belljr
Footballguy
There's more than oneWait, how did Gladiator die and there is a sequel?
There's more than oneWait, how did Gladiator die and there is a sequel?

Best AND worst first date night movie selection ever.Braveheart was a fun movie but if we are getting hung up on historical accuracy there may be some nits to pick there
I took a first date to Braveheart in college. She did not seem to appreciate the 12 minute battle scenes with closeups of arms being cut off and the like as much as I did.
It's a thread about Gladiator 2. It kind of makes sense that people might discuss the original film here. It's not like somebody is parachuting into the Ravens/Chargers game thread to talk about minor historical inaccuracies in the first movie.Some people love going out of their way to say how much they hate a movie.
For cool points?
It's that easy to be cool?Some people love going out of their way to say how much they hate a movie.
For cool points?
This is literally the ending plot of Gladiator. Maximus wins his army back and dies at the end.I dont think he magically appeared anywhere. The games were banned in Rome, which is why he was taken to Africa....then Commodus reinstates the games, so they have to get fighters from somewhere it was already legal
You want to make the argument that a couple of the fights are a bit over the top....maybe I buy that. But I'm pretty sure thats kind of the point of making a movie about a hero soldier. And I dont think any of the fights were over the top absurd like John Wick. (which I still LOVE by the way)
I'd argue that the William Wallace character suviving the main battles in Braveheart was far more ridiculous based on what we saw on film.
Wallace at least had an army with him and did die in the end. But nobody can beat the great Gladiator! No siree, he beat them all. And now he's making sequels!

