds up in, where he gets 15 or so touches per game, he could be fantasy gold.
Maybe I'm missing your point, but it seems you're saying a WR who produces the same as a RB is worth more. You may be right, but it seems contrarian.
 
It's funny you say this because they were talking about him on PTI today and Kornheiser kept referring to him as a RB. Is this just Kornheiser being his usual idiot self, or is he likely to be viewed as and/or drafted as a RB by the NFL community? If he ends up being dubbed a RB, that will obviously put a major dent in his fantasy value, so let's hope he is considered a WR. If he is a WR, and assumes a Bush-like role in the offense he winds up in, where he gets 15 or so touches per game, he could be fantasy gold.
Maybe I'm missing your point, but it seems you're saying a WR who produces the same as a RB is worth more. You may be right, but it seems contrarian.
Let me put it this way: would Reggie Bush (or any RB for that matter) have more fantasy value as a RB or a WR, assuming his role remains the same? In my league this season, the top WR (Fitz) fell between the #12 RB (LT) and the #13 RB (Lynch). Let's say Reggie had not been injured this season, and finished as RB10 (not unrealistic)... He would have been the top scoring WR, assuming he was WR eligible, which of course he is not.So, if Harvin is a Bush-clone (which it sounds like he's not), he loses a ton of value if he is only eligible for fantasy purposes as a RB. If on the other hand he is a WR for fantasy purposes, but plays a Bush-like role in his offense, he's extremely valuable. How many WR's get 15+ touches per game?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do most people involved in the whole scouting/draft process feel the same way? Is Kornheiser just dumber than I thought he was? Or are people split?
I can't say for sure, but I'd venture to guess that almost every scout sees him as a pure WR.Look around the NFL. Most of these slash type guys like Hines Ward, Anquan Boldin, Antwaan Randle El, and Brad Smith settle into one position and concentrate on that position.A creative team might use Harvin on 2-3 running plays per game, but he's a WR.
 
Regarding Harvin, I'd really like to see him go to a team that exploits his running skills - because in addition to having some nice receiving skills, he's got a nice running style, very good vision, and great burst. IMO he's quite strong in the upper body, but he doesn't have Chris Johnson's leg drive and he goes down very easy on contact, even arm tackles. So by comparison, Chris Johnson, for a small back of somewhat similar size, can run the ball up the middle of the line with a reasonable degree of success.

But I do see Harvin as much like a R Bush; he also doesn't show much lower body power so he isn't consistently able to take it up the middle (except for some draws and mis-direction plays). I think if the team that drafts Harvin moves him around and gets him the ball in space with pitches and mis-direction plays as well as pass plays (similar to how NO uses Reggie), rather than use him purely as a WR, IMO he could be just as productive as a healthy Reggie Bush.

But if he is only used as a WR, then IMO his statistical fantasy ceiling will likely be closer to what I would expect from a good but not elite NFL WR. So when I see Harvin, I see a real 'tweener', which can be either a positive or a negative depending on how he is used. If a team makes full use of his 'uniqueness', I really think his ceiling will be much higher.

I don't care if Kornheiser or anyone else calls him a WR or a RB, I really think he maximizes his potential if he is not used exclusively as either, but rather a good mix of both.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wells is the biggest engima. I don't know anything about scouting or watching film, but after watching highlights of the top players (Crabtree, McCoy, Moreno, Wells, Greene), Wells looks the best to me. But his injury history is scary and Todd McShay ripped him for not being tough or liking football. He compared him to Cedric Benson!
My attitude towards Wells is that I think he has a chance to be a good player, but I'm going to let someone else take that gamble.
McCoy and Greene looked the best to me at RB. I don't get Moreno, but again, I'm no expert and don't know what to look for.
I like those three. They're probably my top three backs in some order.

Moreno has good quicks, instincts, and toughness. He runs low with good hip swivel. About the only thing that worries me is his lack of speed. He won't be a big play threat in the NFL.

Harvin looks really good. As a RB. All I see is really nice runs from him. I think he can be Reggie Bush-like. Maybe Chris Johnson-like?
Not a chance, IMO. He's purely a WR for NFL purposes.

It's funny you say this because they were talking about him on PTI today and Kornheiser kept referring to him as a RB. Is this just Kornheiser being his usual idiot self, or is he likely to be viewed as and/or drafted as a RB by the NFL community? If he ends up being dubbed a RB, that will obviously put a major dent in his fantasy value, so let's hope he is considered a WR. If he is a WR, and assumes a Bush-like role in the offense he winds up in, where he gets 15 or so touches per game, he could be fantasy gold.
I don't see him playing more than a handful of snaps at RB in the NFL.
Do most people involved in the whole scouting/draft process feel the same way? Is Kornheiser just dumber than I thought he was? Or are people split?
Kornheiser doesn't know much about football and knows next to nothing about correlating a player's skill set into an NFL position and what kind of success that player might have.
 
