I hate low ceilingbis. Always bumping my headbis.Rudolph….the ceilingbis very kow.
In the other ARod topic, no, not that one, the other one. No, the other, other one. Yeah, that one… I posted O/Us.They are going to win 6-7 games tops with Rudolph….the ceilingbis very kow.
Not necessarily. But they would win more games with him than Rudolph imo. How many? Probably right on that number 9In the other ARod topic, no, not that one, the other one. No, the other, other one. Yeah, that one… I posted O/Us.They are going to win 6-7 games tops with Rudolph….the ceilingbis very kow.
I set W’s at 9.5. So you’d take the over on that?
I try to be vegas-like with my line-setting.So that’s a tough bet to call.
As a Steelers fan I get that.I don't want Rodgers anywhere near the Steelers. I would rather they implode with Rudolph. It's become pretty embarrassing.
I don't want Rodgers anywhere near the Steelers. I would rather they implode with Rudolph. It's become pretty embarrassing.
Rudolph is terrible……so the Steelers will be bad either way.Frankly they might win as many or more with Rudolph. Rodgers is done.
He'd still beat the Ravens at least onceRudolph is terrible
I went to 2 games where Rudolph started against the Bengals and he torched them both times.As a Bengals fan I voted Rudolph by a lot but would have voted Skylar Thompson by a lot if given the choice.
-QG
lol how dare you besmirch the great Nathan Pederson.Is Nathan Peterson still available? If we're just going to scrape the bottle of the barrel here.
The fact that this is still going on. Every single day we have to hear about this clown & what he he may or may not do.I don't want Rodgers anywhere near the Steelers. I would rather they implode with Rudolph. It's become pretty embarrassing.
What is embarrassing?
I don't particularly find the current news cycle on football to have much value. There's not a lot of player movement (free agent signings have mostly ground to a halt, there aren't many trades going to happen right now, and most draft picks haven't signed). That leaves us with OTA reports of guys essentially playing flag football and a guy making a nice catch against a practice squad DB, reports that PLAYER X is in the best shape of his life, and projections on when injured guys will make it back onto the field. The other stories we get are conjecture on why PLAYER Y isn't participating in team activities (is he hurt? is he holding out? is he on the trading block? is there something else going on?) Basically, lots of fluff pieces and not a lot of hard news. The Rogers saga is just another cog in a slow news cycle. Not a ton going on right now.Every single day we have to hear about this clown & what he he may or may not do.
I wonder if they're going to go full Arthur Smith (that's the OC right?) and run the ball 99% of the plays.lol how dare you besmirch the great Nathan Pederson.Is Nathan Peterson still available? If we're just going to scrape the bottle of the barrel here.
(j/k)
Before the Raiders made the trade, I thought PIT might be a nice landing spot for Geno. That offense seems like a nice fit for his strengths.
I wish I knew the behind the scenes in PIT to know what avenues they pursued - we keep talking about this in terms of plan A & plan B, but it seems fair to wonder whether ARod was even plan A, or if they’re already at plans C, D, or E at this point.
I don't particularly find the current news cycle on football to have much value. There's not a lot of player movement (free agent signings have mostly ground to a halt, there aren't many trades going to happen right now, and most draft picks haven't signed). That leaves us with OTA reports of guys essentially playing flag football and a guy making a nice catch against a practice squad DB, reports that PLAYER X is in the best shape of his life, and projections on when injured guys will make it back onto the field. The other stories we get are conjecture on why PLAYER Y isn't participating in team activities (is he hurt? is he holding out? is he on the trading block? is there something else going on?) Basically, lots of fluff pieces and not a lot of hard news. The Rogers saga is just another cog in a slow news cycle. Not a ton going on right now.Every single day we have to hear about this clown & what he he may or may not do.
Not sure I agree with this take. It's VERY unusual for high profile top FAs to be unsigned at this point. And a new QB should be working with his team-mates. Rodgers is waffling, and they're hanging on waiting for him.I don't particularly find the current news cycle on football to have much value. There's not a lot of player movement (free agent signings have mostly ground to a halt, there aren't many trades going to happen right now, and most draft picks haven't signed). That leaves us with OTA reports of guys essentially playing flag football and a guy making a nice catch against a practice squad DB, reports that PLAYER X is in the best shape of his life, and projections on when injured guys will make it back onto the field. The other stories we get are conjecture on why PLAYER Y isn't participating in team activities (is he hurt? is he holding out? is he on the trading block? is there something else going on?) Basically, lots of fluff pieces and not a lot of hard news. The Rogers saga is just another cog in a slow news cycle. Not a ton going on right now.Every single day we have to hear about this clown & what he he may or may not do.
