What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

DYNASTY: 2012 Top college prospects (1 Viewer)

Impact running backs for each day of 2012 NFL Draft

By Chad Reuter NFL.com

The discussions around running backs and the NFL draft typically revolve around the devaluation of the position. But the free-agent contracts signed by Houston Texans star Arian Foster (five years, $43.5 million) and Seattle Seahawks favorite Marshawn Lynch (four years, $31 million) show teams still value strong backs who bring balance to the offense.

The unpredictability of the position is also evident, given those two examples: Foster was an undrafted free agent out of Tennessee, while Lynch was the 12th overall pick in 2007. Three of the top four rushers in the NFL in 2011 were second-round picks, and third-ranked Michael Turner was taken in the fifth round.

But the thought that a team can just find a running back later in the draft ignores the fact that for every ball carrier picked in Rounds 2-7 who becomes a starter, there are plenty of others who get injured or fail to take advantage of opportunities.

So finding an impact rusher isn't simply about waiting until the middle stages of a draft -- it truly hinges on successfully evaluating which back in any round will earn big carries at the next level. Let's take a look at which running backs in the different tiers of this year's draft I think will have the most success at the pro level:

Thursday stars

Impact running backs selected in the first round are expected to be game-changers capable of scoring any time they get into the open field, getting the tough first down and bulling into the end zone.

Trent Richardson, Alabama: It's been clear that Richardson would be a coveted prospect since he was a consensus high school All-American in Pensacola, Fla. His tough running and sub-4.5 speed make him the strong combination teams want in a bell-cow back. He is also adept at pass protection and effective as a receiver out of the backfield, which makes him a true three-down threat.

Doug Martin, Boise State: There's a chance no other back gets picked in the first round this year, but Martin's the top dog if team needs require such a move. Though he is not the fastest of all the second-tier prospects, the former defensive back and special teams ace possesses the burst, balance and sturdy compact build needed to succeed as a starting back.

Friday night lights

Impact second- and third-round backs might not have the full package, but should eclipse 1,000 rushing yards and contribute in the passing game regularly.

David Wilson, Virginia Tech:Stuck behind Ryan Williams and Darren Evans on Tech's running back depth chart his first two years in Blacksburg, Wilson exploded as a junior to become the ACC Player of the Year. The slasher glides through holes inside, showing a bit more strength than you'd expect from a former track star with sub-4.5 speed. If he can tighten up his ball security (seven fumbles in 2011), Wilson can become a LeSean McCoy-type threat.

Robert Turbin, Utah State: A bruising back (5-10, 220) with 4.5 speed, Turbin scored twice against Auburn in Utah State's near upset in the 2011 season opener. He would be a great fit as a third-round pick in a zone scheme, using his lean and explosiveness out of the cut to attack second-level defenders.



Saturday sleepers

Impact running backs from Rounds 4-7 are consistent contributors in a rotation who can step up to become starters in their first or second season.



Chris Polk, Washington: The Huskies rode Polk 799 times over the past three years, including 293 totes (in addition to his 31 receptions) last fall. But multiple shoulder surgeries early in his college career bring up medical red flags. Teams utilizing a power scheme will take advantage of others' concerns about those surgeries and his physical running style to find a great value on Saturday.

Cyrus Gray, Texas A&M: The speedy Gray eclipsed 1,000 yards and rushed for 12 touchdowns in each of the past two seasons, despite sharing carries with talented rising senior Christine Michael and suffering a fractured shoulder in November. He also used his sub-4.5 speed to score twice on kick returns early in his career. If Gray can stay healthy, he can not only contribute on special teams but also as a complementary back capable of breaking off big runs in big spots.

Terrance Ganaway, Baylor: Quarterback Robert Griffin III deservingly got all the headlines for a Heisman Trophy-winning season, but Ganaway's strength and surprising burst in the open field helped him finish 10th in the nation in rushing (1,547 yards). He also ran into the end zone 21 times last season. Though not exceptional in his long speed, Griffin flashes quick enough feet to find a hole and has the frame to make and take hits in the NFL in the same way LeGarrette Blount did while accumulating 1,788 yards over his first two seasons with Tampa Bay.
 
Impact quarterbacks for each day of 2012 NFL Draft

By Chad Reuter NFL.com

The importance of the quarterback position in the NFL is no passing fancy.

It's no coincidence that the No. 1 overall pick has been a quarterback in nine of the past 11 NFL drafts. Not surprisingly, NFL teams threw for more passing yards in 2011 than in any other year in league history.

It is not expected, however, that six of the top 36 picks will be signal callers like in the 2011 NFL Draft. The fact so many quarterbacks came off the board early last year has diminished the feeding frenzy. More teams this year are looking for solid backups or developmental prospects than immediate starters.

The fabulous talents already pegged as the 2012 draft's top two picks, Stanford's Andrew Luck and Baylor's Robert Griffin III, make this quarterback class memorable. The fact the Washington Redskins sent two future first-round picks (in addition to their current second-rounder) to switch spots with the St. Louis Rams so they can nab one of these two players (likely RG3) is all the evidence you need of their potential.

But the rest of the quarterback class appears to be average. That said, impact players can be found in every round of the draft. Let's take a look at which quarterbacks in the different tiers of this year's class I think will enjoy the most success at the pro level.

Thursday stars

Impact quarterbacks in the first round help their teams contend for championships.

Andrew Luck, Stanford: Scouts have already seen Luck's ability to run a pro-style offense. His size (6-foot-4, 234 pounds), lineage (father, Oliver, was an NFL quarterback and is currently the athletic director at West Virginia) and very good athleticism (4.67 40, 36-inch vertical) make him a complete prospect. Indianapolis will have a difficult time passing on the two-time Heisman Trophy runner-up with the first overall pick.

Robert Griffin III, Baylor: Though Griffin showed promise throughout his Baylor career, he really jumped into the national spotlight with this season-opening performance against TCU; RG3 went 21-for-27 for 359 yards and five touchdowns in the 50-48 win. His stock rose throughout his Heisman-winning junior season. He boasts deft touch on deep passes, and his superior speed (4.41 40 at the NFL Scouting Combine), infectious personality and intelligence only augment his value. The Redskins hope their big investment in Griffin pays off with regular playoff appearances -- and a Super Bowl ring.

Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M: The wild card in the first round is the draft's third-rated passer. After losing the quarterback battle to Jerrod Johnson as a redshirt freshman, he led the team in receptions for two straight years. During the 2010 campaign, though, he replaced Johnson behind center, leading the team to six straight wins and a bowl berth. His former head coach at A&M, Mike Sherman, is now the offensive coordinator for the Miami Dolphins, so they seem his most likely suitor in the top 10. But other teams may see his potential as an impact starter and trade up ahead of the Dolphins at No. 8. Stay tuned for how this story will play out early on Thursday evening of draft weekend.



Friday night lights

Impact quarterbacks in the second and third rounds are probable starters who can lead a team to the playoffs with a strong surrounding cast.

Brandon Weeden, Oklahoma State: Weeden will likely be the first quarterback off the board Friday, because of his ability to sling the ball accurately from the pocket. His advanced age (he turns 29 in October) and shoulder injury from his minor league baseball pitching days may scare off teams from selecting him in the first round, but in today's win-now NFL, coaches can't necessarily wait three years for a younger second- or third-round quarterback to mature physically and mentally before making an impact.

Brock Osweiler, Arizona State: His 6-foot-7 frame and inexperience (15 career starts, 7-8 record) worry teams, but the arm strength and better-than-expected agility for his size may land the Sun Devils' first 4,000-yard passer a second- or third-round selection. It could take time for Osweiler to get on the field no matter who takes him, so his best fit might be behind a veteran pocket passer who can teach him the ropes. (Peyton Manning in Denver, possibly?) If he proves to be a good learner, his impact -- though delayed -- could be real.

Saturday sleepers

Impact quarterbacks from rounds four through seven may become regular starters, but should at least be reliable backups and spot starters.



Russell Wilson, Wisconsin: Wilson helped Wisconsin reach the Rose Bowl after transferring from North Carolina State for his senior season, due to Wolfpack coach Tom O'Brien's concerns about his moonlighting as a minor league baseball player in the Colorado Rockies' system. Measuring under 5-11 limits Wilson's upside a bit, and his consistency from the pocket has been questioned, so he'll probably last until the fourth round. But his poise and mobility should make him a locker room favorite and give teams at least a reliable backup -- something many teams don't have right now.

Nick Foles, Arizona: Foles' 6-5, 243-pound frame allows him to see the field and distribute the ball from the pocket. His lack of mobility and inconsistency makes him a third-day prospect, but don't be surprised if he succeeds as a starter or solid option off the bench given more reliable receivers than he played with in Tucson and a line capable of protecting him.

B.J. Coleman, Chattanooga: This Tennessee transfer has the requisite physical attributes (6-3, 233 pounds) to contribute at the next level, and the way the ball comes out of his hand grabbed the attention of scouts throughout the week of the East-West Shrine Game. If he proves mature enough to take coaching and plays with more calm and poise in the pocket, Coleman could develop into a viable option in the right circumstances.
 
I think Polk could be a really nice player. He's a converted wideout which is surprising because he's big. I've heard the comparison to Corey Dillon but with really nice hands. Sounds like he could be another Robert Smith type of guy.

 
NFL Draft Dish: Brock Osweiler's draft stock debated

Excerpts:

This is the time of year you shouldn't believe everything said by NFL teams as they prepare for the 2012 NFL Draft.

Some teams take this process a step beyond secretive. That is, in order to mislead other teams as to their interest in certain players, they will plant rumors via the media. It's all part of the game.

After Arizona State quarterback Brock Osweiler's outstanding pro day performance, NFL.com's Gil Brandt said Osweiler "vaulted himself into the first round on draft day.” However, others in the media, including Charley Casserly of NFL Network and Greg Cosell of NFL Films, said they disagree.

According to sources, Brandt's statement might not be so far-fetched. A number of NFL sources told us their teams have very high grades on Osweiler and would be shocked if he was not drafted by the end of the second round.

In our view, Osweiler is a potential second-round pick, but he must tighten and shorten his delivery. He likely will never succeed without doing so.
— After Georgia Tech wide receiver Stephen Hill had an incredible workout at the Scouting Combine, it became apparent he would be a first-round pick. However, after speaking with numerous sources around the league, it's clear his stock has started to slide. Teams have questions about his hands and route running. As a result, they now view Hill as a second-round pick.
 
Draft Tip Sheet: Georgia Tech WR U; Poe, Barron, Crick updates

Excerpt:

Even with the prospect of having a second player in three years selected at the position in the first round, and the third in six drafts, no one is ready yet to anoint Georgia Tech as "Wide Receiver U."

But it is more than unusual, especially with the offense that coach Paul Johnson operates, to have such success in placing pass-catchers in the early rounds of the draft.

Calvin Johnson as the second overall choice in 2007? That one is certainly understandable, and has worked out swimmingly for the Detroit Lions.

But Johnson played under Chan Gailey for the Yellow Jackets, and not in Paul Johnson's triple-option offense, which has finished no worse than fourth in the country in rushing yards since the coach arrived in 2008, and has ranked either first or second in each of the past three campaigns.

The rush-heavy offense notwithstanding -- the run has accounted for nearly 73 percent of Tech's offense in Paul Jonson's four seasons, and more than three-quarters of the snaps, and the Yellow Jackets have averaged only 167.0 passes per year in that stretch -- Stephen Hill figures to be picked in the first round. Just as Demaryius Thomas was by Denver in 2010.

Hill and Thomas are tremendous examples of NFL scouts projecting talent, no matter the college offense in which they played, to the league level. But they also are, in addition to being players who will help Johnson recruit receivers who might otherwise be reluctant to perform in such a ground-based attack, good examples of how downfield blocking can help to accentuate a wideout's total skill set.

Make no mistake, Thomas was chosen in the first round by the Broncos (No. 22 overall) and Hill figures to get into the first round on April 26, because each is big, fast, and catches the ball well. But the downfield blocking ability of the two Tech players figured into the equation somewhere.

