"They said 40 percent of the fines that are given out are after a penalty is called," Ward said. "And if there's not a penalty, they review it, and then they start setting out fines after they review it.
"But that's kind of contradictory, because I had a 72-yard reception this year in Houston called back because they said that I had a pass interference call. Well, all they did was review it and say, 'Yes, the ref messed up, here's an apology, we're sorry.' They don't give me that 72-yard reception back.
"So when they look at the plays after the fact, they go back and review it, and they say, 'Oh yeah, this is a personal foul,' and then they hand out fines when there wasn't a flag. That ain't right."
Ward suggested that what's good for players should also be good for referees, and maybe the officials should be forced to pay after a poor performance.
"That was my whole argument, and they never really gave me an answer for that," Ward said. "How can you fine players because a ref may miss a call? You can't go back and then say, 'OK, yeah, I think that's a fine.' Well, give me an apology. Don't take $15,000 out my pocket, because you're not fining the referees for calls that they may miss in a game. All you do is give me an apology letter saying, 'This was an incorrect call, I'm sorry', and then move on.
"In my case, I was never flagged or penalized on the plays that I was given, but yet, they take $15,000 out my pocket. If it was an illegal hit, then the refs missed it. You can't go back and review the plays and then give out fines accordingly, based off what you say. The referees don't get a letter saying, 'You know what? You missed Hines' block, and then him and a guy got into a scuffle.'"