Without retrospect, clearly.without retrospect is he the best QB prospect to ever enter the NFL?
I believe this is correct. A lot of people might want to revise history and say Peyton Manning, but there was great doubt at the time whether he was even the best QB in his draft class.Elway is probably the best QB prospect ever.
very true. i was thinking either elway or luck. i also think elway but to even make me think of Luck in the conversation says a lot.Manning was great, but like you said there were doubts by many he was even the best in his class.I believe this is correct. A lot of people might want to revise history and say Peyton Manning, but there was great doubt at the time whether he was even the best QB in his draft class.Elway is probably the best QB prospect ever.
Elway is probably the best QB prospect ever.
Elway is probably the best QB prospect ever.
not even closeWas Andre Ware a big time QB prospect? I work with an old Lions fan and he always brings up his talent/bust level.
Well yeah, but not in the same league as some of the names in this thread. Hell, David Klingler, who succeeded him at UH was probably a better prospect.Ahhhh, the fruits of hanging 95 points on a defenseless SMU team!Was Andre Ware a big time QB prospect?
Elway is probably the best QB prospect ever.![]()
that's not the way i remember it. luck >>>> locker.Luck is pretty far down the list, primarily because he came on fairly late (he wasn't as hyped as Locker was at the beginning of the season).
Just off the top of my head, Elway, Manning, Leaf, and Aikman....were all considered to be superior prospects overall.
Mel Kiper had Locker #1 and Luck #2 at the beginning of the season. Luck was certainly getting a fair amount of press (as shown by the #2 ranking), but few experts were projecting him ahead of Locker prior to mid-September of this season. Locker has been one of the most-hyped college QBs in the nation ever since his freshman year.that's not the way i remember it. luck >>>> locker.Luck is pretty far down the list, primarily because he came on fairly late (he wasn't as hyped as Locker was at the beginning of the season).
Just off the top of my head, Elway, Manning, Leaf, and Aikman....were all considered to be superior prospects overall.
He did have all the tools. My favorite line about Jeff George:"I look at my body today, and if there's a scratch from protecting Jeff George, I feel I did something wrong." - Bubba ParisThe Jeff George hype train was also in full effect prior to the 1990 draft. Some said he was the most technically perfect QB they had ever seen with an absolute cannon hanging from his shoulder. But at the time, not many people realized what a melon head he was.
i'm sure there's a thread on fbg about luck being better than locker as an nfl prospect back in september. or maybe there were just a lot of people who said that in the locker hype thread. i don't remember. but i'm sure i'm not the only one who watched games in 2009 and saw this.oh, and FTR, i think ryan mallet will be a bust in the nfl. just so you can pin this and look it up in 2-3 years when he goes ryan leaf.Mel Kiper had Locker #1 and Luck #2 at the beginning of the season. Luck was certainly getting a fair amount of press (as shown by the #2 ranking), but few experts were projecting him ahead of Locker prior to mid-September of this season. Locker has been one of the most-hyped college QBs in the nation ever since his freshman year.that's not the way i remember it. luck >>>> locker.Luck is pretty far down the list, primarily because he came on fairly late (he wasn't as hyped as Locker was at the beginning of the season).
Just off the top of my head, Elway, Manning, Leaf, and Aikman....were all considered to be superior prospects overall.
A few weeks ago, I heard Kiper say Elway graded out as a 9.9 and Luck was at 9.3. He said that's a pretty big gap. I think he said Bradford was around 9.3, too, and Clausen was a little lower. Not sure where others have been historically, but Elway was a "can't miss" guy.
I remember a lot of them laughing at the Raiders for drafting him that high.Not saying he was the most hyped, but I remember when many, many commentators considered JaMarcus Russell a can't miss prospect who was going to "revolutionize the Quarterback position."Lots of QBs get hyped but it seems like there are as many misses as hits...
Imagine if he didn't have the college knee surgery.Namath
This is the second guy I thought of after Horse Face.Michael Vick...people forget when it was him vs FSU in the Championship...and I do mean it was 1 vs 11 it seemed.
Elway and Manning are two little biatches. They should have just sucked it up.MassRaider already answered your question, but heres an interesting read. http://www.patspulpit.com/2010/12/29/18976...nfl-quarterback
If its before your time, heres a tidbit of info on Elway:
In the 1983 NFL Draft, Elway was selected as the first overall pick by the Baltimore Colts. Elway had, by then, played two summers of minor league baseball for the New York Yankees organization. Additionally, Elway had publicly stated that he refused to join the Colts organization, feeling the team could not allow him to be successful. If they did not trade him he said he was going to play baseball. Eventually, Colts owner Robert Irsay gave in. The Colts traded him to the Denver Broncos for QB Mark Herrmann, rights to OL Chris Hinton and a first-round pick (OG Ron Solt) in the 1984 NFL Draft on May 2, 1983. Elway is one of three quarterbacks in the history of the NFL Draft (started in 1936) to be drafted #1 and go on to be inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The other two are Terry Bradshaw and Troy Aikman.