Notable is that Hill caught just 43 passes his past two seasons. Thomas had 85 grabs his final two years.

"It doesn't hurt," Hill said last month when asked about the blocking. "I think it helps to (dispel) some of the (diva) image that wide receivers have. It's something you have to want to do. The natural thing at the position is to want to catch passes. But here, if you don't block, you're not going to play. It's part of what you buy into when you come here. And I do think it makes an impression (on scouts)."

In fact, at Hill's pro day workout, the scouts who gathered on the Tech campus were far more concerned about his route-running skills, since they were a bit difficult to discern given the offense in which he played. What they found was that Hill, who has blistering speed in the low 4.4 range, is quick in and out of his cuts. What the scouts already knew was that Hill is unselfish and willing to perform the "grunt" tasks that others might avoid.

And, it seems, he's not the only such receiver this year.

The Sports Xchange noted in passing last week that the pool of wide receivers in the 2012 draft class was, as a group, relatively solid in terms of blocking for the run. In addition to Hill, Notre Dame's Michael Floyd has been noted as a standout downfield blocker. LSU's Rueben Randle has garnered mixed reviews for his blocking, but most scouts seem to feel he is above average. Among the highly-regarded wide receivers, Kendall Wright of Baylor is cited as a willing blocker. Some of the middle- and late-round candidates are also mentioned as good blockers by scouts, and not all of them possess great size, but do have obvious tenacity.

Again, teams aren't likely to invest even a late-round selection on a receiver based principally on his blocking prowess. But, as one NFC area scout noted: "Hey, it is part of the job description, you know? It still jumps out at you when guys do it."

And even with the "spread" offenses becoming so prevalent at the college level, more receivers seem to be doing it.

"I don't care where you play," Randle said, "you aren't going to see many long runs without a (wide receiver) blocking somebody down the field. It's almost as if it's become a lost art, and scouts are surprised when they see it. It's an effort thing ... and people want to see effort."
 
Insider: Washington nose tackle underrated

Excerpts:

“(Michigan State’s) Edwin Baker looked good at his pro day. I think he’ll go in the fourth round. I would not take him there — I wouldn’t. I think he is a role player in the NFL. He had a better workout than he played. I just think the way the NFL is now, he will play and be in a rotation and has NFL qualities. You see his speed on stretch plays, but he is not a very big guy. He was getting pushed for playing time — that’s why he came out.”
“(Boise State RB) Doug Martin is a tough one to figure out if you look at this year vs. last year. In 2010, he looks like a surefire late first-rounder. If you watch 2011, there are games where he looks like nothing more than a free agent. I don’t see what everyone else is (seeing) on this year’s tape. If you get the player you see last year, you’d be pretty happy. If you get the 2011 version, you might be disappointed.”
 
Bullocks re: Doug Martin. He seemed to get better every time he took the field. The ASU game (the last of his college career) was the best he has ever looked.

Also, Edwin Baker is not a small back. 204 pounds is a good weight for someone who is 5'8.1". There is a big difference between short and small. Despite the success of guys like Ray Rice and MJD, some people still haven't figured this out.

 
Bullocks re: Doug Martin. He seemed to get better every time he took the field. The ASU game (the last of his college career) was the best he has ever looked.

Also, Edwin Baker is not a small back. 204 pounds is a good weight for someone who is 5'8.1". There is a big difference between short and small. Despite the success of guys like Ray Rice and MJD, some people still haven't figured this out.
:goodposting: On both items, but especially on the bolded part!

 
I think Polk could be a really nice player. He's a converted wideout which is surprising because he's big. I've heard the comparison to Corey Dillon but with really nice hands. Sounds like he could be another Robert Smith type of guy.
Polk is an intriguing player. I'm not thrilled by his running ability but with his receiving ability he could the elusive 'every down back'. The best case is a Corey Dillon with great receiving skills and that's not bad thing to be in PPR leagues. It will be interesting if he goes somewhere where he has a chance to win the starting job.
 
Common opponents provide interesting comparisons of top NFL Draft prospects

By Pat Kirwan | NFL Insider

Common opponents are a decent way to compare player performances. It isn't an exact science by any means, but at least you can witness two players close in ability and how they fared against the same team. If nothing else, it gives a point of reference rather than comparing apples and oranges, which happens when none of the opponents are the same.

Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III both played against Oklahoma State and Washington. Both beat Washington and both lost to Oklahoma State.

Luck went 43 for 52 for 516 yards with four touchdowns, one interception and two sacks in those two games. He completed 83 percent of his passes and was sacked in one of 27 attempts.

Griffin completed 57 of 83 passes for 720 yards with two touchdowns, two interceptions and six sacks. He completed 69 percent of his passes and was sacked in one of 15 attempts.

Luck ran seven times for 20 yards and no touchdowns. Griffin ran 34 times for 82 yards and two touchdowns.

Brandon Weeden led Oklahoma State to victory against both. He completed 53 of 78 passes for 673 yards with six touchdowns, one interception and one sack. He completed 68 percent of his passes and was sacked once in 78 pass plays. He basically outplayed both quarterbacks. He didn't have much use for running: two carries for -7 yards.

The top two wide receivers in this draft, Justin Blackmon and Michael Floyd, both played against Stanford. Granted, Notre Dame didn't have a QB like Weeden, but the comparison against the same opponent is interesting. Blackmon caught eight passes for 182 yards (23 yards per reception) and three touchdowns. Floyd caught eight passes for 92 yards (11.5 per reception) and one touchdown.

For their careers, Floyd played in 42 games, with multiple TD receptions in eight of them. Blackmon played in 35 games, with multiple touchdowns in 12. I like Michael Floyd as a first-round talent, but he struggles against press, gets rerouted too easily and caught just nine TD passes as a senior. Blackmon is sudden, more explosive, caught 38 touchdowns in his last 22 games and loves to block.

I asked two Stanford defensive players to compare the two wide receivers, and they didn't think it was even close. As one defensive back said, Blackmon was from another planet.
 
That is a big selling point for Blackmon. You can talk about measurables all you want, but the guy flat out dominated against anyone and everyone that he faced. There is no way that Oklahoma State would've beaten Stanford if he hadn't played. He was their whole offense.

I still think he will end up being something like a Nicks/Boldin type in the NFL. He may not run a 4.3, but he's a player.

 
Common opponents provide interesting comparisons of top NFL Draft prospects

By Pat Kirwan | NFL Insider

Common opponents are a decent way to compare player performances. It isn't an exact science by any means, but at least you can witness two players close in ability and how they fared against the same team. If nothing else, it gives a point of reference rather than comparing apples and oranges, which happens when none of the opponents are the same.

Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III both played against Oklahoma State and Washington. Both beat Washington and both lost to Oklahoma State.

Luck went 43 for 52 for 516 yards with four touchdowns, one interception and two sacks in those two games. He completed 83 percent of his passes and was sacked in one of 27 attempts.

Griffin completed 57 of 83 passes for 720 yards with two touchdowns, two interceptions and six sacks. He completed 69 percent of his passes and was sacked in one of 15 attempts.

Luck ran seven times for 20 yards and no touchdowns. Griffin ran 34 times for 82 yards and two touchdowns.

Brandon Weeden led Oklahoma State to victory against both. He completed 53 of 78 passes for 673 yards with six touchdowns, one interception and one sack. He completed 68 percent of his passes and was sacked once in 78 pass plays. He basically outplayed both quarterbacks. He didn't have much use for running: two carries for -7 yards.

The top two wide receivers in this draft, Justin Blackmon and Michael Floyd, both played against Stanford. Granted, Notre Dame didn't have a QB like Weeden, but the comparison against the same opponent is interesting. Blackmon caught eight passes for 182 yards (23 yards per reception) and three touchdowns. Floyd caught eight passes for 92 yards (11.5 per reception) and one touchdown.

For their careers, Floyd played in 42 games, with multiple TD receptions in eight of them. Blackmon played in 35 games, with multiple touchdowns in 12. I like Michael Floyd as a first-round talent, but he struggles against press, gets rerouted too easily and caught just nine TD passes as a senior. Blackmon is sudden, more explosive, caught 38 touchdowns in his last 22 games and loves to block.

I asked two Stanford defensive players to compare the two wide receivers, and they didn't think it was even close. As one defensive back said, Blackmon was from another planet.
This is very interesting to me. It seems as though the perception right now is that the gap between Blackmon and Floyd is shrinking, and now very small. -The comments from the Stanford d-players makes me think the gap might not be tiny after all. But the QB play could have contributed to this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
2012 NFL Draft tiers: Elite prospects, blue chips, red chips

By Bucky Brooks NFL.com

Analyst

It is not a coincidence the NFL's perennial title contenders are also the teams that routinely walk away with the best draft classes.

Teams like the Pittsburgh Steelers, Baltimore Ravens, New England Patriots, Green Bay Packers and New York Giants are lauded for their ability to identify talented players at every stage of the draft, but they excel at hitting home runs with their early selections, particularly in the first round.

While every team hopes to find difference makers in the draft's opening round, the fact that these squads have consistently found blue chippers at the bottom of the first round is a tribute to their keen understanding of the draft board and how to identify overlooked blue chippers.

As a young scout for the Seattle Seahawks from 2000-03, I learned from Ted Thompson, John Schneider and Scot McCloughan that most draft classes feature five to eight elite prospects and another 20 players who carry consensus first-round grades across the league. Although this group of 25 or so players with legitimate first-round grades fails to completely fill out the draft's opening stanza, the formula took into the account the different grading systems and player-specific preferences for various teams throughout the league, and provided our team with a quality pool of players to focus our efforts on.

Based on that premise and a few conversations with several scouts around the league, here are the three different tiers at the top of the 2012 draft class:

Elite prospects

These players should earn Pro Bowl recognition early in their careers, and rank among the top five players at their respective positions within two to three years.

1. Andrew Luck, QB, Stanford

2. Robert Griffin III, QB, Baylor

3. Trent Richardson, RB, Alabama

4. Matt Kalil, OT, USC

5. Morris Claiborne, CB, LSU

6. Justin Blackmon, WR, Oklahoma State

Blue chips

These prospects are regarded as difference makers, based solely on their talent. They should start as rookies and make immediate contributions to their respective teams.

1. Quinton Coples, DE, North Carolina

2. Melvin Ingram, DE/OLB, South Carolina

3. Luke Kuechly, LB, Boston College

4. Riley Reiff, OT, Iowa

5. David DeCastro, OG, Stanford

6. Michael Floyd, WR, Notre Dame

7. Jonathan Martin, OT, Stanford

8. Dre Kirkpatrick, CB, Alabama

9. Fletcher Cox, DT, Mississippi State

10. Michael Brockers, DT, LSU

11. Kendall Wright, WR, Baylor

12. Dontari Poe, DT, Memphis

13. Cordy Glenn, OG/OT, Georgia

14. Dont'a Hightower, LB, Alabama

15. Whitney Mercilus, DE/OLB, Illinois

16. Mark Barron, S, Alabama

17. Ryan Tannehill, QB, Texas A&M

18. Janoris Jenkins, CB, North Alabama

19. Stephon Gilmore, CB, South Carolina

20. Jerel Worthy, DT, Michigan State

With a definitive blue-chip class established through film study and workouts, scouts turn their attention to the next tier of players to determine the order of the borderline blue-chip prospects in the class. These players, who fall under the red-chip category, possess a few blue qualities (critical factors like athleticism, football intelligence, explosiveness and production), but lack the consistent profile of their blue counterparts. In the right system, however, they could emerge as Pro Bowlers and impact players. Some of these players will hear their names called in the first round, but scouts across the league were divided in their opinions on their pro potential.

Red chips

These players should contribute as part-time players initially, but finish the season as starters for their respective teams. In addition, they should be key contributors on special teams and provide timely playmaking in their designated roles.

