If Traded Falcons would get a 24 million cap hit I think, if traded after June 1st then 8 million this year and I think over 20 million next year. Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome, I doubt he is traded.Did anyone else see this?What does it mean with Vick's contract?Could he be traded?
I agree on the untradeable part due to contract. That is why i was shocked at the story.If Traded Falcons would get a 24 million cap hit I think, if traded after June 1st then 8 million this year and I think over 20 million next year. Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome, I doubt he is traded.Did anyone else see this?What does it mean with Vick's contract?Could he be traded?
if its even cap possible to happen it would be nice. old pimp al would know better than to force vick into a system. he'd make sure the offence and system was built around him.I could see a loony owner like Al Davis making an offer for Vick.
Don't think so. He's made a fortune off Vick.Good find. With his contract, I don't see how he could be moved. I would say Mr. Blank is regretting that contract at this point.
I think "Shlon"'s #s are wrong. PFT made a pretty convincing case a month or so ago that Vick's contract wouldnt prevent him from being moved. Ill see if I can find it.I agree on the untradeable part due to contract. That is why i was shocked at the story.If Traded Falcons would get a 24 million cap hit I think, if traded after June 1st then 8 million this year and I think over 20 million next year. Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome, I doubt he is traded.Did anyone else see this?What does it mean with Vick's contract?Could he be traded?
this is true of Davis.I could see a loony owner like Al Davis making an offer for Vick.
The accelerated cap hit is for monies already paid in the form of signing or roster bonuses that are amortized over the life of the contract. When the contract is terminated, by cutting the player or trade, the leftover money hits the cap. So in short, unless Vick returns some of the bonuses, there is no relief by renegotiating. And I'm not even sure that's legal.I always knew it was the $$ part of his contract that makes him almost untradeable. But can't they re-work the contract if he's willing to, in order to get traded? Of course, that would mean he'd have to AGREE to being traded first. But if he did, couldn't it be re-worked, THEN traded?
If it costs that much to get rid of him then it'e EXACTLY like being married.If Traded Falcons would get a 24 million cap hit I think, if traded after June 1st then 8 million this year and I think over 20 million next year. Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome, I doubt he is traded.Did anyone else see this?What does it mean with Vick's contract?Could he be traded?
The only possibility I see is for Vick to renegotiate his contract to convert his bonus into salary. The key to making it legal is that the new contract has to be worth more than the old one. The big question is why Vick would want to do such a thing and probably cost himself at least $10M and make it easy for any team that gets him to bench/cut him.The accelerated cap hit is for monies already paid in the form of signing or roster bonuses that are amortized over the life of the contract. When the contract is terminated, by cutting the player or trade, the leftover money hits the cap. So in short, unless Vick returns some of the bonuses, there is no relief by renegotiating. And I'm not even sure that's legal.I always knew it was the $$ part of his contract that makes him almost untradeable. But can't they re-work the contract if he's willing to, in order to get traded? Of course, that would mean he'd have to AGREE to being traded first. But if he did, couldn't it be re-worked, THEN traded?
If it costs that much to get rid of him then it'e EXACTLY like being married.If Traded Falcons would get a 24 million cap hit I think, if traded after June 1st then 8 million this year and I think over 20 million next year. Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome, I doubt he is traded.Did anyone else see this?What does it mean with Vick's contract?Could he be traded?
If it costs that much to get rid of him then it'e EXACTLY like being married.If Traded Falcons would get a 24 million cap hit I think, if traded after June 1st then 8 million this year and I think over 20 million next year. Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome, I doubt he is traded.Did anyone else see this?What does it mean with Vick's contract?Could he be traded?
Why doesnt the nfl allow teams to trade for players with similar contract terms/salary cap hits?Vick is signed through 2013. I doubt it.
You mean like the NBA? I don't know. Some of those NBA cap trades are pretty bad though.Why doesnt the nfl allow teams to trade for players with similar contract terms/salary cap hits?Vick is signed through 2013. I doubt it.
I would love to see the numbers and the story. I would like to be wrong on the above post. The only downside is all of the Schaub owners posting .....I think "Shlon"'s #s are wrong. PFT made a pretty convincing case a month or so ago that Vick's contract wouldnt prevent him from being moved. Ill see if I can find it.I agree on the untradeable part due to contract. That is why i was shocked at the story.If Traded Falcons would get a 24 million cap hit I think, if traded after June 1st then 8 million this year and I think over 20 million next year. Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome, I doubt he is traded.Did anyone else see this?What does it mean with Vick's contract?Could he be traded?
...not to mention the cap thing. No freakin way is he traded.Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome
It is what it is said:Before June 1st in appears the cap hit would be $22.25 million
After June 1st the cap hit would be $7.57 million with a net hit of $1.57 million and would actually create $6 million in cap space for Atlanta
But in 2008 Atlanta would take a $14.68 million cap hit
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-bl...#comment-840207
So it appears like Chris Mortenson and Arthur Blank have reason for this Vick trade talk based on a trade after June 1st...the Raiders took on a pretty big contract with Moss and appear to have alot of dead weight in players taking up alot of cap space for them this upcoming season.
