It is getting worse and worse to be a guy. Maybe Bruce Jenner is onto something.
It was during this talk Kozak reportedly suggested regret over a sexual encounter equals rape, the judge’s ruling stated.
Kozak needs to sit in the presence of an actual rape victim and make that claim, and see what the reaction is.It was during this talk Kozak reportedly suggested regret over a sexual encounter equals rape, the judge’s ruling stated.![]()
This girl would have recorded that video...With the advent of cellphone technology, how are young Bucks today not getting video affirmation before engaing in coitus? Just get a video endorsement from the lady... "I AM LOOKING TO KNOCK THE DUST OFF OF THAT #####......? AM I ALLOWED TO LEGALLY PUMP THAT POOTER?" She says yes.....everything good.
https://youtu.be/Jo4568PIRnkChapelle's "sex contract" skit only seemed like satire at the time...
"And initial here for anal..."
How crazy is it that they both have the same last name? I wonder if they are related and in reality this is a case of incest?The female student who lodged the charge against John Doe has claimed she was the victim of nonconsensual intercourse, or “gray rape,” what Cosmopolitan defines as “sex that falls somewhere between consent and denial and is even more confusing than date rape because often both parties are unsure of who wanted what.”
The plaintiff filed his lawsuit last December, stating the university subjected him to disciplinary actions “in an arbitrary and capricious way, and in discrimination against him on the basis of his male sex.” He accuses the private, liberal arts university in Lexington, Va., of gender bias in violation of Title IX.
The student claimed he was denied legal counsel and representation during the course of the school’s inquiry, that his case was mismanaged and rushed before the Student Faculty Hearing Board, and that Jane Doe’s decision to claim rape was influenced by controversial statements made by the university’s Title IX coordinator Lauren Kozak.
We need to go on strike. start withholding our favors until woman cave and agree to swing the pendulum back to a more reasonable equilibrium. That will teach them. Of course to win the strike we will have to arrange an "appliance" and a produce shortage to hit at the same time.There's been a few recent cases in the UCs as well. Thankfully, the justice system is starting to push back on this crap. The UCs have a "yes" means "yes" policy where the male student has to prove consent was given. It's an impossible standard. These guys are getting totally railroaded.
But I had hand!?We need to go on strike. start withholding our favors until woman cave and agree to swing the pendulum back to a more reasonable equilibrium. That will teach them. Of course to win the strike we will have to arrange an "appliance" and a produce shortage to hit at the same time.There's been a few recent cases in the UCs as well. Thankfully, the justice system is starting to push back on this crap. The UCs have a "yes" means "yes" policy where the male student has to prove consent was given. It's an impossible standard. These guys are getting totally railroaded.
The article references a "Student-Faculty Hearing Board" making this decision, and I just kind of cringe reading that. Its probably an appointed panel made up of some students and some faculty, and you have to wonder what kind of teachers and students sign up for that. The discussion in here will likely conflate this kangaroo process with actual criminal or civil proceedings, when this student-faculty process likely has very little in common with any sort of fair adjudication process.You guys are being all critical of university administrators, but if people with Ph.D.s in history, modern British literature, and chemistry aren't qualified to investigate and prosecute cases of sexual violence, who is? It's not like there's anybody out there with any special professional training in this sort of thing.
This sounds like the plan my wife came up with about 25 years ago... I am still waiting for the pendulum to swing back.We need to go on strike. start withholding our favors until woman cave and agree to swing the pendulum back to a more reasonable equilibrium. That will teach them. Of course to win the strike we will have to arrange an "appliance" and a produce shortage to hit at the same time.There's been a few recent cases in the UCs as well. Thankfully, the justice system is starting to push back on this crap. The UCs have a "yes" means "yes" policy where the male student has to prove consent was given. It's an impossible standard. These guys are getting totally railroaded.
Hang in there brother. Victory, like your war club, is nearly in hand.True butIn addition to the very real possibility of conviction/expulsion/etc for the young men accused in these 'cases', there doesn't seem to be much blow back from being proved absolutely false as the accuser. I'm glad to see some counter legal action in this situation.
Accused of rape(falsely):
Found guilty - Male serves time, expelled, sex offenders list, life ruined. Female - Got revenge, victim status
Found innocent and proved to be completely concocted - Male reputation ruined, lengthy battle to prove innocence (as assumed guilty). Female - Be on your way.
With crime this heinous, there should be very serious ramifications if allegations are proved fabricated. Currently the situation is a bit of, heads I win, tails you lose.