1. Chandler Jones, DE, Syracuse

2. Courtney Upshaw, DE/OLB, Alabama

3. Shea McClellin, OLB, Boise State

4. Andre Branch, DE/OLB, Clemson

5. Lamar Miller, RB, Miami

6. David Wilson, RB, Virginia Tech

7. Coby Fleener, TE, Stanford

8. Devon Still, DT, Penn State

9. Zach Brown, OLB, North Carolina

10. Stephen Hill, WR, Georgia Tech

11. Mike Adams, OT, Ohio State

12. Nick Perry, DE/OLB, USC

13. Harrison Smith, S, Notre Dame

14. Lavonte David, LB, Nebraska

15. Doug Martin, RB, Boise State

The aforementioned prospects listed in the red-chip category are firmly established as top-40 picks, with several expected to come off the board in the first round. Round selection isn't always the best indication of a prospect's pro potential, but I believe there are players on the red list who will make an immediate impact on the NFL based on their talent and potential. Here is a closer look at five red chippers that I expect to thrive as rookies:

1. Coby Fleener, TE, Stanford: With more teams heavily incorporating tight ends into their game plans, Fleener could become an instant star with his dynamic receiving skills. At 6-foot-6, 245 pounds with 4.5 speed, he is fast enough to make plays down the field, while also possessing the big frame to be an effective target between the hashes.

2. Harrison Smith, S, Notre Dame: To combat the athletic tight ends that are beginning to take over the league, teams are looking for versatile safeties with the skills to play in space. Smith is not only capable of locking up in man coverage, but he is a ferocious hitter adept at playing near the line of scrimmage.

3. Lamar Miller, RB, Miami: The devaluation of the running back position will prompt some teams to bypass on runners early in the draft, but Miller is a home-run hitter with a game that reminds some evaluators of Tennessee's Chris Johnson. Given the importance of explosive plays to offensive production, Miller could be a surprise candidate for Offensive Rookie of the Year.

4. Lavonte David, LB, Nebraska: The proliferation of the 3-4 has caused some to overlook talented Will linebackers ideally suited for Tampa 2 schemes. However, David is a speedy playmaker with the instincts and awareness to create disruption at the second level as a run-through player on the backside.

5. Courtney Upshaw, DE/OLB, Alabama: It's funny how a few workouts in shorts and T-shirts can alter the opinion on a good football player, but that certainly appears to be the case with Upshaw. He has been a dominant defender in the college football's toughest conference, and his consistent production on tape should outweigh the concerns regarding his athletic ability. Upshaw possesses all of the intangibles to be an effective pro as an edge player and should shine in a situational role during his first year.
 
Impact receivers, tight ends for each day of 2012 NFL Draft

By Chad Reuter NFL.com

Quarterbacks often get the credit for leading prolific passing attacks, but without exceptional receiving threats, their throws would fall to the ground -- or end up in the hands of eager defenders.

Impact wide receivers are often selected early in the draft. Detroit Lions freak Calvin Johnson and Arizona Cardinals beast Larry Fitzgerald have made good on their promise as top-three overall picks with their Pro Bowl-caliber production. But only eight of the top 20 wide receivers in 2011 (in terms of receiving yardage) were past first-round picks; running backs, whose future success is notoriously difficult to predict, did slightly better, with nine of the top 20 rushers coming from the first round.

Teams are starting to realize that waiting for value by taking a receiver in the second or third round instead of reaching in the first can pay off, just as it can with running backs. This is especially true for this year's receiver class, which is very deep.

Receivers aren't even necessarily the most successful pass-catchers anymore; the work of some top NFL receivers was slightly overshadowed last season during "The Year of the Tight End." The ascension of New Orleans Saints TE Jimmy Graham and the New England Patriots duo of Rob Gronkowski and Aaron Hernandez changed the way that position is viewed. "Gronk" and Graham finished sixth and seventh in receiving yardage, respectively, ahead of fellow Pro Bowl players Brandon Marshall and Mike Wallace. Unfortunately, this year's tight end class sorely lacks elite talent and depth.

Still, impact players can be found in every round of the draft. Here are the receivers and tight ends in each tier of this year's class that I think will enjoy the most success at the pro level.

Thursday stars

Impact first-round receivers and tight ends are constant threats to make the big play, putting up Pro Bowl-caliber numbers in both yardage and touchdowns.

Justin Blackmon, WR, Oklahoma State: Although not considered to be in the elite class of "Megatron" or Fitzgerald, Blackmon is physical and fast enough to be a playmaker in any offense. He'll be a reliable target at each level of the field, capable of beating corners on slants, digs and vertical routes. Like New York Giants star Hakeem Nicks, Blackmon plays bigger than he measures (Blackmon is 6-foot-1, 207 pounds, while Nicks is 6-1, 212). Teams shouldn't allow Blackmon to fall very far, unlike Nicks, who was scooped up by the Giants with the 29th overall pick in 2009.

Michael Floyd, WR, Notre Dame: Some scouts believe Floyd's off-field troubles and pedestrian quickness out of breaks will prevent him from being an impact player at the next level. They might have thought the same thing about Dwayne Bowe, who fell to the 23rd spot in 2007. The Kansas City Chiefs' leading receiver has only averaged about 1,000 yards a season, and in 2010, when everything was clicking on the team's offense, scored 15 touchdowns. Floyd has similar size and speed, and his strong run-blocking skills are a great bonus.

Coby Fleener, TE, Stanford: Fleener, who has a 6-foot-6, 246-pound frame and elite speed, is a potential matchup nightmare for NFL linebackers and safeties. If he's placed in the right system, there's no reason to believe he can't be just as potent a vertical threat as Graham. The footwork he displayed while working as a receiver when Andrew Luck needed better outside targets was not ignored by scouts. If he falls out of the first round due to different team needs, someone's going to get a great bargain early Friday evening.

Friday-night lights

Impact receivers and tight ends who are taken in the second and third rounds are regular producers without possessing elite size or speed. They either stretch defenses vertically or prove difficult to stop in clutch situations.

A.J. Jenkins, WR, Illinois: Even though Illinois didn't feature a feared passing attack, Jenkins' game is not unlike that of the aforementioned Wallace (who was similarly underutilized at Ole Miss). He displayed smooth route-running skills and solid hands in a fine week at the East-West Shrine Game, earning a call-up to the Senior Bowl in January. And the sub-4.4-second 40-yard dash times that Jenkins ran at the NFL Scouting Combine clued teams in to his potential as a difference-maker, whether he's lined up in the slot or outside.

T.Y. Hilton, WR, Florida International: The only thing that can prevent Hilton from becoming an excellent slot receiver and returner at the next level is his health. His strong route-running ability and vision, his quickness with the ball in his hands and his underrated toughness give him a chance to make an impact on special teams as a rookie. He could also surprise defenses if allowed to run free inside.

James Hanna, TE, Oklahoma: Hanna generated some buzz with an impressive combine performance that would have had him rated among the better receiver prospects, despite his size (6-4, 252). His production was not outstanding in Oklahoma's wide-open attack (27 receptions, 381 yards, two touchdowns in 2011), but he has the ability to be a legitimate chain-mover inside, like Tony Moeaki was in his rookie campaign with Kansas City.

Saturday sleepers

Impact receivers and tight ends taken in the later rounds should at least be regular complementary threats on offense and/or key contributors on special teams.

DeVier Posey, WR, Ohio State: The depth of the receiver class and the fact that Posey missed much of the 2011 season with an NCAA suspension could make him a steal on the third day of the draft. He possesses the size (6-2, 211) and 4.4 speed that teams covet in an outside receiver. He also flashed potential as a vertical threat, despite the uneven quarterback play he had to work with at Ohio State.

Devon Wylie, WR, Fresno State: Wylie's injury history is also difficult to ignore. Finally ridding himself of foot and hamstring problems, Wylie came up big as a senior receiver (37 receptions, 494 yards in his last six games) after primarily acting as a returner early in the season (two punt returns for touchdowns in the first six games). His quickness should earn him time in the slot as a rookie and get him a spot on special teams.

Rhett Ellison, TE, USC: The son of two-time Super Bowl champion Riki Ellison (who played with the San Francisco 49ers from 1983 to 1988) has made a name for himself with his versatility. His ability to block in the run game and move the chains as a receiver could make him a starter sooner rather than later. He is also a willing and able tackler on special teams, which increases the odds he'll secure a roster spot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bullocks re: Doug Martin. He seemed to get better every time he took the field. The ASU game (the last of his college career) was the best he has ever looked. Also, Edwin Baker is not a small back. 204 pounds is a good weight for someone who is 5'8.1". There is a big difference between short and small. Despite the success of guys like Ray Rice and MJD, some people still haven't figured this out.
:goodposting: Add Bradshaw to that list.
 
The Shutdown 50 #22: Coby Fleener, TE, Stanford

By Doug Farrar

With the 2011 NFL season in the books, it's time to turn our eyes to the NFL draft, and the pre-draft evaluation process. Before and after the 2012 scouting combine, we'll be taking a closer look at the 50 draft-eligible players who may be the biggest NFL difference-makers when all is said and done.



We continue this year's series with Stanford tight end Coby Fleener, one of Andrew Luck's primary targets as Luck became the next Peyton Manning. Fleener isn't as big a name, but he plays a big game -- in an era where tight ends rule the day more than ever before, Fleener is a great hybrid between the in-line blockers and the big receivers who masquerade as tight ends in spread concepts. In each of his last three years for the Cardinal, Fleener increased his catches, receiving yards, yards per catch, and touchdowns -- in 2011, he brought down 10 touchdowns with just 34 catches, and he led the PAC-12 with 19.6 yards per catch last season. At his Pro Day, Fleener ran wind-aided times under 4.5 seconds in the 40-yard dash; he looked as quick and defined as any big receiver. He's got all the tools required at his position for NFL success; the question is, how productive can he be?

In a less conservative offense than Stanford's, Fleener might have brought in 60 catches per year, and based on his game tape, it's pretty easy to project him doing so in the NFL. Without question, he's the best tight end in this draft class, and he brings to mind the best tight end in the NFL.

Pros: If there's one word that comes to mind when watching Fleener's tape, it's practiced -- as a receiver in the slot or inline, he displays fine fundamentals when it comes to getting open and staying available as a target through the play. Shows a nice hand-strike to get free form linebackers and defensive backs who try to tie him up at the line; press coverage will not slow him up too often. Outstanding hands-catcher (doesn't block the ball with his body) with an array of fairly ridiculous highlight plays. Doesn't have top-level, elite speed for the position (not at the level of Aaron Hernandez or Jimmy Graham), but gets good quickness off the line most of the time. Not a one-speed player; he's dynamic up the seam on longer routes and can break away from safeties at times. Has a second gear in space and knows how to use it. Yards after catch monster who refuses to go down without an extreme fight -- arm-tacklers will not have good days against this guy.

Fleener can be a nightmare for linebackers on slants and crosses because he builds up speed easily and gets upfield with authority. Will cause an extra defender to commit on every play -- if you give Fleener a free play in the short areas, he can take it to the house pretty easily. Surprisingly elusive in space -- he'll juke safeties and stay in line for the timing catch. Outstanding red zone and end zone target who will beat multiple defenders and bring the ball down in heavy, compressed traffic -- Andrew Luck went out of his way to high-point throws to Fleener at Stanford's Pro Day and prove to NFL personnel that in any offense, he'll bring in more than his share of touchdowns.

Cons: Fleener is a willing and able blocker who will sometimes take on two defenders before releasing into a route, but he's not a dominant drive-blocker in the traditional tight end sense. He tends to chip and go more than he engages and pushes back; as a result, his blocking is inconsistent and not always effective. This seems like something that could be corrected. Fleener could be more crisp in some of his short-area routes -- while he's tough in traffic, he needs to cut routes more consistently. Tends to round off quicker in and out routes.

