Tell me you dont watch baseball without telling me you dont watch baseballYes - one of the best player in the game is like 5'2".Have you seen the players in MLB today compared to even the 80s?
Tell me you dont watch baseball without telling me you dont watch baseballYes - one of the best player in the game is like 5'2".Have you seen the players in MLB today compared to even the 80s?
Wilt was crazy athletic, a track star at Kansas, especially in the high jump.Of all the players in the bygone eras, easily the biggest freak to me was Wilt Chamberlain.
After reading up and watching some limited film, I believe his 1960 self could be dropped directly into today's NBA and be an All-Star. I don't think he could just step in and be MVP level, but he could get you 24/12 with 2 blocks a night. Let him take some nights off and get him eating well and and with modern training he's right there with Giannis and Embiid in a couple of years. Heck, they could maybe get him to shoot 60% from the line.
I was joking about Altuve - yes, players work out more, but generally speaking size and strength are not as important in baseball as they are you basketball or football - do you not watch those sports?Tell me you dont watch baseball without telling me you dont watch baseballYes - one of the best player in the game is like 5'2".Have you seen the players in MLB today compared to even the 80s?
Yeah, but these guys today would get their *** kicked by the Steroid Era guys, so there's thatHave you seen the players in MLB today compared to even the 80s?
I remember the story about him out-racing Jim Brown when he was barefoot.Wilt was crazy athletic, a track star at Kansas, especially in the high jump
And you deleted it in 5 seconds like a big babyThanks but you did all the work to earn it.Nice post @Dr. Octopus
Tell me you dont watch baseball without telling me you dont watch baseballYes - one of the best player in the game is like 5'2".Have you seen the players in MLB today compared to even the 80s?You’re alway suck a jackass.

Right!! Let's drop all the pitchers into the 1930's, and give them that workloadTo be fair to the Sultan of Swat and the old timers.....I'd imagine most pitchers from today wouldn't fare well back then. When they started talking load management/pitch counts and 4 and 5 days rest....managers like John McGraw would have had them tarred and feathered and ran out of town on a rail.
I think if you sent Giannis back to the 50s NBA, it would ruin basketball forever. They'd be so freaked out by him they'd ban dribbling and raise the rim to 13 feet, and the sport would never really catch on like it did.To your last point, does that also mean that if you stuck an NBA star like Giannis, (for instance), in 1950s basketball he averages 80 points a game? He’s simply unstoppable, seemingly from another planet?
Do the pitchers have all the training and technology of today to throw high 90s and increase spin rate?To be fair to the Sultan of Swat and the old timers.....I'd imagine most pitchers from today wouldn't fare well back then. When they started talking load management/pitch counts and 4 and 5 days rest....managers like John McGraw would have had them tarred and feathered and ran out of town on a rail.
If you took him straight from 1925 and plopped him into today's game he wouldn't even make a major league roster.
I think he'd start in the minors like Michael Jordan and Tim Tebow.If you took him straight from 1925 and plopped him into today's game he wouldn't even make a major league roster.
Not to be pedantic but if you give any MLB team in 2023 the opportunity to put the time traveling Babe Ruth on their roster I think the marketing folks (much less the owner) would figure out a way to get him on the roster.
Do the pitchers have all the training and technology of today to throw high 90s and increase spin rate?
LMAO at "I took a shot at you". I made a joke and you acted all sensitive and reacted by calling me a jackass then werent even man enough to leave it posted for longer than 5 seconds.So you’re trying to prove me correct.And you deleted it in 5 seconds like a big babyThanks but you did all the work to earn it.Nice post @Dr. Octopus
Tell me you dont watch baseball without telling me you dont watch baseballYes - one of the best player in the game is like 5'2".Have you seen the players in MLB today compared to even the 80s?You’re alway suck a jackass.![]()
I deleted because this place doesn’t need it - but that’s the third time you’ve took a shot at me and it didn’t sit right. I “reacted”. I decided to be mature and actually “respond” instead. Whatever.
