Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Your thoughts?
It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Let's say the trade deadline was still open. What realistic options do you think they'd have? Not just a trade that works for the Colts, but for both teams. Get the Bengals to give up rent-a-Flacco? Russ Wilson? Are those even better options then someone who apparently knows the system?It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Or Derick Carr?It weird for sure, couldn't they have gotten Andrew Luck out of retirement instead?
Agreed - it just seems so odd that orgs churn through QBs, with so little development.Let's say the trade deadline was still open. What realistic options do you think they'd have? Not just a trade that works for the Colts, but for both teams. Get the Bengals to give up rent-a-Flacco? Russ Wilson? Are those even better options than someone who apparently knows the system?It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Maybe they tried but have you seen Andrew Luck in the last few years? I'm thinking they have and did not try because he does not look like someone physically able to play an NFL game.It weird for sure, couldn't they have gotten Andrew Luck out of retirement instead?
I believe he's the property of the Saints still.Or Derick Carr?It weird for sure, couldn't they have gotten Andrew Luck out of retirement instead?
I guess Cam Newton can finally retire.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
They're better options than Reily Leonard. Rivers was elite back in the day, I have no idea if he's better ATM.Let's say the trade deadline was still open. What realistic options do you think they'd have? Not just a trade that works for the Colts, but for both teams. Get the Bengals to give up rent-a-Flacco? Russ Wilson? Are those even better options then someone who apparently knows the system?It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
I think it says there's no substitute for experience. Sure, you can play someone like Riley Leonard, but I think Rivers gives them a better chance. Time will tell. I'm actually very curious to see how Rivers looks, and looking forward to it. I'm not a Colts fan.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Woulda been a great time for ARich to show up or come running off the bench and be ready to help push them into the PlayoffsIf 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
So many people are saying this, but I don't understand why. It's not like Rivers is an MMA fighter getting back into the ring after a 5 year absence at 44 years old. He's playing a position that, as Jack Lambert said over 45 years ago, needs to be wearing dresses. Can you recall the last time an older immobile QB got hurt? For me, it's the young mobile ones that take the beatings.I hope we don't see Rivers get injured in a way that's painful to watch
Hasn’t been medically cleared, still recovering from a broken face.Woulda been a great time for ARich to show up or come running off the bench and be ready to help push them into the Playoffs
I don't think any of those teams would be making those QB's available and just put themselves at being at risk of being in the same position the Colts are in. That's why I said give me a trade that works for both teams. Those ain't it.They're better options than Reily Leonard. Rivers was elite back in the day, I have no idea if he's better ATM.Let's say the trade deadline was still open. What realistic options do you think they'd have? Not just a trade that works for the Colts, but for both teams. Get the Bengals to give up rent-a-Flacco? Russ Wilson? Are those even better options then someone who apparently knows the system?It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Sam Howell, Kenny Pickett, Aidan O'Connell, Minshew, Mason Rudolph, Davis Mills, Garoppolo etc. etc.
Plenty of guys to trade for in the league that I imagine they would have preferred to Rivers. But the deadline is passed.
And even that is a sad statement. Flacco is also old as dirt, NFL-wise. And sure, he had a spike game, but that was short-lived.The reality is I think we had one QB trade in-season. Flacco. Unless I'm forgetting someone. It's pretty hard prying a QB off teams now, or before the deadline.
Yes, my thoughts exactly. There are play style differences for sure between them but the main advantage Flacco has over Rivers is he just has not sat out a few years. Other then that both super olds. Do I think he'd have been a better choice then Rivers? I do, just not sure it's that much better or sure Stiechen think it's any better. Afterall, he did bench Flacco after a few games last season.And even that is a sad statement. Flacco is also old as dirt, NFL-wise. And sure, he had a spike game, but that was short-lived.The reality is I think we had one QB trade in-season. Flacco. Unless I'm forgetting someone. It's pretty hard prying a QB off teams now, or before the deadline.
Spike game? In Flacco's first 4 games as a Bengal, he was the league's QB3, leading the league in both passing yards and passing TD's. Old journeymen rule!And even that is a sad statement. Flacco is also old as dirt, NFL-wise. And sure, he had a spike game, but that was short-lived.The reality is I think we had one QB trade in-season. Flacco. Unless I'm forgetting someone. It's pretty hard prying a QB off teams now, or before the deadline.
the QB landscape is rough. There has never been a time in the history of the NFL finding elite or even really good starting QB play was easy. Supply has never been on their side.