He wouldn't. And the NFLPA would step in even if he tried to take less to get out. The agent/player would get a serious talking to by the powers that be in the Union.The only possibility I see is for Vick to renegotiate his contract to convert his bonus into salary. The key to making it legal is that the new contract has to be worth more than the old one. The big question is why Vick would want to do such a thing and probably cost himself at least $10M and make it easy for any team that gets him to bench/cut him.The accelerated cap hit is for monies already paid in the form of signing or roster bonuses that are amortized over the life of the contract. When the contract is terminated, by cutting the player or trade, the leftover money hits the cap. So in short, unless Vick returns some of the bonuses, there is no relief by renegotiating. And I'm not even sure that's legal.I always knew it was the $$ part of his contract that makes him almost untradeable. But can't they re-work the contract if he's willing to, in order to get traded? Of course, that would mean he'd have to AGREE to being traded first. But if he did, couldn't it be re-worked, THEN traded?
Nice explanation.I think the Vick situation should be a great lesson for teams on why you should never sign a player to a super duper long contract like that. If that player gets hurt, does stupid things, whatever, then they are stuck with him. Just like the Falcons are...The accelerated cap hit is for monies already paid in the form of signing or roster bonuses that are amortized over the life of the contract. When the contract is terminated, by cutting the player or trade, the leftover money hits the cap. So in short, unless Vick returns some of the bonuses, there is no relief by renegotiating. And I'm not even sure that's legal.I always knew it was the $$ part of his contract that makes him almost untradeable. But can't they re-work the contract if he's willing to, in order to get traded? Of course, that would mean he'd have to AGREE to being traded first. But if he did, couldn't it be re-worked, THEN traded?
That's what everybody in this thread is saying.fasteddie_21 said:Am I the only one who thinks that the Falcons would be much better with Matt Schaub at QB?
Except that he ALREADY has a fortune. He made some peanuts and is stuck with sucktitude at QB with ZERO chance of winning a Super Bowl. Yes, he's regretting it.fruity pebbles said:Don't think so. He's made a fortune off Vick.jeter23 said:Good find. With his contract, I don't see how he could be moved. I would say Mr. Blank is regretting that contract at this point.
Methinks Blank decided Mora was the main source of the problem & has already made that hard call.if Blank decides that Vick is the main source of the problem, then you have to make that hard call.
mad sweeney said:If it costs that much to get rid of him then it'e EXACTLY like being married.Shlon said:If Traded Falcons would get a 24 million cap hit I think, if traded after June 1st then 8 million this year and I think over 20 million next year. Right now Vick is probably untradeable & since he's a moneymaker & fills the seats in the Georgia Dome, I doubt he is traded.Did anyone else see this?What does it mean with Vick's contract?Could he be traded?
Right. Why would a 2-14 team possibly want a QB who is 38-25-1 as a starter...That is sheer LUNACY!!!I could see a loony owner like Al Davis making an offer for Vick.
Can't tell if that's sarcasm or not. What was Brooks' record before he signed with the Raiders? Vick would fill seats, sell jerseys and delight a star starved Raider nation. I see it as an immensely better signing than Brooks was so I would not doubt the possibility. Despite the slogan, I haven't seen much from the Raiders lately that makes me feel they're trying to win.Right. Why would a 2-14 team possibly want a QB who is 38-25-1 as a starter...That is sheer LUNACY!!!I could see a loony owner like Al Davis making an offer for Vick.![]()
Of course it's sarcasm.I'm not the biggest Michael Vick fan in the world, but that Atlanta team STUNK before he got there, and he carried them to the playoffs early in his career. I would take him as Oakland's starter in a heartbeat.Can't tell if that's sarcasm or not. What was Brooks' record before he signed with the Raiders? Vick would fill seats, sell jerseys and delight a star starved Raider nation. I see it as an immensely better signing than Brooks was so I would not doubt the possibility. Despite the slogan, I haven't seen much from the Raiders lately that makes me feel they're trying to win.Right. Why would a 2-14 team possibly want a QB who is 38-25-1 as a starter...That is sheer LUNACY!!! :whoosh:I could see a loony owner like Al Davis making an offer for Vick.
Just checkingOf course it's sarcasm.I'm not the biggest Michael Vick fan in the world, but that Atlanta team STUNK before he got there, and he carried them to the playoffs early in his career. I would take him as Oakland's starter in a heartbeat.Can't tell if that's sarcasm or not. What was Brooks' record before he signed with the Raiders? Vick would fill seats, sell jerseys and delight a star starved Raider nation. I see it as an immensely better signing than Brooks was so I would not doubt the possibility. Despite the slogan, I haven't seen much from the Raiders lately that makes me feel they're trying to win.Right. Why would a 2-14 team possibly want a QB who is 38-25-1 as a starter...That is sheer LUNACY!!!I could see a loony owner like Al Davis making an offer for Vick.![]()
As a veteran QB Vick is two games under 500 the last two years as the starter.Vick would be the perfect QB for the Raiders traveling circus. Let him try to run for 2000 yards in Oakland.Can't tell if that's sarcasm or not. What was Brooks' record before he signed with the Raiders? Vick would fill seats, sell jerseys and delight a star starved Raider nation. I see it as an immensely better signing than Brooks was so I would not doubt the possibility. Despite the slogan, I haven't seen much from the Raiders lately that makes me feel they're trying to win.Right. Why would a 2-14 team possibly want a QB who is 38-25-1 as a starter...That is sheer LUNACY!!!I could see a loony owner like Al Davis making an offer for Vick.![]()