Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Thank you. Seriously.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is how I see it: Seattle dominates with Michael running the ball so they can rest Rawls and Wilson won't need to throw a lot. And before you ask, no, I don't own Michael in any leagues so I am neutral on the subject.
I can see that, no 1 projected scoring team I just wonder where the offense will come from. C Mike has let down in a lot of spots over the years. I dont think I can play C Mike in cash. I am leaning Stafford/Wilson in cash but am considering Carr also as of now. I am not sure I want any QB/WR correlation in cash this week so running Wilson out there naked may be my play as I already have Jones and Crabtree most likely as 2 of my WRs.
To bolster your argument, Miami secondary is terrible. So a big Russell game is definitely possible.
I am not sure you ever want this in cash games, at least 50/50's and double ups. Triples/Quads/Leagues are different.
Well now there finally are blurbs on Roto suggesting that West is going to mix in, that the KC website lists West as the RB2 behind Charles, and Reid saying that the RB will depend on situation and personnel. Probably nothing other than mis-direction or keeping all options open to require the defense to prepare, but it's not great to hear seeing as I finalized lineups last night for Sunday, all 3 of which feature Ware.
Yeah, this is a little disconcerting. Might end-up being too uncertain for my liking in cash.
I think the the "Ware is the starter" was always a smokescreen. KC never indicated that West had lost touches altogether. The reason I will still own Ware in a few contests is I think both Ware and West will fare well against SD.
Given what I've heard about Fleener's progress, Bennett will be worth the upgrade if Gronk sits.
I like it. I am leaning more towards a similar LU as your second but with C Mike and David Johnson at RB. Watkins also. Diff K and DEF too. I do love Wilson this week so I am still up in air to run him out in cash. Im still thinking of whether to roll out Ware also. Just worried West gets a early TD and they give the reigns to him most the game.. With C Mike(who I bashed earlier) I think he gets 60/40 or even 70/30 of the carries compared to Rawls. If Pete Carroll keeps his word and this is a pre season game for Rawls, I bet he sees 8-10 carries. No need to rush him back the way Michael has been looking and given the easy W in my eyes. I am curious the Mike Evans play, I love the guy in general as a player but this week vs ATL is a bad match up. Just due to targets? Trufant is no joke and could shut him down. I think Alshon is one guy I may roll the dice with in cash if I change up my LU, he should see 10+ targets due to game flow/no one else there to gobble them up. AJ Green and A Rob as well for targets. cheaper guys I like Crabtree, Moncrief(not sure I will have him), Cobb who isnt that cheap but is much better when Jordy is back, I doubt Ramsey can lock him down in his first NFL game, I like Landry on DK just due to targets alone, DJax in the Monday night game, and Baldwin.
Agree completely - him & Coates, IMO, make great GPP options this week. Been saying all week that this game is going to be a shoot-out, even with Bryant & now Wheaton not playing. In fact, if you really want to get creative, Darrius Heyward-Bey is also an option. And practically guaranteed low ownership of less than 0.5%.Carver said:
This is not true. Nothing wrong with a 3 man stack for cash. Plenty of pros stack a whole offense for cash (qb, RB, RB, WR). It makes sense, if you think an offense is going to explode, have every piece.
It's the variance that's the problem. Putting that many eggs in a basket really reduces your margin of error. If you're right on that 1 game script, you're golden. If you're wrong, you whiff on everything. If you're going to go that route, you really have to plug that lineup into higher-return contests as well to in order to tip the risk-reward analysis towards the reward side. I would play a decent percentage of my cash play in (decreasing amounts): 3x, 10-man leagues, 5x. If you're right, chances are you have a big score, might as well get paid.
Speculation about workload share between him, West and even K. Davis -- Reid saying they will all play. It's also been mirrored by the exact opposite happening to Christine Michael at a cheaper price, setting up an easy swap.
Mainly this Rotoworld
I think they both have very similar ranges today. I lean towards Alshon as he gets like 30% target share but Allen will have a good share and Marcus Peters doesn't scare me too much.
And that is Exactly the thought process here; this game has shoot-out written all over it. And since we're talking 50/50 and not GPP, all I'm looking for is 2-2.5X value, which I believe each will hit with ease.
Vegas projects Washington to score 24 points. That's not an explosion. If all 3 TDs are passes to your guys, then you're fine. Or if you think the o/u is way low and you're right, then you're fine. But that level of risk involving 3 of your bigger salary investments is what mitigates against making that play in only cash contests.
I completely agree with this.. He still has a rookie QB throwing to him against a good defense on the road.
