Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I am in this camp assuming Seattle stays healthy and gets homefield. If the Saints get homefield I would take them.
How are they any different then Seattle? Dominant at home and on one side of the ball, good on the other side and they already beat the main competition in their division once, and that team in each division is 1 - 2.
They look pretty good to me. I wouldn't be shocked to see them make it to the SB.dirtyd30z said:
Holy.... reasonable. Batman.seahawk 17 said:
Most hawk fans are scared to pick their own team. You would be shocked at the number of "trap game" conversations happened last week before the Jax game.
I guess we have a different definition on what 'dominant' is?msudaisy26 said:
That just comes from the whole "martyr complex" Seattle fans suffer from. The worst a letdown would have gotten them is within ten points.
If both teams head into the playoffs with home field advantage then I'd say it was. Of course, at that point so would everybody.Donnybrook said:
They're a team that thrives on takeaways. They already have 3 or 4 RZ takeaways this year. You can't obviously count on them as a game plan, but the D is set up to try and force them. I would love to see a mid season chess match between Seattle's secondary and Manning 'a receiving corps. Seattle 's first team owned Denver 's in preseason, but neuther side was unleashing their full fury.
Sometimes turnovers are a credit to a stout defense. A good turnover ratio can definitely make a team very tough to beat. Bears fans know exactly what I'm talking about.
x100ghostguy123 said:
???Warrior said:
You need more material bro. It got a few people when you said they should have lost to the Redskins, Chicago, etc. last season. Not sure you will hook many this time around, never know though.
