What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (2 Viewers)

I think Seattle win by 2 TD. I don't normally lay chalk but I did with them this week. Just a hunch basd on a trend I found but West Coast teams going to the Eastern time zone to play SNF or MNF lined as the favorite are 11-3 SU and ATS, and they won the games by a minimum of 2 TD on average. Trend spans 24 years.
Where did you dig this up?

 
Atlanta at Giants (-4) Chicago (+2.5) at Carolina Buffalo (+7) at Detroit Jets (+6.5) at San Diego Seattle at Washington (+7)
hmm, interesting grabbing that Jets at +6.5 as a top play. Seems the Chargers have been under-rated for a year and a half at this point. I just know one thing about that Chargers team that seemed evident from last year is that they do not have many games where they come out looking like they don't care. Decker sounds like he is not going to play much this week, and i am just not sure what the angle is there on that game. That Buffalo game is one that is getting a lot of love so i am happy to probably pass on that, and i think the other 4 look solid.

Ballsy taking the Skins on Monday night going against the Seahawks coming off a bye, but i was thinking the same idea that the Skins might surprise on Monday night. Though you have to think the Seahawks playing a nationally televised game will not allow for a letdown. but it is good to see someone not taking popular picks and going on a limb like that, and i have to agree that i don't think it is a bad play
I think the Skins get dominated most likely. I think Cousins is too green for that Seahawk defense. Could be a blowout.

 
swirve/gooroo/other dudes with opinions:

can I pick your brains on the following WRs this weekend for DFS purposes?

T.Y Hilton - Asa Jackson - 53 (Will also see Jimmy Smith who is a 35)

Jeremy Maclin - Gaines -51

Andre Johnson - Sterling Moore - 25

Vincent Jackson - Kennan Lewis - 79

Brandin Cooks - Jonathan Banks - 100

Any help appreciated.
Here is PFF rating vs the CB they should see the most of. High is better matchup (the CB sucks) from 0-100

 
I think Seattle win by 2 TD. I don't normally lay chalk but I did with them this week. Just a hunch basd on a trend I found but West Coast teams going to the Eastern time zone to play SNF or MNF lined as the favorite are 11-3 SU and ATS, and they won the games by a minimum of 2 TD on average. Trend spans 24 years.
Where did you dig this up?
-When Saw posts this stuff the correct answer is either "thank you" or "tailed". No other acceptable responses. After it hits you'll get some leeway. I prefer SAUGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH or the like.

-#threadiquette

-Wake Forest is pathetic. FSU getting back 3 starters on defense that were out last week plus Pender at RB. I'm taking them -38. Is there a site that posts current odds to win the title this year? That's right, wearing my Weinke jammys tonight baby!

-finny-I have a Bovada acct

-Ruds-"we"

-WillBats-IN!

ok, caught up

 
I think Seattle win by 2 TD. I don't normally lay chalk but I did with them this week. Just a hunch basd on a trend I found but West Coast teams going to the Eastern time zone to play SNF or MNF lined as the favorite are 11-3 SU and ATS, and they won the games by a minimum of 2 TD on average. Trend spans 24 years.
Where did you dig this up?
-When Saw posts this stuff the correct answer is either "thank you" or "tailed". No other acceptable responses. After it hits you'll get some leeway. I prefer SAUGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH or the like.

-#threadiquette

-Wake Forest is pathetic. FSU getting back 3 starters on defense that were out last week plus Pender at RB. I'm taking them -38. Is there a site that posts current odds to win the title this year? That's right, wearing my Weinke jammys tonight baby!

-finny-I have a Bovada acct

-Ruds-"we"

-WillBats-IN!

ok, caught up
Tailed :unsure:

 
Homer play:

Dallas-6.5. Houston cannot score enough to keep up with the Cowboys. Houston has major problems with depth in the secondary and they can't stop the run. Foster is hamstrung, Blue can't pass protect, and if Houston has to put the ball in Fitzpatrick's hand, this could get ugly.

If you want to play it, do it now because it will cross 7.

 
I think Seattle win by 2 TD. I don't normally lay chalk but I did with them this week. Just a hunch basd on a trend I found but West Coast teams going to the Eastern time zone to play SNF or MNF lined as the favorite are 11-3 SU and ATS, and they won the games by a minimum of 2 TD on average. Trend spans 24 years.
Where did you dig this up?
Since 1989, West Coast teams traveling to the Eastern time zone to play SNF and MNF:

SU: 21-11-0 (8.81, 65.6%)

ATS: 23-9-0 (8.56, 71.9%) avg line: -0.2

O/U: 16-16-0 (3.89, 50.0%) avg total: 42.6 link

That's pretty good in the first place, but when you filter out those results to only show the teams that were favored to win you get:

SU: 11-3-0 (18.36, 78.6%)

ATS: 11-3-0 (12.39, 78.6%) avg line: -6.0

O/U: 7-7-0 (4.93, 50.0%) avg total: 42.1 link

The average margin of victory in those 11 wins as the favorite was 25.8 ±11.8 points per game.

