Yep, LeShoure would have contributed so much more. Best is a great change of pace back, but just does not seem durable to be in there every down. Mikel would have been a beast and would have been a great compliment to Best.I wanted defense with that 2nd rounder, there were some good linebackers left and I have no idea why nobody wants Brandon Harris. Sure he's smallish for a corner but he's a competitor.That said, if they liked their offensive options better I wish they would've landed on Mikel LeShoure instead of a WR.
Titus is somewhat fast, but not a real burner.They addressed a need with Titus. The Lion's cannot fill all the defensive needs in this draft and they know they need to put up points. Speed on the other side of Calvin will make this offense extremely dangerous. If Best can stay healthy it would give them a triangle of dangerous speed.
He is not a burner? If that is the case they should have waited until round three for WR.Titus is somewhat fast, but not a real burner.They addressed a need with Titus. The Lion's cannot fill all the defensive needs in this draft and they know they need to put up points. Speed on the other side of Calvin will make this offense extremely dangerous. If Best can stay healthy it would give them a triangle of dangerous speed.
4.43 at the combine, but 4.38/4.35 at the Boise State pro day. Reputed to have a great burst.Titus is somewhat fast, but not a real burner.They addressed a need with Titus. The Lion's cannot fill all the defensive needs in this draft and they know they need to put up points. Speed on the other side of Calvin will make this offense extremely dangerous. If Best can stay healthy it would give them a triangle of dangerous speed.
There you go.That said, if they liked their offensive options better I wish they would've landed on Mikel LeShoure instead of a WR.
Now you have your cake and can eat it too.I wanted defense with that 2nd rounder, there were some good linebackers left and I have no idea why nobody wants Brandon Harris. Sure he's smallish for a corner but he's a competitor.That said, if they liked their offensive options better I wish they would've landed on Mikel LeShoure instead of a WR.
•Seahawks trade the No. 57 pick along with fifth- (No. 157) and seventh-round picks (209) to the Lions for third- (No. 75), fourth- (No. 107), fifth- (No. 154) and seventh-round picks (No. 205).2nd + 5th + 7thWhat'd the Lions give to the Seahawks to get their 2nd?
yea now they wait until the 2nd round to draft a marginal WR'Gamblin said:Amazing what a team can do when it doesn't draft WR in the first round every year.

There you go.That said, if they liked their offensive options better I wish they would've landed on Mikel LeShoure instead of a WR.
Titus will be an adequate slot WR. A stretch that early in round 2, but he will contribute. But I do love the other two picks. Two of the best picks in the draft.yea now they wait until the 2nd round to draft a marginal WR'Gamblin said:Amazing what a team can do when it doesn't draft WR in the first round every year.![]()
2HR's and a single.Lions killed it. Props.![]()
Suh and Fairley will make up for a lot of their defensive issues. 65 sacks a game may just be all they needThere you go.That said, if they liked their offensive options better I wish they would've landed on Mikel LeShoure instead of a WR.Still not in love with the Titus pick, but definitely don't mind getting LeShoure afterall. They'll have to address most of their defensive needs in FA now, but oh well...