Conclusion: The Gronkowski comparison seems in line, with one major caveat -- Gronk is the best blocking tight end in the NFL, and Fleener still has miles to go before he's at that level. What Fleener brings to the NFL than even Gronkowski couldn't at first is the experience of being a major, every-down target in an offense proven successful at the professional level. Between Harbaugh and Luck, Fleener was a major target for the best college quarterback in recent memory, in an offense designed (and used after the coach's departure to San Francisco) to be as mistake-proof as possible. Neither man would continue to rely on Fleener as they did if he was anything less than a consistent threat on the field, and the NFL quarterback throwing to Fleener should feel the same sense of security sooner than later.

Pro Comparison: Rob Gronkowski, New England Patriots
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People seem to really be sleeping on Polk. WHy is that? He's got great size, production, good speed, soft hands. Not sure why he's being overlooked.

 
'Before the Beginning' with Chris Polk

By Bob Condotta

Special to NFLDraftScout.com/The Sports Xchange

SEATTLE -- Chris Polk's dream took root immediately.

The first time he touched the ball in an organized football game at age 6, Polk broke loose for a touchdown.

"From that moment on, my dream was to play professionally," Polk said. "I love football so much, I didn't play any other sport since age 6. I never tried basketball, never tried anything else but just football. I've been in love with football since that first carry."

Polk has broken loose with regularity ever since, through his high school days at Redlands (Calif.) East Valley High and the University of Washington, which he left as the second-leading rusher in school history.

Now the question is where football where carry him next.

He's regarded as one of the top handful of running backs available in the NFL Draft later this month, projected by some going as high as the second round. He's currently ranked fifth at the position by NFLDraftScout.com. (Positional Series: Evaluating the Running Backs)

Polk says the conjecture of where and when he'll be drafted doesn't really interest him.

"It's all speculation," he said just under two weeks before the draft. "You never know what this general manger or anyone thinks. I don't pay attention to it. I've been criticized and talked about my whole career and that is what's made me the person I am today. So I don't really let that worry me."

Indeed, in his early years at the University of Washington, the questions were about Polk's durability after he suffered a few injuries, including a dislocated shoulder that sidelined him for the rest of the season two games into his freshman year in 2008.

It didn't take long for Polk to put that tag to rest, carrying the ball at least 226 times each of his three full seasons at UW, finishing with more rushing attempts than anyone in the history of a school traditionally known for strong running games.

En route to rushing for at least 1,000 yards three consecutive seasons -- the only other player in UW history to do that was Napoleon Kaufman, a first-round pick of the Raiders in 1995 -- Polk became known for his tough running style, gaining innumerable yards after contact for a team slowly rebuilding under Steve Sarkisian from the 0-12 disaster of 2008.

Polk says he enjoys doing the dirty work.

"My favorite running plays are anything up the middle," Polk said. "As long as it's up the middle, I'm fine, whether it's inside zone or power or counter or anything up the middle."

At UW, Polk also showed an ability to make the big run, such as the 2010 Washington State game when he rushed for 284 yards on 29 carries, the second-highest yardage total in school history.

Some draft analysts, though, have questioned Polk's speed, whispers that increased after he arrived at the Senior Bowl weighing 224 pounds and called by some observers as "sluggish."

But Polk then slimmed down to 216 and turned in a 4.57-second 40-yard dash at the NFL Scouting Combine in February and an even quicker 4.49 electronically timed 40 at Washington's pro day in March.

"I wanted to lose some weight and show them (NFL teams) that I really do care about my body and I really do take what I do seriously," he said.

He thinks he's shown that his speed should be a non-issue.

"I'm a bigger back moving at a good rate," he said. "I'm a game-speed type of person -- I'm not a track athlete."

And Polk can point to all kinds of long runs as proof of his ability to turn the big play -- he had touchdown runs of 46 and 61 yards in the first-half alone at Stanford.

Polk also lists on his resume a solid ability to catch the ball out of the backfield -- in fact, he was initially used at Washington as a receiver as a true freshman in 2008 before being turned into a running back permanently.

Polk caught 79 passes in his Washington career and helped the Huskies win games last season against Cal and Arizona with late touchdown receptions -- his 70-yarder against the Bears, in which he caught the ball 30 yards or so downfield, was Washington's longest pass play of 2011.

"I've always been very comfortable catching the ball," he said.

Polk was eligible for the draft after the 2010 season but decided to return. Having already been in college four years due to the 2008 season and injury, however, it was a pretty clear choice for Polk to leave after 2011.

"I just feel like I'm as good as all the other running backs in the draft," he said. "They are all great, phenomenal running backs and I feel like I fit right in with them. But at the end of the day, I just want to get drafted -- it doesn't matter what round. Then I can say that I'm a professional football player, a professional athlete, and that must makes the dream for me. Whatever team drafts me won't be sorry."
Video Link:Tony Softli compares Polk to Steven Jackson and Corey Dillon

In this excerpt from "Before the Beginning With Chris Polk," veteran NFL scout and executive Tony Softli compares Chris to Steven Jackson and Corey Dillon, while Caric Sports Management president Steve Caric speaks about Chris' strengths off the field.
 
From a purely FF perspective, I'm starting to wonder if a guy shouldn't just shoot for the moon and select RG3 over Luck. His speed along has got to be worth a few points a week.

 
'Sabertooth said:
From a purely FF perspective, I'm starting to wonder if a guy shouldn't just shoot for the moon and select RG3 over Luck. His speed along has got to be worth a few points a week.
I tend to agree from a purely FF perspective. The Dteve Young/RG3 comp seems spot on to me and Steve had some huge FF seasons.
 
'Sabertooth said:
From a purely FF perspective, I'm starting to wonder if a guy shouldn't just shoot for the moon and select RG3 over Luck. His speed along has got to be worth a few points a week.
I tend to agree from a purely FF perspective. The Dteve Young/RG3 comp seems spot on to me and Steve had some huge FF seasons.
I have the 1st pick in a 2qb dynasty. I am really agonizing over Luck(best shot at long term top 10 numbers), RG3 (not as sure a bet as luck but upside is Aaron Rodgers), and Richardson (potentially LT2 in his prime). :wall:
 
'Sabertooth said:
From a purely FF perspective, I'm starting to wonder if a guy shouldn't just shoot for the moon and select RG3 over Luck. His speed along has got to be worth a few points a week.
I tend to agree from a purely FF perspective. The Dteve Young/RG3 comp seems spot on to me and Steve had some huge FF seasons.
I have the 1st pick in a 2qb dynasty. I am really agonizing over Luck(best shot at long term top 10 numbers), RG3 (not as sure a bet as luck but upside is Aaron Rodgers), and Richardson (potentially LT2 in his prime). :wall:
That's rough. I think I'd take Luck over RG3 to be safe and It's not like Luck has no upside. Never done a 2qb league. I would hate to pass on Trent but if your format dictates it.....
 
That is a big selling point for Blackmon. You can talk about measurables all you want, but the guy flat out dominated against anyone and everyone that he faced. There is no way that Oklahoma State would've beaten Stanford if he hadn't played. He was their whole offense. I still think he will end up being something like a Nicks/Boldin type in the NFL. He may not run a 4.3, but he's a player.
Great post!!! What ever happen to watching the film?!?!?!?
 
(Rotoworld) According to Pro Football Weekly, Baylor WR Kendall Wright is "parked in the third round" on a number of teams' draft boards after an unimpressive offseason.Analysis: There were rumors of an offseason weight gain for Wright, and his forty time at the Combine was slower than anticipated. "Randall Cobb was a lot better," one NFL evaluator said. "Wright is nowhere near as good with the ball in his hands and (Cobb) lasted 'til the back of the second (round). People are getting snookered (by Wright)." Wright managed only four bench-press reps, and Pro Football Weekly reports his body fat was 16 percent. Per PFW, it's "one of the highest percentages for a receiver in the past decade."
 
That is a big selling point for Blackmon. You can talk about measurables all you want, but the guy flat out dominated against anyone and everyone that he faced. There is no way that Oklahoma State would've beaten Stanford if he hadn't played. He was their whole offense. I still think he will end up being something like a Nicks/Boldin type in the NFL. He may not run a 4.3, but he's a player.
Great post!!! What ever happen to watching the film?!?!?!?
I don't have access to game film.
 
This is very interesting to me. It seems as though the perception right now is that the gap between Blackmon and Floyd is shrinking, and now very small. -The comments from the Stanford d-players makes me think the gap might not be tiny after all. But the QB play could have contributed to this.
On Gruden's QB Camp, when Weeden was asked about Blackmon he was clearly awed by him. He very genuinely (I thought) said "He's a freak, man. He's a guy who can really change a football game".
 
That is a big selling point for Blackmon. You can talk about measurables all you want, but the guy flat out dominated against anyone and everyone that he faced. There is no way that Oklahoma State would've beaten Stanford if he hadn't played. He was their whole offense.

I still think he will end up being something like a Nicks/Boldin type in the NFL. He may not run a 4.3, but he's a player.
Great post!!! What ever happen to watching the film?!?!?!?
I don't have access to game film.
My link
 
Bullocks re: Doug Martin. He seemed to get better every time he took the field. The ASU game (the last of his college career) was the best he has ever looked. Also, Edwin Baker is not a small back. 204 pounds is a good weight for someone who is 5'8.1". There is a big difference between short and small. Despite the success of guys like Ray Rice and MJD, some people still haven't figured this out.
:goodposting: Add Bradshaw to that list.
Doug Martin looked average in that game. I didn't see the stop and start cutting ability. No vision, no burst. I also counted 3 times he was tackled by the ankles. Where's the power and balance? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONBzZDKI7IYFor whatever reason, he looked much better and explosive in 2010 and it showed in the numbers. Maybe he got too thick? I feel he'd be better off at 205-210 instead of 220, and still have good power.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmULhgzbcyU
 
The Shutdown 50 — #22: Coby Fleener, TE, Stanford

By Doug Farrar

With the 2011 NFL season in the books, it's time to turn our eyes to the NFL draft, and the pre-draft evaluation process. Before and after the 2012 scouting combine, we'll be taking a closer look at the 50 draft-eligible players who may be the biggest NFL difference-makers when all is said and done.



We continue this year's series with Stanford tight end Coby Fleener, one of Andrew Luck's primary targets as Luck became the next Peyton Manning. Fleener isn't as big a name, but he plays a big game -- in an era where tight ends rule the day more than ever before, Fleener is a great hybrid between the in-line blockers and the big receivers who masquerade as tight ends in spread concepts. In each of his last three years for the Cardinal, Fleener increased his catches, receiving yards, yards per catch, and touchdowns -- in 2011, he brought down 10 touchdowns with just 34 catches, and he led the PAC-12 with 19.6 yards per catch last season. At his Pro Day, Fleener ran wind-aided times under 4.5 seconds in the 40-yard dash; he looked as quick and defined as any big receiver. He's got all the tools required at his position for NFL success; the question is, how productive can he be?

In a less conservative offense than Stanford's, Fleener might have brought in 60 catches per year, and based on his game tape, it's pretty easy to project him doing so in the NFL. Without question, he's the best tight end in this draft class, and he brings to mind the best tight end in the NFL.

Pros: If there's one word that comes to mind when watching Fleener's tape, it's practiced -- as a receiver in the slot or inline, he displays fine fundamentals when it comes to getting open and staying available as a target through the play. Shows a nice hand-strike to get free form linebackers and defensive backs who try to tie him up at the line; press coverage will not slow him up too often. Outstanding hands-catcher (doesn't block the ball with his body) with an array of fairly ridiculous highlight plays. Doesn't have top-level, elite speed for the position (not at the level of Aaron Hernandez or Jimmy Graham), but gets good quickness off the line most of the time. Not a one-speed player; he's dynamic up the seam on longer routes and can break away from safeties at times. Has a second gear in space and knows how to use it. Yards after catch monster who refuses to go down without an extreme fight -- arm-tacklers will not have good days against this guy.

