What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

GM's thread about nothing (29 Viewers)

how the hell does anyone know who most FBG people are on facebook?
I look for the backward hat guy with the scoreboard fetish.
but I don't post under a name like fo shizzle here and a real name there.I guess I get a lot of shark pooler/FBG subscriber types friending me b/c I work here. No idea who most of them are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
how the hell does anyone know who most FBG people are on facebook?
I look for the backward hat guy with the scoreboard fetish.
but I don't post under a name like fo shizzle here and a real name there.I guess I get a lot of shark pooler/FBG subscriber types friending me b/c I work here. No idea who most of them are.
Is there any way to change my username BTW, other than the obvious of just starting over with a new name? I ####### hate the name fo shizzle.
 
how the hell does anyone know who most FBG people are on facebook?
I look for the backward hat guy with the scoreboard fetish.
but I don't post under a name like fo shizzle here and a real name there.I guess I get a lot of shark pooler/FBG subscriber types friending me b/c I work here. No idea who most of them are.
Is there any way to change my username BTW, other than the obvious of just starting over with a new name? I ####### hate the name fo shizzle.
of course. what do you want it changed to?
 
how the hell does anyone know who most FBG people are on facebook?
I look for the backward hat guy with the scoreboard fetish.
but I don't post under a name like fo shizzle here and a real name there.I guess I get a lot of shark pooler/FBG subscriber types friending me b/c I work here. No idea who most of them are.
Is there any way to change my username BTW, other than the obvious of just starting over with a new name? I ####### hate the name fo shizzle.
of course. what do you want it changed to?
Thanks. Ill PM in next few days. Thinking fo shizzle fan.
 
how the hell does anyone know who most FBG people are on facebook?
I look for the backward hat guy with the scoreboard fetish.
but I don't post under a name like fo shizzle here and a real name there.I guess I get a lot of shark pooler/FBG subscriber types friending me b/c I work here. No idea who most of them are.
Is there any way to change my username BTW, other than the obvious of just starting over with a new name? I ####### hate the name fo shizzle.
of course. what do you want it changed to?
How about Buck Bradcanon?
 
Well....wife and I finally made it to the final episode of the Sopranos last night after beginning the series earlier in 2010. It was a thrilling ride the 2nd time around, but the 2nd viewing of the final episode did nothing to abate or mitigate my hatred of how they chose to end it. My wife was furious too. Worst ending ever, IMO. Just brutal. I'd like to nut punch the creators of that show.
I didn't watch the series but did see the end of the finale. I think it's brilliant.
Yes, of course you did. :thumbup:
What didn't you like about it?
 
Well....wife and I finally made it to the final episode of the Sopranos last night after beginning the series earlier in 2010. It was a thrilling ride the 2nd time around, but the 2nd viewing of the final episode did nothing to abate or mitigate my hatred of how they chose to end it. My wife was furious too. Worst ending ever, IMO. Just brutal. I'd like to nut punch the creators of that show.
I didn't watch the series but did see the end of the finale. I think it's brilliant.
Yes, of course you did. :pickle:
What didn't you like about it?
You mean other than it just ending abruptly and fading to black for 10 seconds of confusing silence and nothingness, originally causing me to kick my DiretTV device and bang my remote furiously against my head? Okay, I hated that AJ's car caught fire because it was left idling over some leaves, which I'm sure were wet since it was fall and earlier the area had been hit by a pretty severe snow storm. I mean, he had that hot chick (Emily Wickersham - google image) topless in the front seat where we gloriously got to see most of her left boob, then "AHHHHH FIRE, GET OUT!!!" Thanks a lot, David Chase.I hated the truce that was arranged after all the drama and build up leading to the war. It was too....easy. Have a tough time believing that Phil got sold out like that. Again, just felt like the writers were taking an easy, quick way out.And how about some background into why Carlo flipped? Just some hurried story that his son was on drugs? How about some details. Christ, they spent episode after episode dealing with Adriana's FBI involvement. Here, leading up to the big ending, we get nothing?Having to watch Meadow parallel park made me want to jump through the TV screen, open her door, yank her out of the car and show her how to park a small sedan into a space the size of Uhaul.Okay, okay....we're all left wondering "WHAT HAPPENED". Genius. :bowtie: I prefer closure. Maybe that's because every book and nearly every movie I've ever read or watch HAD A MOTHER FREAKING ENDING. This? This just cut away to black. Well pardon me if I'm not smart enough to appreciate the brilliance of that. I want an ending I can wrap my head around.
 
