FFA Moderation Thoughts - What Do You Think? (5 Viewers)

[sho nuff]

Well in his notebook everyone is.   He assumes too much and is too quick to accuse.  His notebook is also distorted with his rhetoric and muscharacterizations.  Instead of discussing the topic at hand, it turns into dragging up old irrelevant topics with personal attacks sprinkled in.  Really terrible every time he enters. 

Same as other sure...he isn't a ton different than those he complains about.

you won't see me argue that...but my comment stands on Ward and June's kid.

 

[squistion]

Like me pigeon lover?  Still want to bet that I am an alias of another poster? You are an absolute POS poster here and a troll.  GFY.

FTR, Trump sucks donkey balls.

Tsk, tsk...such language...this is not being excellent to one another. And in the moderation thread of all places.

 

[jon_mx]

I usually do, but you always respond with an ad hominem attack like you just did above, calling me a tool.

Oh bs.  You have piped in at least the last dozen times with attacks when I did not say boo to you. 

 

[avoiding injuries]

I am beaver

 

[squistion]

Oh bs.  You have piped in at least the last dozen times with attacks when I did not say boo to you. 

jonny...criticizing your never ending defense of Trump or for the Republicans in the Flint water crisis or other ridiculous positions you take, is in response to what you have actually said. Doesn't matter if you have addressed me personally - if you want to defend the indefensible, expect to be called on it.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Tsk, tsk...such language...this is not being excellent to one another. And in the moderation thread of all places.

Says the guy that accused staff of creating troll accounts.

You're universally hated here.  By libs.  By conservatives.  By non-political posters.  Congrats that's hard to do.

 

[squistion]

Says the guy that accused staff of creating troll accounts.

You're universally hated here.  By libs.  By conservatives.  By non-political posters.  Congrats that's hard to do.

I never said that. That is a lie.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

I never said that. That is a lie.

Okay, Trump

 

[jon_mx]

jonny...criticizing your never ending defense of Trump or for the Republicans in the Flint water crisis or other ridiculous positions you take, is in response to what you have actually said. Doesn't matter if you have addressed me personally - if you want to defend the indefensible, expect to be called on it.

And you are a damn liar.   As usual you completely mischaracterize and lack a ounce of honesty.  You are just a hack and can't even comprehend an honest balanced point.  

 

[jon_mx]

I am beaver

I love beaver.  

 

[squistion]

9 minutes ago, squistion said:

I never said that. That is a lie.

Okay, Trump

You really are shameless.

You flat out lie about something you claim I said.

When you are called on it, you deflect.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

You really are shameless.

You flat out lie about something you claim I said.

When you are called on it, you deflect.

Weren't you just complaining about personal attacks?  Seriously, just go away.  No one here would care.

 

[squistion]

Weren't you just complaining about personal attacks?  Seriously, just go away.  No one here would care.

This was a lie by you:

18 minutes ago, Ramblin Wreck said:

Says the guy that accused staff of creating troll accounts.

I never accused the staff of creating troll accounts. Other people said that but you attributed that to me.

You lied about what I said. Calling you out on that is not a personal attack.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

This was a lie by you:

I never accused the staff of creating troll accounts. Other people said that but you attributed that to me.

You lied about what I said. Calling you out on that is not a personal attack.

You attacked me with "you really are shameless".  Perhaps you should have said my post was shameless if that's how you feel.  Or stop crying about others when you're just as guilty as anyone around here.  

 

[squistion]

You attacked me with "you really are shameless".  Perhaps you should have said my post was shameless if that's how you feel.  Or stop crying about others when you're just as guilty as anyone around here.  

Dude, you are shameless because you lied about what I said and then instead of providing a link or proof when you were called on it, you attempted to make a lame joke.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Dude, you are shameless because you lied about what I said and then instead of providing a link or proof when you were called on it, you attempted to make a lame joke.

Another personal attack.

In no way do I have to go find a link to post here.  I recall you saying someone either hacked FBG or FBG staff was providing accounts.  Deal with it.

 

[Dedfin]

squiston, I really don't get this metagame you are playing here.  Why can't we just talk #### to each other and joke with each other and leave it at that?  Leave this stuff alone, dude.