 
Looking at the above trends, the 3 stand out (heavily sided for both teams) would lean towards:

BUF +7

Since 2004, the Bills following two losses and as dogs of 7 or more points are 6-1 ATS (86%)
Since 2011, the Lions as home favorites of 3 points or more are 7-11 ATS (39%)

CLE -2

In the last 10 years, the Browns as a road favorite are 5-1 ATS (83%)
In the last 10 years, the Titans as home dogs are 10-22 SU (31%) - still have the potential Cle win by 1 here, but it's still strong

NE +1

Since 2001, the Tom Brady era, the Patriots as home dogs are 6-2 ATS (75%)
All-time, 3-0 teams that are road favorites of 3 or fewer points are 6-12-2 ATS (33%)
I always wonder if these stats really mean anything. Maybe pre-1992 (or whatever year free agency started and Keith Jackson, then Reggie White a year or 2 later, fled Philly), but just thinking of Cle and Ten, those teams are vastly different during that 10-year span from '04 until now. Hell, look at some teams that are drastically different year to year. I mean some teams this may apply to, but only if you have the same basic core for those years.

i would say comparing stats from the Eagles from '04 until now would be drastically different. '04 the team was on the rise, leveled off for a few years, then nosedived a few years before Andy left. Now a year and 1/4 of Chip. But taking any stats and comparing Andy to Chip would just seem useless. 2 different mindsets and styles of play.

just wondering if there is any legitimacy to stats like these, or if they really are not worth too much

ETA: taking that site a little further, and just pulling a few that i think make sense. Hard to compare some of these guys and basing stats on their career numbers with those teams. They love looking at QBs, which i think is a classic mistake anyway, but looking at some of these QBs from rookie year until now is looking at totally different teams. I would think a lot of young guys are started out slow and more game managers, and as they are in the system for a few years they loosen the reigns a little. Example off the top of my head is Russel Wilson
I'm not saying they do by any means...just posting some leans/trends

 
Looking at the above trends, the 3 stand out (heavily sided for both teams) would lean towards:

BUF +7

Since 2004, the Bills following two losses and as dogs of 7 or more points are 6-1 ATS (86%)
Since 2011, the Lions as home favorites of 3 points or more are 7-11 ATS (39%)

CLE -2

In the last 10 years, the Browns as a road favorite are 5-1 ATS (83%)
In the last 10 years, the Titans as home dogs are 10-22 SU (31%) - still have the potential Cle win by 1 here, but it's still strong

NE +1

Since 2001, the Tom Brady era, the Patriots as home dogs are 6-2 ATS (75%)
All-time, 3-0 teams that are road favorites of 3 or fewer points are 6-12-2 ATS (33%)
I always wonder if these stats really mean anything. Maybe pre-1992 (or whatever year free agency started and Keith Jackson, then Reggie White a year or 2 later, fled Philly), but just thinking of Cle and Ten, those teams are vastly different during that 10-year span from '04 until now. Hell, look at some teams that are drastically different year to year. I mean some teams this may apply to, but only if you have the same basic core for those years.

i would say comparing stats from the Eagles from '04 until now would be drastically different. '04 the team was on the rise, leveled off for a few years, then nosedived a few years before Andy left. Now a year and 1/4 of Chip. But taking any stats and comparing Andy to Chip would just seem useless. 2 different mindsets and styles of play.

just wondering if there is any legitimacy to stats like these, or if they really are not worth too much

ETA: taking that site a little further, and just pulling a few that i think make sense. Hard to compare some of these guys and basing stats on their career numbers with those teams. They love looking at QBs, which i think is a classic mistake anyway, but looking at some of these QBs from rookie year until now is looking at totally different teams. I would think a lot of young guys are started out slow and more game managers, and as they are in the system for a few years they loosen the reigns a little. Example off the top of my head is Russel Wilson
I'm not saying they do by any means...just posting some leans/trends
yeah, didn't mean to sound like a d-bag or anything, i was just wondering about stats like these. They seem to be just kind of arbitrary because the samples they are pulling from can vary so much from year to year. Basically was wondering if i was missing something by not paying attn. to stats like these, and if they hold up pretty well.

