What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

DYNASTY: Top 2013 College Prospects (2 Viewers)

I've posted this before, but updated it due to the end of the season. I'm not saying Lacy is better than Ingram/Richardson...but I don't think he's not in the discussion.

Interesting comparison of Alabama RBs

Mark Ingram's YPC: 5.1, 6.1, 5.5

T Richardson's YPC: 5.2, 6.3, 5.9

Eddie Lacy's YPC: 7.3, 7.1, 6.5

Lacy has 3 seasons all better than the best single season of Ingram/Richardson combined.
Um, no. You kind of have to take the amount of carries into consideration, you can't just focus on YPC and ignore all other statistics; because then you're left making the erroneous conclusion that Eddie Lacy's 56 carry, 406 rushing yard freshman season was better than Richardson's 283 carry, 1679 rushing yard junior season, for example.
If you compare their 200+ carry junior seasons Lacy has him beat (6.5 on 204 vs. 5.9 on 283). Lacy had a higher YPC in their sophomore years too on a similar number of carries (7.1 on 95 vs. 6.3 on 112). I don't think Lacy is anywhere near as talented as Richardson but in terms of production he compares favorably. The problem with analyzing Alabama RB's from their production is that the OL makes all of them look good so the eyeball test and measureables are more important to determine how they will do in the NFL.

 
I like Lacy and I think he'll probably be a better pro than Ingram, but ultimately college stats are just college stats. It goes without saying that what you do against amateurs isn't going to be a perfect predictor of what you do against professionals. Otherwise Ron Dayne would've been a Hall of Famer.

 
I like Lacy and I think he'll probably be a better pro than Ingram, but ultimately college stats are just college stats. It goes without saying that what you do against amateurs isn't going to be a perfect predictor of what you do against professionals. Otherwise Ron Dayne would've been a Hall of Famer.
 
I don't think Lacy is anywhere near as talented as Richardson but in terms of production he compares favorably. The problem with analyzing Alabama RB's from their production is that the OL makes all of them look good so the eyeball test and measureables are more important to determine how they will do in the NFL.
Why not? What is he lacking? Not that I disagree - just trying to work the answer to that out myself. He's been as productive in a pretty equal situation. He made as many plays at the college level as Trent did and stepped up when the situation called for it. He's likely as fast as Trent and as strong. His footwork doesn't look as good, likely because he is taller and more top heavy, but it seems to be as effective; He makes as many people miss as Trent did. Trent caught more balls over the span of his career, but Lacy (Jr.) actually caught more per play than Trent did (Jr.).

I am having a hard time understanding why Lacy isn't considered a potential top 10 pick. People that know a lot more than me are starting to warm to Lacy, but still don't consider him a slam dunk 1st rounder. I can't help but wonder if the same would be true if he wasn't following behind Richardson/Ingram.

The only thing I can see that Richardson offers that Lacy does not is that he fits a mold or look. Richardson looks more like a traditional or ideal NFL RB. I know Trent's lower body is stronger, but I don't think Lacy is any less capable of moving the pile for it.

Not that I am making a claim, but what did Richardson do or posses that made him the clearly better prospect?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've posted this before, but updated it due to the end of the season. I'm not saying Lacy is better than Ingram/Richardson...but I don't think he's not in the discussion.

Interesting comparison of Alabama RBs

Mark Ingram's YPC: 5.1, 6.1, 5.5

T Richardson's YPC: 5.2, 6.3, 5.9

Eddie Lacy's YPC: 7.3, 7.1, 6.5

Lacy has 3 seasons all better than the best single season of Ingram/Richardson combined.
Um, no. You kind of have to take the amount of carries into consideration, you can't just focus on YPC and ignore all other statistics; because then you're left making the erroneous conclusion that Eddie Lacy's 56 carry, 406 rushing yard freshman season was better than Richardson's 283 carry, 1679 rushing yard junior season, for example.
If you compare their 200+ carry junior seasons Lacy has him beat (6.5 on 204 vs. 5.9 on 283). Lacy had a higher YPC in their sophomore years too on a similar number of carries (7.1 on 95 vs. 6.3 on 112). I don't think Lacy is anywhere near as talented as Richardson but in terms of production he compares favorably. The problem with analyzing Alabama RB's from their production is that the OL makes all of them look good so the eyeball test and measureables are more important to determine how they will do in the NFL.
Eddie Lacy2010:56 carries 406 yards 7.3 6 TD

2011:95 for 674 7.1 7

2012:204 for 1322 6.5 17

Trent Richardson

2009:145 for 751 5.2 8

2010:112 for 700 6.3 6

2011:283 for 1679 5.9 21

Mark Ingram

2008:143 for 728 5.1 12

2009:271 for 1658 6.1 17

2010:158 for 875 5.5 13

That's everything. Lets also not forget that Ingram/Trich also had some pretty good offensive lineman as well.

 
Not that I am making a claim, but what did Richardson do or posses that made him the clearly better prospect?
I would start by asking the Bama coaches who redshirted Lacy behind Richardson and played Trent over him every time they had the opportunity. Lacy is a solid player, but let's not get carried away. Richardson was a special athlete in terms of balance, quickness, and strength. You're not going to find many 5'9" 230 pounders who can cut on a dime and bounce off hits like him. Lacy is nimble for a big back and he's got some nice speed to boot, but the overall package is a half notch or notch below Richardson and that's why he was Trent's backup and won't be picked as high in the draft.
 
Not that I am making a claim, but what did Richardson do or posses that made him the clearly better prospect?
I would start by asking the Bama coaches who redshirted Lacy behind Richardson and played Trent over him every time they had the opportunity. Lacy is a solid player, but let's not get carried away. Richardson was a special athlete in terms of balance, quickness, and strength. You're not going to find many 5'9" 230 pounders who can cut on a dime and bounce off hits like him. Lacy is nimble for a big back and he's got some nice speed to boot, but the overall package is a half notch or notch below Richardson and that's why he was Trent's backup and won't be picked as high in the draft.
Richardson was Ingrams backup each season as well. I think everyone can agree that Trich is a better prospect than Ingram.
 
