Both sides of this argument are being very shortsighted and not recognizing some very simple truths.
Those pointing to his senior stats and saying they weren't impressive seem to have no idea what they are looking at. He was 1 year removed from ACL surgery and nobody plays all world one year after ACL surgery.
While it is an extremely safe bet that he would have played better at Miami two years after his surgery, his ceiling was not able to be seen and could have been slightly higher or it could have been tremendously higher.
While Barlow has the size and talent and the big contract, the fact is that no matter how much you can blame of last year's performance on the supporting cast, he was outplayed for the majority of the year by an undrafted free agent in Maurice Hicks. While the starting job should be his to lose, he has certainly shown the capability of losing it so seeing him lose his job to a 3rd round pick isn't exactly that crazy of a prediction.
He undoubtedly was seen as having top notch talent and was ahead of McGahee and Portis on the depth chart his Sophomore year. You can point to the fact that he was a "high school" talent that was only at the top of the depth chart on paper and for the time being but keep in mind that all three guys had been on the team and seen playing time and practice time the previous season and the coaches had been able to take the time to evaluate them before placing him at the top of the depth chart. It wasn't like he was a hot freshman recruit that was slated to start. He'd been in the system a year and so had the other two.You can take a look at these things and you can declare him the next McGahee or you can declare him the next bust, but the fact remains that neither side has enough evidence to declare themselves to be the victor in this debate. ALL RB's IN THIS DRAFT CARRY RISK. Gore carries more risk than a lot of people feel comfortable with for an early rookie draft pick but to say he has no talent or to declare him to be a no brainer are both so obviously moronic it hurts to read it. People need to see this for what it is, a risk/reward type pick that could come back to burn you or it could work out phenomenally for you.
You obviously do not understand this forum. You HAVE to pick a side, and once you do, slam the other side for how stupid they are. Do not waiver, do not be flexible, do not have an open mind. This can only be seen as weakness.
LOL...while that might seem the case sometimes, it's really not.While I personally think it's downright illogical to suggest that Gore is anything more than a 50/50 shot at being a successful NFL RB (and don't think he graded out as a 1st day pick), it's entirely possible that he could buck his injury history and ultimately beat out Kevan Barlow for the job.
Here's what we know so far:
Barlow has been a disappointment
The team made a financial commitment to bring Barlow back for another shot at starting in 2005
Barlow, when focused, can be effective
Gore, before his injuries, was considered an elite tailback prospect
His injuries robbed him of the chance to prove (or disprove) that reputation on the field
The 49ers coaches saw enough of him, on film and in person, to think his injury history is something worth betting is surmountable
The 49ers won't hesitate to play whichever back is the more deserving
Next year, neither of these backs could be the 49ers starter...or one could be on their way to a 2nd consecutive 1,000 yard seasonI said after the draft that Barlow got about as lucky as he could've with the 49ers choice of Gore. Because of Gore's injury history and his lack of on-field production; it's IMHO a much easier leap of faith to think Barlow can outperform him and retain his job. It's by no means a foregone conclusion, far from it, but had any number of other collegiate backs been the 49ers choice, I would be far less sanguine about the situation. Had the Niners drafted: Benson, Brown, Williams, Arrington, Moats, Barber instead; I would already be penciling in the rookie ahead of Barlow on the depth chart.
My $0.02