I like Gladiator a lot better than John Wick because of the deeper plotline, but I fully agree that they are very different movies from one another. I mean, they basically have the same thing in common that Revenge of the Nerds and Enough do.Sure, they're both "revenge" movies, but they're pretty different otherwise.
My comment was more about one guy being a "regular" guy or a superhero.It's interesting that people are bringing up John Wick as a comparison point. I like John Wick quite a bit, and it's pretty easy to explain why I find it a more pleasant watch than Gladiator. John Wick is a live-action cartoon that makes absolutely no pretense of being anything other than a stylistic, hyper-violent Hong Kong film. It has a 1:41 run time that feels about half that long. It's filmed meticulously so that you can see every little detail of every fight scene, or at least it seems like you can.
Gladiator is an action movie that purports to be a historical drama. It has long breaks from any kind of action, it goes on and on for 2:35, and the action sequences are filmed with jump cuts that hide what the characters are doing. Sure, they're both "revenge" movies, but they're pretty different otherwise.
Well, did you guys like it?
First one sucked. no need to torture myself further.
Gladiator was a masterpiece compared to Troy - easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. You want torture, try to siting through that one.
Taste is subjective blah blah blah but it's one of my favorite handful of movies ever. I'd be at the first showing of Gladiator 2 if it wasn't such a pain to find a babysitter for my kids.I don't trust anyone who has bad things to say about Gladiator
Well, did you guys like it?
First one sucked. no need to torture myself further.
Gladiator was a masterpiece compared to Troy - easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. You want torture, try to siting through that one.
Movie is memorable for that scene alone.Well, did you guys like it?
First one sucked. no need to torture myself further.
Gladiator was a masterpiece compared to Troy - easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. You want torture, try to siting through that one.
Achilles battling the giant is still one of my favorite scenes though.
ACHILLES!!!
And that's why no one will remember your name.Movie is memorable for that scene alone.Well, did you guys like it?
First one sucked. no need to torture myself further.
Gladiator was a masterpiece compared to Troy - easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. You want torture, try to siting through that one.
Achilles battling the giant is still one of my favorite scenes though.
ACHILLES!!!
Well, did you guys like it?
First one sucked. no need to torture myself further.
Gladiator was a masterpiece compared to Troy - easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. You want torture, try to siting through that one.
Achilles battling the giant is still one of my favorite scenes though.
ACHILLES!!!
Well, it was terrible. A lot of continuity errors. Tried to strike the same chords as the original and just missed, badly.Going to see it tomorrow with my son.
I parachuted into that thread with a tiger under my arm, with an Aussie Scottish accent. I killed that thread because it needed killing. It shoulda armed itself, ifbit was gonna decorate its saloon with my dead dig. And now, I’m gonna kill you, Little Bill.It's a thread about Gladiator 2. It kind of makes sense that people might discuss the original film here. It's not like somebody is parachuting into the Ravens/Chargers game thread to talk about minor historical inaccuracies in the first movie.Some people love going out of their way to say how much they hate a movie.
For cool points?
Interesting. The movie that I compared G2 to last night was Troy.Gladiator was a masterpiece compared to Troy - easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. You want torture, try to siting through that one.
Troy has some pretty great scenes, but yeah, not comparable
Interesting. The movie that I compared G2 to last night was Troy.Gladiator was a masterpiece compared to Troy - easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. You want torture, try to siting through that one.
Troy has some pretty great scenes, but yeah, not comparable
I literally (and I don't use that word lightly) rolled my eyes at the final speech and scene. Corny doesn't begin to describe it.
Some very hard to please reviewers in here.....but hey it's all opinions.
We liked not loved G2.
Will I rush to watch it again? Nope. It was entertaining for one watch on the big screen as this is a big screen film but was nothing like the original in terms of characters, story and caring for the outcome. It had some fantastic and over the top coliseum battles and I personally really liked Denzils role and where it went.
But overall a B- and a completely unnecessary sequel.
Movie is memorable for that scene alone.Well, did you guys like it?
First one sucked. no need to torture myself further.
Gladiator was a masterpiece compared to Troy - easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. You want torture, try to siting through that one.
Achilles battling the giant is still one of my favorite scenes though.
ACHILLES!!!
Lord really? LOL that's crazy talk. Put the pipe down now Denzel.Some very hard to please reviewers in here.....but hey it's all opinions.
We liked not loved G2.
Will I rush to watch it again? Nope. It was entertaining for one watch on the big screen as this is a big screen film but was nothing like the original in terms of characters, story and caring for the outcome. It had some fantastic and over the top coliseum battles and I personally really liked Denzils role and where it went.
But overall a B- and a completely unnecessary sequel.
Denzel was one of the only really good things about the movie.
Saw an interview with him and he compared this movie to godfather 2. I was like what the hell you smoking buddy
www.forbes.com
Denzel is almost always great. Sometimes he had a look on his face like "I know this is trash, but I'm gonna ham it up!" He chewed up every scene he was in.Some very hard to please reviewers in here.....but hey it's all opinions.
We liked not loved G2.
Will I rush to watch it again? Nope. It was entertaining for one watch on the big screen as this is a big screen film but was nothing like the original in terms of characters, story and caring for the outcome. It had some fantastic and over the top coliseum battles and I personally really liked Denzel's role and where it went.
But overall a B- and a completely unnecessary sequel.
That is a very good review, except at the end he said he was entertained (saying even bad movies can be entertaining). I found this one just bad.Nails it...
![]()
‘Gladiator 2’ Review: A Dreadful, Pointless Sequel That Never Should Have Seen The Light Of Day
We are not entertained.www.forbes.com
I avoided this thread because I didn't want Gladiator II spoilers but instead it was just people arguing about other movies. I guess that's how this place operates.
Woah. Woah. That first Care Bear movie from 1985 came out in a time where I really needed the idea of the Care Bear stare.I would rather watch Troy over John Wick. Troy is more my genre and I find movies like Wick to be awesome for about 10 minutes. Then it’s just sensory overload.
Gladiator is aight.
Braveheart could use much of the extras fighting in the backgrounds of the battles scenes being CGI’d out. Some of the absolute worst.
Braveheart = Die Hard > Gladiator >Johnny Dangerously> Troy > Carebears II New Generation > Wick> Carebears (OG)
I mean there’s dumb then there’s really dumb.Was entertaining but too close to the plot of the first, the twin emperors were not good and I didn’t like the seemingly forced connections to part 1. I was disappointed overall.Finally watched this. It's now on Paramount plus.
I think the big negative to this movie is that it follows a really really good first one. Hard for a sequel to follow Mr. Crow and Mr Phoenix in those epic roles.
Overall it wasnt great. It wasn't horrible. It was meh. Had it's moments. Loved the guy on a rhino entrance. Denzel was decent.
Denzel was the best part for me too because he was the one part that seemed original.Forgettable for many reasons. I found Denzel's Brooklyn accent distracting.
The search for more money strikes again.
The ambitious gladiator troupe owner from Brooklyn was definitely a change from the original.Denzel was the best part for me too because he was the one part that seemed original.Forgettable for many reasons. I found Denzel's Brooklyn accent distracting.
The search for more money strikes again.

Ya. The production was good and they definitely spent money. Like someone mentioned above, the storyline just mirrored the first one too much for me. I enjoyed it, but I won't watch it again.I was entertained![]()
Yeah pretty much.Ya. The production was good and they definitely spent money. Like someone mentioned above, the storyline just mirrored the first one too much for me. I enjoyed it, but I won't watch it again.I was entertained![]()
Outsider rides into town on a chariot.Denzel was the best part for me too because he was the one part that seemed original.Forgettable for many reasons. I found Denzel's Brooklyn accent distracting.
The search for more money strikes again.
Definitely didn’t make sense. Just seemed like the only character who wasn’t copied and pasted from the original.Outsider rides into town on a chariot.Denzel was the best part for me too because he was the one part that seemed original.Forgettable for many reasons. I found Denzel's Brooklyn accent distracting.
The search for more money strikes again.
Literally 2 days worth of games later (no time lapse of multiple months/years) and he's the most trusted advisor that gets alone time with not just 1 emperor, but 2?
Yeah...