 

[squistion]

Another personal attack.

In no way do I have to go find a link to post here.  I recall you saying someone either hacked FBG or FBG staff was providing accounts.  Deal with it

:sigh:

I said that Steve is obviously Beaver Cleaver (mods can verify). And that the Steve's account could not have been one created by him in 2003 that he then held dormant for 14 years anticipating that the Toe Cutter alias would be banned in 2017. No one can seriously argue this guy has been lurking for 14 years and suddenly started posting, please.

That left only two possible explanations. One was that he has help from someone on the inside. However, if you read I what I said at the time, I went out of my way to say that I didn't think any of the mods were corrupt or could be bought and, so, such a possibility, was "highly unlikely". However since we know Beaver didn't start the Steve account in 2003, it had to raised as a possibility, although highly unlikely.

Dismissing that it appears that this could not have been an original account started by Beaver and also not one provided by the staff - then, it was an old account that was somehow hacked.

 

[McGarnicle]

Honestly, I think if the enforced moral boundaries of a fake football forum cost you any significant portion of your free time..........ermmmmmmm, dude, we live like 80 years if we're lucky. Go cliff diving or throw a frisbee, please. 

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

:sigh:

I said that Steve is obviously Beaver Cleaver (mods can verify). And that the Steve's account could not have been one created by him in 2003 that he then held dormant for 14 years anticipating that the Toe Cutter alias would be banned in 2017. No one can seriously argue this guy has been lurking for 14 years and suddenly started posting, please.

That left only two possible explanations. One was that he has help from someone on the inside. However, if you read I what I said at the time, I went out of my way to say that I didn't think any of the mods were corrupt or could be bought and, so, such a possibility, was "highly unlikely". However since we know Beaver didn't start the Steve account in 2003, it had to raised as a possibility, although highly unlikely.

Dismissing that it appears that this could not have been an original account started by Beaver and also not one provided by the staff - then, it was an old account that was somehow hacked.

You have an odd obsession with conspiracy theories on a football forum.

 

[squistion]

You have an odd obsession with conspiracy theories on a football forum.

Hacking old accounts created in 2003 with probably minimal password protection (if any by the original account holder) is hardly a conspiracy theory - particularly since it is the only explanation that makes any logical sense (dismissing Steve's alias account of 2003 being actually legitimate or that someone on the inside is helping him).

 

[Henry Ford]

I am beaver

This is one of those "you are what you eat" jokes, isn't it?

 

[Scoresman]

The really simple solution is to stop posting in political threads. 

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

My posts/tweets usually generate over 10+ likes a day, so it appears that, um, someone seems to like me, if not just more a few people.

 

[Dan Lambskin]

:cstu:

 

[squistion]

That is all you got. The default response to anything and everything.

Since you refuse to seriously discuss anything with me and the emoji is your default position. I shall put you on ignore.

 

[-fish-]

My posts/tweets usually generate over 10+ likes a day, so it appears that, um, someone seems to like me, if not just more a few people.

This is one of the saddest things I've ever read.  Maybe you need to step away from the keyboard for a while.

 

[squistion]

This is one of the saddest things I've ever read.  Maybe you need to step away from the keyboard for a while.

No, that actually was an appropriate response to:

No one likes you

 

[flapgreen]

Smh

 

[the rover]

No, that actually was an appropriate response to:

No one likes you

Why does it matter what people on a message board think about you?  

 

[squistion]

Why does it matter what people on a message board think about you?  

I don't care. I didn't bring it up to begin with.

But if someone says that that no one likes you, well, there is literal proof to the contrary, which I provided, to the extent that likes mean anything.

 

[MaxThreshold]

This is one of the saddest things I've ever read.  Maybe you need to step away from the keyboard for a while.

"You like me!  You really, really like me!"

 

[Slapdash]

It is always amusing when snowflakes troll for reactions then come in here to complain when they can't take it.

 

[MaxThreshold]

It is always amusing when snowflakes troll for reactions then come in here to complain when they can't take it.

It's always amusing when you trolls come in here period.

 

[HellToupee]

My posts/tweets usually generate over 10+ likes a day, so it appears that, um, someone seems to like me, if not just more a few people.