Not that I am making a claim, but what did Richardson do or posses that made him the clearly better prospect?
I would start by asking the Bama coaches who redshirted Lacy behind Richardson and played Trent over him every time they had the opportunity. Lacy is a solid player, but let's not get carried away. Richardson was a special athlete in terms of balance, quickness, and strength. You're not going to find many 5'9" 230 pounders who can cut on a dime and bounce off hits like him. Lacy is nimble for a big back and he's got some nice speed to boot, but the overall package is a half notch or notch below Richardson and that's why he was Trent's backup and won't be picked as high in the draft.
Richardson was Ingrams backup each season as well. I think everyone can agree that Trich is a better prospect than Ingram.
The difference is that Richardson and Ingram were in different recruiting classes. By the time Richardson arrived on campus, Ingram was already an established player. Also, the split in carries was quite a bit more even. Richardson had 145 carries in 2009 compared to 271 for Ingram. Meanwhile Lacy had just 95 carries last year compared to 283 for Richardson. So while Richardson had roughly 50% of Ingram's carries, Lacy had about 35% of Trent's carries. Put simply, Richardson/Ingram was more of a committee than Richardson/Lacy.
 
I would start by asking the Bama coaches who redshirted Lacy behind Richardson and played Trent over him every time they had the opportunity.
You yourself just said that college production doesn't always translate, right? A college coach's job is getting college production out of his players, not worrying about how their talents translate to the NFL.I am not worried about who backed up who or anything along those lines.From a skill standpoint, as it relates to NFL potential, why is Richardson head and shoulders ahead of Lacy?
Lacy is nimble for a big back and he's got some nice speed to boot, but the overall package is a half notch or notch below Richardson and that's why he was Trent's backup and won't be picked as high in the draft.
What makes Richardson more nimble? I don't think you find 6' 235 pound backs as nimble as Lacy, either. He makes peolpe miss just as much as Trent, based on what I have seen. Why do we assume Trent will translate, in that regard, and Lacy won't?Not trying to be a smartass. Just really trying to gain understanding.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From a skill standpoint, as it relates to NFL potential, why is Richardson heads and shoulders ahead of Lacy?
Balance, power, and cutting ability. Those are the main things that come to mind.Lacy might weigh more than Trent, but Trent is certainly heavier from a weight-per-height standpoint. That's pretty significant. Maurice Drew is only 207 pounds, but because of how that weight is concentrated he runs with a lot more thump than a heavier, taller back like Darren McFadden. At 5'9" 228, Trent is right up there with MJD and Turner as one of the most rocked out RBs in the league. And that's probably a big part of the reason why you saw teams like the Ravens saying he was the hardest back in the NFL to tackle.Trent has better balance than Lacy for similar reasons and is also extremely quick for his size. I don't know of too many 220+ pound RBs in the NFL who can make the difficult cuts that he makes. He's got the sideways quickness of a back like Ray Rice, but on a much heftier frame. Lacy is not bad in any of these respects. He has some nice footwork and quickness (I actually have him ranked as the top back from his draft), but he's not Ricky Williams or Trent Richardson either. That's why he was redshirted at Bama and that's why he won't be a top 10 pick in April. I'm sure all of the scouting reports you can find from pros and amateurs will corroborate the idea that he isn't on that level.
 
Balance, power, and cutting ability. Those are the main things that come to mind.Lacy might weigh more than Trent, but Trent is certainly heavier from a weight-per-height standpoint. That's pretty significant. Maurice Drew is only 207 pounds, but because of how that weight is concentrated he runs with a lot more thump than a heavier, taller back like Darren McFadden. At 5'9" 228, Trent is right up there with MJD and Turner as one of the most rocked out RBs in the league. And that's probably a big part of the reason why you saw teams like the Ravens saying he was the hardest back in the NFL to tackle.Trent has better balance than Lacy for similar reasons and is also extremely quick for his size. I don't know of too many 220+ pound RBs in the NFL who can make the difficult cuts that he makes. He's got the sideways quickness of a back like Ray Rice, but on a much heftier frame. Lacy is not bad in any of these respects. He has some nice footwork and quickness (I actually have him ranked as the top back from his draft), but he's not Ricky Williams or Trent Richardson either. That's why he was redshirted at Bama and that's why he won't be a top 10 pick in April. I'm sure all of the scouting reports you can find from pros and amateurs will corroborate the idea that he isn't on that level.
Thanks for this. I am trying not to go overboard with the Lacy love, but after watching the kid dominate two of the nations best defenses in back-to-back games, it is really hard. I know his offensive line is one of the best ever, but he made plays AFTER initial contact and made people miss at a very high rate. Everything that I see, in my opinion, is likely to translate. I honestly don't understand the 2nd round talk I keep reading from very smart people. I thought he was a future 2nd rounder last year, before the amazing year he just put together.
 
Balance, power, and cutting ability. Those are the main things that come to mind.Lacy might weigh more than Trent, but Trent is certainly heavier from a weight-per-height standpoint. That's pretty significant. Maurice Drew is only 207 pounds, but because of how that weight is concentrated he runs with a lot more thump than a heavier, taller back like Darren McFadden. At 5'9" 228, Trent is right up there with MJD and Turner as one of the most rocked out RBs in the league. And that's probably a big part of the reason why you saw teams like the Ravens saying he was the hardest back in the NFL to tackle.Trent has better balance than Lacy for similar reasons and is also extremely quick for his size. I don't know of too many 220+ pound RBs in the NFL who can make the difficult cuts that he makes. He's got the sideways quickness of a back like Ray Rice, but on a much heftier frame. Lacy is not bad in any of these respects. He has some nice footwork and quickness (I actually have him ranked as the top back from his draft), but he's not Ricky Williams or Trent Richardson either. That's why he was redshirted at Bama and that's why he won't be a top 10 pick in April. I'm sure all of the scouting reports you can find from pros and amateurs will corroborate the idea that he isn't on that level.
Thanks for this. I am trying not to go overboard with the Lacy love, but after watching the kid dominate two of the nations best defenses in back-to-back games, it is really hard. I know his offensive line is one of the best ever, but he made plays AFTER initial contact and made people miss at a very high rate. Everything that I see, in my opinion, is likely to translate. I honestly don't understand the 2nd round talk I keep reading from very smart people. I thought he was a future 2nd rounder last year, before the amazing year he just put together.
If its any consolation, I agree with you. Guy could be a serious stud in the NFL
 