Eh, wouldn't say a C+ but a B or B- so far. Problem with the O-line issue is that unless they took one instead of Fairley, they weren't going to get one of the top ones with their 2nd rounder. Seven were gone by the end of the 1st round, and the remaining ones didn't seem worthy of a 2nd rounder. I was kinda hoping we would trade back into the late 1st round to nab one of the remaining available O-linemen. At least the guy that Green Bay took. I knew they were going to take one, so it would have been win-win to keep him out of Green Bay and to bolster our own line.so the lions have no pick until the 6th round, didnt address their terrible oline, linee backing core or secondary. I know Rome wasnt built in a day but the 2nd round picks today were not very "need" worthy for the lions. C+
Williams is a nice DT...but there is a far cry from being good and being nearly just as good as Suh who had an incredible year.We are talking about DT- that is a position that can't always be measured by stats. Williams was really good last year with the exception of his false start penalties.Suh 66 tackles 10 sacks.Williams 37 tackles 2 sacks.Not sure people realize this, but Corey Williams was nearly just as good as Suh last year.![]()
Gunther Cunningham and Lions beat writer Tom Kowalski were saying it all year.Williams is a nice DT...but there is a far cry from being good and being nearly just as good as Suh who had an incredible year.We are talking about DT- that is a position that can't always be measured by stats. Williams was really good last year with the exception of his false start penalties.Suh 66 tackles 10 sacks.Williams 37 tackles 2 sacks.Not sure people realize this, but Corey Williams was nearly just as good as Suh last year.![]()
Well, if a beat writer and coach were pumping up a player...it must all be true.Sorry, from what I see...Williams is a very good DT...Suh is freaking outstanding and it was not all that close.(And Im one who disagreed with Ted Thompson on not resigning Williams during the year before he let him go...though, now it works out as he does not really fit the 3-4).Gunther Cunningham and Lions beat writer Tom Kowalski were saying it all year.Williams is a nice DT...but there is a far cry from being good and being nearly just as good as Suh who had an incredible year.We are talking about DT- that is a position that can't always be measured by stats. Williams was really good last year with the exception of his false start penalties.Suh 66 tackles 10 sacks.Williams 37 tackles 2 sacks.Not sure people realize this, but Corey Williams was nearly just as good as Suh last year.![]()
Lions offensive line was actually one of the best pass protection groups in the league last year.so the lions have no pick until the 6th round, didnt address their terrible oline, linee backing core or secondary.
I know Rome wasnt built in a day but the 2nd round picks today were not very "need" worthy for the lions.
C+
I am not saying Williams is as talented as Suh- ofcourse not. Suh is unreal. However, Suh also had some struggles last year. He didn't always do a great job against the run and there were times he looked very rookie-like. Suh is great at penetrating the middle, but Williams is much better at the traditional role of being a DT: eating up blocks and clogging the middle running lanes.Well, if a beat writer and coach were pumping up a player...it must all be true.Sorry, from what I see...Williams is a very good DT...Suh is freaking outstanding and it was not all that close.(And Im one who disagreed with Ted Thompson on not resigning Williams during the year before he let him go...though, now it works out as he does not really fit the 3-4).Gunther Cunningham and Lions beat writer Tom Kowalski were saying it all year.Williams is a nice DT...but there is a far cry from being good and being nearly just as good as Suh who had an incredible year.We are talking about DT- that is a position that can't always be measured by stats. Williams was really good last year with the exception of his false start penalties.Suh 66 tackles 10 sacks.Williams 37 tackles 2 sacks.Not sure people realize this, but Corey Williams was nearly just as good as Suh last year.![]()
Is pass protection the only thing a line does?Reminds me of Vikings fans talking about how great their line was because they could run the ball...meanwhile they were giving up 40 sacks per year.Lions offensive line was actually one of the best pass protection groups in the league last year.so the lions have no pick until the 6th round, didnt address their terrible oline, linee backing core or secondary.
I know Rome wasnt built in a day but the 2nd round picks today were not very "need" worthy for the lions.
C+
The Lions actually ran the ball very well to the left side, but did struggle running up the middle and to the right. I believe the offensive line certainly could be upgraded, but you called it terrible which is untrue. The Lions will be addressing LB and CB in free agency.Is pass protection the only thing a line does?Reminds me of Vikings fans talking about how great their line was because they could run the ball...meanwhile they were giving up 40 sacks per year.Lions offensive line was actually one of the best pass protection groups in the league last year.so the lions have no pick until the 6th round, didnt address their terrible oline, linee backing core or secondary.
I know Rome wasnt built in a day but the 2nd round picks today were not very "need" worthy for the lions.
C+
I think they do need to address the Oline and secondary at some point. I would not call it a terrible Oline...but average and IMO every team should keep building bodies and depth on the Oline.