Fleener can be a nightmare for linebackers on slants and crosses because he builds up speed easily and gets upfield with authority. Will cause an extra defender to commit on every play -- if you give Fleener a free play in the short areas, he can take it to the house pretty easily. Surprisingly elusive in space -- he'll juke safeties and stay in line for the timing catch. Outstanding red zone and end zone target who will beat multiple defenders and bring the ball down in heavy, compressed traffic -- Andrew Luck went out of his way to high-point throws to Fleener at Stanford's Pro Day and prove to NFL personnel that in any offense, he'll bring in more than his share of touchdowns.

Cons: Fleener is a willing and able blocker who will sometimes take on two defenders before releasing into a route, but he's not a dominant drive-blocker in the traditional tight end sense. He tends to chip and go more than he engages and pushes back; as a result, his blocking is inconsistent and not always effective. This seems like something that could be corrected. Fleener could be more crisp in some of his short-area routes -- while he's tough in traffic, he needs to cut routes more consistently. Tends to round off quicker in and out routes.

Conclusion: The Gronkowski comparison seems in line, with one major caveat -- Gronk is the best blocking tight end in the NFL, and Fleener still has miles to go before he's at that level. What Fleener brings to the NFL than even Gronkowski couldn't at first is the experience of being a major, every-down target in an offense proven successful at the professional level. Between Harbaugh and Luck, Fleener was a major target for the best college quarterback in recent memory, in an offense designed (and used after the coach's departure to San Francisco) to be as mistake-proof as possible. Neither man would continue to rely on Fleener as they did if he was anything less than a consistent threat on the field, and the NFL quarterback throwing to Fleener should feel the same sense of security sooner than later.

Pro Comparison: Rob Gronkowski, New England Patriots
Gronkowski is a horrible comparison. Fleener is closer to Graham than he is to Gronkowski. But, actually, he reminds me of Greg Olsen, but a better redzone threat. Or a faster Todd Heap. He'll be better than both most likely, though.
 
2012 NFL Draft countdown: SN's No. 6 prospect, Oklahoma State WR Justin Blackmon

Russ Lande Sporting News

This is the 35th in a daily series of in-depth evaluations on the top 40 prospects leading up to the 2012 NFL draft, which runs April 26-28. Today: Justin Blackmon, WR, Oklahoma State

Strengths: Blackmon, who came out early for the draft after his junior year, has naturally strong hands to catch the ball away from his body without having to slow down. In the games we evaluated, he caught an amazing 94.6 percent of the passes thrown to him. (Vital statistics: 6-1, 207 pounds, 4.54 seconds in the 40-yard dash)

Oklahoma State was so confident in Blackmon's hands that it often put him in tough positions because it knew he could make difficult catches. This skill will serve him well in the NFL. Being able to routinely make the tough over-the-shoulder and back-shoulder catches makes Blackmon an excellent red zone target. His ability to consistently make the catch while a defender attempts to break up the pass from behind compensates for his lack of explosiveness out of cuts.

Blackmon uses his hands to subtly push off defenders to create a little space against tight man coverage. In addition, he uses his size, strength and hands to fight through a cornerback's jam to consistently and easily release off the line. He makes himself a more dangerous player when he quickly gets started upfield after the catch.

When running after the reception, his size, strength and balance, combined with his aggressive running style, make him a legitimate big-play threat. This was exemplified against Stanford early in the Fiesta Bowl, when he turned a short slant on fourth-and 4 into a 21-yard gain. That play was in the fourth quarter with three minutes to play.

Blackmon was named the game's best player, with eight passes for 186 yards and three touchdowns, and his play helped Oklahoma State rally to win in overtime.

Blackmon's effectiveness as a blocker, both on the line of scrimmage and downfield, makes him a more valuable receiver. He plays bigger than his measured size.

Having caught 232 passes the past two seasons, he proved he has the durability to stay in the lineup.

Weaknesses: Blackmon's routes are just average. Furthermore, he lacks the explosiveness out of cuts to consistently establish separation. His lack of burst out of his cuts will hinder him more against man coverage.

He lacks the acceleration to close cushion on a cornerback in an "off" alignment. He also lacks the top speed to create separation on deep routes. While he breaks tackles running after the catch, he lacks the elite speed to outrun both angles and the defense to take plays the distance.

Draft status: Blackmon will be the first receiver drafted and probably will be selected in the top six. Few receivers enter the NFL with his combination of size, strength, hands and strong run-after-the-catch ability. Blackmon was remarkably productive his final two seasons at Oklahoma State, catching 232 passes for 3,304 yards and 38 touchdowns. Blackmon's style and production is reminiscent of the Baltimore Ravens' Anquan Boldin.

If the Cleveland Browns do not draft quarterback Ryan Tannehill with the fourth overall pick, they likely will look at Blackmon or Alabama running back Trent Richardson. Blackmon would provide Colt McCoy with a big, strong receiver he could rely on in key situations.

The St. Louis Rams, with the sixth overall choice, reportedly are interested in Richardson. However, if Richardson is chosen earlier, they will give Blackmon a lot of consideration because they badly need a high-end receiver to help Sam Bradford's development.

The Jacksonville Jaguars, who own the seventh overall pick, signed veteran Laurent Robinson as a free agent. However, they would like an additional receiver to give young quarterback Blaine Gabbert another weapon. If the Jags don't take Blackmon, the Dolphins could select him at No. 8 to replace recently traded Brandon Marshall.
 
Intriguing WR talent

Excerpt:

WR Dale Moss, #13

South Dakota State PFW grade: 5.23

Ht: 6-3 1/4 | Wt: 213 | Sp: 4.56 | Arm: 33 | Hand: 10 1/4

Notes: Uncle, Johnny Rodgers, was the 1972 Heisman Trophy winner as a Nebraska running back before being selected in the first round by the Chargers and opting to play in the CFL. Cousin, Bobby Newcome, played quarterback for the Cornhuskers (1997-2000). Moss prepped in South Dakota, where he was an all-state performer in basketball and football and placed in the long jump at the state track and field championships. Played basketball for four years (averaged 7.6 rebounds and 4.5 rebounds as a senior starter) before exhausting his eligibility on the football field — started 9-of-11 games in 2011, totaling 61 receptions for 949 yards (15.6-yard average) and six touchdowns.

Bottom line: Four-year hoopster who parlayed one season of football into an NFL opportunity. Raised eyebrows at his pro day, where he looked explosive (41½-inch vertical leap, broad jump of 10 feet 10 inches) and scorched a 6.35-second 3-cone drill, one of the quickest ever recorded. Has a basketball physique and needs to get stronger, but has intriguing length — has good height, long arms and large hands — and room to bulk up (could play closer to 230 pounds down the road). Is surprisingly aggressive attacking the ball and snatching throws with his hands, and shows body control and hand-eye coordination to win in the air. Draftable on size-speed ratio and developmental upside as a West Coast receiver and red-zone target.

NFL projection: Fifth- to sixth-round pick.
 
Small-school sleeper prospects

Excerpts on selected offensive skill position players:

Dane Simoneau, QB, Washburn: The four-year starter threw for more than 4,000 yards as a senior and added 38 touchdowns. He's a big-armed passer who can make every throw and easily delivers strikes down the field. Simoneau has been receiving a lot of interest from the quarterback-needy Miami Dolphins.

Nate Eachus, RB, Colgate: Eachus was a record-setting running back at Colgate despite being limited to six games last season. He's a complete ball carrier who does the little things well, and Eachus projects as a complimentary fourth back on an NFL roster. He's getting long looks by the Seattle Seahawks and San Diego Chargers.

Derek Carrier, TE/WR, Beloit: The three-sport athlete could be the draft's biggest sleeper. He totaled 75 receptions for 1,250 yards and 12 touchdowns at receiver last season, and was the star of Wisconsin's pro day in March. He's a Division III player who was not deemed camp worthy by scouts at the start of the season, but Carrier has since received late-round grades from most teams around the league. The Oakland Raiders and Seattle Seahawks are both considering using picks on the last day of the draft to acquire Carrier.

Dale Moss, WR, South Dakota State: Moss spent four seasons on the hardwood at South Dakota State before moving onto the gridiron, starting at receiver in 2011. He posted a team-leading 61 receptions and 949 yards his only year on the football field, then wowed coaches at his pro day with a phenomenal workout. Moss could be selected as early as the fifth round by either the New Orleans Saints or Cincinnati Bengals.
 
Blackmon not like Dez Bryant, and that's good

By Jon Saraceno, USA TODAY

Justin Blackmon is no Dez Bryant.

That might serve him well in the NFL.

Both were star wide receivers at Oklahoma State. Bryant now plays for the "other" Cowboys, in Dallas, where his transition to pro football has been difficult, on and off the field. Still, the comparisons are inevitable.

"It's funny," Hall of Fame receiver James Lofton says. "You look at him and kind of think Dez Bryant."

Bryant is more naturally gifted but also seems to lug more personal baggage than Blackmon, son of a Marine. Other wide receivers in this year's draft class are faster than Blackmon, including Georgia Tech's Stephen Hill. Some have better prime-time NFL frames such as South Carolina's Alshon Jeffery.

Nevertheless, Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy says, "I just haven't been around a guy like Justin who is the total package.

"He has a great competitive nature. Great practice player. He is very intelligent. … And he thrives under pressure, doesn't panic. Players who are very mentally stable make better NFL players."

Some observers temper their enthusiasm for the 6-1, 207-pound two-time Biletnikoff Award winner.

"I think maybe he has been overhyped a bit when you compare him to A.J. Green and Julio Jones," last year's top two picks at the position, says Mike Mayock, an NFL Network analyst.

"I look at him more like (the New York Giants') Hakeem Nicks or (the Kansas City Chiefs') Dwayne Bowe. That means he is going to be a good player."

From an athletic standpoint, Blackmon often is compared to Anquan Boldin of the Baltimore Ravens. With a sculpted, muscular body, he can outmuscle defenders and is dangerous after the catch.

"If you don't like Justin Blackmon, you don't like football," says former coach Jon Gruden, ESPN Monday Night Football analyst.

After Blackmon's sophomore season, the consensus two-time All-American was the first receiver named as the Big 12 Conference's offensive player of the year, in 2010.

In his sophomore and junior seasons, Blackmon produced results at a staggering rate — 232 catches, 3,304 yards and 38 touchdowns, plus one rushing TD. In January, Blackmon was named Fiesta Bowl MVP after an eight-catch, 186-yard, three-TD performance in a 41-38 victory against Stanford.

The most impressive thing Blackmon did last season, Gundy says, was coming to practice every day "like he was trying to earn a job."

During the Fiesta Bowl, Gundy says, "When he didn't have the football he was blocking downfield and being a team player."

While Gruden was a bit startled to discover that the former Oklahoma State player wasn't nearly as big, nor as fast, he says, "When you watch film of Justin Blackmon, he is a difference-maker, and I expect that to continue at the next level.

"He fits any offense, I think. I've seen him play the slot, flanker and split end. He is smart, heady, experienced, and he is clutch in clutch situations — third down, red zone, two-minute, big games. That is the best of Justin Blackmon."
USA TODAY Sports’ Jon Saraceno and National Football Post director of college scouting Wes Bunting break down other top wide receivers and tight ends:

Michael Floyd, Notre Dame

Height: 6-3. Weight: 220.

Scouting report: His stock rose dramatically after impressive predraft workouts that highlighted his playmaking potential. Back-to-back team MVP in 2010 and ’11; caught 100 passes his senior season. Injury history and three alcohol-related arrests, including a DUI charge last year, mar his college résumé.

Bunting’s take: Looked more sudden, explosive; showcased the ability to separate quickly as a senior. Is one of the draft’s top receiving prospects.

Stephen Hill, Georgia Tech

Height: 6-4. Weight: 215.

Scouting report: A legitimate deep threat. Opened eyes at the NFL combine with a blazing 40-yard dash time (4.36). Great leaping ability and athleticism. Led nation with a 29.3-yard average as a senior. Game lacks sophistication and polish.

Bunting’s take: Has a unique skill set, can pluck off his frame, track the football and is the next big-time talent from Georgia Tech. Is going to need some time to develop.

Kendall Wright, Baylor

Height: 5-10. Weight: 196.

