What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Help! I have kerry rhodes and T. Suggs (1 Viewer)

varmint cong

Footballguy
I thought I drafted good IDPs, but these guys have been extremely disappointing. with 4 games in the books, I cant put my finger on it. I dont think its been their competition, injuries? no , scheme? maybe? same D coordinators..I'm confused? thoughts?

 
Definite trend with both.

Norton, in our podcast last week, suggested that opposing teams were targeting the Jets outside the hashmarks, presumably due to the improved run defense among the front seven and relatively weak corner play (until Revis began to step up). Those gameplans may have resulted in the Jets corners blowing up in the stat lines. Far be it from me to argue with the Guru, and I only saw the Week 2 game, but the Jets have faced the fifth most rushing attempts thus far and a reasonable run-pass split against so I'm having a hard time chalking it up to gameplans. It is clear that the ends and Vilma are playing much better though. Still, I don't think there's much excuse for Rhodes right now. Bad luck, questionable play, whatever. Four weeks is too long to keep providing a different excuse. I wouldn't cut him and he's talented enough to bounce back, but he deserves a bench spot until something changes.

Suggs is a different issue and I'm not as fussy about him...yet. The Ravens are using much more 3-4 than they had in previous seasons. That's not a huge hindrance, as Suggs is still coming as a rush backer as frequently as ever. But he's feeling the ripple effects of missing Trevor Pryce and the downgrade from Adalius Thomas to Jarrett Johnson. There's plenty of reason for optimism here, though. Suggs has had eight solos and three passes defended in the past three weeks and is still around the ball. While it would've been nice to see sacks against matchups like ARI and CLE, he still has a string of juicy matchups on the way -- SF/STL/BUF before the bye -- before slipping back into average matchups the rest of the way. He's risky in big play leagues right now, but still worth starting over the next three weeks and an attractive buy low candidate. Hopefully, he'll take advantage.

 
Definite trend with both.Norton, in our podcast last week, suggested that opposing teams were targeting the Jets outside the hashmarks, presumably due to the improved run defense among the front seven and relatively weak corner play (until Revis began to step up). Those gameplans may have resulted in the Jets corners blowing up in the stat lines. Far be it from me to argue with the Guru, and I only saw the Week 2 game, but the Jets have faced the fifth most rushing attempts thus far and a reasonable run-pass split against so I'm having a hard time chalking it up to gameplans. It is clear that the ends and Vilma are playing much better though. Still, I don't think there's much excuse for Rhodes right now. Bad luck, questionable play, whatever. Four weeks is too long to keep providing a different excuse. I wouldn't cut him and he's talented enough to bounce back, but he deserves a bench spot until something changes.Suggs is a different issue and I'm not as fussy about him...yet. The Ravens are using much more 3-4 than they had in previous seasons. That's not a huge hindrance, as Suggs is still coming as a rush backer as frequently as ever. But he's feeling the ripple effects of missing Trevor Pryce and the downgrade from Adalius Thomas to Jarrett Johnson. There's plenty of reason for optimism here, though. Suggs has had eight solos and three passes defended in the past three weeks and is still around the ball. While it would've been nice to see sacks against matchups like ARI and CLE, he still has a string of juicy matchups on the way -- SF/STL/BUF before the bye -- before slipping back into average matchups the rest of the way. He's risky in big play leagues right now, but still worth starting over the next three weeks and an attractive buy low candidate. Hopefully, he'll take advantage.
:blackdot:
 
Definite trend with both.Norton, in our podcast last week, suggested that opposing teams were targeting the Jets outside the hashmarks, presumably due to the improved run defense among the front seven and relatively weak corner play (until Revis began to step up). Those gameplans may have resulted in the Jets corners blowing up in the stat lines. Far be it from me to argue with the Guru, and I only saw the Week 2 game, but the Jets have faced the fifth most rushing attempts thus far and a reasonable run-pass split against so I'm having a hard time chalking it up to gameplans. It is clear that the ends and Vilma are playing much better though. Still, I don't think there's much excuse for Rhodes right now. Bad luck, questionable play, whatever. Four weeks is too long to keep providing a different excuse. I wouldn't cut him and he's talented enough to bounce back, but he deserves a bench spot until something changes.Suggs is a different issue and I'm not as fussy about him...yet. The Ravens are using much more 3-4 than they had in previous seasons. That's not a huge hindrance, as Suggs is still coming as a rush backer as frequently as ever. But he's feeling the ripple effects of missing Trevor Pryce and the downgrade from Adalius Thomas to Jarrett Johnson. There's plenty of reason for optimism here, though. Suggs has had eight solos and three passes defended in the past three weeks and is still around the ball. While it would've been nice to see sacks against matchups like ARI and CLE, he still has a string of juicy matchups on the way -- SF/STL/BUF before the bye -- before slipping back into average matchups the rest of the way. He's risky in big play leagues right now, but still worth starting over the next three weeks and an attractive buy low candidate. Hopefully, he'll take advantage.
great stuff Jene, I read somewhere, not sure where, that Suggs was dropping in coverage much more than last year, and being from the NYC area, it seems to me, that Rhodes is playing away from the line of scrimmage more and stunting less
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top