If the team is upset with a 4.3yrd/carry, if I were James, I wouldn't wanna play for them. Seems like if the team was upset with his lack of yardage for the game they should blame the offensive play caller.Where is Edge gonna be next year? I don't think they want to pay him to run 13 times for 56 yards in big games..
Edge seems pretty powerful to me. I would bet opposing defenses would concur.From what the front office has said here in Indy over the last two days they want to go to a power running game. Does not sound like E James to me. IMO a change will be good.
Sounds smart to me.I bumped this up to add that on PTI yesterday that a columnist from the Indianapolis star and asked him if he thought James would be back next year. He stated that in his opinion, there was an 80% chance that Edge would be playing somewhere else next year. He said that it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to pay James a truckload of money, when you don't even make your RB your go-to guy in the biggest game of the year. He also said that good RBs can be had relatively cheaply and that locking older guys to long term contracts. He said that the Colts want to avoid a situation like the Titans, where many older players are tied into long-term big-money deals, but are underperforming, handcuffing the team's ability to rebuild.
No transcript (I paraphrased all of the above) and this is just a columnist's opinion. Howver, this is definately a guy in the know with regard to the Colts, so I think he's likely on to something.
Completely agree - I doubt Dominic Rhodes is the answer - there is always the draft but letting Edge go before then and hope the right guy falls - that is a dangerous strategyEdge seems pretty powerful to me. I would bet opposing defenses would concur.From what the front office has said here in Indy over the last two days they want to go to a power running game. Does not sound like E James to me. IMO a change will be good.
I agree with jurb26 in terms of Edge being a critical component part of that offense, considering how much they've gone to a more balanced attack. I'm not convinced that you can just plug and play any decent RB back there with similar success.
To me that sounds more like a local writer complaining about playcalling than someone who has any inside information on the plans of the colts.He said that it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to pay James a truckload of money, when you don't even make your RB your go-to guy in the biggest game of the year.
What about the possibility of a Ricky trade? If the claim of a more powerful running game were correct, Ricky would fit that mold at a lower sticker price. Edge and Ricky are similar backs both proven to run 30+ times a game. Something to chew on.To me that sounds more like a local writer complaining about playcalling than someone who has any inside information on the plans of the colts.He said that it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to pay James a truckload of money, when you don't even make your RB your go-to guy in the biggest game of the year.
People need to get off this kick. Manning STATED THE OBVIOUS. Manning was on his ### all day.Manning threw him under the bus just as much as the O-Line.
Franchise?He is an UFA.
They could do that, but I think they are going to run a high risk of him holding out.He wasn't real happy about it last year.Franchise?He is an UFA.
Don't waste your breath. There are so many Manning haters on this board nothing you say will change their minds. It's a way to make up for their meaningless and pathetic lives. You know, to make them feel better about themselves.People need to get off this kick. Manning STATED THE OBVIOUS. Manning was on his ### all day.Manning threw him under the bus just as much as the O-Line.
The line allowed a league LOW 20 sacks and Pitt got to him 5 times and countless others.
Stating we had protection problems is not throwing anybody under the bus. It was obvious to anybody that saw the game, whether at the Dome, at home on TV or on the Moon. He was on his ### all day. That's PROTECTION PROBLEMS.
He didn't just say, "We had some protection problems." He prefaced it with something like, "I'm trying to be a good teammate here, but, well, let's just say we had protection problems." He was basically calling people out. He could have just said that the Pitt D played a great game and got to him, or something like that. Instead he called out his own guys.People need to get off this kick. Manning STATED THE OBVIOUS. Manning was on his ### all day.Manning threw him under the bus just as much as the O-Line.
The line allowed a league LOW 20 sacks and Pitt got to him 5 times and countless others.
Stating we had protection problems is not throwing anybody under the bus. It was obvious to anybody that saw the game, whether at the Dome, at home on TV or on the Moon. He was on his ### all day. That's PROTECTION PROBLEMS.
Why is that? It's the truth, and by saying we had protection problems is stating it in a nice way. He's the coach on the field, so answering a question and stating the obvious in a nice way doesn't mean throwing someone under the bus.He could have just said that the Pitt D played a great game and got to him, or something like that. Instead he called out his own guys.
The answer to all of this, is that the Colts coaches, OL, and Manning haven't mastered how to deal with the 3-4 defense. They had trouble with Baltimore, New England, and now Pittsburgh. Yes they beat Baltimore, but I hope you see what I'm getting at.Sorry, I'm not a Manning hater.
