Anyone who watches the Steelers consistently knows that the sack problem is far more of an o-line problem than a qb problem. Not only that but I'll take a few extra sacks along with Ben's propensity to create plays with his scrambling ability.Brees or Cutler (I voted Brees).Big Ben holds onto the ball way to long, he gets sacked once every 10.4 pass plays, that's very bad.
What can I say, not a fan.But mostly, I just forgot about him.What, no Philip Rivers option?
You have the "other" option available.But dang near noone would go with the Rivers option at this point.What can I say, not a fan.But mostly, I just forgot about him.What, no Philip Rivers option?
Color me confused.Which of these QBs not named Brady or Manning would you want leading your team?
Eli - 1/3/1981
Fixed it.Color me confused.Which of these QBs not named Brady or Manning would you want leading your team?
Eli - 1/3/1981
If the Question is which guy do I want as QB I take Brees, but if the question is which guy do I think has the best chance of being the next Brady/Peyton the its Ben.Just curious as to who most think has the best chance to reach Brady/Manning status.For me it's a toss up between Cutler and Big Ben. I think they have the most complete skill sets of the players listed and also happen to be the youngest.
Right now the consensus opinion is that Brady and Peyton are in a tier unto themselves as the super-elite QBs in the NFL. The rest of these guys are all considered at least a tier or two below. So my question is which of them has the best chance to enter that top tier with Brady and Peyton. I guess I assumed, incorrectly I guess, that whoever that QB might be would also be the QB people would most want to start a franchise with. Care to explain the difference?If the Question is which guy do I want as QB I take Brees, but if the question is which guy do I think has the best chance of being the next Brady/Peyton the its Ben.Just curious as to who most think has the best chance to reach Brady/Manning status.For me it's a toss up between Cutler and Big Ben. I think they have the most complete skill sets of the players listed and also happen to be the youngest.
agreed. I dropped carson down for the injury, using inj's as tiebreakers for a pretty solid list of qbs.Carson is catching alot of heat because of his wack organization. Then again every single name you dropped are solid options. I would take any of them.
I think Trent Edwards is looking pretty good on his developmental path...Just curious as to who most think has the best chance to reach Brady/Manning status.For me it's a toss up between Cutler and Big Ben. I think they have the most complete skill sets of the players listed and also happen to be the youngest.
And Leinart. (Although he'd only get LHUCKS's vote.)And at this point it's pretty obvious that I missed the boat by leaving Rivers off of the list.
Holding on too long is the price you pay for an 8.2 career y/a (4th best in NFL history), as well as being the active leader in yards per completion. He holds it to give his offense some time to develop. The sacks are the price you pay for having such a terrible pass-blocking Oline. The fact that he can lead the league in y/a and y/c behind that line is a testament to his toughness and his mobility.I thought long and hard on this one, and I eventually went with Roethlisberger over Cutler by the narrowest of margins. What decided me was the offensive line- Cutler hasn't even been hit through all of preseason and either game this season. Put Roethlisberger behind that kind of protection, and I think he'd be doing just as well, if not better.Brees or Cutler (I voted Brees).Big Ben holds onto the ball way to long, he gets sacked once every 10.4 pass plays, that's very bad.
Yeah, I made what I considered to be a not-so-subtle reference to that early in the thread.Leinart simply does not belong in this discussion.And Leinart. (Although he'd only get LHUCKS's vote.)And at this point it's pretty obvious that I missed the boat by leaving Rivers off of the list.
I completely respect his guts and killer instinct but along with his high YPA/YPC he is also the youngest player in the top 20 of active players in taking sacks with 151 to date. Taking a sack is worse then throwing it out of bounds. You can't make big plays and win games for your team from a stretcher. In the long run he hurts his team more than helps it by exposing himself to more damage and negative plays.He still needs to learn the balance between going for big plays and taking big risks or his career will be over long before anyone else in this poll.Holding on too long is the price you pay for an 8.2 career y/a (4th best in NFL history), as well as being the active leader in yards per completion. He holds it to give his offense some time to develop. The sacks are the price you pay for having such a terrible pass-blocking Oline. The fact that he can lead the league in y/a and y/c behind that line is a testament to his toughness and his mobility.I thought long and hard on this one, and I eventually went with Roethlisberger over Cutler by the narrowest of margins. What decided me was the offensive line- Cutler hasn't even been hit through all of preseason and either game this season. Put Roethlisberger behind that kind of protection, and I think he'd be doing just as well, if not better.Brees or Cutler (I voted Brees).Big Ben holds onto the ball way to long, he gets sacked once every 10.4 pass plays, that's very bad.
So do Trent Dilfer, Jeff Hostetler, Doug Williams and Jim McMahon.Roethlisberger also throws a lot of INTs (per attempt).But he does have a ring.