Well....wife and I finally made it to the final episode of the Sopranos last night after beginning the series earlier in 2010. It was a thrilling ride the 2nd time around, but the 2nd viewing of the final episode did nothing to abate or mitigate my hatred of how they chose to end it. My wife was furious too. Worst ending ever, IMO. Just brutal. I'd like to nut punch the creators of that show.
I didn't watch the series but did see the end of the finale. I think it's brilliant.
Yes, of course you did. :pickle:
What didn't you like about it?
You mean other than it just ending abruptly and fading to black for 10 seconds of confusing silence and nothingness, originally causing me to kick my DiretTV device and bang my remote furiously against my head? Okay, I hated that AJ's car caught fire because it was left idling over some leaves, which I'm sure were wet since it was fall and earlier the area had been hit by a pretty severe snow storm. I mean, he had that hot chick (Emily Wickersham - google image) topless in the front seat where we gloriously got to see most of her left boob, then "AHHHHH FIRE, GET OUT!!!" Thanks a lot, David Chase.I hated the truce that was arranged after all the drama and build up leading to the war. It was too....easy. Have a tough time believing that Phil got sold out like that. Again, just felt like the writers were taking an easy, quick way out.And how about some background into why Carlo flipped? Just some hurried story that his son was on drugs? How about some details. Christ, they spent episode after episode dealing with Adriana's FBI involvement. Here, leading up to the big ending, we get nothing?Having to watch Meadow parallel park made me want to jump through the TV screen, open her door, yank her out of the car and show her how to park a small sedan into a space the size of Uhaul.Okay, okay....we're all left wondering "WHAT HAPPENED". Genius. :bowtie: I prefer closure. Maybe that's because every book and nearly every movie I've ever read or watch HAD A MOTHER FREAKING ENDING. This? This just cut away to black. Well pardon me if I'm not smart enough to appreciate the brilliance of that. I want an ending I can wrap my head around.
tell us how you really feel..
 
I agree with GM:

I was at a buddy's house for the end of the Sopranos. "What the #### is wrong with your TV?" In those seconds, there was almost a brawl. I had a 3 hour drive ahead of me and basically walked out the door without saying much at all. I called back about an hour into the drive and we whined about the ending together, but we were both so unamused, we didn't speak much about it after the credits rolled.

:pickle: @ preschool

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well....wife and I finally made it to the final episode of the Sopranos last night after beginning the series earlier in 2010. It was a thrilling ride the 2nd time around, but the 2nd viewing of the final episode did nothing to abate or mitigate my hatred of how they chose to end it. My wife was furious too. Worst ending ever, IMO. Just brutal. I'd like to nut punch the creators of that show.
I didn't watch the series but did see the end of the finale. I think it's brilliant.
Yes, of course you did. :lmao:
What didn't you like about it?
Count me as another fan. I can understand why people hate it, but I think that that one scene completed something that all of the rest of the episodes couldn't quite do - it showed you the reality of Tony's lifestyle. Through all the other seasons, you always kind of wanted to be Tony. They showed you the reality of him being a boss and how it impacted his family and his marriage and how he lost the people who were close to him or was betrayed. You saw the tough decisions he had to make, and the violence and the danger, and you saw that he could never just quit. But the impact of the final scene - of something so basic - and seeing that guy over there, and wondering if that's the guy, and today's the day, and is this really the end? - that was the first time that you really understood. They spent the whole show taking this outrageous type of character - someone you'd never be or want to be or hang out with - and just fleshed it out and made him seem like he was just another guy like you or me leading a normal life - a normal life with power and drugs and money and crime, but a family and relationships and bad days at work and health problems and all the normal stuff. Then they flipped that on its ear by showing you that this was not a normal life in any way. And in that moment - in a way they could never really have convinced you of in a random episode in the middle of season four - you realized the additional toll that his life was taking on him, his family, and everyone around him. I thought it was brilliant.
 
