The Commish
Footballguy
I guess it depends on how the individual presents it and how it's received. So, for instance, with these two yahoos, I don't think there is a serious bone in HT's body in terms of this voting scandal thing. I think it's pure shtick based on his body of work, so that's how I approach it.....SHTICK IT UP I SAY!!!!! Squis on the other hand has (and always has) come across as a "serious business" kind of dude with little to no sense of humor. If I'm being honest, I have no idea why he even comes here.I don't disagree but it's still trolling HT even if it's harmless fun, right? Maybe a better way to put it is I don't think it's fair to troll HT about that and call it good fun but other posters get suspended if they are having harmless fun with the pigeon shtick. Just because HT handles it better than Squis doesn't make it okay because then it gives Squis (and others) free reign to troll HT but he gets suspended if he plays along and returns fire.Here's the thing. There are some things that a person goes so over the top with that it will follow them forever. There is no doubt in my mind that at some point in the future I will poke at Tim for his "Trump is going to be dictator of the USA" shtick. The nonsense that HT spewed regarding voter fraud is pretty much the same IMO. It's going to stick with him for a long time.
To me "trolling" has an element of making a comment just to get under someone's skin. Granted, I have not seen all the posts to HT in this forum, but the ones I have seen seem to be of the "
yeah, ok, keep going with your bad shtick" variety. Perceptions and all that....it's probably better left to the two in the immediate conversation to police. The rest of us are just guessing.