I remember one of the biggest one's has always been west coast teams playing 1:00 games. and that one seemed to hold up for awhile too, but i always thought it was because the NFC west used to be mediocre and some of those other teams on the West Coast (:cough, cough: Raiders), have a tendency to blow year after year. You don't seem to hear about it as much now that teams like Seattle and some others have really improved overall. kind of like the old 3-year rule for WRs that everybody was loving years ago in fantasy football. It seemed like it applied one year and everybody was head over heels about it until a few years later when they realized that is varies greatly depending on quite a few variables

 
FWIW, I'll be in Indy for Colts v. Ravens. Indy is 2-1 ATS and SU last 3 years when I am there including a win v. Seattle last year. HTH
So if you had to pick a team to win, and you can't take New Orleans, green bay or Detroit, who would you take this week? I think i am talking myself out of the Chargers play, so thinking of options. I imagine the pool will be 95% Philly, Denver, Seattle, or San Diego.
I agree with AB and would pick the Colts. The Ravens have never played Luck at his house. Luck is 11-3 SU when the opposing team is seeing him at home for the first time (8-5-1 ATS against an avg line of -0.6). And he's 8-1 SU and 5-3-1 ATS (avg line -1.0) against the AFC in that situation.

I thought last week that Carolina would look at what the Browns did on defense to stop the Ravens back in week three in Cleveland. The Ravens barely won that week-three game in the last minute with a field-goal drive in the two-minute drill in the fourth quarter. Cleveland kept that game close despite missing a field-goal, having a field-goal blocked, committing 12 penalties, and having their dude fall down on a play that would have been an easy TD. Cleveland should have beat the Ravens in week three.

As it turned out in "the revenge game," the Ravens and Steve Smith played out of their minds versus the RB-less Panthers (Tonydead>Hi) and cost me some coin, and the public is all over them this week as a result. Big picture though, the Ravens are only 3-6 SU on the road since last season, and that is including the win they squeaked out in Cleveland two weeks ago. I just figured out my action junkie play for noon on Sunday is. I'll be on the Colts now, just have to figure out how.

 
FWIW, I'll be in Indy for Colts v. Ravens. Indy is 2-1 ATS and SU last 3 years when I am there including a win v. Seattle last year. HTH
So if you had to pick a team to win, and you can't take New Orleans, green bay or Detroit, who would you take this week? I think i am talking myself out of the Chargers play, so thinking of options. I imagine the pool will be 95% Philly, Denver, Seattle, or San Diego.
I agree with AB and would pick the Colts. The Ravens have never played Luck at his house. Luck is 11-3 SU when the opposing team is seeing him at home for the first time (8-5-1 ATS against an avg line of -0.6). And he's 8-1 SU and 5-3-1 ATS (avg line -1.0) against the AFC in that situation.

I thought last week that Carolina would look at what the Browns did on defense to stop the Ravens back in week three in Cleveland. The Ravens barely won that week-three game in the last minute with a field-goal drive in the two-minute drill in the fourth quarter. Cleveland kept that game close despite missing a field-goal, having a field-goal blocked, committing 12 penalties, and having their dude fall down on a play that would have been an easy TD. Cleveland should have beat the Ravens in week three.

As it turned out in "the revenge game," the Ravens and Steve Smith played out of their minds versus the RB-less Panthers (Tonydead>Hi) and cost me some coin, and the public is all over them this week as a result. Big picture though, the Ravens are only 3-6 SU on the road since last season, and that is including the win they squeaked out in Cleveland two weeks ago. I just figured out my action junkie play for noon on Sunday is. I'll be on the Colts now, just have to figure out how.
hmm, good stuff here bud. Didn't think of the Colts as much of an option with those big 4 as looking like obvious plays. but you are making a lot of sense here

 
According to Brian Fremeau's system, FSU has played the toughest schedule to date of any undefeated team. But the national media isn't taking note.
OMFG! Weinke jammys!

Nate...whatcha doing with this BYU/somewhere in the north State game tonight? Gimme an O?

 
Las Vegas Sharps Report, Week 5

CHICAGO AT CAROLINA:
The big news here is that the game hasn’t moved off the opener of Carolina -2.5. If sharps liked the host, they would have pounded the Panthers just below the key number of three. That’s how far Carolina has fallen respect-wise after their losses to Pittsburgh and Baltimore. Sharps don’t trust the defense any more, and they were already skeptical of Cam Newton playing with bad ribs. Chicago may not be a popular bet at +2.5 for the Wise Guys, but Chicago +8.5 will be heavily played in two-team teasers because it crosses both the 3 and the 7. Not much interest on the total. As usual, we’ll only mention Over/Unders from this point forward when there’s been a move of at least a point.