This sounds like the plan my wife came up with about 25 years ago... I am still waiting for the pendulum to swing back.We need to go on strike. start withholding our favors until woman cave and agree to swing the pendulum back to a more reasonable equilibrium. That will teach them. Of course to win the strike we will have to arrange an "appliance" and a produce shortage to hit at the same time.There's been a few recent cases in the UCs as well. Thankfully, the justice system is starting to push back on this crap. The UCs have a "yes" means "yes" policy where the male student has to prove consent was given. It's an impossible standard. These guys are getting totally railroaded.
Hang in there brother. Victory, like your war club, is nearly in hand.True butIn addition to the very real possibility of conviction/expulsion/etc for the young men accused in these 'cases', there doesn't seem to be much blow back from being proved absolutely false as the accuser. I'm glad to see some counter legal action in this situation.
Accused of rape(falsely):
Found guilty - Male serves time, expelled, sex offenders list, life ruined. Female - Got revenge, victim status
Found innocent and proved to be completely concocted - Male reputation ruined, lengthy battle to prove innocence (as assumed guilty). Female - Be on your way.
With crime this heinous, there should be very serious ramifications if allegations are proved fabricated. Currently the situation is a bit of, heads I win, tails you lose.
This sounds like the plan my wife came up with about 25 years ago... I am still waiting for the pendulum to swing back.We need to go on strike. start withholding our favors until woman cave and agree to swing the pendulum back to a more reasonable equilibrium. That will teach them. Of course to win the strike we will have to arrange an "appliance" and a produce shortage to hit at the same time.There's been a few recent cases in the UCs as well. Thankfully, the justice system is starting to push back on this crap. The UCs have a "yes" means "yes" policy where the male student has to prove consent was given. It's an impossible standard. These guys are getting totally railroaded.
If you really get desperate, another woman can swing that pendulum for you.This sounds like the plan my wife came up with about 25 years ago... I am still waiting for the pendulum to swing back.We need to go on strike. start withholding our favors until woman cave and agree to swing the pendulum back to a more reasonable equilibrium. That will teach them. Of course to win the strike we will have to arrange an "appliance" and a produce shortage to hit at the same time.There's been a few recent cases in the UCs as well. Thankfully, the justice system is starting to push back on this crap. The UCs have a "yes" means "yes" policy where the male student has to prove consent was given. It's an impossible standard. These guys are getting totally railroaded.
The application of "regret means rape" or "yes means yes" as a means to kick young men out of school is a new low.it's not, of course. but is this really that surprising? the lines of what is and isn't legally 'rape' seem to blur more and more each year.
Not 100% sure what this means, but I laughed.I'm glad I'm married, because my nickname in college could have been "Gray Rape" instead of "Grape Ape".
To a fantasy football board to discuss rape?Sickening that this is where society has taken us.
That someone could have their career ruined due to the jealously of a young, immature person.George Jefferson Airplane said:To a fantasy football board to discuss rape?dschuler said:Sickening that this is where society has taken us.
http://www.wlu.edu/student-life/policies-and-guidelines/student-conduct/student-faculty-hearing-boardCletiusMaximus said:The article references a "Student-Faculty Hearing Board" making this decision, and I just kind of cringe reading that. Its probably an appointed panel made up of some students and some faculty, and you have to wonder what kind of teachers and students sign up for that. The discussion in here will likely conflate this kangaroo process with actual criminal or civil proceedings, when this student-faculty process likely has very little in common with any sort of fair adjudication process.IvanKaramazov said:You guys are being all critical of university administrators, but if people with Ph.D.s in history, modern British literature, and chemistry aren't qualified to investigate and prosecute cases of sexual violence, who is? It's not like there's anybody out there with any special professional training in this sort of thing.
There's a whole thread on that somewhere. Seems like a vety different kind of issue.Not to derail the story at hand, but how about "Man must register as sex offender after girl lies about age."
Bonfire said:In addition to the very real possibility of conviction/expulsion/etc for the young men accused in these 'cases', there doesn't seem to be much blow back from being proved absolutely false as the accuser. I'm glad to see some counter legal action in this situation.
Accused of rape(falsely):
Found guilty - Male serves time, expelled, sex offenders list, life ruined. Female - Got revenge, victim status
Found innocent and proved to be completely concocted - Male reputation ruined, lengthy battle to prove innocence (as assumed guilty). Female - Be on your way.
With crime this heinous, there should be very serious ramifications if allegations are proved fabricated. Currently the situation is a bit of, heads I win, tails you lose.
Just saying that not only might you need video proof of agreement prior to any sexual act, you may also want proof of age.There's a whole thread on that somewhere. Seems like a vety different kind of issue.Not to derail the story at hand, but how about "Man must register as sex offender after girl lies about age."