What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W1 - NY Giants V Dallas (2 Viewers)

Are the Giants trying to give the ball back to the Cowboys for a drive before the half? Why do you call timeout with 1:43 left when you are inside the 20. YOU HAVE PLENTY OF TIME!!

 
I don't want to pile onto the Manning pile-on, but he does perpetually look like a pouting child.

Edit: But the pouting child just threw a TD

Norm

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't get behind this Cowboy team at all. Their secondary, special teams, Bozo the QB. How are people seriously predicting 11 wins from this group?

 
So we have this fancy game center thing on NFL.com that tells us all kinds of good stuff. It tells you the Score of the game. and and and....

oh and it tells me I can buy Cowboys and Giants stuff in the NFL.com store.

Maybe one day it will show live game stats and cool stuff like that..LIKE IT HAS FOR THE PAST SIX YEARS OR SO !!!!

:( :lmao: :rant:

 
Go for two dummy.
In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.
.98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?
The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices.
Given that we're only at halftime and there's still a million possible outcomes, I'm pretty sure the higher EV is gonna give you the higher win probability.
 
Go for two dummy.
In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.
.98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?
The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices.
Given that we're only at halftime and there's still a million possible outcomes, I'm pretty sure the higher EV is gonna give you the higher win probability.
Um . . . I was not told that there would be math . . . :(
 
Go for two dummy.
In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.
.98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?
The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices.
Given that we're only at halftime and there's still a million possible outcomes, I'm pretty sure the higher EV is gonna give you the higher win probability.
I agree that it's "less certain" at this point of the game. For example with no time left, it's obvious there is no choice but to go for 2 down 2. We are not at that point. That doesn't mean that going for 2 now doesn't give them a better chance of winning the game.Your math is only analyzing the risk not the reward.
 
I can't get behind this Cowboy team at all. Their secondary, special teams, Bozo the QB. How are people seriously predicting 11 wins from this group?
I think they look pretty good. All that's keeping the Giants in this game is Plaxico Burress. Having Terrence Newman around might help quite a bit with that situation.Romo has been disappointing though.
 
There's a reason why RBs the size of Brandon Jacobs aren't feature backs.
And what is that?
Somehow, there's a correlation between being a "bigger" back and injuries.
Link?
I'm just an interpreter. Never said I agreed with him.
I'd be careful to distance myself from KRS if I were you.
:(
 
Go for two dummy.
In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.
.98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?
The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices.
Given that we're only at halftime and there's still a million possible outcomes, I'm pretty sure the higher EV is gonna give you the higher win probability.
I agree that it's "less certain" at this point of the game. For example with no time left, it's obvious there is no choice but to go for 2 down 2. We are not at that point. That doesn't mean that going for 2 now doesn't give them a better chance of winning the game.Your math is only analyzing the risk not the reward.
You also have to consider more than math. Go for 2 now and miss it, and how does that affect the confidence of the players? There are intangibles that can not be factored in. You also have to consider that coaching is not a stable occupation. Coaches are often criticized when they take a risk and it does not pan out, they are often immune if general consensus was he played it safe. Sometimes the right statistical move is to "go for it", but playing it safe is in the coach's best interests.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I need more tds from Romo.. playing the burress/wayne owner its a close game, but romo could really help

 
You also have to consider more than math. Go for 2 now and miss it, and how does that affect the confidence of the players? There are intangibles that can not be factored in. You also have to consider that coaching is not a stable occupation. Coaches are often criticized when they take a risk and it does not pan out, they are often immune if general consensus was he played it safe. Sometimes the right statistical move is to "go for it", but playing it safe is in the coach's best interests.
This can be measured and your assumption is that the effect is negative.The second bolded statement is probably the reason reason coaches make -EV decisions. Their job is on the line. And you seem to suggest that you should make the wrong call for job security sake. Ironically, not a good way to keep a job. Althouh 16 game season might not be enough to make the law of averages speak for itself.

Look at coaches like BB who are good and have good job security. They often go for it in situations other don't to good results.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top