I think they are fine this year, but time is ticking fast on Backus and Raiola. I wouldn't be surprised to see them take spend their top 2 picks on offensive linemen next year with a LT and C like the Jets did a few years ago.As a guy who has been loving what the Lions have done in recent drafts, I have to agree that the o-line needs to be addressed and I wonder if they aren't taking a track of building the d-line, getting outside weapons and addressing the rest via free agency. All I know is as much as I'm excited about the future of this franchise, the present line could really derail that if they don't see more improvements soon.
I don't agree that there were no LBs or CBs worthy of a 2nd or 3rd rounder. Brandon Harris and Justin Houston were both available in the 2nd round for either of Det's picks. Both guys were almost universally rated as boarder line 1st round talents. I know Houston had character concerns that dropped him, I'm not sure what Harris deal was. As a matter of fact, when I saw Det was trading up for that 2nd round pick I thought for sure they would be calling Harris' name. I like the Leshoure pick as well so it's not a knock on the pick. Both were great needs, I guess Det simply had Leshoure rated higher. It's hard for me to 2nd guess any of Det's picks as I really like all of the players they got. I think they took Young too early though. I would have expected him to be there in the 3rd. I guess that's kind of irrelevant considering they traded their 3rd though.Mayhew probably saw the same things many of us saw...this draft is incredibly weak for CBs and LBs and offensive tackles. Once he took Fairley (a no brainer), my guess is he didn't see any LBs, CBs, or OL worthy of a 2nd or 3rd rounder. I was really hoping to see Bruce Carter slide.
Would have loved to see Bruce Carter here. He shows up in every UNC game I've seen.Mayhew probably saw the same things many of us saw...this draft is incredibly weak for CBs and LBs and offensive tackles. Once he took Fairley (a no brainer), my guess is he didn't see any LBs, CBs, or OL worthy of a 2nd or 3rd rounder. I was really hoping to see Bruce Carter slide.
I think they would have taken him if he was there. That was what I wanted to see. After he was gone, the LB dropoff was pretty steep in my opinion. I didn't care for the Young pick. He went too early. I loved the Leshoure pick.Would have loved to see Bruce Carter here. He shows up in every UNC game I've seen.Mayhew probably saw the same things many of us saw...this draft is incredibly weak for CBs and LBs and offensive tackles. Once he took Fairley (a no brainer), my guess is he didn't see any LBs, CBs, or OL worthy of a 2nd or 3rd rounder. I was really hoping to see Bruce Carter slide.
Bingo, one of the worst run blocking olines in all of footballIs pass protection the only thing a line does?Reminds me of Vikings fans talking about how great their line was because they could run the ball...meanwhile they were giving up 40 sacks per year.Lions offensive line was actually one of the best pass protection groups in the league last year.so the lions have no pick until the 6th round, didnt address their terrible oline, linee backing core or secondary.
I know Rome wasnt built in a day but the 2nd round picks today were not very "need" worthy for the lions.
C+
I think they do need to address the Oline and secondary at some point. I would not call it a terrible Oline...but average and IMO every team should keep building bodies and depth on the Oline.
The OL is not very good. That could prove to be problematic.QB - Stafford
RB - Best, Leshoure
WR - Johnson, Burleson, Young
TE - Pettigrew
Our offense is complete, young and talented, if they can stay healthy how can this offense not compete?
They had another win that was stolen by the refs against the Bears too.The Lions are pretty well set up for FA. They are set at all offensive skill positions. I think their run blocking was as more of a product of having Shaun Hill and Stanton under center. With those two, any D will force them to beat them.
Defensively, they have a lot of DLman. 7 legitimate starters. I don't see the definite need for a secondary. Smith was pretty good. Houston was okay. And they still have Speivey. Delmas is there too. There are 3 big picks back there. What they really need is a true middle LB. Levy needs to move outside. You can't play good pass D when you have liabilities at linebacker. When Follett is expected to cover anybody, it will make the rest look real bad.
A signing at the OL, a couple LBs and a CB could make them pretty damn good. The team was a lot better than their record showed.