It says the NFL is Horrible this yearIt says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Everything is for sale, it's just a matter of price.I don't think any of those teams would be making those QB's available and just put themselves at being at risk of being in the same position the Colts are in. That's why I said give me a trade that works for both teams. Those ain't it.They're better options than Reily Leonard. Rivers was elite back in the day, I have no idea if he's better ATM.Let's say the trade deadline was still open. What realistic options do you think they'd have? Not just a trade that works for the Colts, but for both teams. Get the Bengals to give up rent-a-Flacco? Russ Wilson? Are those even better options then someone who apparently knows the system?It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Sam Howell, Kenny Pickett, Aidan O'Connell, Minshew, Mason Rudolph, Davis Mills, Garoppolo etc. etc.
Plenty of guys to trade for in the league that I imagine they would have preferred to Rivers. But the deadline is passed.
It says the NFL is Horrible this yearIt says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
It says way more than that. Surely, there is at least 10 to 15 other options over the past 5 years of guys that have come and gone since Rivers retired.It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
It’s only going to get worse. The majority of these college quarterbacks don’t even know how to call plays anymore. They just look at the sideline and if the sign is Bugs Bunny they run and if it’s Yosemite Sam, they pass.
Amusingly, I’d recently read a quote from Chip Kelly - he was asked if he would ever reveal what the signs meant.It’s only going to get worse. The majority of these college quarterbacks don’t even know how to call plays anymore. They just look at the sideline and if the sign is Bugs Bunny they run and if it’s Yosemite Sam, they pass.
Right. It's a hard ****ing job that requires a ton of practice and experience in additional to immense natural talent. And it's a massive indication as to just how good defensive players have gotten.It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Strongly disagree. With, like all of this except the occasional "the."It’s only going to get worse. The majority of these college quarterbacks don’t even know how to call plays anymore. They just look at the sideline and if the sign is Bugs Bunny they run and if it’s Yosemite Sam, they pass.
Compared to now Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Joe Burrow, Jayden Daniels, Lamar Jackson. It's really only Burrow that is not athletically elite. If you put Mahomes, Allen, LJax, etc in Drew Brees' body they would most likely be nobodies.
The defenses just seem to get better all the time. No matter what new wrinkle opposing offenses might throw at them they eventually seem to come up with a solution with those talents on defense. And against a bottom half starting QB the job becomes much easier.It's a hard ****ing job that requires a ton of practice and experience in additional to immense natural talent. And it's a massive indication as to just how good defensive players have gotten.
I look at that Kendall Hinton Broncos* game from a few years ago as Exhibit A and any refutation to some idiot on his couch saying he could so better than the Kenny Picketts of the world.The defenses just seem to get better all the time. No matter what new wrinkle opposing offenses might throw at them they eventually seem to come up with a solution with those talents on defense. And against a bottom half starting QB the job becomes much easier.It's a hard ****ing job that requires a ton of practice and experience in additional to immense natural talent. And it's a massive indication as to just how good defensive players have gotten.
Or, and maybe this is crazy talk, NFL teams like to churn and burn QB prospects, to the point that there is a massive shortage, despite only 32 starting jobs in the NFL. Collegiate programs don’t seem to be developing quality prospects and NFL Teams are constantly chasing the shiny new toy while discarding former top prospects to the scrap heap.Right. It's a hard ****ing job that requires a ton of practice and experience in additional to immense natural talent. And it's a massive indication as to just how good defensive players have gotten.It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
Well, the state of your dynasty teams anyway.I'd say the state of QBs in the NFL is um, dire?

You act like a dearth of quality NFL QBs is something new.Or, and maybe this is crazy talk, NFL teams like to churn and burn QB prospects, to the point that there is a massive shortage, despite only 32 starting jobs in the NFL. Collegiate programs don’t seem to be developing quality prospects and NFL Teams are constantly chasing the shiny new toy while discarding former top prospects to the scrap heap.Right. It's a hard ****ing job that requires a ton of practice and experience in additional to immense natural talent. And it's a massive indication as to just how good defensive players have gotten.It says that it's week 15, all the most capable QBs are already on NFL rosters and the trade deadline has passed.If 44 y/o Phillip Rivers is the best option for a team in the Colts situation, what does that say about the greater QB picture in the NFL?
Your thoughts?
I’m curious what the rules are for poaching CFL players? Surely there must be a talent or 2 in that league, or the Arena league worth giving a shot to in situations like this.
No, I’m reiterating that it’s a continuing problem.You act like a dearth of quality NFL QBs is something new.
Excellent 2nd half of your strawman.There have always been a lot of serviceable starters available and, every now and again, one of them catches lightning in a bottle and wins a Super Bowl (Hostetler, Dilfer, Foles, Favre etc)

If it's always been that way it's not a problem it's a simple reality.No, I’m reiterating that it’s a continuing problem.You act like a dearth of quality NFL QBs is something new.