Edit - and, oh dear, no, I didn't say they hacked accounts 14 years ago, they are hacking old accounts in 2017 created in 2003 (see Steve and waterworld).

This my friends is a special post . I had to read this not once or twice but three times to make sure what a I was reading was correct. 

Its Saturday night and I would imagine DD is pickled right now but he needs to see this 

@Doctor Detroit

 

[HellToupee]

It is always amusing when snowflakes troll for reactions then come in here to complain when they can't take it.

We love you slappy , we really do

 

[squistion]

This my friends is a special post. I had to read this not once or twice but three times to make sure what a I was reading was correct. 

 

All of my posts are special. Not as special as those found in your Official Men's Underwear Thread. NTTIAWIT. But, still, special.

 

[Osaurus]

I heard a talk the other night about social media popularity.  Ask each of your followers/likers for $1 and see what the results are.  Then you will be able to accurately assess.

 

[MaxThreshold]

I heard a talk the other night about social media popularity.  Ask each of your followers/likers for $1 and see what the results are.  Then you will be able to accurately assess.

As a grown ### man, if you are willfully on social media to begin with (other than being required for your job) then you're doing it wrong already.

 

[MaxThreshold]

 

All of my posts are special. Not as special as those found in your Official Men's Underwear Thread. NTTIAWIT. But, still, special.

Not special, but Special K.

 

[jon_mx]

This my friends is a special post . I had to read this not once or twice but three times to make sure what a I was reading was correct. 

Its Saturday night and I would imagine DD is pickled right now but he needs to see this 

@Doctor Detroit

DD is on timeout for calling someone stupid.  Different rules for different people which is my biggest gripe.  Establish rules and enforce them equally.  The rules change and how they are enforced change with who the poster is. 

Joe made up a rule and tagged me for 90 days and really misinterpreted my point.  

 

[IvanKaramazov]

Hacking old accounts created in 2003 with probably minimal password protection (if any by the original account holder) is hardly a conspiracy theory - particularly since it is the only explanation that makes any logical sense (dismissing Steve's alias account of 2003 being actually legitimate or that someone on the inside is helping him).

Hold on a second.  You seriously believe that people are hacking old accounts just to win arguments on a magic football forum?  That seems reasonable to you?

 

[sho nuff]

Hold on a second.  You seriously believe that people are hacking old accounts just to win arguments on a magic football forum?  That seems reasonable to you?

Yeah...that's pretty nuts.

Easier to believe a few people keep a bunch of burner accounts since they get banned multiple times a year.

 

[squistion]

Hold on a second.  You seriously believe that people are hacking old accounts just to win arguments on a magic football forum?  That seems reasonable to you?

No, they are hacking old accounts because their prior accounts have been banned and they want to continue posting/trolling here.

 

[jon_mx]

No, they are hacking old accounts because their prior accounts have been banned and they want to continue posting/trolling here.

So instead of the rather simple process of creating a new account, they are hacking old one.  

 

[HellToupee]

Hold on a second.  You seriously believe that people are hacking old accounts just to win arguments on a magic football forum?  That seems reasonable to you?

No, they are hacking old accounts because their prior accounts have been banned and they want to continue posting/trolling here.

 

[HellToupee]

So instead of the rather simple process of creating a new account, they are hacking old one.  

Thats seems like what he is saying comrade

 

[Slapdash]

I think what might have happened in that 2003 timeframe is FBGs switched over from the old site and posters had to reregister and deactivate their handles. Some didn't. Just an observation, I think it's interesting.

That isn't how it worked, everyone had to sign up anew.  Now, there was a period where a certain mod was giving away inactive accounts with lower member numbers.

 

[squistion]

So instead of the rather simple process of creating a new account, they are hacking old one.  

New accounts have to be approved by the mods and can be checked against banned ISP addresses.

It is probably simpler to find an old account not used in years, like Beaver Cleaver did with Toe Cutter and now Steve, then when it will be inevitably banned (like the 10 others before it) just find another old account.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

That isn't how it worked, everyone had to sign up anew.  Now, there was a period where a certain mod was giving away inactive accounts with lower member numbers.

Thanks. I'll stay out of it, I just think it's interesting that 2003 timeframe has popped up. Horner's didn't even have one post.