CLEVELAND AT TENNESSEE:
Slight support for Tennessee at the opener of -1. But, we’re only seeing Titans -1.5 or -2 in most places as we go to press. Those are such low priority numbers that it’s barely a relevant move. That’s happening below the key number of three. REAL support would have tested the key number more. Sharps will be looking to use Cleveland in teasers because they’re in the underdog strike point just like Chicago is as long as the number is at +1.5 or +2. Remember that the Wise Guys become more aggressive with teasers in terms of betting unit size about a month into a season because the original lines will be more accurate in terms of what happens on the field…which means the points you take in teasers are more valuable.

ST. LOUIS AT PHILADELPHIA:
Strong support for St. Louis, as an opener of +8 was bet down to the key number of seven. And, it’s stayed there! There wasn’t a bounce off the seven from any Eagles money. Sources tell us that sharps haven’t been impressed at all with the Eagles offensive consistency since the latter stages of the Indianapolis game. Another team, like Carolina, that’s dropped in Power Ratings (the Eagles were only in last week’s game at SF because of three non-offensive touchdowns).

ATLANTA AT NY GIANTS:
While the Panthers and Eagles are falling, the Giants are rising. They opened the week and -3, and were bet up to -3.5 and -4. It takes a lot of money to move off the three in the NFL. Sharps did flood the market at the key number. Though, stores testing Atlanta +4.5 did see Falcons money come in at that time. So, the percentages have the sharps on NYG -3 but Atlanta +4.5. Because interest in NYG is tied to their improving offense, it’s not surprising that the Over was bet as well. An opener of 49 is up to 50.5 at press time. It may reach 51 or more if weather isn’t going to be a factor in this early Sunday kick. Atlanta plays high scoring games, and now the Giants have an offense that’s finding the end zone.

TAMPA BAY AT NEW ORLEANS:
Throw New Orleans on the list of NFC teams that’s falling in the Power Ratings. An opener of Saints -11 was bet down to -10…and, as we saw with the Eagles, there wasn’t a bounce at the key number even though the favorite is generally loved by squares. New Orleans didn’t look great in a home game they barely covered vs. Minnesota two weeks ago, and has been awful away from home. Sharps aren’t impressed! We’re hearing that the Wise Guys were impressed with TB’s fourth quarter rally in Pittsburgh last week. Don’t be surprised if this develops into a game day tug-of-war between the public on NO -10, and sharps on Tampa Bay at +10.5 or higher. The total has been bet down from 49 to 48, largely because the Saints offense isn’t scaring people like it used to.

HOUSTON AT DALLAS:
Dallas has become the hot new NFC team for sharps because they improved on recent good form this past Sunday vs. New Orleans. An opener of Dallas -4 has been bet up to -6. Support did stop at the six, but didn’t bounce back downward toward the Texans. We’re hearing that Houston money is waiting to see if the public pushes this line higher before kickoff. Dog backers would love +7, and would take +6.5 if that’s the best they’ll see. Cowboys money is very happy to be in at -4 and -5 given how the offense is clicking in recent games. The Over/Under is up a point from 46 to 47 because of that recent scoring consistency.

BUFFALO AT DETROIT:
Not much betting interest at all here. Sharps don’t want to gamble with Kyle Orton taking over for Buffalo. And, they don’t want to ask Detroit to play another great game in a row after the Lions covered vs. Green Bay and the NY Jets. If the public drives the line up to Detroit -7.5, we’re hearing that the Wise Guys would fade that move with Buffalo +7.5, but would use the Lions in two-team teasers at -1.5.

BALTIMORE AT INDIANAPOLIS:
Indianapolis was hit hard enough to push the opener off of -3 and up to -3.5. Again, it takes strong support to move off the three in the NFL. So, sharps did hit this one hard even though it’s only a half point move. And, there wasn’t a buyback on the Ravens. We are hearing that dog money is waiting to see if +4 becomes available on game day. But, what could have been “dog money” was actually invested on the Over. Sharps impressed with Baltimore’s recent offense under new coordinator Gary Kubiack hit Over 46.5, 47, 47.5, and 48 while driving the number up to 49. So, in essence, Indy money is on the Colts -3, while Baltimore money is on Over.

PITTSBURGH AT JACKSONVILLE:
Not much interest here because sharps want no part of the Jaguars until they play a good game. But, Pittsburgh has been an untrustworthy favorite both Tampa Bay and Cleveland. An opener of Pittsburgh -6 has mostly stood pat, though some stores are testing -6.5 to see if there are any nibbles. The total has been bet up from 45.5 to 47 because of Pittsburgh’s suspect second-half defense.