Balance, power, and cutting ability. Those are the main things that come to mind.Lacy might weigh more than Trent, but Trent is certainly heavier from a weight-per-height standpoint. That's pretty significant. Maurice Drew is only 207 pounds, but because of how that weight is concentrated he runs with a lot more thump than a heavier, taller back like Darren McFadden. At 5'9" 228, Trent is right up there with MJD and Turner as one of the most rocked out RBs in the league. And that's probably a big part of the reason why you saw teams like the Ravens saying he was the hardest back in the NFL to tackle.Trent has better balance than Lacy for similar reasons and is also extremely quick for his size. I don't know of too many 220+ pound RBs in the NFL who can make the difficult cuts that he makes. He's got the sideways quickness of a back like Ray Rice, but on a much heftier frame. Lacy is not bad in any of these respects. He has some nice footwork and quickness (I actually have him ranked as the top back from his draft), but he's not Ricky Williams or Trent Richardson either. That's why he was redshirted at Bama and that's why he won't be a top 10 pick in April. I'm sure all of the scouting reports you can find from pros and amateurs will corroborate the idea that he isn't on that level.
Thanks for this. I am trying not to go overboard with the Lacy love, but after watching the kid dominate two of the nations best defenses in back-to-back games, it is really hard. I know his offensive line is one of the best ever, but he made plays AFTER initial contact and made people miss at a very high rate. Everything that I see, in my opinion, is likely to translate. I honestly don't understand the 2nd round talk I keep reading from very smart people. I thought he was a future 2nd rounder last year, before the amazing year he just put together.
I wasn't quite sold on him until the last two games against Georgie and Notre Dame. This moveembarrassed the top MLB in the draft.
 
Balance, power, and cutting ability. Those are the main things that come to mind.Lacy might weigh more than Trent, but Trent is certainly heavier from a weight-per-height standpoint. That's pretty significant. Maurice Drew is only 207 pounds, but because of how that weight is concentrated he runs with a lot more thump than a heavier, taller back like Darren McFadden. At 5'9" 228, Trent is right up there with MJD and Turner as one of the most rocked out RBs in the league. And that's probably a big part of the reason why you saw teams like the Ravens saying he was the hardest back in the NFL to tackle.Trent has better balance than Lacy for similar reasons and is also extremely quick for his size. I don't know of too many 220+ pound RBs in the NFL who can make the difficult cuts that he makes. He's got the sideways quickness of a back like Ray Rice, but on a much heftier frame. Lacy is not bad in any of these respects. He has some nice footwork and quickness (I actually have him ranked as the top back from his draft), but he's not Ricky Williams or Trent Richardson either. That's why he was redshirted at Bama and that's why he won't be a top 10 pick in April. I'm sure all of the scouting reports you can find from pros and amateurs will corroborate the idea that he isn't on that level.
Thanks for this. I am trying not to go overboard with the Lacy love, but after watching the kid dominate two of the nations best defenses in back-to-back games, it is really hard. I know his offensive line is one of the best ever, but he made plays AFTER initial contact and made people miss at a very high rate. Everything that I see, in my opinion, is likely to translate. I honestly don't understand the 2nd round talk I keep reading from very smart people. I thought he was a future 2nd rounder last year, before the amazing year he just put together.
I wasn't quite sold on him until the last two games against Georgie and Notre Dame. This moveembarrassed the top MLB in the draft.
Te'o is overrated as a MLB. He should be playing OLB due to his coverage skills. Kevin Minter is the real top MLB.
 
Balance, power, and cutting ability. Those are the main things that come to mind.Lacy might weigh more than Trent, but Trent is certainly heavier from a weight-per-height standpoint. That's pretty significant. Maurice Drew is only 207 pounds, but because of how that weight is concentrated he runs with a lot more thump than a heavier, taller back like Darren McFadden. At 5'9" 228, Trent is right up there with MJD and Turner as one of the most rocked out RBs in the league. And that's probably a big part of the reason why you saw teams like the Ravens saying he was the hardest back in the NFL to tackle.Trent has better balance than Lacy for similar reasons and is also extremely quick for his size. I don't know of too many 220+ pound RBs in the NFL who can make the difficult cuts that he makes. He's got the sideways quickness of a back like Ray Rice, but on a much heftier frame. Lacy is not bad in any of these respects. He has some nice footwork and quickness (I actually have him ranked as the top back from his draft), but he's not Ricky Williams or Trent Richardson either. That's why he was redshirted at Bama and that's why he won't be a top 10 pick in April. I'm sure all of the scouting reports you can find from pros and amateurs will corroborate the idea that he isn't on that level.
Thanks for this. I am trying not to go overboard with the Lacy love, but after watching the kid dominate two of the nations best defenses in back-to-back games, it is really hard. I know his offensive line is one of the best ever, but he made plays AFTER initial contact and made people miss at a very high rate. Everything that I see, in my opinion, is likely to translate. I honestly don't understand the 2nd round talk I keep reading from very smart people. I thought he was a future 2nd rounder last year, before the amazing year he just put together.
I wasn't quite sold on him until the last two games against Georgie and Notre Dame. This moveembarrassed the top MLB in the draft.
Maybe I'm blind, but from what I can tell Te'o is off in the back of the endzone somewhere covering a TE/WR, because I don't see him in either of those gifs.
 
I wasn't quite sold on him until the last two games against Georgie and Notre Dame. This moveembarrassed the top MLB in the draft.
Maybe I'm blind, but from what I can tell Te'o is off in the back of the endzone somewhere covering a TE/WR, because I don't see him in either of those gifs.
Good call. Te'o is not involved in the play at all. You can see #5 enter the frame at the very end of the gif.
 
Balance, power, and cutting ability. Those are the main things that come to mind.Lacy might weigh more than Trent, but Trent is certainly heavier from a weight-per-height standpoint. That's pretty significant. Maurice Drew is only 207 pounds, but because of how that weight is concentrated he runs with a lot more thump than a heavier, taller back like Darren McFadden. At 5'9" 228, Trent is right up there with MJD and Turner as one of the most rocked out RBs in the league. And that's probably a big part of the reason why you saw teams like the Ravens saying he was the hardest back in the NFL to tackle.Trent has better balance than Lacy for similar reasons and is also extremely quick for his size. I don't know of too many 220+ pound RBs in the NFL who can make the difficult cuts that he makes. He's got the sideways quickness of a back like Ray Rice, but on a much heftier frame. Lacy is not bad in any of these respects. He has some nice footwork and quickness (I actually have him ranked as the top back from his draft), but he's not Ricky Williams or Trent Richardson either. That's why he was redshirted at Bama and that's why he won't be a top 10 pick in April. I'm sure all of the scouting reports you can find from pros and amateurs will corroborate the idea that he isn't on that level.
Thanks for this. I am trying not to go overboard with the Lacy love, but after watching the kid dominate two of the nations best defenses in back-to-back games, it is really hard. I know his offensive line is one of the best ever, but he made plays AFTER initial contact and made people miss at a very high rate. Everything that I see, in my opinion, is likely to translate. I honestly don't understand the 2nd round talk I keep reading from very smart people. I thought he was a future 2nd rounder last year, before the amazing year he just put together.
I wasn't quite sold on him until the last two games against Georgie and Notre Dame. This moveembarrassed the top MLB in the draft.
Maybe I'm blind, but from what I can tell Te'o is off in the back of the endzone somewhere covering a TE/WR, because I don't see him in either of those gifs.
He's not in that play. Te'o is #5 and is nowhere to be seen. Lacy spun around #13, Danny Spond. He had already essentially scored when he spun past #17, Zeke Motta.
 