Especially considering the timeline.Not sure I agree with this take. It's VERY unusual for high profile top FAs to be unsigned at this point. And a new QB should be working with his team-mates. Rodgers is waffling, and they're hanging on waiting for him.
NE was extremely laissez-faire after Tom Brady signed with TB. They had Jarrett Stidham and Brian Hoyer to pick from (if they wanted to). They pretty much waited for every other QB to sign and then signed Cam Newton on July 8th. Newton had no place else to go, so they got him to sign for peanuts (made $4M that season). The Pats didn't have a Plan A or Plan B for life after Brady. Jimmy G. was probably the succession plan years earlier, but Brady outlasted what Bill thought to be his expected shelf life. Really surprising that for someone said to be one of the greatest football minds ever to end up with close to nothing at QB.I can’t remember a team being in this position before, seemingly without a plan B.
Solid point. This is definitely similar, except like, without all the Super Bowl rings to show for it.NE was extremely laissez-faire after Tom Brady signed with TB. They had Jarrett Stidham and Brian Hoyer to pick from (if they wanted to). They pretty much waited for every other QB to sign and then signed Cam Newton on July 8th. Newton had no place else to go, so they got him to sign for peanuts (made $4M that season). The Pats didn't have a Plan A or Plan B for life after Brady. Jimmy G. was probably the succession plan years earlier, but Brady outlasted what Bill thought to be his expected shelf life. Really surprising that for someone said to be one of the greatest football minds ever to end up with close to nothing at QB.I can’t remember a team being in this position before, seemingly without a plan B.
This is what I hope happens. Both sides need a fresh start IMO. I’d be okay with some bad years as I’d at least feel we were trying to turn things around. I don’t get that feeling now. It just feels we are good with what they got.If the Steelers decide to (basically) tank with Rudolph, would they decide to also move on from Tomlin? Bring in a fresh everything?
If the Steelers decide to (basically) tank with Rudolph, would they decide to also move on from Tomlin? Bring in a fresh everything?
This.Now if Kirk Cousins is gettable without giving up much post-June 1st, then I think Cousins>Rodgers. But that's not the question here.
Yeah, I'd probably call that a crazy thought. Winston is the worst decision maker in the NFL. He's going into year 11, and he's never gotten better. He's fun for fantasy I guess, but I honestly think they'd win more games with Rudolph than Winston.This.Now if Kirk Cousins is gettable without giving up much post-June 1st, then I think Cousins>Rodgers. But that's not the question here.
I want no part of Rodgers, didn’t when the Jets took him and don’t now.
Crazy thought - I’d rather have Winston than either but I have no idea what the giants will do.
If the Steelers decide to (basically) tank with Rudolph, would they decide to also move on from Tomlin? Bring in a fresh everything?
Full disclosure, as a packer fan i hold a soft spot for him and want to see him succeed. I don't think I've missed a snap of his NFL career. Also from a pure entertainment purpose him and Tomlin trying to co-exist could be gold if things started to go sideways so i fully get a steelers fan's apprehension.
Skyler if they really wanna tank. Rudolph probably good enough to get them close to a .500 season.Depends. If the GM wants to win games, it's Rodgers. If he wants to tank, Rudolph.
I probably want Rodgers to get the Pittsburgh job just so I can listen to the TV personalities make excuses for him if he does not flourish.
And I think that's why the Jets cut bait with Rodgers after bringing in a new HC/regime. Not that I think Aaron Glenn is a shrinking violet rookie HC (I wouldn't mess with that man for any amount of money), but I get what he's trying to do there in instilling a new culture.He might have a different personality than Tomlin, but I think, and again it's just a guess, that he'd have a much different relationship and would respect him tons more than he would a less experienced coach. I think that may have been some of it with Saleh.
I just feel they will be saying that Tomlin is going to run a conservative offense. Running the ball in situations where Monday morning QBs will want him to pass etc. Not giving Rodgers free reign etc.I probably want Rodgers to get the Pittsburgh job just so I can listen to the TV personalities make excuses for him if he does not flourish.
Do you think that will happen though?
It seems he's pretty universally disliked.
I see it being a field day for folks if he goes out and plays just average.
In all honesty, this is my biggest concern with bringing in Aaron. If you bring him in, you have to unleash him. Trying to fit him into a system built around "Dino ball overly conservative play-calling, leaning too hard on the run, and failing to exploit the modern NFL’s pass-friendly rule would be a recipe for disaster.I just feel they will be saying that Tomlin is going to run a conservative offense. Running the ball in situations where Monday morning QBs will want him to pass etc. Not giving Rodgers free reign etc.I probably want Rodgers to get the Pittsburgh job just so I can listen to the TV personalities make excuses for him if he does not flourish.