ARIZONA AT DENVER:
Looks like we may have an intense game-day tug-of-war between Denver -7 and Arizona +7.5. That was put in play when the opener of Denver -8.5 was bet down toward the key number. Stores testing the seven see Broncos money come in pretty hard. Those staying at 7.5 see Arizona backers invest confidently. The Over/Under is down a point to a point and a half from an opener of 49.5. We’re now seeing 48 in most places because the math guys made it 48. Some stores have tested 47.5 in anticipation of possible weather influences.

KANSAS CITY AT SAN FRANCISCO:
Only a half point move here, but it was an important one. San Francisco opened at -6.5. Instead of the game being bet toward the key number of seven, it was bet AWAY to Kansas City +6. Obviously the sharps don’t like the Niners or the game would have moved to seven instantly. They like the Chiefs so much it moved away from the seven! The Chiefs have played very well since that opening loss to Tennessee. Sources tell us that sharps became believers by the end of the first quarter of the New England game this past Monday Night.

NY JETS AT SAN DIEGO:
Similar story here, in that a half point move was a big one. In this case, it was the opener of San Diego -7 moving down to NY Jets +6.5. The game moved off the key number and didn’t bounce back. That tells you that Jets money came in right away…and there wasn’t any Chargers money waiting to exploit the move. Sharps hate Geno Smith, but love this Jets defense when getting at least a touchdown. Note that the money did stop after the move. Sharps like the Jets +7, not the Jets +6.5 because the seven is such a common projected ending for the scoreboard margin.

CINCINNATI AT NEW ENGLAND:
The big story here was what happened before the game went up. It’s rare to see the market disrespect New England to any meaningful degree. They were still laying a field goal to Kansas City last Monday. But, after that debacle, this game opened at pick-em. That means the market had Cincinnati Power Rated about three points better than New England on a neutral field. BIG adjustment! Then, sharps bet the Bengals at pick-em! We’re now seeing Cincinnati -1, as there’s no public interest in investing in the Pats right now. Squares learned their lesson in the non-covers against Oakland and Kansas City.

SEATTLE AT WASHINGTON:
Looks like a tug-of-war shaping up here near the key number of seven next Monday. An opener of Seattle -8.5 was bet down to Washington +7.5. Stores that test the seven see Seattle money come in. So, even before the public is involved, we’re seeing sharps “tug” over Seattle -7 and Washington +7.5 or more. The public will very likely want Seattle on Monday given Washington’s poor showing the last time they were on TV (plus Seattle’s coming off a bye). Sharps who want Washington +7.5 will be able to bet to their heart’s content in the hours leading up to kickoff.
 
We talk to Jay Rood, Director of Race and Sports at MGM properties in Las Vegas, about the biggest line moves on the Week 6 board and where those odds could end up come kickoff:

Texas A&M Aggies at Mississippi State Bulldogs – Open: Pick, Move: -2.5

This SEC showdown opened with oddsmakers on the fence, but wiseguys hit Mississippi State hard early in the week and pushed this spread as many as 2.5 points. Rood, however, doesn’t expect a move to the key number of three before the noon ET kickoff.

“The ticket count is fairly even, with a little lean to Texas A&M. But the sharps are all on Mississippi State,” Rood tells Covers. “Hard to say what the public will do now. Depending on where this spread moves, we could have sharps coming in late and laying the favorite.”

SMU Mustangs at East Carolina Pirates – Open: -34.5, Move: -41.5

The cat is out of the bag on East Carolina, which seems to be the mightiest of the mid-major programs. Sharps were all over the Pirates in the opening weeks of the season but now the public has caught on and has moved this spread as much as a touchdown at online books.

“Sharp action laid the big number and the public continues to bet East Carolina,” says Rood. “Everyone is keenly aware of ECU now, they’re not an undercover story now. So we will be needing the Ponies in a big way Saturday, probably need them for two scores. And the way they’ve played recently, they could be hard pressed to do that.”

Wisconsin Badgers at Northwestern Wildcats – Open: +10, Move: +7

Some markets have moved the spread for this Big Ten battle as much as a field goal, while MGM properties opened Wisconsin -9 and are now dealing -8. All the money is on Northwestern, which is a change of pace for the Badgers’ recent games, in which Wisconsin was the overwhelming choice for bettors.

“They’re definitely all over Northwestern,” Rood says of the wiseguys. “This game is dropping as we speak. The home dog is getting all the action, from the sharp perspective. However, it’s all Wisconsin on parlays and teasers.”

Kansas Jayhawks at West Virginia Mountaineers – Open: -24, Move: -28

The firing of Kansas coach Charlie Weis has sparked money against the Jayhawks in Week 6. It’s a tough call whether or not KU will be better or worse without Weis – it can’t get much worse, can it?