Scouting report: The favorite target for quarterback Robert Griffin III posted 108 catches, 1,663 yards and 14 touchdowns last season. His 4.61 40-yard time at the combine failed to impress, but he improved to a 4.4 at his pro day. Versatility could be his greatest asset but size might be an issue.

Bunting’s take: In the same mold as a number of Pittsburgh Steelers receivers (Mike Wallace, Emmanuel Sanders) and can be effective inside and out down the field.

Coby Fleener, Stanford

Height: 6-6. Weight: 244.

Scouting report: Growing up with Andrew Luck helped Fleener become the top tight end in the draft. More receiver than blocker, although he can hold his own on the line and figures to follow the recent trend of impact tight ends.

Bunting’s take: An impressive pass catcher who can win down the field and underneath vs. man coverage. Has the frame and flexibility to develop into a solid blocker as well.
 
'Faust said:
Intriguing WR talent

Excerpt:

WR Dale Moss, #13

South Dakota State PFW grade: 5.23

Ht: 6-3 1/4 | Wt: 213 | Sp: 4.56 | Arm: 33 | Hand: 10 1/4

Notes: Uncle, Johnny Rodgers, was the 1972 Heisman Trophy winner as a Nebraska running back before being selected in the first round by the Chargers and opting to play in the CFL. Cousin, Bobby Newcome, played quarterback for the Cornhuskers (1997-2000). Moss prepped in South Dakota, where he was an all-state performer in basketball and football and placed in the long jump at the state track and field championships. Played basketball for four years (averaged 7.6 rebounds and 4.5 rebounds as a senior starter) before exhausting his eligibility on the football field — started 9-of-11 games in 2011, totaling 61 receptions for 949 yards (15.6-yard average) and six touchdowns.

Bottom line: Four-year hoopster who parlayed one season of football into an NFL opportunity. Raised eyebrows at his pro day, where he looked explosive (41½-inch vertical leap, broad jump of 10 feet 10 inches) and scorched a 6.35-second 3-cone drill, one of the quickest ever recorded. Has a basketball physique and needs to get stronger, but has intriguing length — has good height, long arms and large hands — and room to bulk up (could play closer to 230 pounds down the road). Is surprisingly aggressive attacking the ball and snatching throws with his hands, and shows body control and hand-eye coordination to win in the air. Draftable on size-speed ratio and developmental upside as a West Coast receiver and red-zone target.

NFL projection: Fifth- to sixth-round pick.
This guy is a perfect developmental prospect and a poster child for why the League needs a true minor league system.
 
Faust, this is far and away the most valuable thread in the SP. It is one-stop plethora of info awesomeness, and your effort is much appreciated. Thank you, sir.

 
Thanks guys, I appreciate the feedback. I do think that I have a bit of an addiction to this hobby and with the NFL draft in particular.

 
2012 NFL Draft countdown: SN's No. 5 prospect, Alabama RB Trent Richardson

Russ Lande Sporting News

This is the 36th in a daily series of in-depth evaluations on the top 40 prospects leading up to the 2012 NFL draft, which runs April 26-28. Today: Trent Richardson, RB, Alabama

Strengths: Richardson has rare athleticism for such a strong, powerful back. After sharing the running back duties his first two seasons with Mark Ingram, he finished his career on a strong note by rushing for almost 1,700 yards and scoring 24 total touchdowns in his first and only year as Alabama’s feature back. (Vital statistics: 5-9, 228, 4.45 in the 40-yard dash)

His ability to change directions remarkably fast, explode through the hole and consistently make big plays makes him an extremely dangerous cutback runner. He attacks the hole, has an explosive burst through it and has uncommon strength and power on contact. He has consistently shown the ability to keep his feet against hard hits and runs through grab tackles to gain yards after contact.

On short-yardage plays, he does an excellent job of attacking the line. He has the power to drag tacklers for extra yards. He has outstanding quickness, balance and lateral agility to make tacklers miss. Few backs possess this ability.

Every time he touches the ball, he has the explosiveness through the hole and elite speed to be a legitimate touchdown threat. His aggressive running style when no hole exists is a particularly impressive skill. As a result, he is able to drive into traffic when it appears there is nowhere to run. He rarely loses yards.

Richardson’s ability to change a game when he has the ball in his hands is a big reason he likely will be a top pick. Furthermore, he can be a three-down back immediately in the NFL.

As a pass blocker, he displays exceptional aggressiveness and violence. He is quick to read the defense, picks up the blitzer and finishes the block with outstanding effort. He is also a surehanded receiver out of the backfield and a dangerous runner after the catch.

Weaknesses: After splitting carries his first two seasons with Ingram, Richardson was a full-time feature back for only one year at the college level.

Though he showed toughness battling through minor injuries in 2011, he has yet to prove he can be a durable back for the long haul.

Draft status: Richardson is the best back I have ever evaluated and likely will be drafted in the top six. Explosive backs with big-play ability are not rare; however, it is rare to see one with Richardson’s strength as a runner and production in the passing game.

He has been compared with Adrian Peterson because of how high Peterson was drafted, but we believe Richardson is a better prospect than Peterson. He reminds us of a tougher and more physical Rashard Mendenhall. However, more so than Mendenhall, Richardson possesses the elite speed and elusiveness to make tacklers miss and to make big plays.

Look for Cleveland (fourth overall pick), Tampa Bay (No. 5) or St. Louis (No. 6) to select Richardson in the first round. The Browns do not have an established back after they lost Peyton Hillis in free agency, and Richardson would immediately upgrade their rushing attack and make Colt McCoy a better quarterback.

The Buccaneers have their quarterback of the future in Josh Freeman, but their rushing attack was inconsistent last season. Richardson would give them a dangerous running game with his big-play ability, and his presence would open up the Bucs’ passing attack.

Rumors have been circulating that the Rams desperately want to draft Oklahoma State's Justin Blackmon to provide Sam Bradford with an elite receiver. However, our sources indicate Richardson is the team’s first choice. He would be a perfect fit as a complement to Steven Jackson in 2012. Then in 2013, Richardson could assume the feature role.
 
The Shutdown 50 — #17: Michael Floyd, WR, Notre Dame

By Doug Farrar

With the 2011 NFL season in the books, it's time to turn our eyes to the NFL draft, and the pre-draft evaluation process. Before and after the 2012 scouting combine, we'll be taking a closer look at the 50 draft-eligible players who may be the biggest NFL difference-makers when all is said and done.

We continue this year's series with Notre Dame wide receiver Michael Floyd. Floyd is a talented receiving prospect with issues. That happens a lot; when I type "talented receiving prospect," AutoText fills in "with issues" automatically so I can save a few character strokes. In Floyd's case, these issues include three underage drinking and DUI incidents and arrests. As the old saying in scouting goes, once is a mistake, twice is a pattern, and three is Janoris Jenkins. While a little underage drinking on a college campus can be shrugged off, a DUI does not exactly demonstrate that Floyd learned from his previous mistakes.

Notre Dame coach Brian Kelly suspended Floyd indefinitely after the third incident. In college coach-ese, "indefinitely," means "you will be in, definitely, by the time we play an important game." Sure enough, Floyd returned just in time to catch a school-record 100 passes. Since then, Floyd has been saying the right things about changing his lifestyle and moving forward from his youthful indiscretions. He also ran a sub 4.5 forty, closing the gap between himself and top receiver Justin Blackmon, who also has a DUI on his record (though Blackmon's appears to have been a quirk of Texas law).

So, is Floyd slow or fast? Reliable or immature? The tape cannot answer all questions, but it does confirm that Floyd is big, and he can catch.

Pros: Floyd is 6-foot-3 and 220 pounds, and he has "big receiver" skills. He can shield the ball on slants, post up cornerbacks on jump balls, and is a willing, high-effort blocker. Scouts who tracked Floyd in 2010 say that his blocking improved last season.

Floyd's route running gets very mixed reviews, but I liked what I saw. He has great potential as a double-move receiver on deep routes: he can fake with his head and shoulders in one direction then crisply turn the other way. He is smooth and natural at the top of his stem when running in and out routes. Floyd ran a lot of short hitch routes against zone coverage, and he knew when to come back an extra step for the ball or slide laterally to find a crease between two defenders. There is certainly room to improve, and there may be inconsistency issues that I missed, but Floyd ran a full route tree and demonstrated an understanding of how to set up a deep route by making it look like his short routes.

Floyd will not blow anyone away with his open-field moves, but he can break tackles and sometimes drags defenders for an extra yard or two.

Cons: Floyd does not look like a 4.4 receiver on tape; some of that speed will likely disappear when he is wearing pads and the speed specialists are not standing by with their "get-off" tips and parachutes.

Floyd had some concentration and attention drops. He dropped a sure touchdown in the end zone when he tried to one-hand the ball, even though both hands were free. He once kneed the ball out of his own arms after catching a short hitch. Both of these plays came late in productive games, and Floyd may be a guy who coasts after he has had some success.

Floyd suffered a collarbone injury in 2009. Oh, and the three alcohol-related incidents.

Conclusion: Floyd has the skill set to be a go-to, all purpose receiver. His size and ability to shield defenders on slants makes him a great West Coast Offense fit. His knack for getting open deep make him the kind of receiver Norv Turner likes to mold (and while we always tease Norv, he is good at tutoring wide receivers). He blocks well enough to help any team.

The unanswerable question is whether he will do all of these things consistently, while staying out of trouble. The downside for Floyd is Kenny Britt, a gifted receiver whose flashes of excellence are being swallowed by injuries, drama, and Sammy Hagar driving habits. The upside goes straight up to Terrell Owens, if Floyd really is as fast as his Combine performance suggested.

For our NFL Comparison, let's split the difference and take note of the fact that the Bills are reportedly very interested in Floyd. Chan Gailey has a lot of patience for a certain kind of talented, enigmatic receiver.

NFL Comparison: Stevie Johnson, Buffalo Bills
 
Michael Floyd = Steve Johnson?

Whaaaa....?

I sometimes wonder if these writers even watch football.

 
Draft positional series: Quarterbacks

By Frank Cooney | NFLDraftScout.com

While NFL Draft followers are focused forward on quarterbacks Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III, aka RG3, as the predetermined 1-2 knockout punch in this year's event, it is interesting to look backward.

Quarterbacks are at once the most scrutinized and misdiagnosed players in football. NFL history is littered with spectacular mistakes in overrating and overlooking players at the most crucial position in the game.

Some of the most lightly regarded college prospects became stunning sensations in the NFL -- Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Kurt Warner. The highest-drafted player in that group was Montana, a third-rounder in 1979.

Meanwhile, many players selected in the top three overall became verifiable busts in the NFL -- JaMarcus Russell (1st, 2007), Tim Couch (1st, 1999), Akili Smith (3rd, 1999) and Ryan Leaf (2nd, 1998).

The biggest quarterback bust of all fizzled so quickly that his name is rarely remembered. Stanford All-American Bobby Garrett was the first player selected in the 1954 draft by the Cleveland Browns, who were seeking a replacement for the legendary Otto Graham.

But Garrett never played a game for the Browns. He was unable to call plays because he stuttered. He was quickly traded and played only nine NFL games.

Even against that embarrassing background, the buildup to the 2012 draft bravely boasts that this event will feature a sure-fire quarterback in Stanford's Luck. Like Garrett, Luck is expected to replace a living legend, former Colts quarterback Peyton Manning, who changed horses this year and renews his career with the Denver Broncos.

With Luck as a first pick, Stanford's record would include four QBs as No. 1 overall selections: John Elway, Jim Plunkett and, of course, Garrett.

Scouts, teams and the media have been so sure about Luck that he was tagged for almost three years as the best pro quarterback prospect in college.

Curiously, praise was muted in terms of adjectives as analysts cite the sum of his football smarts, genealogy, practical experience, size and athleticism. Seldom, if ever, is the word spectacular attached to Luck. More often he is called solid, safe or cerebral.

As the annual momentum to uncover QBs gained steam, RG3 overtook Luck for the Heisman Trophy and ignited debates over whether he is a better NFL prospect. Also, befitting his Superman socks, RG3 is often described with words such as spectacular.

