redman
Footballguy
Cheesy x2@ playing Carrie Underwood's music after a Tony Romo touchdown.Even more
that I recognized the song after 5 notes.
Cheesy x2@ playing Carrie Underwood's music after a Tony Romo touchdown.Even more
that I recognized the song after 5 notes.
Um, it's already happening. I want to know how long before he loses his mind.Half way through Q2 and Owens hasnt touched the ball yet. How long until he starts sulking? I say 6 minutes into Q3.
I loled."Ok, Chris, you know how you keep inadvertantly tackling your teammates after they intercept passes. We have a plan. From now on, run straight to the sideline if there's an interception in order to avoid that, ok? Got it? [The play unfolds]Wade Phillips:What the hell was Canty doing?![]()
I give it another quarter. Then his 1500/20TD season will seem impossible to him and he'll blow up.Um, it's already happening. I want to know how long before he loses his mind.Half way through Q2 and Owens hasnt touched the ball yet. How long until he starts sulking? I say 6 minutes into Q3.
Well, I guess we actually have to talk about fantasy football instead of Barney Stinson and Carrie Underwood.Ward has looked good in limited action. Anyone know (doctors, etc.) how severe the injury could be?Jacobs out, sprained knee
Yes. Correlation always means causation.Good read.Jacobs did a lot of talkin this week and now he's hurt, go figure.
Wanna know what else is cheesy? doing this!Cheesy x2@ playing Carrie Underwood's music after a Tony Romo touchdown.Even more
that I recognized the song after 5 notes.
It just occurred to me: is "cheesy" an insult in Green Bay? Is it a compliment there?Wanna know what else is cheesy? doing this!Cheesy x2@ playing Carrie Underwood's music after a Tony Romo touchdown.Even more
that I recognized the song after 5 notes.
It just occurred to me: is "cheesy" an insult in Green Bay? Is it a compliment there?Wanna know what else is cheesy? doing this!Cheesy x2@ playing Carrie Underwood's music after a Tony Romo touchdown.Even more
that I recognized the song after 5 notes.
I think people forget Keys is from Wisconsin. Cheesy is a very good thing.I need some cheese curds. Mmmmm.In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.Go for two dummy.
Waaaay too early to start chasing 2 point conversions...Kick the XP and go to the half down 4...Go for two dummy.
.98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.Go for two dummy.
And what is that?There's a reason why RBs the size of Brandon Jacobs aren't feature backs.
The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices..98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.Go for two dummy.
Somehow, there's a correlation between being a "bigger" back and injuries.And what is that?There's a reason why RBs the size of Brandon Jacobs aren't feature backs.
Link?Somehow, there's a correlation between being a "bigger" back and injuries.And what is that?There's a reason why RBs the size of Brandon Jacobs aren't feature backs.
I'm just an interpreter. Never said I agreed with him.Link?Somehow, there's a correlation between being a "bigger" back and injuries.And what is that?There's a reason why RBs the size of Brandon Jacobs aren't feature backs.
I'd be careful to distance myself from KRS if I were you.I'm just an interpreter. Never said I agreed with him.Link?Somehow, there's a correlation between being a "bigger" back and injuries.And what is that?There's a reason why RBs the size of Brandon Jacobs aren't feature backs.
Given that we're only at halftime and there's still a million possible outcomes, I'm pretty sure the higher EV is gonna give you the higher win probability.The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices..98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.Go for two dummy.
Um . . . I was not told that there would be math . . . :(Given that we're only at halftime and there's still a million possible outcomes, I'm pretty sure the higher EV is gonna give you the higher win probability.The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices..98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.Go for two dummy.
damn, was just about to pull that one out :(Also in before the "look what happened to Carolina in the SB v New England when they went for two early" comments.
I agree that it's "less certain" at this point of the game. For example with no time left, it's obvious there is no choice but to go for 2 down 2. We are not at that point. That doesn't mean that going for 2 now doesn't give them a better chance of winning the game.Your math is only analyzing the risk not the reward.Given that we're only at halftime and there's still a million possible outcomes, I'm pretty sure the higher EV is gonna give you the higher win probability.The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices..98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.Go for two dummy.
I think they look pretty good. All that's keeping the Giants in this game is Plaxico Burress. Having Terrence Newman around might help quite a bit with that situation.Romo has been disappointing though.I can't get behind this Cowboy team at all. Their secondary, special teams, Bozo the QB. How are people seriously predicting 11 wins from this group?
:(I'd be careful to distance myself from KRS if I were you.I'm just an interpreter. Never said I agreed with him.Link?Somehow, there's a correlation between being a "bigger" back and injuries.And what is that?There's a reason why RBs the size of Brandon Jacobs aren't feature backs.
You also have to consider more than math. Go for 2 now and miss it, and how does that affect the confidence of the players? There are intangibles that can not be factored in. You also have to consider that coaching is not a stable occupation. Coaches are often criticized when they take a risk and it does not pan out, they are often immune if general consensus was he played it safe. Sometimes the right statistical move is to "go for it", but playing it safe is in the coach's best interests.I agree that it's "less certain" at this point of the game. For example with no time left, it's obvious there is no choice but to go for 2 down 2. We are not at that point. That doesn't mean that going for 2 now doesn't give them a better chance of winning the game.Your math is only analyzing the risk not the reward.Given that we're only at halftime and there's still a million possible outcomes, I'm pretty sure the higher EV is gonna give you the higher win probability.The fact that your simplification doesn't account for win probabilities given the various outcomes of both choices..98*1 > .4*2What's wrong with that logic?In before the "you kick early and go for it late" and other variations of bad logic.Go for two dummy.
If Romo is your QB#1 I suspect you will find yourself in need most weeks.I need more tds from Romo.. playing the burress/wayne owner its a close game, but romo could really help
This can be measured and your assumption is that the effect is negative.The second bolded statement is probably the reason reason coaches make -EV decisions. Their job is on the line. And you seem to suggest that you should make the wrong call for job security sake. Ironically, not a good way to keep a job. Althouh 16 game season might not be enough to make the law of averages speak for itself.You also have to consider more than math. Go for 2 now and miss it, and how does that affect the confidence of the players? There are intangibles that can not be factored in. You also have to consider that coaching is not a stable occupation. Coaches are often criticized when they take a risk and it does not pan out, they are often immune if general consensus was he played it safe. Sometimes the right statistical move is to "go for it", but playing it safe is in the coach's best interests.