What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W5 - San Diego vs. Pittsburgh (1 Viewer)

On the 2pt Conv why not throw it up for Gates? No risk of an INT. Let him out jump and out muscle the cover guy.

 
Now here's a FF nut for you. If Pitt scores it has to be a TD so San Diego cannot win on a FG...NK has to be out of it the rest of the way.LT got me 23...NK got 11 for the opponent...I am clinging to a 1-2 point lead.

 
On the 2pt Conv why not throw it up for Gates? No risk of an INT. Let him out jump and out muscle the cover guy.
Because I asked them not to go to Gates or McCardell. But you are right, I thought for sure they would go to him.
 
On the 2pt Conv why not throw it up for Gates?  No risk of an INT.  Let him out jump and out muscle the cover guy.
Because I asked them not to go to Gates or McCardell. But you are right, I thought for sure they would go to him.
Well splitting out 3 WR like they did meant they were going to run.
 
No Yankees & no Red Sox = low TV ratings
I think the fact that it's Chicago versus LA (admittedly the #2 team in each town) should mean it's going to be fine. It's not like it's something like Milwaukee v Pittsburgh.
 
LT vs. Oakland to tie the record for games with a TD.  Sounds so easy that it is an obvious trap game.
Good point. I think you should bench him.
:rolleyes: Was talking about his attempt at a real life record there junior, not anything to do whether he will have a good day fantasy wise.
I thought they split Gates out and was matching him up on a nickel back or safety. Not sure, just what I thought.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top