ML are up 5.84u over 8 days. Excluding ML over -150, 10.02u.Yeah, just eliminate the ML bets entirely and you're onto something.![]()
ML are up 5.84u over 8 days. Excluding ML over -150, 10.02u.Yeah, just eliminate the ML bets entirely and you're onto something.![]()
I'm just wondering what to do when I have a disagreement with you. Last Friday night, for example. I was on the DET/BOS under and I couldn't comprehend how your model advised an over play between Scherzer and Lester. That was the 1-0 final. Now, there have been numerous other times when you were on the right side and I wasn't. But my larger point is, do I (we) just suck it up and play what your model recommends, even if we strongly disagree with it? Will the math win out overall in the end?No, just not huge favorite MLs.So we're just playing the RLs and totals from here on in?GPJ, I hope if you did play those picks yesterday you did it again today. Got it all back barring Angels collapse
There are also other situations I want to look at. For example, I projected almost identical runs for Tor/Bos (although my total was off) and Min/SD. Min and Tor were both big underdogs, so that should be a +EV spot.
At 5dimes reduced. Only things they don't have are RL on dogs which I have to get at Bovada (unless it's a public game like Det/Bos Sunday night). I'm not sure if saving juice on overnight is better value than missing a top batter sitting.Tj, do you usually play overnight lines?
McAllister isn't as bad as he was last Friday, and the Tribe hit well at home.http://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/2014-mlb-betting-public-report/Remember when I took the A's on Friday night @ Cleveland, and they beat the Tribe 11-1? They scored 8 runs in the 2nd. CLE's starting pitcher that night (McAllister) is going tomorrow at noon against Max, who is 3-0, 2.17 in his last four starts in Cleveland. He's also won six straight overall with a microscopic ERA, and Detroit is trying to avoid the sweep.
Could the Tigers have any more going for them tomorrow?
He's trending downward, yo.McAllister isn't as bad as he was last Friday, and the Tribe hit well at home.Remember when I took the A's on Friday night @ Cleveland, and they beat the Tribe 11-1? They scored 8 runs in the 2nd. CLE's starting pitcher that night (McAllister) is going tomorrow at noon against Max, who is 3-0, 2.17 in his last four starts in Cleveland. He's also won six straight overall with a microscopic ERA, and Detroit is trying to avoid the sweep.
Could the Tigers have any more going for them tomorrow?
http://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/2014-mlb-betting-public-report/
Scheduled Indians starter Zach McAllister (3-4, 5.36) posted a 1.37 ERA while winning three straight starts from April 9-21, but is 0-4 with an 8.72 ERA in the following five.
Look, all I've done is post 18-16 +.06u. For all I know, fading my model might be profitable. What I do know is I have a strong quant background and love all the advanced stats in baseball. Baseball is all about volume - the more data you have, the more credible it is.I'm just wondering what to do when I have a disagreement with you. Last Friday night, for example. I was on the DET/BOS under and I couldn't comprehend how your model advised an over play between Scherzer and Lester. That was the 1-0 final. Now, there have been numerous other times when you were on the right side and I wasn't. But my larger point is, do I (we) just suck it up and play what your model recommends, even if we strongly disagree with it? Will the math win out overall in the end?No, just not huge favorite MLs.So we're just playing the RLs and totals from here on in?GPJ, I hope if you did play those picks yesterday you did it again today. Got it all back barring Angels collapse
There are also other situations I want to look at. For example, I projected almost identical runs for Tor/Bos (although my total was off) and Min/SD. Min and Tor were both big underdogs, so that should be a +EV spot.
Baseball to me is ignoring the variance. Sometimes the Astros suck. Sometimes they don't.My model says whatever Chain recommendsMcAllister 2-0 SU with 3ER in 14 IP since 2012 after going less than 3 IP in his previous start. He is 5-0 SU with 8ER allowed in 32.1 IP since 2012 after going 4 or less innings in his previous start.
Today will be Max Scherzer's earliest start time in his career. But that might not matter since he is 23-8 SU (2-2 away) in his career in games starting at 1:10 PM EST or earlier (avg start time 1:06 PM EST).
Disagreeing with you /= fading you. It = disagreeing with you.Look, all I've done is post 18-16 +.06u. For all I know, fading my model might be profitable. What I do know is I have a strong quant background and love all the advanced stats in baseball. Baseball is all about volume - the more data you have, the more credible it is. I will tell you the two strongest totals I had tonight were Oak/TB 10 vs a line of 8 and Bos/Tor under 8 vs a line of 9.5. I didn't play the CWS/KC over because of .06runs againI'm just wondering what to do when I have a disagreement with you. Last Friday night, for example. I was on the DET/BOS under and I couldn't comprehend how your model advised an over play between Scherzer and Lester. That was the 1-0 final. Now, there have been numerous other times when you were on the right side and I wasn't. But my larger point is, do I (we) just suck it up and play what your model recommends, even if we strongly disagree with it? Will the math win out overall in the end?No, just not huge favorite MLs. There are also other situations I want to look at. For example, I projected almost identical runs for Tor/Bos (although my total was off) and Min/SD. Min and Tor were both big underdogs, so that should be a +EV spot.So we're just playing the RLs and totals from here on in?GPJ, I hope if you did play those picks yesterday you did it again today. Got it all back barring Angels collapseBaseball to me is ignoring the variance. Sometimes the Astros suck. Sometimes they don't.
If you disagree with me, by all means, fade me.
I'll be up before the 2:00 starts to see what y'all like.Every site has max payout restrictionsPayout times good with these three? And no max payout amount restrictions? ($2,500 per check at SB, for example).Do not play at Wagerweb if u want a quick payout.I did a quick thread search and didn't find much. Lumpy mentioned sportsbetting.ag and wagerweb, but both of them took a beating in the online reviews I read.