Still, while this year's quarterback prospects are interesting, that is mostly because scouts are more curious than confident of the skills and potential they display. Yet, in an NFL that has picked quarterbacks No. 1 overall in 10 of the past 11 drafts, teams are scouring the lists looking for signs of stardom.

The result includes prospects that played more at wide receiver (Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M) and baseball (28-year old Brandon Weeden, Oklahoma State), are freakishly tall (6-foot-7 Brock Osweiler, Arizona State) or historically too small (5-11 Russell Wilson, Wisconsin).

Here is a closer look at the top quarterback prospects in this draft (overall rating, player, school, height, weight, projected round; * indicates underclassman):

1. *Andrew Luck, Stanford, 6-4, 234, 1

It seemed appropriate for a long time that Luck was hailed as the second coming of Peyton Manning, even if that isn't technically accurate. After all, Indianapolis has the first pick in the draft and that second-coming stuff goes hand-in-hand with Luck being considered the logical heir to the cerebral offense Manning ran so well for the Colts. But Luck isn't exactly Manning. And the Colts aren't the same Colts. So that begs the question -- are Luck and the Colts still a logical match? Owner Robert Irsay tweets all the right things about Luck, especially after the quarterback's team visit. And as the draft draws closer the inevitable sequence of events should be 1) Reports that Luck is indeed the Colts' pick (check); 2) Verification in an Irsay tweet that this is true; 3) Perhaps announcement of a signed contract. And, finally, Luck should be No. 1 after finishing second in two Heisman Trophy votes where he was expected to win at least once. Last year he yielded to Baylor quarterback Robert Griffin III, who is listed behind Luck on almost every draft list, including that of NFLDraftScout.com. But since the end of the season, more scouts questioned whether Luck really is a better pro prospect than the athletic RG3. Most still concede Luck is the safer pick. To be clear, Luck is a truly exceptional athlete himself, with workout results similar to those of Cam Newton. He is the son of Oliver Luck, the former Detroit Lions and Houston Oilers quarterback and current athletic director at West Virginia, and masterfully manipulated a pro-style offense coached until last year by former NFL quarterback Jim Harbaugh. Luck can make every throw, but, like almost everyone else, doesn't play with the urgency of Manning. His athleticism, genetics and coaching resulted in amazing college statistics. He completed 713 of 1,064 passes (67 percent) for 9,430 yards, 82 touchdowns, 22 interceptions and a passer rating of 162.8. And, while those are spectacular stats, Luck is expected finally to be the No. 1 because he is the safe pick.



2. *Robert Griffin III, Baylor, 6-2, 223, 1

Since he won the Heisman, RG3's ascent into the consciousness of NFL scouts, teams and fans has been one of the most remarkable in draft history. At one point it was blasphemous to think another quarterback might challenge Luck to be the first pick. Then RG3 beat Luck for the Heisman and the debate became everyday conversation. Even Redskins general manager Bruce Allen, who engineered a historic trade into the second spot, admits there is no guarantee whether he is in position to take Luck or RG3. "But I'm not complaining," he said. "You gotta love both of them." A fan of super heroes, Griffin became one himself last season as the unstoppable RG3, leading Baylor to unprecedented heights with a strong arm, quick feet and made-for-Hollywood charisma. Griffin's humble disguise as a prelaw student with a political science degree (2010) was transparent even before he revealed those Superman socks the night he accepted the Heisman Trophy. A dynamic, graceful athlete, Griffin leapt over intermediate hurdles in world-class time as a prep. He verified that at the combine, where they announced his 40-yard time as 4.41 seconds, but Griffin himself was told he was actually timed as fast as 4.33. Griffin may have the best combination of quick release and velocity of any QB in the draft. He throws with accuracy and his deep passes are especially impressive, destroying defenses like long-range missiles. In only three seasons, Griffin set or tied 54 school records and several NCAA marks. He is only one of three players in college history to throw for 10,000 yards (10,071) and rush for more than 2,000 (2,199). Born in Japan as the son of Army Sergeants, Griffin is a natural leader with a team-first attitude. He has flaws, including a severe knee injury in 2009 and a concussion in 2011. He ran a spread offense in college; is not totally comfortable under center; can be skittish in the pocket and doesn't move through his progressions as well as Luck. But even Superman had his Kryptonite.



3. Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M, 6-4, 222, 1

As is the case almost every year, the No. 3-rated quarterback in the draft has seen his stock rise quickly in the past month. This year that is Tannehill, who is the target for teams needing a quarterback but who are not in position to take Luck or Griffin. Tannehill is also this year's Rubik's cube, a complex combination of intriguing variables that are difficult to evaluate. He is reminiscent, in a way, of Tim Tebow and Cam Newton, problematic first-round picks from the past two drafts. They all have obvious athletic ability and an unorthodox passing motion. Tannehill's delivery is slightly sidearm, somewhere between David Carr (Houston Texans, N.Y. Giants) and Philip Rivers (San Diego Chargers), possibly because for such a big quarterback he has surprisingly small hands (9 inches). But of more concern is his minimal experience at QB. Tannehill spent his first 30 college games at wide receiver, then, coached by West Coast offense devotee Mike Sherman (formerly of Green Bay, now with the Miami Dolphins), he moved to quarterback in 2010. Last season he threw for 3,744 yards, 29 touchdowns and 15 interceptions. His complicated career totals include completing 484 of 774 passes for 5,450 yards, 42 touchdowns, 21 interceptions as well as 112 receptions for 1,596 yards. He also punted. Scouts agree only on one thing -- he is a gamble. Tannehill had foot surgery in early January then missed the Senior Bowl and the combine. But he finally healed and at his pro day ran like, well, a wide receiver (4.58 seconds in 40 yards). In early January, Tannehill was single, on crutches and rated by most as a second-round prospect. Since then he married a model, ran like a wide receiver and Colts owner Jim Irsay tweeted his praises last week. "Tannehill is a hidden gem in this draft, a quiet secret who was always sneaking up to #3...you want him you better talk to Zigi The Biggie," referencing Zygi Wilf, owner of the Minnesota Vikings and the franchise has the No. 3 spot in the draft, which is apparently available on the trade market.

4. Brandon Weeden, Oklahoma State, 6-4, 221, 2

Weeden proved he knows how to call his own plays when he rejected the NFL's offer to attend the draft in New York. Great call considering how humiliating it was in New York for some previous quarterbacks who squirmed on camera until their names were called later than some expected, such as Aaron Rodgers (24th) and Brady Quinn (22nd). Weeden is rated by most as a second-round prospect, but some scouts believe at least one team may try to steal him in the first. Regardless, he will watch from his parents' home. Weeden certainly has the physical ability to be a pro QB, but he is 28 years old and damaged goods after pitching five years (2002-2006) in the minors for the Yankees, Dodgers and Royals. Weeden pitched 374 innings with a 19-26 record and 5.02 ERA. More significantly, he left baseball because of a torn labrum and tendinitis in the rotator cuff of his throwing arm and did not have surgery. Instead, he redshirted at Oklahoma State in 2007, played little the next two years, then did so well the past two years pro scouts couldn't ignore him regardless of his age. His demeanor reflects advanced maturity, and that was obvious in his pro day. But he is not a vociferous team leader and often has too much confidence in his arm. He needs to improve pocket awareness and stepping up. Weeden sometimes negates his height with a three-quarters, sidearm delivery that might have concerned right-handed batters, but is ripe for an alert defender to bat down. He looks excellent when his timing is on, but sails wild pitches off his back foot when things break down. Weeden ruptured a tendon in his right thumb the first game of 2010 but played through the injury. Most of all, his production was too gaudy to overlook. In little more than two seasons he completed 766 of 1,102 passes (69.5 percent) for 9,260 yards, 75 touchdowns and 27 interceptions (157.7 passer rating).

5. Kirk Cousins, Michigan State, 6-3, 214, 2-3

Descriptions and statistics on Cousins might be hard to evaluate. He has good size, played four years in a pro system including two as captain, is a great citizen in the community, a strong team leader on the field and has already graduated with a 3.68 GPA in kinesiology. As far as statistics, Cousins is MSU's career record holder in passing touchdowns (66), passing yards (9,131), completions (723) and passing efficiency (146.1 rating). After that he was impressive in both Senior Bowl workouts and the game, and then did well at the scouting combine and looked even better at his pro day. Perhaps the only obvious wart on his list of achievements is that his career statistics include a total of minus-127 yards rushing, which may be revealing. Cousins is football smart and performs well within the system, but when things go awry he does not have the knack or arm as a passer, nor the athleticism as a runner, to make good things happen. In fact, closer analysis of his stats shows that an inordinate amount of completions and yards were either screens or very short passes. His arm strength and passing velocity are less than scouts want, but they are still intrigued by his advanced understanding of a pro-like passing system and excellent anticipation. Despite his statistical accuracy (64 percent completions), Cousins does not place the ball well to help yards after the catch and if he is unable to throw in rhythm his effectiveness declines noticeably. Cousins broke his ankle coming out of high school and after being ignored by most big schools was set to go to Toledo until Mark Dantonio was hired as MSU's head coach. After failing to get his preferred quarterbacks, Dantonio offered Cousins a chance and it paid off. In that regard, there is a chance history might repeat.

6. *Brock Osweiler, Arizona State, 6-7, 242, 2-3

After starting only 15 college games, Osweiler is far from refined as a pro prospect, but there are two things about him that are tantalizing to scouts: He is 6-7, and has a high ceiling -- and that's not a joke. It means his potential boggles the minds of some scouts. Osweiler has exceptional natural athletic ability, evidenced by his great high school career as a star basketball player and quarterback. After verbally committing as a sophomore to Gonzaga, a basketball powerhouse, Osweiler opted for Arizona State after being promised he could play both sports there. He chose not to pursue basketball, but on Nov. 14, 2009, became the first true freshman to start at quarterback for the Sun Devils since Jake Plummer in 1993. In 2010 former Georgia Tech and Michigan quarterback Steven Threet was the starter, but Osweiler played in six games, including a comeback win over UCLA and a victory over rival Arizona. Last year, his only full season as a starter, Osweiler completed 326 of 516 passes for 4,036 yards, 26 touchdowns and 13 interceptions. But after the coaching staff was replaced, he surprised everybody by entering the draft. Scouts know there is more to him than his unusual height (technically 6-6 3/8). He is tough, mobile, intuitive and has a strong, accurate arm and throws with authority that defenses must respect. Osweiler sometimes throws a three-quarters sidearm, but at his height it doesn't matter. He probably isn't ready for prime pro action, but there is so much promise that some team will surely spend a second- or third-round pick as an investment for the future.

7. Russell Wilson, Wisconsin, 5-11, 204, 3-4

Wilson is a special person whose shocking leadership and athletic abilities ignited a Wisconsin offense that averaged 44.1 points a game last year. But it will be historic if he overcomes his height deficiency to star in the NFL. At the combine, Wilson measured exactly 5-10 5/8, which is rounded to 5-11. To give that historical perspective, since 1952 only two quarterbacks that short have been successful in the NFL -- Eddie LeBaron (Washington, Dallas, 1952-63), who was 5-7; and Doug Flutie (Chicago, New England, Buffalo, San Diego, 1986-2005) was 5-9¾. The NFL's shortest current starting quarterback is Drew Brees (6-0¼). Still, Wilson's athleticism is tempting and somebody will give him a chance to fulfill his family dream. His father, Harrison Wilson III, was a baseball/football star at Dartmouth, but missed the final cut as a pro wide receiver (Chargers) before becoming a successful lawyer. He was Russell's idol and biggest fan. But he died from complications of diabetes in June 2010, one day after learning his son was drafted by the Colorado Rockies. Last year, with N.C. State pressuring him to quit baseball, Wilson transferred to Wisconsin and didn't have to sit out a season because he already earned a degree. Wilson started all 14 games in 2011, setting an NCAA single-season record for passing efficiency (191.78 rating) and completing 225 of 309 passes (72.82 percent) for 3,175 yards, 33 touchdowns and only four interceptions. He rushed for another 338 yards and six scores. In 50 college games, Wilson passed for 11,720 yards, 109 TDs and only 29 interceptions. He is cerebral, instinctive and agile and has a powerful, accurate arm with great touch. He now says he is committed to football. But he's short. However, he has the wingspan of somebody 6-3¼ and larger hands than any quarterback rated above him (10¼ inches). If he could just add a couple of those inches to his height.