“It’s literally all West Virginia money from everywhere – sharps and squares,” says Rood, “Everyone is calling for a lopsided affair. I sometimes look at these situations and expect some extra motivation (from the team that fired its coach). But I just don’t know in this case?”

LSU Tigers at Auburn Tigers – Open: -9, Move: -7.5

This SEC matchup is the big game on the Week 5 schedule, and it looks like Auburn is the popular play even though the line has moved as much as 1.5 points toward LSU, pointing the finger to sharp money. According to Rood, there haven’t been a lot of tickets written on this game yet, but the ones that have come in are substantial.

“We have some decent-sized tickets on this. It’s going to be a pretty high dollar amount game. We’ll write some business on this one,” he says. “Sharps could bring this one down and the public could keep playing it. We could get some decent two-way action on this but if sharps keep chopping it down, we could find ourselves in a spot where we get sided on eight.”
 
Steele: Week 6 picks | Harris: Best bets | CFB PickCenter | ESPN Chalk

Each week during the 2014 college football season, I will offer my picks and scores for the biggest games, in addition to a handful of other key matchups.

Last week, my picks went 9-1 straight up and 5-4-1 against the spread. My overall record stands at 40-10 SU and 26-23-1 ATS.

Week 6 brings us the best slate of games to date, including six matchups between ranked teams, and we are guaranteed to see at least four teams fall from the ranks of the unbeaten.






No. 3 Alabama Crimson Tide (-6.5) at No. 11 Ole Miss Rebels

Saturday at 3:30 p.m. ET

The Crimson Tide have won 10 in a row in this series, and in their past two trips to Oxford they have won by a combined score of 74-10. Last year, Ole Miss QB Bo Wallace made some comments about being able to put some points on the Tide defense and Alabama felt disrespected. Bama responded with a 25-0 win, becoming the first No. 1-ranked team to shut out an opposing ranked team since 2001.

Insider PickCenter

Wondering which side to take? Check out PickCenter and do your research before making that critical decision. PickCenter
in.gif




This year, Alabama comes in fresh off a bye after destroying Florida 42-21 and piling up 645 yards, the most ever allowed by a Gators team. However, this is the Tide's first true road test of the season, and it will be interesting to see how quarterbackBlake Sims does in a hostile environment. While he has played brilliantly to date, with 1,077 pass yards and 10 total touchdowns, he will be facing an Ole Miss defense that has allowed just two touchdowns through four games, fewest in the nation.

The key to the game will be which quarterback can take better care of the football. Wallace's entire career has been marred by turnovers, and he has six interceptions already this year (33 total in his career). On the other side, the Crimson Tide were careless with the football against Florida, and turning it over four times in Oxford will get them beat.

What's a little surprising to me is that my computer -- with all its power ratings, data and statistics -- is calling for the Rebels to pull off the upset, but I will disagree with technology and take the Tide to make it 11 straight over the Rebels.

Pick: Alabama 27, Ole Miss 20






No. 6 Texas A&M Aggies at No. 12 Mississippi State Bulldogs (-2)

Saturday at noon ET, ESPN

Since joining the SEC, the Aggies have won both matchups by double digits. Two years ago in Starkville, the two teams were ranked in the top 20, but A&M absolutely dominated en route to a 31-0 first-half lead. The Aggies would cruise to a 38-13 win. Last year, they led 51-27 in the middle of the fourth quarter, but Mississippi State made it respectable with a couple of late touchdowns.

This season, the unbeaten Aggies come in off a hard-fought, come-from-behind 35-28 win over Arkansas. They were down 28-14 in the fourth quarter before Arkansas made a couple of mistakes (a penalty wiping out a touchdown, bobbled snap and missed FG) and QB Kenny Hilltook advantage, throwing for 200-plus yards and three touchdowns in the fourth quarter and overtime.

The Bulldogs are fresh off a bye, and the week before they made a statement with a win in Death Valley over LSU. The Bulldogs' 570 total yards were the most they've gained against an SEC opponent under coach Dan Mullen, and QB Dak Prescott deserves to be in the Heisman race, as he is averaging 336 total yards per game, with 14 total touchdowns.

I like the Bulldogs here for a couple of reasons. First, this might be one of my favorite situational plays of the week as this will be Texas A&M's third straight away game and sixth game in six weeks overall, while the Bulldogs have had two weeks to prepare. Also, I think the matchups favor the more physical Bulldogs, as A&M allowed 285 rush yards last week while MSU had a season-high 302 rush yards against LSU on the road two weeks ago. With those two factors in mind, I look for the Bulldogs to get the win in a battle of unbeatens, and for Prescott to overtake Hill on many Heisman ballots.

