ZenMaster said:
Road Warriors said:
ZenMaster said:
Apple Jack said:
ZenMaster said:
Dark Matter said:
Update:
http://abc13.com/sports/assistant-mack-breed-told-john-jay-principal-he-ordered-ref-hits-in-anger/997662/
"[Gutierrez] stated that Coach Breed initially asked him what was going to happen to the players during their ride home from the game. After Coach Gutierrez informed him that the players would be removed from the team, he informed Coach Gutierrez that he directed the players to strike the referee."
Looks like the coach is taking the fall for the players.
Schtick?
Nope. My guess is that the players did it themselves without any direction from the coach. Assuming the quote I posted from the story is correct, it seems suspicious that the coach asked first what would happen to the players and then admitted he directed them to do it after he was told they would be suspended.
If he was going to admit culpability, why would he ask about the players' punishment first?
My guess is if it was a couple of laps, he wouldn't have admitted it. When the punishment was significant, he felt he had to fess up. IMO, of course.
I think that's possible. My opinion was based on that I think the players acted alone - teenagers, emotion, hormones - that kind of thing.
Maybe I don't want to believe that a coach would tell his players to intentionally hit a referee.
Reality is, some coaches are just nuts.
Just this last week, the High School Ice hockey league I ref had a game where the ref ejected both assist coaches for abuse of official. After the game, the assistants and heads coach were waiting for the ref right off the ice.
After some words, one asst coach made am over at the ref and when he went to defend himself, the coach grabbed his arm and twisted it. It didn't get much further b/c people stepped in. The whole thing is under review of the board at this point, but it just goest to show how coaches can't act like adults sometimes.