Balance, power, and cutting ability. Those are the main things that come to mind.Lacy might weigh more than Trent, but Trent is certainly heavier from a weight-per-height standpoint. That's pretty significant. Maurice Drew is only 207 pounds, but because of how that weight is concentrated he runs with a lot more thump than a heavier, taller back like Darren McFadden. At 5'9" 228, Trent is right up there with MJD and Turner as one of the most rocked out RBs in the league. And that's probably a big part of the reason why you saw teams like the Ravens saying he was the hardest back in the NFL to tackle.Trent has better balance than Lacy for similar reasons and is also extremely quick for his size. I don't know of too many 220+ pound RBs in the NFL who can make the difficult cuts that he makes. He's got the sideways quickness of a back like Ray Rice, but on a much heftier frame. Lacy is not bad in any of these respects. He has some nice footwork and quickness (I actually have him ranked as the top back from his draft), but he's not Ricky Williams or Trent Richardson either. That's why he was redshirted at Bama and that's why he won't be a top 10 pick in April. I'm sure all of the scouting reports you can find from pros and amateurs will corroborate the idea that he isn't on that level.
Thanks for this. I am trying not to go overboard with the Lacy love, but after watching the kid dominate two of the nations best defenses in back-to-back games, it is really hard. I know his offensive line is one of the best ever, but he made plays AFTER initial contact and made people miss at a very high rate. Everything that I see, in my opinion, is likely to translate. I honestly don't understand the 2nd round talk I keep reading from very smart people. I thought he was a future 2nd rounder last year, before the amazing year he just put together.
I wasn't quite sold on him until the last two games against Georgie and Notre Dame. This moveembarrassed the top MLB in the draft.
Maybe I'm blind, but from what I can tell Te'o is off in the back of the endzone somewhere covering a TE/WR, because I don't see him in either of those gifs.
He's not in that play. Te'o is #5 and is nowhere to be seen. Lacy spun around #13, Danny Spond. He had already essentially scored when he spun past #17, Zeke Motta.
My bad it was Spond. I didn't watch the lower video which makes it very clear.
 
'JohnnyU said:
'Time Kibitzer said:
DeAndre Hopkins declares for NFL draft. He's a shoe in for the 2nd round imo, wouldn't be surprised to see him go in the first round of rookie drafts.
I can't think of 12 players I like more than Hopkins. I don't think there is any doubt about him going in the first round of rookie drafts. I can see him going in the middle 1st.
He's in my top 10 without question and I've yet to update my Big Board from last year. Without going through my notes I'd say he's probably in my to 7 for sure.....Tex
 
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.

 
One thing to keep in mind regarding Lacy is that he wasn't fully healthy and in game shape until the second half of the season....maybe late. He had a rough summer with his toe...and was out of shape in Sept.
This is a good point that shouldn't be missed. I have Lacy ranked #1 so for me it really doesn't matter.
 
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.
IMHO, he will be the biggest surprise in the NFL for most people. My crush on him is not too much lower than my crush for Watkins.
 
What teams would be good fits for Lacy? Ingram was looking like a high dynasty pick and then New Orleans destroyed his value. Richardson on the otherhand, went to great situation. Lacy really doesn't have much experience catching the ball does he?

 
What teams would be good fits for Lacy? Ingram was looking like a high dynasty pick and then New Orleans destroyed his value. Richardson on the otherhand, went to great situation. Lacy really doesn't have much experience catching the ball does he?
I think he'd be a good fit for any scheme. As for catching the ball, I think he'll be fine. He catches with his hands and is fluid in turning north and south after the catch. That is really all I personally look for - you don't need to be Matt Forte or Ray Rice to put up PPR numbers. He is also good in protection, which can hinder early production.
 
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.
IMHO, he will be the biggest surprise in the NFL for most people. My crush on him is not too much lower than my crush for Watkins.
You had/have a crush on Spiller too if I remember correctly. Maybe it's a Clemson thing :shrug:
 
If I remember correctly, Hopkins lined up on the left side most of the time. When he lined up on the right, he didn't run too many routes, except for one route up the right sideline where Boyd overthrew him. I don't watch much Clemson football, so question is: is there anything gimmicky or overly simplistic to Clemson's offense where you'd think Hopkins will need longer to develop in the pros? Brian Hartline is my 2nd highest scoring receiver, so I need some major help.
IMHO, no. Like someone early mentioned, his routes are crisp and he's always in the right stop. He looks as NFL ready as any receiver in this draft. That's not to say that he is the fastest, best, bigger or anything like that but "NFL ready" he had his ups and downs like most players do but when I watch him play he seems to understand the game. Some players I watch and they are just clearly talented but I question their football I.Q. but not him.I haven't been posting much over the last month or so because all I've done is watch games (taped) while I'm not working. This is in NO way, shape, or form to say I'm a freaking expert. I'm just basing my opinion off of what I've seen personally.Tex
 
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.
IMHO, he will be the biggest surprise in the NFL for most people. My crush on him is not too much lower than my crush for Watkins.
You had/have a crush on Spiller too if I remember correctly. Maybe it's a Clemson thing :shrug:
You are correct but it's not a Spiller crush so much as it is his talent, attitude, work and potential and it's not a Clemson thing. It's me watching Player A to evaluate his talent and as I watch more games on Player A, Player B consistently catches my eye and so I begin evaluate player B to see if there is something there or not. And in Clemson's case at least this year and last I've carefully watched four players. I do watch more teams than others but it's nearly always based on their recruiting class with-in a certain time frame and in some cases how their players have translated in the NFL in years past.Tex
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.
IMHO, he will be the biggest surprise in the NFL for most people. My crush on him is not too much lower than my crush for Watkins.
You had/have a crush on Spiller too if I remember correctly. Maybe it's a Clemson thing :shrug:
You are correct but it's not a Spiller crush so much as it is his talent, attitude, work and potential and it's not a Clemson thing. It's me watching Player A to evaluate his talent and as I watch more games on Player A, Player B consistently catches my eye and so I begin evaluate player B to see if there is something there or not. And in Clemson's case at least this year and last I've carefully watched four players. I do watch more teams than others but it's nearly always based on their recruiting class with-in a certain time frame and in some cases how their players have translated in the NFL in years past.Tex
Just teasing Tex, but since we're on Clemson and I don't get to watch a ton. I'd love to hear your breakdown of Hopkins(probably only saw 3 of his games) and Tahj Boyd.
 