Pick: Mississippi State 34, Texas A&M 30






No. 14 Stanford Cardinal (-2) at No. 9 Notre Dame Fighting Irish

Saturday at 3:30 p.m. ET

Notre Dame had won seven in a row in this series -- from 2002 to 2008 -- but Stanford has won four of the past five. There was a controversial ending two years ago, as Cardinal RB Stepfan Taylor was ruled down on fourth-and-goal in overtime and the Cardinal lost 20-13. Last year, Stanford was out for revenge and managed a 27-20 win against a very banged-up Notre Dame team.

[+] Enlarge
Rich Barnes/USA TODAY SportsEverett Golson threw for 362 yards and four touchdowns against Syracuse last week.




The Irish come in to this matchup a perfect 4-0, and last week QB Everett Golson completed a school-record 25 straight passes (one off the FBS record). Despite committing five turnovers, the Irish beat Syracuse 31-15 and had a dominating 311-142 yardage edge at the half. On the other side, the Cardinal found themselves in a 13-13 game at Washington, but a failed fake-punt attempt by the Huskies allowed Stanford to drive for a game-winning touchdown. The Cardinal can ill afford another loss if they want to make the initial College Football Playoff.

It will be strength against strength here, as the Irish have scored 30 or more points in the first four games of the season for the first time since 1943, but they will be tested against the No. 1 total and scoring defense in the country, as the Cardinal are allowing just 198 yards per game and seven points per game.

The Irish are getting points in this one, despite the fact that they are on a 15-1 run at home and Golson is a perfect 14-0 as a starting quarterback in the regular season. With that in mind, I'll call for the Irish to take another step toward what has been a surprising 2014 season.

Pick: Notre Dame 23, Stanford 20






No. 15 LSU Tigers at No. 5 Auburn Tigers (-7.5)

Saturday at 7 p.m. ET, ESPN

There's only one SEC program that's beaten Auburn six times in the past seven years, and that's LSU, which has done so by an average of 11 points per game. The Tigers from the Plains have not scored more than 24 points in any of those seven games, while LSU has scored 30 or more four times. Last year, LSU jumped out to a 21-0 lead as the rain affected Auburn's offense in the first half. Coming out of halftime, Gus Malzahn thought his offense would be in good shape with the rain letting up, and Auburn did put up 318 yards in the second half but still lost 35-21.

Auburn comes in 4-0, but after compiling a record 13-game ATS win streak, the Tigers failed to beat the Las Vegas experts in each of the past two weeks. However, this week's 7.5-point line seems reasonable, as this will be the first true away game for many of LSU's young skill position players, including true freshman quarterback Brandon Harris, who will get his first career start.

On the other side of the ball, I look for Auburn's rush offense to take advantage of an LSU rush defense that allowed 268 yards (6.9 yards per carry) to Wisconsin and 302 yards (6.2) to Mississippi State.

Pick: Auburn 34, LSU 23






No. 19 Nebraska Cornhuskers at No. 10 Michigan State Spartans (-7)

Saturday at 8 p.m. ET, ABC

Nebraska had won all seven games in this series until Michigan State got a 41-28 win last year in Lincoln. The final was a bit misleading, as the Huskers had a 392-361 edge in yards. But Nebraska turned the ball over five times, which the Spartans converted into 24 points. Also notable is the fact that the Huskers managed 182 rush yards against a Spartans defense that was allowing just 43 rush yards per game prior to that.

[+] Enlarge
AP Photo/Nati HarnikAmeer Abdullah has racked up 437 rushing yards and five touchdowns in the past two games.




The matchup everyone will be watching is how Nebraska running back Ameer Abdullah and his nation-leading 833 rush yards fare against a Michigan State defense that is allowing just 78 rush yards per game. While it would not surprise me to see Abdullah get his fair share of yards in this one, I think the matchup on the other side of the ball gives the Spartans the leg up.

This is not a "three yards and a cloud of dust" Michigan State offense, as the Spartans are averaging 50 points per game while showing incredible balance. They are averaging 252 yards per game on the ground and 263 yards through the air. On the other side, the Nebraska defense allowed 359 pass yards to Miami true freshman quarterback Brad Kaaya a couple of weeks ago, and now face the veteran Connor Cook, who is completing 69 percent of his passes, with a 9-2 TD-to-INT ratio. I'll call for the Spartans to take a major step in getting back into the playoff discussion.