No chanceDo the pitchers have all the training and technology of today to throw high 90s and increase spin rate?
I don't really know the answer, but:
Could modern guys throw that way for 150-170 pitches a game for 40 starts? A lot of three-days-rest starts, too.
One of my favorite parts of his autobiography, which had a lot of great stories.I remember the story about him out-racing Jim Brown when he was barefoot.Wilt was crazy athletic, a track star at Kansas, especially in the high jump
Maybe, but they were also putting stuff on the ball (vaseline, etc.) to get movement that I’m betting came close to mirroring todays pitchers.Walter Johnson wasn’t throwing splitters or sliders that dropped off the table as it crossed the plate.
Mostly agree with your first paragraphThere isn't a player in any sport that could just time travel from their prime to right now and be as good as they were, but if you brought them along with all the advancements in training, medicine, nutrition etc, then I think most if not all of them would be just as good as they were before.
Example. Do I think you could drop 30 year old Michael Jordan into the NBA right and he would be the best player in the NBA? No he wouldn't. Now bring back highschool Jordan and let him have all the advantages and I think you get a guy that is maybe the greatest ever.
Maybe, but they were also putting stuff on the ball (vaseline, etc.) to get movement that I’m betting came close to mirroring todays pitchers.Walter Johnson wasn’t throwing splitters or sliders that dropped off the table as it crossed the plate.
Mostly agree with your first paragraphThere isn't a player in any sport that could just time travel from their prime to right now and be as good as they were, but if you brought them along with all the advancements in training, medicine, nutrition etc, then I think most if not all of them would be just as good as they were before.
Example. Do I think you could drop 30 year old Michael Jordan into the NBA right and he would be the best player in the NBA? No he wouldn't. Now bring back highschool Jordan and let him have all the advantages and I think you get a guy that is maybe the greatest ever.
Disagree with your second. Hand checking rules in the era jordan played in made playing offense so much harder than playing offense in today's game. Jordan would still be the best playing I'm basketball I'm today's game and may have average 40ppg under today's rules.
There's a joke in here about the racial makeup in MLB at the time, but I think it's probably best I move along.Skoal, too. And I'd have to look it up, but it was once legal to dirty up a ball with mud to make it less white so it was harder to pick up.
The 3 pt shot existed back then too so not sure what the difference is.Mostly agree with your first paragraphThere isn't a player in any sport that could just time travel from their prime to right now and be as good as they were, but if you brought them along with all the advancements in training, medicine, nutrition etc, then I think most if not all of them would be just as good as they were before.
Example. Do I think you could drop 30 year old Michael Jordan into the NBA right and he would be the best player in the NBA? No he wouldn't. Now bring back highschool Jordan and let him have all the advantages and I think you get a guy that is maybe the greatest ever.
Disagree with your second. Hand checking rules in the era jordan played in made playing offense so much harder than playing offense in today's game. Jordan would still be the best playing I'm basketball I'm today's game and may have average 40ppg under today's rules.
He wouldn't for one reason. He can't shoot 3's. He is like a career 30 percent shooter from deep. Teams would just lay back and take away lanes.
You mean like they did when he was playing but without the physical defense he had to face?He wouldn't for one reason. He can't shoot 3's. He is like a career 30 percent shooter from deep. Teams would just lay back and take away lanes.
Maybe, but they were also putting stuff on the ball (vaseline, etc.) to get movement that I’m betting came close to mirroring todays pitchers.
The illegal defense rules. The Bulls could stand Bill Cartwright by the 3-point line and if nobody guarded him it was a technical foul. Made it easier to isolate.The 3 pt shot existed back then too so not sure what the difference is.
The 3 pt shot existed back then too so not sure what the difference is.Mostly agree with your first paragraphThere isn't a player in any sport that could just time travel from their prime to right now and be as good as they were, but if you brought them along with all the advancements in training, medicine, nutrition etc, then I think most if not all of them would be just as good as they were before.