Speaking of Wheaton, he is probably one of the most underrated skill prospects nationally. Ripped the Pac-12 a new one this year with 1207 yards and 11 TDs in just 12 games. Was the focal point of OSU's offense and figures to shine in the postseason at the Senior Bowl and combine. Has clocked 10.58 in the 100m and famously beat Oregon's DeAnthony Thomas over that distance. If you want to talk about an unheralded receiver who could sneak into round one, he has a much better chance than Bailey. I think he's probably a better prospect than Robert Woods, who is a lot more well-known.

I like Wheaton, my ONLY concern with him is he catches with his body and not with his hands...........A LOT.
 
If I remember correctly, Hopkins lined up on the left side most of the time. When he lined up on the right, he didn't run too many routes, except for one route up the right sideline where Boyd overthrew him. I don't watch much Clemson football, so question is: is there anything gimmicky or overly simplistic to Clemson's offense where you'd think Hopkins will need longer to develop in the pros? Brian Hartline is my 2nd highest scoring receiver, so I need some major help.
IMHO, no. Like someone early mentioned, his routes are crisp and he's always in the right stop. He looks as NFL ready as any receiver in this draft. That's not to say that he is the fastest, best, bigger or anything like that but "NFL ready" he had his ups and downs like most players do but when I watch him play he seems to understand the game. Some players I watch and they are just clearly talented but I question their football I.Q. but not him.I haven't been posting much over the last month or so because all I've done is watch games (taped) while I'm not working. This is in NO way, shape, or form to say I'm a freaking expert. I'm just basing my opinion off of what I've seen personally.

Tex
Great points Tex. On the bolded items, I had posted at some point that I wondered what his true 40 time is. I think he is one of those that definitely plays faster than he likely will time. That is due to his technique and route running skills, imo. I am bad with comparisons, but I think there is some Greg Jennings in his game - sets up defenders well, gets separation and gets enough to make the explosive plays.
 
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.
IMHO, he will be the biggest surprise in the NFL for most people. My crush on him is not too much lower than my crush for Watkins.
You had/have a crush on Spiller too if I remember correctly. Maybe it's a Clemson thing :shrug:
You are correct but it's not a Spiller crush so much as it is his talent, attitude, work and potential and it's not a Clemson thing. It's me watching Player A to evaluate his talent and as I watch more games on Player A, Player B consistently catches my eye and so I begin evaluate player B to see if there is something there or not. And in Clemson's case at least this year and last I've carefully watched four players. I do watch more teams than others but it's nearly always based on their recruiting class with-in a certain time frame and in some cases how their players have translated in the NFL in years past.Tex
Just teasing Tex, but since we're on Clemson and I don't get to watch a ton. I'd love to hear your breakdown of Hopkins(probably only saw 3 of his games) and Tahj Boyd.
No worries, I didn't take your comment the wrong way. Some people may have thought the same thing so I do want to make that clear just in case someone thinks I'm a homer. Truth is I graduated from Texas Tech and the only person I ever argued about from Tech is Crabby.Hopkins often gets over looked larger because people tend to watch games with tunnel vision and I say that because last year everyone (including myself) was gushing over Watkins because of what he was accomplishing as a true freshman but man, Hopkins caught my attention and did so rather quickly.I don't know what his combine numbers are going to be but I don't give the combine that much more value over game play simply because some players just turn "it" on when it's game time. Some players have "it" when it comes to the combine and some don't, they only have that mental switch when they are on the field, the lights are on, the fans are screaming, the camera is rolling and the ball is hiked. So their "Mental Switch" only comes on when it's game time and so I completely understand that aspect of certain players. This game is both mental and physical but we often focus more on the physical, i.e. size, weight, height, speed which are all important but only part of the player.Hopkins had 191yds against IIRC #9 LSU and Watkins was injured....think about that for a second. He broke Watkins' single season receiving record from last year, hhmmm....think about that. If you loved Watkins last year, with the same coach, same qb, same system how can you not love what Hopkins has done and not just this year but over his career. He has run the route tree with precision, which is very important to the growth of any WR at the NFL level. He runs hard....very hard, as does Watkins so it's not always easy to bring him down and he can elusive and in the open field he can forget about it, good luck catching him unless his tired and I still wish luck on the pursuing defense.I originally planned to put out videos on draft eligible players like I did last year but some of the comments I was getting was just plain ridicules and I just didn't feel like hearing it this year.Some people are down on the 2013 draft, I actually like what I'm seeing.Hope I answered your question,Tex
 
If I remember correctly, Hopkins lined up on the left side most of the time. When he lined up on the right, he didn't run too many routes, except for one route up the right sideline where Boyd overthrew him. I don't watch much Clemson football, so question is: is there anything gimmicky or overly simplistic to Clemson's offense where you'd think Hopkins will need longer to develop in the pros? Brian Hartline is my 2nd highest scoring receiver, so I need some major help.
IMHO, no. Like someone early mentioned, his routes are crisp and he's always in the right stop. He looks as NFL ready as any receiver in this draft. That's not to say that he is the fastest, best, bigger or anything like that but "NFL ready" he had his ups and downs like most players do but when I watch him play he seems to understand the game. Some players I watch and they are just clearly talented but I question their football I.Q. but not him.I haven't been posting much over the last month or so because all I've done is watch games (taped) while I'm not working. This is in NO way, shape, or form to say I'm a freaking expert. I'm just basing my opinion off of what I've seen personally.