5dimes
Bookmaker
Betdsi
Heritage
Betonline
Sportsbetting.ag
This is sorta the right of passage. Grandpa (RN) has to approve you then we all accept you in.I thought this was a thread where we all love each other?
What is your profession?Guess I'll hold off on Max then. I generally don't like laying a heavy number on the road, anyway. And I certainly don't want to get up at noon.I'll be up before the 2:00 starts to see what y'all like.
Someone has to solve the world's hunger and male enhancement problems. Our best guy is on the case, but he's with us in spirit...always.I miss Brong
NOI'm 1 for 1 in $500+ bets, but do they have to be made intentionally to count?
Not sure what the bet is here. Bridgewater to get more starts than Bortles? I'm in.http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9320/blake-bortles
Still available on Bovada.
I was able to place three seperate bets to get past the $50 limit but then they cut me off.
a $25 a $40 and a $10
In.Not sure what the bet is here. Bridgewater to get more starts than Bortles? I'm in.http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9320/blake-bortles
Still available on Bovada.
I was able to place three seperate bets to get past the $50 limit but then they cut me off.
a $25 a $40 and a $10
He did make it through 2 innings today."Good said:His k/bb is better in those last five starts, it's just that his hr/fb got normal and his babip skyrocketed.
He's also much better at home. Dunno if i'd play him, just saying it probably wont be as easy as it looks.
Opposing team is now 16-6 SU in Samardzija starts at Wrigley since 2013 and 6-0 L6 with an avg line of 100.7 with a ROI of +42.2% since 2013.Samardzija has a 1.48 ERA in four starts at Wrigley this season. The Cubs are 0-4 in those four games, 0-5 L5 Samardzija starts at Wrigley, and 6-15 L21 Samardzija starts at Wrigley since 2013 (avg line -110).
INOpposing team is now 16-6 SU in Samardzija starts at Wrigley since 2013 and 6-0 L6 with an avg line of 100.7 with a ROI of +42.2% since 2013.Samardzija has a 1.48 ERA in four starts at Wrigley this season. The Cubs are 0-4 in those four games, 0-5 L5 Samardzija starts at Wrigley, and 6-15 L21 Samardzija starts at Wrigley since 2013 (avg line -110).
correct.. at -150Not sure what the bet is here. Bridgewater to get more starts than Bortles? I'm in.http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9320/blake-bortles
Still available on Bovada.
I was able to place three seperate bets to get past the $50 limit but then they cut me off.
a $25 a $40 and a $10
Also Im dumb as the limit must be to win $50.. So betting $75 to win the $50, I didn't outsmart themNot sure what the bet is here. Bridgewater to get more starts than Bortles? I'm in.http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9320/blake-bortles
Still available on Bovada.
I was able to place three seperate bets to get past the $50 limit but then they cut me off.
a $25 a $40 and a $10
5dimesDoes anyone know of another book that posts the alternative run lines for underdogs besides Bovada?
betus does as well.5dimesDoes anyone know of another book that posts the alternative run lines for underdogs besides Bovada?
Oh in the drop downs. Whoops!5dimesDoes anyone know of another book that posts the alternative run lines for underdogs besides Bovada?
I was wondering why you were looking for alternate run lines. I was so confused as to shy you weren't going to 5d for them. Also.. man.. don't forget about the build-your-own -1 line calculator. 5d cuts you off at the knees if you try to bet their -1 lines from the drop down menu.Oh in the drop downs. Whoops!5dimesDoes anyone know of another book that posts the alternative run lines for underdogs besides Bovada?
I figured of anywhere 5d would have them but didn't think to click the giant drop down box under run lines. And yeah, you are absolutely right, buying pts is usually a really bad position. There are still some select spots where it makes sense even w the extra juiceI was wondering why you were looking for alternate run lines. I was so confused as to shy you weren't going to 5d for them. Also.. man.. don't forget about the build-your-own -1 line calculator. 5d cuts you off at the knees if you try to bet their -1 lines from the drop down menu.Oh in the drop downs. Whoops!5dimesDoes anyone know of another book that posts the alternative run lines for underdogs besides Bovada?
Yeah....loved seeing this as I had grabbed the Tigers +130 in live betting and thought to my self when I turned away from my computer...watch him give up a 2 run bomb.Ohhhhhh Joe Nathan.
Adding:Internet stopped working last night. Missed Det/Cle
Have Seattle +132, -1.5 +190 at Bovada
Not playing Chi/NYY
Pretty sure the Indians are all out of relievers. So you're in good shape if this goes awhile.Yeah....loved seeing this as I had grabbed the Tigers +130 in live betting and thought to my self when I turned away from my computer...watch him give up a 2 run bomb.Ohhhhhh Joe Nathan.
Or Not....lolPretty sure the Indians are all out of relievers. So you're in good shape if this goes awhile.Yeah....loved seeing this as I had grabbed the Tigers +130 in live betting and thought to my self when I turned away from my computer...watch him give up a 2 run bomb.Ohhhhhh Joe Nathan.
Or Not....lolPretty sure the Indians are all out of relievers. So you're in good shape if this goes awhile.Yeah....loved seeing this as I had grabbed the Tigers +130 in live betting and thought to my self when I turned away from my computer...watch him give up a 2 run bomb.Ohhhhhh Joe Nathan.
GO CUBS!RN-yanks vs smarghyfjjhgdtfza....whatchoo got?
Smardzzzza just cannot get a win. It's unbelievable.GO CUBS!RN-yanks vs smarghyfjjhgdtfza....whatchoo got?![]()