What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Foxy Knoxy (1 Viewer)

What are your thoughts?

  • Is innocent and will be found innocent

    Votes: 36 34.6%
  • Is innocent but will be found guilty

    Votes: 27 26.0%
  • Is guilty but will be found innocent

    Votes: 16 15.4%
  • Is giulty and will be found guilty

    Votes: 25 24.0%

  • Total voters
    104
You guys are freaking paranoid. It looks like it might be the most beautiful country in the world. I'll take my chances visiting Italy eventually.
Too right. I would love to go to Italy. Of course, I don't plan on murdering anyone while I'm there, so I think I'll be alright.
Very little in the way of real evidence that Knox murdered anyone.
Well luckily that never happens in the US.
Of course it does. We allow prosecutors to lie. We don't bother really confirming allegedly scientific evidence. And when we finally get proof someone is innocent the prosecutors still fight letting them out and are too often aided by the courts in that. But I already live here. And I am a white guy so I got that going for me. I got nothing going for me in Italy.
Access to wicked awesome cannoli down?
Now don't confuse me with the never visit types. I could see some legal paranoia being reasonable but personally I want to go to Tuscany and spend some time. Probably never get to though.
 
Still amazed at how many people think that they know what happened over seas based on the little info we have

 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?

From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.

 
If I was in her shoes, and they acquitted me, and suddenly after a year and a half they want to look at the case, I'd tell them to pound sand. I know they aren't asking for her to go back yet, but even then, I heard that the US would say that amounts to double jeopardy, and keep her here.

 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
It reminds me of the Satan worshipping hysteria in the US in the '80s, culminating in the West Memphis thing. I have no idea if she did it, but the story the prosecution is putting forward, on the surface, doesn't pass the sniff test.
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
How about they have a guy in prison whose DNA was everywhere? Even on the victims bra and panties IIRC. How about there is not one piece of physical evidence to tie her to the crime? And no motive?
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
It reminds me of the Satan worshipping hysteria in the US in the '80s, culminating in the West Memphis thing. I have no idea if she did it, but the story the prosecution is putting forward, on the surface, doesn't pass the sniff test.
Yea. That's kind of where I am. I haven't researched court documents or anything, but from what I have read or seen about it on TV, the whole theory on how and why she did it was absurd, along with the evidence being questionable at best.
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
How about they have a guy in prison whose DNA was everywhere? Even on the victims bra and panties IIRC. How about there is not one piece of physical evidence to tie her to the crime? And no motive?
Yea. This.
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
How about they have a guy in prison whose DNA was everywhere? Even on the victims bra and panties IIRC. How about there is not one piece of physical evidence to tie her to the crime? And no motive?
i was not and am not arguing she did itmy argument was his post did not address if she did it or not in any waya broader argument is we are half a world away getting info through the media and some of us are certain we know what happenedi think there are isolated points on both sides that when presented can make that side sound compelling
 
Much hotter than both Jodi Arias and Casey Anthony. :wub:
It's really not close.
Why did she act like such a lunatic after she was arrested?
See?nothing about this case seems to add up

the two things I think most of us can agree on is:

1) Italian law is strange - i hesitate to overly critisize it because most of what I know about it is from this case alone, but the processes and procedures are very strange. I think we as Americans tend to think anyone who does anything differently from us is an idiot. speaking of idiots...

2)This case was bungled from the beginning and throughout - While I don;t want to pass judgement on all of ITaly for this case, it does seem the people in charge here screwed it up

IF i had to guess past that I'd guess there's a reasonable explanation of what happened somewhere in between the defense and the prosecution. How poorly Amanda Knox comes off in that or how much guilt she has, if any, are things I don't really have much thought on. The real story has not been told and likely never will.

 
Much hotter than both Jodi Arias and Casey Anthony. :wub:
It's really not close.
Why did she act like such a lunatic after she was arrested?
See?nothing about this case seems to add up

the two things I think most of us can agree on is:

1) Italian law is strange - i hesitate to overly critisize it because most of what I know about it is from this case alone, but the processes and procedures are very strange. I think we as Americans tend to think anyone who does anything differently from us is an idiot. speaking of idiots...