Tex
Great points Tex. On the bolded items, I had posted at some point that I wondered what his true 40 time is. I think he is one of those that definitely plays faster than he likely will time. That is due to his technique and route running skills, imo. I am bad with comparisons, but I think there is some Greg Jennings in his game - sets up defenders well, gets separation and gets enough to make the explosive plays.
Thanks, I tend to stay away from comparisons and focus on physical and mental skill set, attitude, and production. Not that there's anything wrong with it and he could be 100%, it tends to cause an argument that gradually takes the attention off the player and on other players because someone will almost always disagree with you then another player is brought up into the conversation and it creates at times an unwanted/needed diversion. Yet I agree with what you mentioned here and there are many players to like in this draft at this point it's about separating true talent from system productive players which I haven't begun to do yet lol.Tex

 
'JohnnyU said:
'Time Kibitzer said:
DeAndre Hopkins declares for NFL draft. He's a shoe in for the 2nd round imo, wouldn't be surprised to see him go in the first round of rookie drafts.
I can't think of 12 players I like more than Hopkins. I don't think there is any doubt about him going in the first round of rookie drafts. I can see him going in the middle 1st.
Right now I have him slotted as WR 4-7 in the draft. I can see him going as early as 1.06 in the right situation.
 
Speaking of Wheaton, he is probably one of the most underrated skill prospects nationally. Ripped the Pac-12 a new one this year with 1207 yards and 11 TDs in just 12 games. Was the focal point of OSU's offense and figures to shine in the postseason at the Senior Bowl and combine. Has clocked 10.58 in the 100m and famously beat Oregon's DeAnthony Thomas over that distance. If you want to talk about an unheralded receiver who could sneak into round one, he has a much better chance than Bailey. I think he's probably a better prospect than Robert Woods, who is a lot more well-known.

I noticed that but he seemed to always make the play regardless. Did he have any trouble with drops?
 
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.
IMHO, he will be the biggest surprise in the NFL for most people. My crush on him is not too much lower than my crush for Watkins.
You had/have a crush on Spiller too if I remember correctly. Maybe it's a Clemson thing :shrug:
You are correct but it's not a Spiller crush so much as it is his talent, attitude, work and potential and it's not a Clemson thing. It's me watching Player A to evaluate his talent and as I watch more games on Player A, Player B consistently catches my eye and so I begin evaluate player B to see if there is something there or not. And in Clemson's case at least this year and last I've carefully watched four players. I do watch more teams than others but it's nearly always based on their recruiting class with-in a certain time frame and in some cases how their players have translated in the NFL in years past.

Tex
Just teasing Tex, but since we're on Clemson and I don't get to watch a ton. I'd love to hear your breakdown of Hopkins(probably only saw 3 of his games) and Tahj Boyd.
No worries, I didn't take your comment the wrong way. Some people may have thought the same thing so I do want to make that clear just in case someone thinks I'm a homer. Truth is I graduated from Texas Tech and the only person I ever argued about from Tech is Crabby.Hopkins often gets over looked larger because people tend to watch games with tunnel vision and I say that because last year everyone (including myself) was gushing over Watkins because of what he was accomplishing as a true freshman but man, Hopkins caught my attention and did so rather quickly.

I don't know what his combine numbers are going to be but I don't give the combine that much more value over game play simply because some players just turn "it" on when it's game time. Some players have "it" when it comes to the combine and some don't, they only have that mental switch when they are on the field, the lights are on, the fans are screaming, the camera is rolling and the ball is hiked. So their "Mental Switch" only comes on when it's game time and so I completely understand that aspect of certain players. This game is both mental and physical but we often focus more on the physical, i.e. size, weight, height, speed which are all important but only part of the player.

Hopkins had 191yds against IIRC #9 LSU and Watkins was injured....think about that for a second. He broke Watkins' single season receiving record from last year, hhmmm....think about that. If you loved Watkins last year, with the same coach, same qb, same system how can you not love what Hopkins has done and not just this year but over his career. He has run the route tree with precision, which is very important to the growth of any WR at the NFL level. He runs hard....very hard, as does Watkins so it's not always easy to bring him down and he can elusive and in the open field he can forget about it, good luck catching him unless his tired and I still wish luck on the pursuing defense.

I originally planned to put out videos on draft eligible players like I did last year but some of the comments I was getting was just plain ridicules and I just didn't feel like hearing it this year.

Some people are down on the 2013 draft, I actually like what I'm seeing.

Hope I answered your question,

Tex
Hope you reconsider, but I realize it's a lot of work. There will always be idiots who make crazy comments. But your videos were greatly appreciated by the vast majority of us.
 
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.
IMHO, he will be the biggest surprise in the NFL for most people. My crush on him is not too much lower than my crush for Watkins.
You had/have a crush on Spiller too if I remember correctly. Maybe it's a Clemson thing :shrug:
You are correct but it's not a Spiller crush so much as it is his talent, attitude, work and potential and it's not a Clemson thing. It's me watching Player A to evaluate his talent and as I watch more games on Player A, Player B consistently catches my eye and so I begin evaluate player B to see if there is something there or not. And in Clemson's case at least this year and last I've carefully watched four players. I do watch more teams than others but it's nearly always based on their recruiting class with-in a certain time frame and in some cases how their players have translated in the NFL in years past.

Tex
Just teasing Tex, but since we're on Clemson and I don't get to watch a ton. I'd love to hear your breakdown of Hopkins(probably only saw 3 of his games) and Tahj Boyd.
No worries, I didn't take your comment the wrong way. Some people may have thought the same thing so I do want to make that clear just in case someone thinks I'm a homer. Truth is I graduated from Texas Tech and the only person I ever argued about from Tech is Crabby.Hopkins often gets over looked larger because people tend to watch games with tunnel vision and I say that because last year everyone (including myself) was gushing over Watkins because of what he was accomplishing as a true freshman but man, Hopkins caught my attention and did so rather quickly.

I don't know what his combine numbers are going to be but I don't give the combine that much more value over game play simply because some players just turn "it" on when it's game time. Some players have "it" when it comes to the combine and some don't, they only have that mental switch when they are on the field, the lights are on, the fans are screaming, the camera is rolling and the ball is hiked. So their "Mental Switch" only comes on when it's game time and so I completely understand that aspect of certain players. This game is both mental and physical but we often focus more on the physical, i.e. size, weight, height, speed which are all important but only part of the player.