Example. Do I think you could drop 30 year old Michael Jordan into the NBA right and he would be the best player in the NBA? No he wouldn't. Now bring back highschool Jordan and let him have all the advantages and I think you get a guy that is maybe the greatest ever.
Disagree with your second. Hand checking rules in the era jordan played in made playing offense so much harder than playing offense in today's game. Jordan would still be the best playing I'm basketball I'm today's game and may have average 40ppg under today's rules.
He wouldn't for one reason. He can't shoot 3's. He is like a career 30 percent shooter from deep. Teams would just lay back and take away lanes.
You mean like they did when he was playing but without the physical defense he had to face?He wouldn't for one reason. He can't shoot 3's. He is like a career 30 percent shooter from deep. Teams would just lay back and take away lanes.
The illegal defense rules. The Bulls could stand Bill Cartwright by the 3-point line and if nobody guarded him it was a technical foul. Made it easier to isolate.The 3 pt shot existed back then too so not sure what the difference is.
That said I think Jordan would be fine today. He had some pretty decent 3-point shooting years later in his career, even shot .427 one year when the line was moved in. If defenses really started to sag on him he'd have worked on that shot more.
It's why they have more arm injuries today. They haven't build up endurance and arm strength like the pitchers even a generation ago. Everyone is too soft. Load management in basketball has destroyed the sport for the average fan. Mindset is regular season and home court advantage doesn't matter at all. They just want everyone fresh. Imagine somebody taking the night off Pistons vs Celtics. You have to be kidding me. And all of these load management guys take time off and STILL get hurt. Proves the whole mentality is flawed. Baseball not as bad but pitchers have arm injuries because of low usage, not the other way around.Right!! Let's drop all the pitchers into the 1930's, and give them that workloadTo be fair to the Sultan of Swat and the old timers.....I'd imagine most pitchers from today wouldn't fare well back then. When they started talking load management/pitch counts and 4 and 5 days rest....managers like John McGraw would have had them tarred and feathered and ran out of town on a rail.
You forgot softer and more fragile.You mean like they did when he was playing but without the physical defense he had to face?He wouldn't for one reason. He can't shoot 3's. He is like a career 30 percent shooter from deep. Teams would just lay back and take away lanes.
Not even close to the same. The athletes now are much stronger and faster compared to when Jordan played.
The problem is there are different kinds of load management. Pitch count is one but year long throwing is another. I think there is too much focus on pitch count game to game rather than throws all year long. I also think weight training and striving for max velocity on every throw is a big contributing factor as well.It's why they have more arm injuries today. They haven't build up endurance and arm strength like the pitchers even a generation ago. Everyone is too soft. Load management in basketball has destroyed the sport for the average fan. Mindset is regular season and home court advantage doesn't matter at all. They just want everyone fresh. Imagine somebody taking the night off Pistons vs Celtics. You have to be kidding me. And all of these load management guys take time off and STILL get hurt. Proves the whole mentality is flawed. Baseball not as bad but pitchers have arm injuries because of low usage, not the other way around.
I mean, for real.Any discussion of Jordan not thriving today is ludicrous
Your avatar is really in sync with you today.It's why they have more arm injuries today. They haven't build up endurance and arm strength like the pitchers even a generation ago. Everyone is too soft. Load management in basketball has destroyed the sport for the average fan. Mindset is regular season and home court advantage doesn't matter at all. They just want everyone fresh. Imagine somebody taking the night off Pistons vs Celtics. You have to be kidding me. And all of these load management guys take time off and STILL get hurt. Proves the whole mentality is flawed. Baseball not as bad but pitchers have arm injuries because of low usage, not the other way around.
Come on man, Jordan couldn’t even make his sophomore basketball team. How good was he really?I mean, for real.Any discussion of Jordan not thriving today is ludicrous
Hasn't the mid-range jumper become obsolete in todays game? Jordan would definitely have to work on his 3 point shot.Any discussion of Jordan not thriving today is ludicrous. We're not talking George Mikan 50+ years ago. He'd dominate.