I prefer closure. Maybe that's because every book and nearly every movie I've ever read or watch HAD A MOTHER FREAKING ENDING. This? This just cut away to black. Well pardon me if I'm not smart enough to appreciate the brilliance of that. I want an ending I can wrap my head around.
That was an ending. The difference is that this wasn't a story. It was a character study. At the ending of a story, you realize the point of all the stuff that happened, how all these things in the beginning led all that stuff at the end and you can stop and think about everything that happened along the way and where things went so terribly wrong and how we would all be dead if it weren't for the hero and so on. At the end of a character study, you realize the point of the character. I feel like that ending made me more fully understand Tony Soprano, and his family, and their lifestyle. I didn't find season six as enjoyable as the earlier seasons, and I agree that there were some sucky moments, but I think that season and that ending added a missing element to the show. When it comes to understanding a family like the Sopranos, I don't need a shootout, or to see Tony die in a shootout or see him beat some other boss knowing there's another one who will pop up after him. That's fun eye candy, but it's just detail in the bigger picture. This ending completed the picture of the character, and that's what made it so successful at what they were trying to accomplish.
 
I prefer closure. Maybe that's because every book and nearly every movie I've ever read or watch HAD A MOTHER FREAKING ENDING. This? This just cut away to black. Well pardon me if I'm not smart enough to appreciate the brilliance of that. I want an ending I can wrap my head around.
That was an ending. The difference is that this wasn't a story. It was a character study. At the ending of a story, you realize the point of all the stuff that happened, how all these things in the beginning led all that stuff at the end and you can stop and think about everything that happened along the way and where things went so terribly wrong and how we would all be dead if it weren't for the hero and so on. At the end of a character study, you realize the point of the character. I feel like that ending made me more fully understand Tony Soprano, and his family, and their lifestyle. I didn't find season six as enjoyable as the earlier seasons, and I agree that there were some sucky moments, but I think that season and that ending added a missing element to the show. When it comes to understanding a family like the Sopranos, I don't need a shootout, or to see Tony die in a shootout or see him beat some other boss knowing there's another one who will pop up after him. That's fun eye candy, but it's just detail in the bigger picture. This ending completed the picture of the character, and that's what made it so successful at what they were trying to accomplish.
:thumbup: Sometimes BF reads my mind.
 