Regarding Harvin, I'd really like to see him go to a team that exploits his running skills - because in addition to having some nice receiving skills, he's got a nice running style, very good vision, and great burst. IMO he's quite strong in the upper body, but he doesn't have Chris Johnson's leg drive and he goes down very easy on contact, even arm tackles. So by comparison, Chris Johnson, for a small back of somewhat similar size, can run the ball up the middle of the line with a reasonable degree of success.

But I do see Harvin as much like a R Bush; he also doesn't show much lower body power so he isn't consistently able to take it up the middle (except for some draws and mis-direction plays). I think if the team that drafts Harvin moves him around and gets him the ball in space with pitches and mis-direction plays as well as pass plays (similar to how NO uses Reggie), rather than use him purely as a WR, IMO he could be just as productive as a healthy Reggie Bush.

But if he is only used as a WR, then IMO his statistical fantasy ceiling will likely be closer to what I would expect from a good but not elite NFL WR. So when I see Harvin, I see a real 'tweener', which can be either a positive or a negative depending on how he is used. If a team makes full use of his 'uniqueness', I really think his ceiling will be much higher.

I don't care if Kornheiser or anyone else calls him a WR or a RB, I really think he maximizes his potential if he is not used exclusively as either, but rather a good mix of both.
That's key for me. If he's a pure WR, I probably won't draft him. But if there's a chance he's used like Bush, I think he's a steal between picks 6 and 8.
 
I see 3 tiers of impact dynasty players right now in PPR:

1) McCoy, Moreno, Crabtree

2) Green, Harvin, Maclin, Wells

3) Stafford, Sanchez, Brown

Those 10 should be good NFL players in time regardless of where they go, IMO. I'm least convinced of Wells and Stafford from that list.

 
I see 3 tiers of impact dynasty players right now in PPR:1) McCoy, Moreno, Crabtree2) Green, Harvin, Maclin, Wells3) Stafford, Sanchez, BrownThose 10 should be good NFL players in time regardless of where they go, IMO. I'm least convinced of Wells and Stafford from that list.
Good list :thumbup:
 
I see 3 tiers of impact dynasty players right now in PPR:1) McCoy, Moreno, Crabtree2) Green, Harvin, Maclin, Wells3) Stafford, Sanchez, BrownThose 10 should be good NFL players in time regardless of where they go, IMO. I'm least convinced of Wells and Stafford from that list.
I think Nicks and Britt should be added to the 3rd group (especially in ppr). I would take both over the QB's. (Also i see Wells in the first tier, but i can understand why people are hesitant with him)
 
I see 3 tiers of impact dynasty players right now in PPR:1) McCoy, Moreno, Crabtree2) Green, Harvin, Maclin, Wells3) Stafford, Sanchez, BrownThose 10 should be good NFL players in time regardless of where they go, IMO. I'm least convinced of Wells and Stafford from that list.
I think there's very little separation in the top 6-8 picks this year. The guys in your second tier all have the potential to put up first tier numbers.
 
I see 3 tiers of impact dynasty players right now in PPR:1) McCoy, Moreno, Crabtree2) Green, Harvin, Maclin, Wells3) Stafford, Sanchez, BrownThose 10 should be good NFL players in time regardless of where they go, IMO. I'm least convinced of Wells and Stafford from that list.
I think there's very little separation in the top 6-8 picks this year. The guys in your second tier all have the potential to put up first tier numbers.
True, but I think the guys in the first tier are safer. I think they should be the top 3 in every rookie draft, with the order determined by their landing spot. I have some doubts about the second tier, although I think they're still all very good.
 
I see 3 tiers of impact dynasty players right now in PPR:1) McCoy, Moreno, Crabtree2) Green, Harvin, Maclin, Wells3) Stafford, Sanchez, BrownThose 10 should be good NFL players in time regardless of where they go, IMO. I'm least convinced of Wells and Stafford from that list.
I think Nicks and Britt should be added to the 3rd group (especially in ppr). I would take both over the QB's. (Also i see Wells in the first tier, but i can understand why people are hesitant with him)
Ehhh..I'd put them in the next tier but they could round out the first round. I think they are at the point where you really should be taking one of the QBs, assuming they go in the top 20 picks, before Nicks or Britt.
 
I see 3 tiers of impact dynasty players right now in PPR:1) McCoy, Moreno, Crabtree2) Green, Harvin, Maclin, Wells3) Stafford, Sanchez, BrownThose 10 should be good NFL players in time regardless of where they go, IMO. I'm least convinced of Wells and Stafford from that list.
I think Nicks and Britt should be added to the 3rd group (especially in ppr). I would take both over the QB's. (Also i see Wells in the first tier, but i can understand why people are hesitant with him)
Ehhh..I'd put them in the next tier but they could round out the first round. I think they are at the point where you really should be taking one of the QBs, assuming they go in the top 20 picks, before Nicks or Britt.
First round QBs take years to develop and bust more often than most positions. Even when they pan out, they generally don't have much trade value unless you happen to get the once-a-decade Peyton Manning type of player. In PPR, I'm not sure I'd use a first round pick on any of the QBs in this group. The WR depth is too good to justify it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top