2)This case was bungled from the beginning and throughout - While I don;t want to pass judgement on all of ITaly for this case, it does seem the people in charge here screwed it up

IF i had to guess past that I'd guess there's a reasonable explanation of what happened somewhere in between the defense and the prosecution. How poorly Amanda Knox comes off in that or how much guilt she has, if any, are things I don't really have much thought on. The real story has not been told and likely never will.
Pretty sure the real story, the only one they could place with the victim, is doing 16 years right now.
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
That's how criminal trials work. Actual guilt doesn't matter. Whether the prosecution can prove guilt is all that matters.
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
That's how criminal trials work. Actual guilt doesn't matter. Whether the prosecution can prove guilt is all that matters.
Yes, i understand thatbut when the question is asked IS she innocent and how will she be FOUNDthen the question of if she actually did it is not at all related to what the prosecution can or cannot prove. arguing the prosecution ####ed up so she did not do it is not correct, that just means she should be found innocent, not that she is
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
That's how criminal trials work. Actual guilt doesn't matter. Whether the prosecution can prove guilt is all that matters.
Yes, i understand thatbut when the question is asked IS she innocent and how will she be FOUNDthen the question of if she actually did it is not at all related to what the prosecution can or cannot prove. arguing the prosecution ####ed up so she did not do it is not correct, that just means she should be found innocent, not that she is
I was simply pointing out that the evidence was seriously lacking and was contaminated, and the motive the prosecution came up with was absurd and most likely fabricated. So what indication is there that she actually did do it? That was my question. I wasn't trying to debate the finer points of why someone is found guilty or innocent in a court of law. I simply did not understand what people were basing their opinions of her being guilty on. :dunno:
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
That's how criminal trials work. Actual guilt doesn't matter. Whether the prosecution can prove guilt is all that matters.
Yes, i understand thatbut when the question is asked IS she innocent and how will she be FOUNDthen the question of if she actually did it is not at all related to what the prosecution can or cannot prove. arguing the prosecution ####ed up so she did not do it is not correct, that just means she should be found innocent, not that she is
I was simply pointing out that the evidence was seriously lacking and was contaminated, and the motive the prosecution came up with was absurd and most likely fabricated. So what indication is there that she actually did do it? That was my question. I wasn't trying to debate the finer points of why someone is found guilty or innocent in a court of law. I simply did not understand what people were basing their opinions of her being guilty on. :dunno:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/8803077/Amanda-Knox-Guilty-or-innocent-five-reasons-why.html
 
Much hotter than both Jodi Arias and Casey Anthony. :wub:
It's really not close.
Why did she act like such a lunatic after she was arrested?
People deal with stress in all kinds of different ways and there's no normal reaction to extreme circumstances. Is that really the only reason people think she did it given the lack of evidence and motive?
I probably wouldn't do cartwheels in front of interrogates, but that's just me.
 
It seems like the bottom half is a lot more meaty than the top half. All of that stuff that happened during the investigation, her statements, etc. happened when she was denied a lawyer and interrogated overnight and probably hadn't slept in 24 hours. I am under the impression that they were threatening her. She was a young girl who spoke very little Italian. I guess I can kind of understand and in a similar situation - being in a foreign country, not really speaking the language, and being accused of murder with seemingly no legal recourse - I'm not sure I would have acted differently.
Much hotter than both Jodi Arias and Casey Anthony. :wub:
It's really not close.
Why did she act like such a lunatic after she was arrested?
People deal with stress in all kinds of different ways and there's no normal reaction to extreme circumstances. Is that really the only reason people think she did it given the lack of evidence and motive?
I probably wouldn't do cartwheels in front of interrogates, but that's just me.
It's definitely a little strange, but she may have been going crazy. I still don't think that's a compelling reason to think she is guilty of murder. I was really just wondering if there was some evidence out there or any indication that she did commit the crime other than she acted crazy and made false statements during a pretty brutal interrogation during which she was given no access to talk to legal counsel, the American embassy, etc.
 
I'm really surprised at how many people think she actually did it. Why is that? Because she was acting weird right after the murder?From everything I know about the case, the cops completely bungled the investigation, but even so, her DNA wasn't found anywhere on the crime scene. The prosecutor outright lied. And the whole story they came up with about the ritualistic sex orgy was just ludicrous and unbelievable. And from certain things I've read over the years about the Italian legal system, I got the impression it is pretty weird.
I don't have an opinionbut you do realize none of what you said has any bearing on if she actually did it.Maybe the DNA not being found has some. Other than that all you did was try and say that from what you have read (probably mostly in american newspapers) that they did not prove she did it
That's how criminal trials work. Actual guilt doesn't matter. Whether the prosecution can prove guilt is all that matters.
Yes, i understand thatbut when the question is asked IS she innocent and how will she be FOUNDthen the question of if she actually did it is not at all related to what the prosecution can or cannot prove. arguing the prosecution ####ed up so she did not do it is not correct, that just means she should be found innocent, not that she is
People are claiming she didn't do it based on the information they have--which is the information that came out at trial filtered through the press. There's nothing unusual about that. The only people who actually know if she did it are the people who were there.
 