Pick: Michigan State 37, Nebraska 28






No. 4 Oklahoma Sooners (-5) at No. 25 TCU Horned Frogs

Saturday at 3:30 p.m. ET

Four of the past five games between these two teams have been decided by a touchdown or less, including last year's 20-17 Sooners victory in Norman. While the Sooners are coming off a bye, this will be their third road trip in four games, and they have the Red River Rivalry on deck. On the other side, the Horned Frogs had lowly SMU last week and a bye the week before, and they should be highly motivated to show that their 4-8 record last year was a fluke.

The marquee matchup will be an Oklahoma offense averaging 45 points per game and 223 rush yards per game versus a TCU defense that ranks No. 2 in the country in both scoring and total defense.

However, the matchup on the other side of the ball will ultimately determine the outcome. TCU is averaging 45 points per game and 532 yards per game, but has played only Samford, Minnesota and SMU, while the Sooners' defense could be the best they've had in Norman since the early part of Bob Stoops' tenure. I look for this one to go down to the wire, but the Sooners have been more battled-tested to date.

Pick: Oklahoma 27, TCU 24






Quick Hitters

Wake Forest Demon Deacons at No. 1 Florida State Seminoles (-39)

Saturday at 3:30 p.m. ET, ABC

Shockingly, these two have split their past eight meetings; of course, Florida State has won the most recent two by a combined score of 111-3. While the defending champs are 4-0 this year, the Seminoles have failed to cover the spread in each of their games; last week, in a 56-41 road win over N.C. State, they allowed a school-record 24 first-quarter points. On the other side, the Demon Deacons are coming off a misleading 20-10 loss at Louisville, as they were outgained 421-100 and their only touchdown came via a recovered fumble in the end zone. They are actually averaging minus-17 rush yards per game away from home, and have given up 21 sacks in those three games. That's not good news against a team needing a statement win. FSU gets its first cover of 2014.

Pick: Florida State 52, Wake Forest 3







Vanderbilt Commodores at No. 13 Georgia Bulldogs (-32)

Saturday at 4 p.m. ET, SEC Network

Georgia is clearly playing for legitimate revenge this year, as the Bulldogs blew a 10-point halftime lead in this matchup in 2013. The key play of that game happened when Vanderbilt was stopped on fourth down in the second half, but Georgia was flagged for targeting and that fueled the Vandy comeback. The Bulldogs are playing their third straight home game, while the Commodores are on the road for a second straight week. I am expecting Georgia defensive coordinator Jeremy Pruitt to have his troops playing angry. Following the poor defensive performance against South Carolina, the Bulldogs shut out Troy. Vanderbilt gained only 139 yards last week, which were the fewest allowed by Kentucky in an SEC game since 1996. Despite having a big game against Missouri on deck, I look for the Bulldogs to take care of business.

Pick: Georgia 44, Vanderbilt 6







No. 7 Baylor Bears (-16.5) at Texas Longhorns

Saturday at 3:30 p.m. ET, ABC

Texas had beaten Baylor 12 straight years -- from 1998 to 2009 -- before Baylor won three of the past four. This was basically the de facto Big 12 title game last season, and it was tied 3-3 at halftime. Baylor pulled away in the end, securing its first conference title since 1980. The Longhorns are coming off a 23-0 shutout of Kansas last week, and I expect them to continue to show improvement after the wheels fell off against BYU. On the other side, the Bears come in 4-0 and are outscoring their foes by 43 points per game, while outgaining them by 416 yards per game. On paper, this looks like a significant mismatch; however, while going through my records that date back to 1976, this will be the largest underdog role Texas has faced at home during that time, and I will call for them to keep it closer than the Vegas experts think.

Pick: Baylor 34, Texas 23







Arizona State Sun Devils at USC Trojans (-12)

Saturday at 7:20 p.m. ET

USC is playing with legit revenge on its mind after a 62-41 trouncing on the road at Arizona State last year; then-head coach Lane Kiffin was fired when the team landed back home in Los Angeles. USC had been 12-1 in this series prior to that loss. These two teams come into this matchup from very different spots, as USC mauled Oregon State 35-10, including a 461-181 yardage edge, and the Beavers' only touchdown was a 97-yard kick return. The Sun Devils are coming off of a 62-27 loss at the hands of UCLA; they were outscored 42-3 in approximately 20 minutes of game time after racing out to a 17-6 second-quarter lead. This will be Sun Devils QB Mike Bercovici's first road start, and that does not bode well against a USC defense that is allowing just 156 pass yards per game and a 52 percent completion rate. I look for the Trojans to get their revenge in a big way.

Pick: USC 42, Arizona State 23

 
so tonight:

Kershaw/Wainwright game had 19 runs

2 safeties in the Louisville/Syracuse game

Both the umpire and heisman hopeful QB leave the game in Utah with broken legs(+/-)

man...Park Your ### Saturday is gonna be EPIC

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top