Crazy how much two games can impact our collective perception... Big Ben was leading by a wide margin before I bumped this. Cutler, Romo, and Brees were in a deadlock for second...Not surprising that Big Ben is the clear cut favorite...Interesting, though, that there is virtually no separation between the others listed.
I'm glad this thread floated back up because I want to officially change my vote to Cutler. Very impressed with his progress. He is the next BIG thing and gets the nod to lead my pretend franchise to the promised land. I'll take his two wideouts while I'm at it too.Interesting question. I voted Palmer even though he's longer in the tooth than your other options. Ben and Cutler are good, and as you pointed out, younger options. Between the two, I'd rather go with Ben for my new franchise. As far as really getting young. Guys in the "other" category could include youngsters such as Ryan and Russell... Also, Aaron Rodgers is missing from your list. I understand some would take him even with an older (perhaps better) option staring them in the face...
With Cutler having almost caught Big Ben now, it seems you're not alone in this sentiment. When I bumped this, Cutler had 21 votes to Big Ben's 46.The thing is, I think most Bronco fans who had watched Cutler's development from his rookie year, through last season, and into the pre-season, were aware of how special he is. But I think the rest of the football world is just now catching up with us.I'm glad this thread floated back up because I want to officially change my vote to Cutler. Very impressed with his progress. He is the next BIG thing and gets the nod to lead my pretend franchise to the promised land. I'll take his two wideouts while I'm at it too.Interesting question. I voted Palmer even though he's longer in the tooth than your other options. Ben and Cutler are good, and as you pointed out, younger options. Between the two, I'd rather go with Ben for my new franchise. As far as really getting young. Guys in the "other" category could include youngsters such as Ryan and Russell... Also, Aaron Rodgers is missing from your list. I understand some would take him even with an older (perhaps better) option staring them in the face...
Ben's actually gone 5 straight regular season games without an INT (108 attempts). If you remove his motorcyle/appendix season his career INT % is 3.1 instead of 3.7. More impressive is his TD % which moves from 5.9% to 7.0%.Roethlisberger and Cutler would be my clear 1-2 here, I'd only give Ben the edge due to his playoff/SB experience and overall record. They both possess all the tools you look for in a QB: size, athleticism, accuracy, arm strength, ability to extend plays in and out of the pocket, able to throw on the move, desire to work and win.Roethlisberger also throws a lot of INTs (per attempt).But he does have a ring.
Not the rest of the football world, the rest of the casual football world. ESPN polled a bunch of scouts and GMs last season, and they named Cutler as the QB most likely to join Peyton and Brady in the elite tier (ahead even of Rooflesburger).thatguy said:With Cutler having almost caught Big Ben now, it seems you're not alone in this sentiment. When I bumped this, Cutler had 21 votes to Big Ben's 46.The thing is, I think most Bronco fans who had watched Cutler's development from his rookie year, through last season, and into the pre-season, were aware of how special he is. But I think the rest of the football world is just now catching up with us.I'm glad this thread floated back up because I want to officially change my vote to Cutler. Very impressed with his progress. He is the next BIG thing and gets the nod to lead my pretend franchise to the promised land. I'll take his two wideouts while I'm at it too.Interesting question. I voted Palmer even though he's longer in the tooth than your other options. Ben and Cutler are good, and as you pointed out, younger options. Between the two, I'd rather go with Ben for my new franchise. As far as really getting young. Guys in the "other" category could include youngsters such as Ryan and Russell... Also, Aaron Rodgers is missing from your list. I understand some would take him even with an older (perhaps better) option staring them in the face...
He will need to take up the pro golf tour pretty darn soon for that to happen.20 years from now after his 3rd major championship it will be obvious the correct answer was Romo.
No, I was actually just choosing sub-30 QBs. Hence, no Donavan. As I've mentioned there are a couple of guys, namely Rodgers and Rivers, that I forgot to include. They are the only two as far as I'm concerned.And I started this poll pre-season pal, before Cutler had done squat. I bumped it to see if two weeks had changed people's perception. I could care less which QB ends up winning, but nonetheless I do think the swing is interesting.Donovan McNabb.
I would just be smart enough to get him some top receiver help.
He took the Eagles to 4 straight NFC championships with the likes of Pinkston and Thrash... just think what he could have been, if during all that time he had true # 1 and # 2 WRs. Instead he was dealing with 3s and 4s.
I guess 'thatguy' is seeking some love for his man Cutler. No better than all the Brady fans coming up with these polls hoping to get him ranking high. And it is always best to these polls right after your target had a great game... and forget to add some others who likewise had great games... no since in the playing field being even.
Von