Hopkins had 191yds against IIRC #9 LSU and Watkins was injured....think about that for a second. He broke Watkins' single season receiving record from last year, hhmmm....think about that. If you loved Watkins last year, with the same coach, same qb, same system how can you not love what Hopkins has done and not just this year but over his career. He has run the route tree with precision, which is very important to the growth of any WR at the NFL level. He runs hard....very hard, as does Watkins so it's not always easy to bring him down and he can elusive and in the open field he can forget about it, good luck catching him unless his tired and I still wish luck on the pursuing defense.

I originally planned to put out videos on draft eligible players like I did last year but some of the comments I was getting was just plain ridicules and I just didn't feel like hearing it this year.

Some people are down on the 2013 draft, I actually like what I'm seeing.

Hope I answered your question,

Tex
Hope you reconsider, but I realize it's a lot of work. There will always be idiots who make crazy comments. But your videos were greatly appreciated by the vast majority of us.
I concur
 
Youtube is famous for having terrible commenters. You can feel free to ignore them. There are plenty of people (including me) who get a lot of value out of good prospect videos but don't leave Youtube comments.

 
2013 NFL Draft: Alabama trio making jump to NFL

By Dane Brugler | NFLDraftScout.com Senior Analyst

January 11, 2013 12:36 pm ET

Alabama cornerback Dee Milliner, running back Eddie Lacy and offensive tackle D.J. Fluker announced on Friday they will forgo their senior seasons and enter the 2013 NFL Draft. All three project as potential top-40 selections in April.

Milliner is NFLDraftScout.com's No. 1 cornerback prospect and is a projected top-10 pick. He finished 2012 with 54 tackles, 4.0 tackles for loss, 1.5 sacks, one forced fumble and two interceptions. Milliner led the SEC with 22 passes defended and earned First Team All-SEC honors.

Listed at 6-foot-1, 198 pounds, he has an impressive combination of size, length and strength for the position. Though he probably won't run a blazing 40-yard dash time, he has enough speed to be an impact starter in the NFL. Milliner is extremely aggressive with the ball in the air and plays with excellent timing, instincts and anticipation.

Lacy is rated as NFLDraftScout.com's No. 1 running back and No. 43 prospect overall. He will compete with Giovani Bernard and a few others to be the first running back off the board, likely in the second-round range. Although overshadowed at times this season by true freshman T.J. Yeldon, Lacy was strong down the stretch, with a career-high 181 rushing yards against Georgia in the SEC Championship Game followed by 140 rushing yards in the BCS title game, earning Offensive Player of the Game honors. He finished the 2012 season with 1,322 rushing yards on 204 carries (6.5 average) and 17 touchdowns, earning First Team All-SEC honors.

At 220 pounds, Lacy has the power to run over defenders but also shows the fluid feet to sidestep defenders and accelerate downfield. He runs tough and determined with an angry attitude to finish each carry and gain yardage. While not quite as highly regarded as his predecessors, Mark Ingram and Trent Richardson, Lacy projects as a starting running back in the NFL, similar to a more agile Michael Bush-type.

Fluker is NFLDraftScout.com's No. 4 offensive tackle and a borderline first-round pick. He started all 14 games this past season, leaving Alabama with 36 career starts at right tackle under his belt. At 6-foot-6 and 335 pounds, Fluker has the mammoth frame and length to engulf rushers and be a mauler as a run blocker. He plays tight in space and can have trouble against speed rushers, causing some to think he's better suited at guard.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
2013 NFL Draft: Ziggy Ansah rising; QBs have question marks

By Daniel Jeremiah

Analyst, NFL.com and NFL Network

There are still eight NFL teams hot in pursuit of a Super Bowl championship, but the other 24 organizations have turned their focus to improving the roster for next season. The NFL Draft is the best way to build a championship team. This year's draft class might lack top-tier talent, but it's shaping up to be very deep at several key positions.

To kick off my draft preparation, I hopscotched across the country to attend eight bowl games that were filled with NFL prospects. I already wrote about the prospects that participated in the BCS title game. Here are 10 observations from the rest of my bowl-season journey:

1) BYU defensive end Ziggy Ansah has a huge upside, but he is incredibly raw. Ansah is likely to be a mid-to-late first-round pick because of his combination of size, speed and motor. He plays extremely hard every snap and flashed a couple of "wow" plays during the Poinsettia Bowl. However, he is still learning to play the game and his instincts/awareness are very suspect at this time.

2) UCLA linebacker Anthony Barr's decision to return to Westwood will have a major impact on the Bruins' 2013 season. Barr was easily one of the most impressive players I watched during my bowl tour. He is long, athletic and explosive. His first step is dynamic and he has a natural feel as a pass rusher. He should easily be the top defender in the Pac-12 next season.

3) Baylor wide receiver Terrance Williams is not just a product of an effective scheme. With an offensive system like Baylor's, it is very possible for ordinary pass catchers to post big numbers. However, that wasn't the case with previous Baylor wideouts Josh Gordon and Kendall Wright, and it isn't the case with Williams, either. He has the speed to create separation down the field and he tracks the ball naturally over his shoulder. He looked like a solid second-round player in the Holiday Bowl.

4) West Virginia quarterback Geno Smith has all the tools, but his pocket awareness is a concern. The weather at the Pinstripe Bowl was less than ideal for the West Virginia offense. It was cold, snowy and windy. Smith still found a way to make a couple impressive throws, but he had issues dealing with pressure. When his first read was unavailable, he struggled to work through his progressions and held the ball too long. He took two costly safeties that were both avoidable.

5) Syracuse quarterback Ryan Nassib's arm strength and mobility are enticing, but he needs to develop more touch as a passer. I stood on the field during pregame warmups and was very impressed with Nassib's arm. He spins the ball easily and can make difficult drive throws look routine. While I love his arm strength, he has a lot of work to do to develop touch on underneath throws. He fires all fastballs and his accuracy is spotty at best.

6) Georgia's outstanding junior linebackers are explosive, three-down defenders. Jarvis Jones and Alex Ogletree have both announced their intentions to enter the 2013 draft following successful junior campaigns. I was well aware of Jones' pass-rushing prowess prior to the Capital One Bowl, but it was his ability to play the run that stood out in this contest. He lacks ideal size for a 4-3 end, but his hand usage and leverage allowed him to consistently set the edge in the run game.

Ogletree has an outstanding blend of size and speed, plus excellent football instincts. He has the range to make plays sideline to sideline and the athleticism to mirror running backs and tight ends in coverage.