Much hotter than both Jodi Arias and Casey Anthony. :wub:
It's really not close.
Why did she act like such a lunatic after she was arrested?
People deal with stress in all kinds of different ways and there's no normal reaction to extreme circumstances. Is that really the only reason people think she did it given the lack of evidence and motive?
I probably wouldn't do cartwheels in front of interrogates, but that's just me.
IIRC she was seriously sleep deprived and hallucinating, or that was her story.
 
Guess there is no double jeopardy rule in Italy....... :bag:
There isn't a double jeopardy rule in Italy but obviously there is one here in the US. That is the primary reason the US will not comply with any request by Italy to send her back.
She was found guilty by the trial court. It was reversed on appeal. Under that circumstance, double jeopardy doesn't apply in the US.
So if this happened in the US, she was found guilty and then it was overturned on appeal, the government could order another trial?
 
Guess there is no double jeopardy rule in Italy....... :bag:
There isn't a double jeopardy rule in Italy but obviously there is one here in the US. That is the primary reason the US will not comply with any request by Italy to send her back.
She was found guilty by the trial court. It was reversed on appeal. Under that circumstance, double jeopardy doesn't apply in the US.
So if this happened in the US, she was found guilty and then it was overturned on appeal, the government could order another trial?
Why is what our law is relevant?She is being tried in Italy, they allow for appeals by the prosecution
 
Guess there is no double jeopardy rule in Italy....... :bag:
There isn't a double jeopardy rule in Italy but obviously there is one here in the US. That is the primary reason the US will not comply with any request by Italy to send her back.
She was found guilty by the trial court. It was reversed on appeal. Under that circumstance, double jeopardy doesn't apply in the US.
So what you're saying is that it's time for her to dye her hair blonde, cut her hair short, get implants, find colored contacts, and find some shady guy to give her a new identity in Canada?
 
It seems like the bottom half is a lot more meaty than the top half. All of that stuff that happened during the investigation, her statements, etc. happened when she was denied a lawyer and interrogated overnight and probably hadn't slept in 24 hours. I am under the impression that they were threatening her. She was a young girl who spoke very little Italian. I guess I can kind of understand and in a similar situation - being in a foreign country, not really speaking the language, and being accused of murder with seemingly no legal recourse - I'm not sure I would have acted differently.
Much hotter than both Jodi Arias and Casey Anthony. :wub:
It's really not close.
Why did she act like such a lunatic after she was arrested?
People deal with stress in all kinds of different ways and there's no normal reaction to extreme circumstances. Is that really the only reason people think she did it given the lack of evidence and motive?
I probably wouldn't do cartwheels in front of interrogates, but that's just me.
It's definitely a little strange, but she may have been going crazy. I still don't think that's a compelling reason to think she is guilty of murder. I was really just wondering if there was some evidence out there or any indication that she did commit the crime other than she acted crazy and made false statements during a pretty brutal interrogation during which she was given no access to talk to legal counsel, the American embassy, etc.
I didn't say she was guilty of murder. :shrug: Just thought her behavior was really strange. And making false statements doesn't make me think any more of her.
 
Guess there is no double jeopardy rule in Italy....... :bag:
There isn't a double jeopardy rule in Italy but obviously there is one here in the US. That is the primary reason the US will not comply with any request by Italy to send her back.
She was found guilty by the trial court. It was reversed on appeal. Under that circumstance, double jeopardy doesn't apply in the US.
So if this happened in the US, she was found guilty and then it was overturned on appeal, the government could order another trial?
Why is what our law is relevant?She is being tried in Italy, they allow for appeals by the prosecution
It is highly relevant when the Italian government reaches out to the US seeking extradition. The US will typically only reject those types of requests if the foreign country's laws violate a US legal principle.
 