Do you think that will happen though?
It seems he's pretty universally disliked.
I see it being a field day for folks if he goes out and plays just average.
In all honesty, this is my biggest concern with bringing in Aaron. If you bring him in, you have to unleash him. Trying to fit him into a system built around "Dino ball overly conservative play-calling, leaning too hard on the run, and failing to exploit the modern NFL’s pass-friendly rule would be a recipe for disaster.I just feel they will be saying that Tomlin is going to run a conservative offense. Running the ball in situations where Monday morning QBs will want him to pass etc. Not giving Rodgers free reign etc.I probably want Rodgers to get the Pittsburgh job just so I can listen to the TV personalities make excuses for him if he does not flourish.
Do you think that will happen though?
It seems he's pretty universally disliked.
I see it being a field day for folks if he goes out and plays just average.
Rodgers thrives on control, creativity, and pushing the ball downfield. If the Steelers try to force-feed the ground game in situations where the pass is the clear advantage, I could see this marriage crumbling fast. The media spin will be something else, but at the end of the day, it'll come down to whether Tomlin is willing to adapt and let Rodgers be Rodgers.
Yes, this makes sense. Tomlin is about as respected as a coach gets in the league and that has to hold some sway.Full disclosure, as a packer fan i hold a soft spot for him and want to see him succeed. I don't think I've missed a snap of his NFL career. Also from a pure entertainment purpose him and Tomlin trying to co-exist could be gold if things started to go sideways so i fully get a steelers fan's apprehension.
This is just me speculating so take it for what it's worth, but he strikes me, (as a lot of the long time vets do) as someone who puts a ton of weight on track record. I've known people like that in other vocations who put an inordinate amount of value on having done the thing and proven themselves. He might have a different personality than Tomlin, but I think, and again it's just a guess, that he'd have a much different relationship and would respect him tons more than he would a less experienced coach. I think that may have been some of it with Saleh.
All that armchair pscyhology to say I think there's a good shot he could work with Tomlin. And Smith too.
But we'll see if it happens.
This is what i mean by ego being the biggest factor. They're going to reign him in and he'll have to accept the game manager role (which if he committed to he could do quite well, the man is pretty efficient). Will he or will he improvise when asked not too? After watching him as long as i have i don't know that a leopard can change it's spots, but maybe mutual respect can reach a compromise and it will have to if this is going to work.In all honesty, this is my biggest concern with bringing in Aaron. If you bring him in, you have to unleash him. Trying to fit him into a system built around "Dino ball overly conservative play-calling, leaning too hard on the run, and failing to exploit the modern NFL’s pass-friendly rule would be a recipe for disaster.I just feel they will be saying that Tomlin is going to run a conservative offense. Running the ball in situations where Monday morning QBs will want him to pass etc. Not giving Rodgers free reign etc.I probably want Rodgers to get the Pittsburgh job just so I can listen to the TV personalities make excuses for him if he does not flourish.
Do you think that will happen though?
It seems he's pretty universally disliked.
I see it being a field day for folks if he goes out and plays just average.
Rodgers thrives on control, creativity, and pushing the ball downfield. If the Steelers try to force-feed the ground game in situations where the pass is the clear advantage, I could see this marriage crumbling fast. The media spin will be something else, but at the end of the day, it'll come down to whether Tomlin is willing to adapt and let Rodgers be Rodgers.
In all honesty, this is my biggest concern with bringing in Aaron. If you bring him in, you have to unleash him. Trying to fit him into a system built around "Dino ball overly conservative play-calling, leaning too hard on the run, and failing to exploit the modern NFL’s pass-friendly rule would be a recipe for disaster.I just feel they will be saying that Tomlin is going to run a conservative offense. Running the ball in situations where Monday morning QBs will want him to pass etc. Not giving Rodgers free reign etc.I probably want Rodgers to get the Pittsburgh job just so I can listen to the TV personalities make excuses for him if he does not flourish.
Do you think that will happen though?
It seems he's pretty universally disliked.
I see it being a field day for folks if he goes out and plays just average.
Rodgers thrives on control, creativity, and pushing the ball downfield. If the Steelers try to force-feed the ground game in situations where the pass is the clear advantage, I could see this marriage crumbling fast. The media spin will be something else, but at the end of the day, it'll come down to whether Tomlin is willing to adapt and let Rodgers be Rodgers.
Nah. The Steelers will win one of those 12-11getting blown out by 40+ points in the Ravens matchups late in the year.