Well....wife and I finally made it to the final episode of the Sopranos last night after beginning the series earlier in 2010. It was a thrilling ride the 2nd time around, but the 2nd viewing of the final episode did nothing to abate or mitigate my hatred of how they chose to end it. My wife was furious too. Worst ending ever, IMO. Just brutal. I'd like to nut punch the creators of that show.
I didn't watch the series but did see the end of the finale. I think it's brilliant.
Yes, of course you did. :confused:
What didn't you like about it?
Count me as another fan. I can understand why people hate it, but I think that that one scene completed something that all of the rest of the episodes couldn't quite do - it showed you the reality of Tony's lifestyle. Through all the other seasons, you always kind of wanted to be Tony. They showed you the reality of him being a boss and how it impacted his family and his marriage and how he lost the people who were close to him or was betrayed. You saw the tough decisions he had to make, and the violence and the danger, and you saw that he could never just quit. But the impact of the final scene - of something so basic - and seeing that guy over there, and wondering if that's the guy, and today's the day, and is this really the end? - that was the first time that you really understood. They spent the whole show taking this outrageous type of character - someone you'd never be or want to be or hang out with - and just fleshed it out and made him seem like he was just another guy like you or me leading a normal life - a normal life with power and drugs and money and crime, but a family and relationships and bad days at work and health problems and all the normal stuff. Then they flipped that on its ear by showing you that this was not a normal life in any way. And in that moment - in a way they could never really have convinced you of in a random episode in the middle of season four - you realized the additional toll that his life was taking on him, his family, and everyone around him. I thought it was brilliant.
Yeah, I didn't get that at all. This sounds like what all the critics wrote in the aftermath, including the ones who originally panned it, but refuted their negative reviews and jumped on the bandwagon proclaiming how brilliant it was. As far as wondering 'is this really the end': OF COURSE IT WAS THE END. IT WAS THE FINAL EPISODE. Just give me an ending with closure. Six Feet Under did that in remarkable fashion. This series just faded to black and silence. Neat. You say brilliant, I say cop out.You say they packaged up this larger than life mob boss and in once scene reduced him to a normal guy with a family and health problems, etc. I don't agree with that. The whole series was about a mob boss who has a family and health problems, etc. He was a paradox from the get go. I didn't need a scene with him in the diner to realize what he was. I had countless scenes with him and Dr. Melfi fleshing out what his life was truly like and how he had to walk a line between dark side and light. I'd also say that we saw several ways in which his lifestyle manifested itself upon his family throughout the series....AJ committing suicide, getting kicked out of school, dropping out of college. Meadow losing two relationships because the men were afraid of her father or her father's cronies. And the toll his life took upon his wife was evident early and often.I don't know. If it's brilliant because I'm angry, then David Chase wins. I say he couldn't find a better way to end it so this was his trump card. The critical reviews I've read read like something from the mouths of David Chase sycophants.At least Jeep is with me. :shiny:
 
I think the Sopranos ending was, in part, a business decision. A few more years down the road, there could be a substantial payday for a Sopranos movie. If Tony's brains are spattered all over the wall of a diner, you can't do that. If you fade to black, everyone can think whatever they like, while leaving all your (money-making) options open.

 
The abrupt finish was ridiculous. Had the show done things like this during its run I wouldn't have minded so much, but deliberately trying to be obtuse was a cheap out.

Other than that, I thought it was fine.

 
You say they packaged up this larger than life mob boss and in once scene reduced him to a normal guy with a family and health problems, etc. I don't agree with that. The whole series was about a mob boss who has a family and health problems, etc. He was a paradox from the get go. I didn't need a scene with him in the diner to realize what he was. I had countless scenes with him and Dr. Melfi fleshing out what his life was truly like and how he had to walk a line between dark side and light.
I think you misunderstood me. I totally agree with you on all that. That was the point of the whole show, and every season you learned a little more about Tony, or his wife, his daughter, his son, Christopher, Paulie, etc. The thing the final episode did that the rest of the show couldn't do - even when Tony went into the hospital at the end of one of the seasons - was make you realize the gravity of knowing that at any moment, no matter how mundane, it could all end. Just getting together for a bite to eat with his family - something you and I take for granted - you see this guy walk to the bathroom, and you wonder. They couldn't show that to you in the middle of season one, because you'd never believe that they'd kill the title character. They got you to believe that they'd kill off other characters on the show, and they were one of the first shows that actually did it. But they'd never kill off Tony. But in the series finale, you believed they might do it. And so the moment was real in a way that all the other scenes from all the episodes in all the other seasons never really was. It was a brilliant way to acknowledge the flaw of the medium - the fact that while we'll all suspend disbelief, there are rules in a series like this, and one of those rules is that you don't kill off Tony Soprano - and use the final episode to fill in that blank. So while they'd shown you all the weird mundane moments in this fascinating person's life, this was the first and only opportunity to show you that final piece of the puzzle. I might have been more entertained by another ending, but I think the way they used the final episode was a complete success in the arc of the show.
 