So what you're saying is that it's time for her to dye her hair blonde, cut her hair short, get implants, find colored contacts, and find some shady guy to give her a new identity in Canada?
Hard to get rock-solid info ... bur from what I'm understanding from another board, now that she's in the U.S., she's untouchable. The Italian courts will try her in absentia, but the U.S. will not extradite her under any circumstances.Have no way to independently confirm that, and have no cites :shrug:

 
Guess there is no double jeopardy rule in Italy....... :bag:
There isn't a double jeopardy rule in Italy but obviously there is one here in the US. That is the primary reason the US will not comply with any request by Italy to send her back.
She was found guilty by the trial court. It was reversed on appeal. Under that circumstance, double jeopardy doesn't apply in the US.
So if this happened in the US, she was found guilty and then it was overturned on appeal, the government could order another trial?
Why is what our law is relevant?She is being tried in Italy, they allow for appeals by the prosecution
Our law is relevant because the issue being discussed was whether the US would honor a request to send her back to Italy for the new trial. The post I responded to stated the US wouldn't send her back because the retrial violates double jeopardy principles. If what was happening did violate double jeopardy the US very well could refuse to send her back since she's a US citizen. I was pointing out that given the procedural posture it doesn't appear that a retrial violates double jeopardy.
 
So what you're saying is that it's time for her to dye her hair blonde, cut her hair short, get implants, find colored contacts, and find some shady guy to give her a new identity in Canada?
Hard to get rock-solid info ... bur from what I'm understanding from another board, now that she's in the U.S., she's untouchable. The Italian courts will try her in absentia, but the U.S. will not extradite her under any circumstances.Have no way to independently confirm that, and have no cites :shrug:
Going to be hard for her to get a job if she does get convicted in absentiaEmployer: "Have you been convicted of any felonies?"

Amanda: "Oh, I was convicted of murder in Italy."

Employer: :mellow:

 
So what you're saying is that it's time for her to dye her hair blonde, cut her hair short, get implants, find colored contacts, and find some shady guy to give her a new identity in Canada?
Hard to get rock-solid info ... bur from what I'm understanding from another board, now that she's in the U.S., she's untouchable. The Italian courts will try her in absentia, but the U.S. will not extradite her under any circumstances.Have no way to independently confirm that, and have no cites :shrug:
Going to be hard for her to get a job if she does get convicted in absentiaEmployer: "Have you been convicted of any felonies?"

Amanda: "Oh, I was convicted of murder in Italy."

Employer: :mellow:
I hear it's really hard to get a job if you're in prison.
 
So what you're saying is that it's time for her to dye her hair blonde, cut her hair short, get implants, find colored contacts, and find some shady guy to give her a new identity in Canada?
Hard to get rock-solid info ... bur from what I'm understanding from another board, now that she's in the U.S., she's untouchable. The Italian courts will try her in absentia, but the U.S. will not extradite her under any circumstances.Have no way to independently confirm that, and have no cites :shrug:
Going to be hard for her to get a job if she does get convicted in absentiaEmployer: "Have you been convicted of any felonies?"

Amanda: "Oh, I was convicted of murder in Italy."

Employer: :mellow:
I hear it's really hard to get a job if you're in prison.
She isn't going to prison if she stays here.
 
So what you're saying is that it's time for her to dye her hair blonde, cut her hair short, get implants, find colored contacts, and find some shady guy to give her a new identity in Canada?
Hard to get rock-solid info ... bur from what I'm understanding from another board, now that she's in the U.S., she's untouchable. The Italian courts will try her in absentia, but the U.S. will not extradite her under any circumstances.Have no way to independently confirm that, and have no cites :shrug:
Going to be hard for her to get a job if she does get convicted in absentiaEmployer: "Have you been convicted of any felonies?"

Amanda: "Oh, I was convicted of murder in Italy."

Employer: :mellow:
I hear it's really hard to get a job if you're in prison.
She isn't going to prison if she stays here.
No, but the conversation continues.Employer: "Why aren't you in prison now?"

Amanda: "Um...because I haven't gone to Italy?"

Employer: :mellow:

Amanda: "Is that bad?"

Employer: :mellow:

 
Her income is guaranteed. As soon as she writes her book and sells movie rights. She is not going to need any job interviews.

 
Loved the shot of her sex diary, they flashed it quick but saw that one guy had to wear a condom while she let another go bare back and pull out.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top