I'm actually a fan of his.
I don't care what line would have been playing in that game, the end result would have been the same.
When a defense doesn't have to play the run, it really isn't that hard to rush an immobile QB.
Sorry if being realistic makes my life "pathetic", but that's how it is.
Edge to JAX makes sense to me. That team IMO is already the favorite to come out of the AFC South next year . . . gaining Edge would soldify this.Living here in Indy, my GUT tells me that if Edge is allowed to play anywhere he wants, he'll choose a florida team.
Since Miami and Tampa have their backs for the future, that leaves Jacksonville. Fred T is washed up, and Greg Jones is .. well, a fullback.
Edge in a Jaguar uniform would be NASTY news for Colts fans.
Need to research how this works though. If the Colts have anything to say about where Edge plays, I can't imagine them allowing the Jags to get their hands on him.
I think that would make his salary about 9.7 mil. I don't think they'll franchise him. I have recently looked for old "Polian's Corner" with out much luck, but about mid-season he did mention how much James touched the ball and that he had a lot of miles on him. Something to that effect anyway.So as much as I would like to see him stay in Indy, and as valuable I believe he is to the Colts, I won't be surprised to see him somewhere else next year.Franchise?
It would be closer to 11 mill.I think that would make his salary about 9.7 mil. I don't think they'll franchise him. I have recently looked for old "Polian's Corner" with out much luck, but about mid-season he did mention how much James touched the ball and that he had a lot of miles on him. Something to that effect anyway.So as much as I would like to see him stay in Indy, and as valuable I believe he is to the Colts, I won't be surprised to see him somewhere else next year.Franchise?
That Indy columnist was Bob Kravitz. He's not very respected here. He's the "controversial" local columnist. You can take what he says with a grain of salt. He's harder on the Pacers than he is the Colts though.I bumped this up to add that on PTI yesterday that a columnist from the Indianapolis star and asked him if he thought James would be back next year. He stated that in his opinion, there was an 80% chance that Edge would be playing somewhere else next year. He said that it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to pay James a truckload of money, when you don't even make your RB your go-to guy in the biggest game of the year. He also said that good RBs can be had relatively cheaply and that locking older guys to long term contracts. He said that the Colts want to avoid a situation like the Titans, where many older players are tied into long-term big-money deals, but are underperforming, handcuffing the team's ability to rebuild.
No transcript (I paraphrased all of the above) and this is just a columnist's opinion. Howver, this is definately a guy in the know with regard to the Colts, so I think he's likely on to something.
man i come to my fantasy football bb, and I still have to deal with Kobe hate? Give the MVP a little more respectHere is my take on this situation...
To keep Edge next season they either have to sign him to a long-term deal or pay him under the franchise tag which will be about $11Million.
Neither will happen unless Manning restructures.
Wayne will either be signed or franchised.
Look for the Colts to go OL and RB with their first 2 picks. I think they get a serviceable RB in FA for less money than Edge. Maybe a Travis Henry-type.
Bob Kravitz likes to stir the pot. But, the jist of it is they don't count on him in the crunch, Manning is the golden-boy and therefore, he trumps all.
I am starting to look at Peyton as I do Kobe Bryant. And I don't like what I see.
Sorry, not hate, but I think they have a huge amount of input on how to run the team.man i come to my fantasy football bb, and I still have to deal with Kobe hate? Give the MVP a little more respect
Signing is a possibility, but I don't see any chance of a good-but-not great #2 WR being franchised.Wayne will either be signed or franchised.
Edge on the Steelers in '06 = Possible MVP.I think a good fit would be the Steelers. With Bettis retiring and Duce being cut, that'll free up money for him to sign with the team with a great OL. With Pittsburgh, he'll have the balance in passing and running to keep him fresh for the yearly trips to the playoffs.
I dunno about that. Rhodes DID come in a few years ago when Edge tore his ACL and ran off a 4.7ypc and 1104yds and 9 TDs in ten starts..This isn't the type of offense you can just plug a guy into and expect to excel.
If Wayne doesn't constitute a great #2 WR, what does? How many #2 WRs around the league are better than Wayne?2300 yards and 17 TDs the last two years is darn impressive for a #2 WR, and better than half the #1's out there.Signing is a possibility, but I don't see any chance of a good-but-not great #2 WR being franchised.Wayne will either be signed or franchised.