Question for all you facebook FBG's....Do you have it separated so only FBG's can see other FBG's or work people can only see work people, etc. etc.?
I have no idea how to do that, I'd love to keep "work friends" separate from real life friends because my "work friends" are very nosey. For instance, I was in a meeting today had at least 5 co-workers who are FB friends ask me "who's that Catshirt guy you're friends with now?" One person referred to him as "Catfish Bill". :goodposting: I told them he ran a non-profit animal rescue agency specializing in cats. That ended the conversation, as I figured it would.
 
I have an FBG group on mine, but I don't think I've restricted anything on it. I had a work group as well, with my old job, and set some pretty major restrictions on it. I'm a pretty boring Facebooker, but I didn't want them knowing how much time I spent on there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:kicksrock: What can I say, I like you guys.
Question for all you facebook FBG's....Do you have it separated so only FBG's can see other FBG's or work people can only see work people, etc. etc.?
I have no idea how to do that, I'd love to keep "work friends" separate from real life friends because my "work friends" are very nosey. For instance, I was in a meeting today had at least 5 co-workers who are FB friends ask me "who's that Catshirt guy you're friends with now?" One person referred to him as "Catfish Bill". :argue: I told them he ran a non-profit animal rescue agency specializing in cats. That ended the conversation, as I figured it would.
:goodposting: :lmao:
People become FB friends with people they work with?
No kidding. I have, thousands I guess, of people I don't want to know I'm on FB.
 
You say they packaged up this larger than life mob boss and in once scene reduced him to a normal guy with a family and health problems, etc. I don't agree with that. The whole series was about a mob boss who has a family and health problems, etc. He was a paradox from the get go. I didn't need a scene with him in the diner to realize what he was. I had countless scenes with him and Dr. Melfi fleshing out what his life was truly like and how he had to walk a line between dark side and light.
I think you misunderstood me. I totally agree with you on all that. That was the point of the whole show, and every season you learned a little more about Tony, or his wife, his daughter, his son, Christopher, Paulie, etc. The thing the final episode did that the rest of the show couldn't do - even when Tony went into the hospital at the end of one of the seasons - was make you realize the gravity of knowing that at any moment, no matter how mundane, it could all end. Just getting together for a bite to eat with his family - something you and I take for granted - you see this guy walk to the bathroom, and you wonder. They couldn't show that to you in the middle of season one, because you'd never believe that they'd kill the title character. They got you to believe that they'd kill off other characters on the show, and they were one of the first shows that actually did it. But they'd never kill off Tony. But in the series finale, you believed they might do it. And so the moment was real in a way that all the other scenes from all the episodes in all the other seasons never really was. It was a brilliant way to acknowledge the flaw of the medium - the fact that while we'll all suspend disbelief, there are rules in a series like this, and one of those rules is that you don't kill off Tony Soprano - and use the final episode to fill in that blank. So while they'd shown you all the weird mundane moments in this fascinating person's life, this was the first and only opportunity to show you that final piece of the puzzle. I might have been more entertained by another ending, but I think the way they used the final episode was a complete success in the arc of the show.
Six Feet Under killed Nate Fisher. He was pretty important.I get what you're saying and have read several critical accounts that reflect your view. I happen to disagree and from my perspective - which I'll admit is clouded by booze, smoke and unlucky genes - do not find any sort of brilliance in how they chose to end the series.

The movie theory is a good one. Though I think it's probably a long shot at best.

 
I'm still digesting the 'couple times a month' is normal for normal, healthy married couples.
Prolly about right in my house. Honestly not even sure I want much more, and my wife is still very attractive IMO.I get tired at night. Kids are 3 and 7. :kicksrock:
Kids are 16, 11, 8, 5, 2, and 1...if we were down to a couple of times a month, I'd be single. And probably have fewer kids.
All from the same daddy?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top