Analytics.......The 3 pt shot existed back then too so not sure what the difference is.Mostly agree with your first paragraphThere isn't a player in any sport that could just time travel from their prime to right now and be as good as they were, but if you brought them along with all the advancements in training, medicine, nutrition etc, then I think most if not all of them would be just as good as they were before.
Example. Do I think you could drop 30 year old Michael Jordan into the NBA right and he would be the best player in the NBA? No he wouldn't. Now bring back highschool Jordan and let him have all the advantages and I think you get a guy that is maybe the greatest ever.
Disagree with your second. Hand checking rules in the era jordan played in made playing offense so much harder than playing offense in today's game. Jordan would still be the best playing I'm basketball I'm today's game and may have average 40ppg under today's rules.
He wouldn't for one reason. He can't shoot 3's. He is like a career 30 percent shooter from deep. Teams would just lay back and take away lanes.
Do the pitchers have all the training and technology of today to throw high 90s and increase spin rate?To be fair to the Sultan of Swat and the old timers.....I'd imagine most pitchers from today wouldn't fare well back then. When they started talking load management/pitch counts and 4 and 5 days rest....managers like John McGraw would have had them tarred and feathered and ran out of town on a rail.
They’d also both sign with the Padres in the offseason.Ruth swung a 42-44oz bat with the Yankees. Give him a modern bat and he’d at least be Alejandro Kirk.
give Walter Johnson the benefit of modern training & nutrition and he would be pumping 102 to the plate
Wait the 3 pt line moved IN and you're saying Jordan had a low 3 pt % compared to today's players?The 3 pt shot existed back then too so not sure what the difference is.Mostly agree with your first paragraphThere isn't a player in any sport that could just time travel from their prime to right now and be as good as they were, but if you brought them along with all the advancements in training, medicine, nutrition etc, then I think most if not all of them would be just as good as they were before.
Example. Do I think you could drop 30 year old Michael Jordan into the NBA right and he would be the best player in the NBA? No he wouldn't. Now bring back highschool Jordan and let him have all the advantages and I think you get a guy that is maybe the greatest ever.
Disagree with your second. Hand checking rules in the era jordan played in made playing offense so much harder than playing offense in today's game. Jordan would still be the best playing I'm basketball I'm today's game and may have average 40ppg under today's rules.
He wouldn't for one reason. He can't shoot 3's. He is like a career 30 percent shooter from deep. Teams would just lay back and take away lanes.
Then we can't help you if you don't understand the difference between the 3 back then and now.

Probably one of the dumber takes I've seen in awhileAny discussion of Jordan not thriving today is ludicrous. We're not talking George Mikan 50+ years ago. He'd dominate.
Wait the 3 pt line moved IN and you're saying Jordan had a low 3 pt % compared to today's players?The 3 pt shot existed back then too so not sure what the difference is.Mostly agree with your first paragraphThere isn't a player in any sport that could just time travel from their prime to right now and be as good as they were, but if you brought them along with all the advancements in training, medicine, nutrition etc, then I think most if not all of them would be just as good as they were before.
Example. Do I think you could drop 30 year old Michael Jordan into the NBA right and he would be the best player in the NBA? No he wouldn't. Now bring back highschool Jordan and let him have all the advantages and I think you get a guy that is maybe the greatest ever.
Disagree with your second. Hand checking rules in the era jordan played in made playing offense so much harder than playing offense in today's game. Jordan would still be the best playing I'm basketball I'm today's game and may have average 40ppg under today's rules.
He wouldn't for one reason. He can't shoot 3's. He is like a career 30 percent shooter from deep. Teams would just lay back and take away lanes.
Then we can't help you if you don't understand the difference between the 3 back then and now.
Isn't that a point in his favor?
![]()