Excellent 2nd half of your strawman.There have always been a lot of serviceable starters available and, every now and again, one of them catches lightning in a bottle and wins a Super Bowl (Hostetler, Dilfer, Foles, Favre etc)![]()
I bet a lot of teams are kicking themselves for not bringing in Brissett this season.If it's always been that way it's not a problem it's a simple reality.No, I’m reiterating that it’s a continuing problem.You act like a dearth of quality NFL QBs is something new.
Excellent 2nd half of your strawman.There have always been a lot of serviceable starters available and, every now and again, one of them catches lightning in a bottle and wins a Super Bowl (Hostetler, Dilfer, Foles, Favre etc)![]()
And, that's not a strawman it's a fact. Teams do manage to put it all together with a less than average starter.
And sometimes a less than average starter comes in and puts together a magical season even if they don't win much. Jacoby Brissett is a great example of that. I bet the Colts would love to have him under center right about now.
Two years ago that looked like a very good deal, even in super-flex.I bet a lot of teams are kicking themselves for not bringing in Brissett this season.If it's always been that way it's not a problem it's a simple reality.No, I’m reiterating that it’s a continuing problem.You act like a dearth of quality NFL QBs is something new.
Excellent 2nd half of your strawman.There have always been a lot of serviceable starters available and, every now and again, one of them catches lightning in a bottle and wins a Super Bowl (Hostetler, Dilfer, Foles, Favre etc)![]()
And, that's not a strawman it's a fact. Teams do manage to put it all together with a less than average starter.
And sometimes a less than average starter comes in and puts together a magical season even if they don't win much. Jacoby Brissett is a great example of that. I bet the Colts would love to have him under center right about now.
I, for one, am kicking myself for giving him up in a trade for Mixon 2 years ago.
I also gave up a 2nd and a 3rd IIRC.Two years ago that looked like a very good deal, even in super-flex.I bet a lot of teams are kicking themselves for not bringing in Brissett this season.If it's always been that way it's not a problem it's a simple reality.No, I’m reiterating that it’s a continuing problem.You act like a dearth of quality NFL QBs is something new.
Excellent 2nd half of your strawman.There have always been a lot of serviceable starters available and, every now and again, one of them catches lightning in a bottle and wins a Super Bowl (Hostetler, Dilfer, Foles, Favre etc)![]()
And, that's not a strawman it's a fact. Teams do manage to put it all together with a less than average starter.
And sometimes a less than average starter comes in and puts together a magical season even if they don't win much. Jacoby Brissett is a great example of that. I bet the Colts would love to have him under center right about now.
I, for one, am kicking myself for giving him up in a trade for Mixon 2 years ago.
No one cares about your fantasy team.I also gave up a 2nd and a 3rd IIRC.Two years ago that looked like a very good deal, even in super-flex.I bet a lot of teams are kicking themselves for not bringing in Brissett this season.If it's always been that way it's not a problem it's a simple reality.No, I’m reiterating that it’s a continuing problem.You act like a dearth of quality NFL QBs is something new.
Excellent 2nd half of your strawman.There have always been a lot of serviceable starters available and, every now and again, one of them catches lightning in a bottle and wins a Super Bowl (Hostetler, Dilfer, Foles, Favre etc)![]()
And, that's not a strawman it's a fact. Teams do manage to put it all together with a less than average starter.
And sometimes a less than average starter comes in and puts together a magical season even if they don't win much. Jacoby Brissett is a great example of that. I bet the Colts would love to have him under center right about now.
I, for one, am kicking myself for giving him up in a trade for Mixon 2 years ago.
My mother does, and she wants you to know this was a very hurtful thing to say. She said I should report you but I’m no snitch.No one cares about your fantasy team.I also gave up a 2nd and a 3rd IIRC.Two years ago that looked like a very good deal, even in super-flex.I bet a lot of teams are kicking themselves for not bringing in Brissett this season.If it's always been that way it's not a problem it's a simple reality.No, I’m reiterating that it’s a continuing problem.You act like a dearth of quality NFL QBs is something new.
Excellent 2nd half of your strawman.There have always been a lot of serviceable starters available and, every now and again, one of them catches lightning in a bottle and wins a Super Bowl (Hostetler, Dilfer, Foles, Favre etc)![]()
And, that's not a strawman it's a fact. Teams do manage to put it all together with a less than average starter.
And sometimes a less than average starter comes in and puts together a magical season even if they don't win much. Jacoby Brissett is a great example of that. I bet the Colts would love to have him under center right about now.
I, for one, am kicking myself for giving him up in a trade for Mixon 2 years ago.
![]()