7) Johnny Football isn't a one-man show for the Aggies. Johnny Manziel won the Heisman Trophy after a phenomenal freshman campaign, but he had plenty of help from his offensive mates. The Alabama offensive line was rightfully praised all season long for their fantastic play, but neither one of their offensive tackles would start for Texas A&M. Juniors Luke Joeckel and Jake Matthews were dominant in the Aggies' route of the Oklahoma Sooners in the Cotton Bowl. Joeckel ended up deciding to forego his senior season, while Matthews will return to continue protecting Manziel next fall.

8) Oklahoma offensive tackle Lane Johnson will be a fast riser over the next two months. Johnson hasn't been given much press for his play this season, but trusted NFL executives and scouts have taken notice of the Sooners' tackle. He was impressive on the tape that I studied prior to the Cotton Bowl and he was even better in person. He has quick feet, plays with a firm base and uses his length to keep defenders off his chest. He looked like a mid-to-late first-round pick.

9) Oklahoma quarterback Landry Jones hasn't improved over his career as much as evaluators like to see, but he is still very talented. I haven't heard any NFL evaluators offer up exciting reviews of the Sooners quarterback. Earlier in his career, there was a lot of buzz around Jones and his potential to develop into a top-tier NFL prospect. Unfortunately, his development never advanced at the desired pace. That being said, he does still possess a lot of intriguing tools. He has great size, plenty of arm strength and a plethora of experience. I could see him landing somewhere in the middle of the second round.

10) N.C. State quarterback Mike Glennon is a mixture of Joe Flacco and Derek Anderson. Glennon definitely has the desired size and arm strength to be an NFL starting quarterback. During pregame warmups at the Music City Bowl, he whistled one fastball after another. He also unleashed several impressive throws during the game. Unfortunately, just as I would get excited about one of those darts, I would witness an interception, fumble or bad sack. (He tossed three interceptions, took three sacks and had one fumble.) At his best, he can resemble Flacco. But there were too many moments where he looked more like the turnover-prone Anderson.
 
Speaking of Wheaton, he is probably one of the most underrated skill prospects nationally. Ripped the Pac-12 a new one this year with 1207 yards and 11 TDs in just 12 games. Was the focal point of OSU's offense and figures to shine in the postseason at the Senior Bowl and combine. Has clocked 10.58 in the 100m and famously beat Oregon's DeAnthony Thomas over that distance. If you want to talk about an unheralded receiver who could sneak into round one, he has a much better chance than Bailey. I think he's probably a better prospect than Robert Woods, who is a lot more well-known.

This is 100% true. No, I have never really seen him consistantly have trouble with drops but I personally have never none one WR be a successful and producted in the NFL by catching footballs with their body. Most WRs and DBs are taught to catch the ball at it's highest point and "look it into your body" to secure it. With that being said I don't think he can be successful catching footballs in such a manner he would have to learn to catch with his hands and he may very well be capable of learning how especially with a good WR coach. Again, to my knowledge I don't know of any WRs who have been successful and production in catching the body the way he does.Tex

 
Hopkins will be the biggest riser in my next rankings. I wouldn't say he's a top 30 NFL pick just yet, but there doesn't appear to be a great difference between him and someone like Markus Wheaton.
IMHO, he will be the biggest surprise in the NFL for most people. My crush on him is not too much lower than my crush for Watkins.
You had/have a crush on Spiller too if I remember correctly. Maybe it's a Clemson thing :shrug:
You are correct but it's not a Spiller crush so much as it is his talent, attitude, work and potential and it's not a Clemson thing. It's me watching Player A to evaluate his talent and as I watch more games on Player A, Player B consistently catches my eye and so I begin evaluate player B to see if there is something there or not. And in Clemson's case at least this year and last I've carefully watched four players. I do watch more teams than others but it's nearly always based on their recruiting class with-in a certain time frame and in some cases how their players have translated in the NFL in years past.

Tex
Just teasing Tex, but since we're on Clemson and I don't get to watch a ton. I'd love to hear your breakdown of Hopkins(probably only saw 3 of his games) and Tahj Boyd.
No worries, I didn't take your comment the wrong way. Some people may have thought the same thing so I do want to make that clear just in case someone thinks I'm a homer. Truth is I graduated from Texas Tech and the only person I ever argued about from Tech is Crabby.Hopkins often gets over looked larger because people tend to watch games with tunnel vision and I say that because last year everyone (including myself) was gushing over Watkins because of what he was accomplishing as a true freshman but man, Hopkins caught my attention and did so rather quickly.

I don't know what his combine numbers are going to be but I don't give the combine that much more value over game play simply because some players just turn "it" on when it's game time. Some players have "it" when it comes to the combine and some don't, they only have that mental switch when they are on the field, the lights are on, the fans are screaming, the camera is rolling and the ball is hiked. So their "Mental Switch" only comes on when it's game time and so I completely understand that aspect of certain players. This game is both mental and physical but we often focus more on the physical, i.e. size, weight, height, speed which are all important but only part of the player.

Hopkins had 191yds against IIRC #9 LSU and Watkins was injured....think about that for a second. He broke Watkins' single season receiving record from last year, hhmmm....think about that. If you loved Watkins last year, with the same coach, same qb, same system how can you not love what Hopkins has done and not just this year but over his career. He has run the route tree with precision, which is very important to the growth of any WR at the NFL level. He runs hard....very hard, as does Watkins so it's not always easy to bring him down and he can elusive and in the open field he can forget about it, good luck catching him unless his tired and I still wish luck on the pursuing defense.

I originally planned to put out videos on draft eligible players like I did last year but some of the comments I was getting was just plain ridicules and I just didn't feel like hearing it this year.

Some people are down on the 2013 draft, I actually like what I'm seeing.

Hope I answered your question,

Tex
Hope you reconsider, but I realize it's a lot of work. There will always be idiots who make crazy comments. But your videos were greatly appreciated by the vast majority of us.
I concur
Thanks guys, I still have hours of around 85-100 college football games. I think I may release a few of either unknown players or players that may have little to no videos available for some of the 2013 draft class we'll see. It does take a lot of time and energy. I just got really beat down by some of the idiots in this world with a bunch of negative comments about my vids....it just got old for me very quickly. But for this board which I love being a part of I may do something in that Feb-Apr range so this board can look at the player game and not highlights and there is a big difference between the two.Tex

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top