8. Ryan Lindley, San Diego State, 6-4, 229, 4

Under the tutelage of QBs coach Brian Sipe, Lindley made noticeable progress in his mechanics and understanding since 2009. It should be noted that Sipe learned quarterbacking at SDSU under the legendary Don Coryell -- famed for Air Coryell, which was football's original West Coast offense. Coryell was a disciple of the same Sid Gilman aerial show that begat the vertical passing game Al Davis brought to Oakland. And, unlike latter day West Coast (II) devotees of Bill Walsh, all those icons preferred to pester defenses with longer completions rather than rack up easy stats with short, high-percentage plays. So it might be no coincidence that in his years with the Cleveland Browns (1974-83), Sipe completed only 56.5 percent of his passes and threw 149 interceptions to go with his 154 touchdowns. Sipe had a decent arm for a 6-1, 195-pound quarterback, but Lindley is bigger and his arm is stronger. So in his 49 starts Lindley was far more prolific than his mentor and set school and Mountain West Conference records for completions (961), attempts (1,732), yards passing (12,690) and his 90 touchdown passes is a San Diego State high. But concerns about Lindley also echo those that haunted Sipe's career. Lindley completed only 55.5 percent of his passes and had 47 interceptions to go with those 90 TDs. Lindley shows the ability to fire the ball into a small opening, but too often is unable to complete the easy pass or, worse, tries to force the ball in a way that only makes defenders happy. If he can learn to pick the right target and shoot straight with more consistency, then Lindley has the physical tools to play in the NFL. In fact, Lindley is a far better prospect than Sipe was as a 13th-round draft pick in 1972 (330th overall), before he overcame everything to become NFL MVP in 1980.

9. B.J. Coleman, Tennessee-Chattanooga, 6-3, 233, 5

An imposing physical specimen, Coleman has natural leadership skills that are evident on the field and around the locker room. He is capable of doing everything necessary to be a pro QB, but needs to learn how to do it and when to do it. Think of him in terms a very raw Brett Favre, who was pretty raw himself when he came out of Southern Mississippi. Coleman was considered one of the top prep quarterbacks in the nation when he selected Tennessee. But after seeing too little action, he transferred to Chattanooga, where his father Byron played (1977-80) with Russ Huesman, now the team's head coach. After playing in only three games for the Vols, Coleman started 32 at Chattanooga and took advantage of the small-school competition to generate great statistics, but not enough experience against top players to help him improve. He is mobile for his size and has an arm that is so powerful that he needs to learn how to control it. He wasn't able to throw at the combine because of a broken pinky finger, but he wowed the teams that watched him at his pro day. For his career, Coleman completed 583 of 1,016 passes for 6,892 yards, 52 touchdowns and 32 interceptions. He ran for seven more scores and even pooch punted a few times. But if some team wants to take advantage of his ample abilities, it will require time and patience to coach him up to an NFL-caliber quarterback. Perhaps it was with that in mind that he selected agent Bus Cook, who also represented Favre.

10. Nick Foles, Arizona, 6-5, 243, 5-6

Considering he broke the passing records of Drew Brees at Westlake High in Austin, Texas, Foles really wasn't that hotly pursued by college recruiters who obviously didn't think he was in the same league as Brees. Still, Foles managed to make his selection of colleges an adventure. He first committed to Arizona State, then de-committed. He then opted for Michigan State. After a year there he realized he was stuck behind Kirk Cousins (No. 5 on this list), among others. So he jumped ship for Arizona, where he had to sit out for a year before beginning his college career in earnest. The vagabond sophomore didn't begin the 2009 season as a starter, but after getting a chance in the third game he kept the job. Foles looked good from the start, standing tall and confident in the pocket, albeit often after taking a shotgun snap. Despite not being an elite athlete and never having much of a surrounding cast, Foles managed to improve over the past three years. During that time he set school passing records in completions (933) and attempts (1,396) while totaling 10,011 yards, 67 touchdowns and 33 interceptions. He did all that using basically great vision and a good arm in a simple offense. So scouts are curious how well his talent will convert in the more complicated NFL. One thing Foles won't need to figure out this time is what team he will go to. That will be decided for him in the draft, perhaps not until the fifth round. This will finally put him in the same league with Brees, but still behind Cousins.
 
Polian: Robert Griffin III presents an 'absolutely unique' threat

Robert Griffin III, the likely second-overall pick in next week's NFL draft, represents a new type of player to the league, former Indianapolis Colts general manager Bill Polian recently told The Washington Post.

"He presents a threat that we really haven't seen before," Polian said of the Baylor quarterback's arm and sprinter's speed.

The Washington Redskins, who sent three first-round picks and their 2012 second-rounder to the St. Louis Rams for the No. 2 pick, are widely expected to choose Griffin.

Often compared to last year's top pick, dual-threat QB Cam Newton, Polian contrasted their two styles of play.

Griffin "is a world-class track man and as such, is a bit of a long-strider and a bit of a narrow-base guy, as opposed to Cam, who's an instinctive, natural football runner," Polian said.

"RG3 is not that," Polian added. "That said, he has enough shake to beat most defensive linemen. And once he sticks his foot in the ground and goes, it's gone baby, gone ... that's unique. He presents a threat that's absolutely unique."

Polian also lauded the 6-foot-3, 223-pound Griffin's arm: "If he pulls up to throw ... all he has to do is stand up and flick that wrist and the ball will go across the field 55, 50 yards in the wink of an eye -- on a rope, and it's accurate."

Last year's No. 2-overall draft pick, Denver Broncos linebacker Von Miller, however, thinks Griffin won't be able to stand up to the pounding a running quarterback takes.

"He can throw the ball pretty well, and he's fast," Miller said. "But if you hit him enough times, he's going to wear down. He can run and throw, but I wouldn't put him in that same class as (Michael) Vick, Cam (Newton) or (Josh) Freeman," Miller said.
 
The Shutdown 50 — #15: Ryan Tannehill, QB, Texas A & M

By Doug Farrar

With the 2011 NFL season in the books, it's time to turn our eyes to the NFL draft, and the pre-draft evaluation process. Right up to the draft, we'll be taking a closer look at the 50 players who may be the biggest NFL difference-makers when all is said and done.

We continue this year's series with Texas A & M quarterback Ryan Tannehill, seen by most evaluators as the next man up behind Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III at the quarterback position in the 2012 draft class. However, Luck and RGIII didn't have to start their collegiate careers as a receiver like Tannehill did -- the Aggies took the Big Spring High School quarterback and made him a pass-catcher for his first two years. When Jerrod Johnson struggled in 2010, the move was finally made, and Tannehill was able to establish some pretty interesting records -- not only did he set single-season school marks for yards (3,744), attempts (531) and completions (327) in 2011, he's the only player in FBS history to post a 400-yard passing game and 200-yard receiving game ... AND the only player in FBS history to total more than 4,000 passing yards and 1,500 receiving yards in a career.

That's all well and good, but what happens when you stick the kid in the NFL soup? When a quarterback has just 19 starts at the collegiate level, and that lack of experience shows up pretty glaringly on tape, it's a bit tougher to separate the tools that will allow him to succeed from the mistakes that could doom him against better defenses if he's not handled the right way. In every draft, there are safe picks, and there are boom-and-bust risks. Ryan Tannehill, through no fault of his own, is very much the latter.

Pros: Tannehill's athleticism shows up on just about every play -- he's agile in the pocket and has great escapability. Not a bailout thrower by any means; he'll stand in the pocket, step up, or roll right before just tanking the pass play and running out of trouble. Has no seeming loss of accuracy whether rolling left or right; most of his sailing throws seem to be a function of mechanics. Well-versed in boot-action concepts and the short passing game; Tannehill would seem to be a natural fit in any West Coast offense as a result, especially in one where play-action is a strong aspect (Houston) or there's heavy shotgun (Philadelphia). Primarily a shotgun quarterback, but Tannehill can run a game from under center. He's a little edgy in his dropback at times, but he's better at this part of the game than some people think.

Has a nice play-fake that he'll most often use to freeze defenders before taking off from the pocket on designed run plays. Resourceful, tough player who will flash out of multiple offensive concepts and formations. Legitimate receiver at the college level, but he always attended quarterback meetings until he finally got a shot. Team leader; teammates respect and gravitate toward him. Coached in NFL concepts by Mike Sherman, former Green Bay Packers head coach and current Miami Dolphins offensive coordinator. Not a default spread-offense washout; there 's enough to see of an embryonic pro skill set to believe that Tannehill will eventually succeed in the right NFL situation. Missed the combine due to a foot injury, but looked great at his Pro Day. Has been working with performance coach Chris Weinke, who facilitated mechanical fixes for Cam Newton and Christian Ponder last year.

Cons: Heavy first-read thrower who locks onto the primary target far too often; Tannehill will need to learn the art of the head fake and he does not possess what Ron Jaworski calls "EYE DISCIPLINE!" While he's a better thrower on the run than in the pocket, the sideline routes that tend to be the mobile quarterback's best friend can be a real adventure with Tannehill at times -- he'll sail throws wild high for no apparent reason even when he doesn't have people in his face.

Will throw from different arm angles and slots, and not always to his own benefit. Throws with a lot of sidearm and three-quarter delivery stuff that works for Philip Rivers and few others at the NFL level -- he doesn't have the consistency throwing to all areas to make an idiosyncratic delivery work for him at this point. Has the arm to make all the throws, but occasionally struggles with anticipation on deeper throws -- at times, he'll flat-out miss the target. Tends to "finesse" intermediate throws; doesn't seem to have an understanding of his own velocity and the ability to time it in conjunction with the route tree. Doesn't yet have the ability to adjust when receivers are re-routed by coverage.

Conclusion: When you're evaluating a quarterback prospect with a low college start count, you have to decide what your goal is. Is it to encapsulate his collegiate career, or to project what he will be able to do in the NFL, and what will most likely be coached out of him in a big hurry? With Tannehill, the hype outstrips the actual performance because NFL evaluators are trained to look more at what the player can be than what he is now. In that sense, his raw physical tools -- athleticism, arm strength, toughness, and the ability to run a nebulous offense -- are seen more than the inevitable effects of inexperience.

Had Tannehill played quarterback throughout his time at Texas A & M, many of the things you see on tape would have been ironed out by now -- you'd see a more refined sideline shot and backdoor fade, the play selection wouldn't have been so limited, and there would be a better overall body of work to see and project. In a way, Tannehill's lack of experience is an advantage -- in an NFL more desperate for elite starting quarterbacks than ever before, teams will see Tannehill as high-class raw clay that can be used to mold the ideal signal-caller. All the basic traits are there -- by all accounts, Tannehill is a tough, team-first, real football player with great physical attributes.

Like Locker, who one former (and fortunately deposed) Washington coaching staff wanted to move to safety at one point, Tannehill would be best served biding his time and learning the NFL behind a veteran. If he goes to Cleveland or Miami with the fourth or eighth picks, and the "veterans" in front of him are Colt McCoy or Matt Moore, that prospect becomes much more dicey. If a team meets Tannehill halfway with the playbook as the Carolina Panthers did with Cam Newton and the Denver Broncos did with Tim Tebow, maybe there's a chance for some first-year fireworks.

Make no mistake -- Ryan Tannehill is a top-10 prospect in the NFL because what he could be, not what he has done. Even at a position where you're a batting champion if you're guessing half-right, that's a pretty risky way to go.

Pro Comparison: Jake Locker, Tennessee Titans
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top