Elway stormed into the mile-high air as one of the most highly anticipated athletes in the history of the NFL.
I'm pretty sure who ever the next guy is will also be the best ever...and so on
Yeah...I remember a LOT of hype about Bradford last year (deservedly so, it turns out...)Wasn't Sam Bradford featured as Gill Brandt's best QB prospect EVER just last year?
Mainly because his last name was Manning. He would have been a mid first rounder if his name was Eli Johnson.Wasn't Eli a guy that was a no doubt #1 overall pick and considered can't miss?
I don't think Brandt ever went that far. I think he said Bradford's pro day was one of the best he'd ever seen. But I don't think he called him "best QB prospect ever."Wasn't Sam Bradford featured as Gill Brandt's best QB prospect EVER just last year?
Yes, everyone wanted to "catch lightining in a bottle" and get Peyton's little brother...but there were not the same "best ever" thoughts...maybe "safest ever" thoughts...and that is probably exactly what he was.On a side note, I am very curious what Rivers would have been touted as, if not for Eli. I am not a State fan (at all), but I could not take my eyes off the guy and always found myself rooting for him. Could you imagine if the Giants kept him and had Smith, Manningham and Nicks? Jocobs and Bradshaw could play into their 40s with the lack of wear and tear on their bodies!Mainly because his last name was Manning. He would have been a mid first rounder if his name was Eli Johnson.Wasn't Eli a guy that was a no doubt #1 overall pick and considered can't miss?
From a prospect level I think some "experts" had an issue with his delivery...which obviously has been a non-issue.Yes, everyone wanted to "catch lightining in a bottle" and get Peyton's little brother...but there were not the same "best ever" thoughts...maybe "safest ever" thoughts...and that is probably exactly what he was.On a side note, I am very curious what Rivers would have been touted as, if not for Eli. I am not a State fan (at all), but I could not take my eyes off the guy and always found myself rooting for him. Could you imagine if the Giants kept him and had Smith, Manningham and Nicks? Jocobs and Bradshaw could play into their 40s with the lack of wear and tear on their bodies!Mainly because his last name was Manning. He would have been a mid first rounder if his name was Eli Johnson.Wasn't Eli a guy that was a no doubt #1 overall pick and considered can't miss?
I may be misremembering, but I think the Giants had Roethlisberger higher than Rivers, but picked Rivers because that's who San Diego wanted in a trade for Eli.Yes, everyone wanted to "catch lightining in a bottle" and get Peyton's little brother...but there were not the same "best ever" thoughts...maybe "safest ever" thoughts...and that is probably exactly what he was.On a side note, I am very curious what Rivers would have been touted as, if not for Eli. I am not a State fan (at all), but I could not take my eyes off the guy and always found myself rooting for him. Could you imagine if the Giants kept him and had Smith, Manningham and Nicks? Jocobs and Bradshaw could play into their 40s with the lack of wear and tear on their bodies!Mainly because his last name was Manning. He would have been a mid first rounder if his name was Eli Johnson.Wasn't Eli a guy that was a no doubt #1 overall pick and considered can't miss?
Yeah, there were a lot of questions about Rivers.If we are talking about best QB prospect ever, then I think we can dismiss guys that weren't even a shoo-in to be the best QB in their own class......Roethlisberger? No. Manning? No. Either one.Vick? No. He was a freak, and people talked about the possibilities of what he could do, but I definitely remember some negative stuff. I would say as a prospect he was close to McNair when he came out. More hyped because he played at VTech instead of Alcorn St., but McNair was a big deal when he was coming out as well. Elway, Palmer, Aikman. The big ones that I can remember. And two more names that people missed, but were as hyped as any of these other guys--Testaverde and Bartkowski.From a prospect level I think some "experts" had an issue with his delivery...which obviously has been a non-issue.Yes, everyone wanted to "catch lightining in a bottle" and get Peyton's little brother...but there were not the same "best ever" thoughts...maybe "safest ever" thoughts...and that is probably exactly what he was.On a side note, I am very curious what Rivers would have been touted as, if not for Eli. I am not a State fan (at all), but I could not take my eyes off the guy and always found myself rooting for him. Could you imagine if the Giants kept him and had Smith, Manningham and Nicks? Jocobs and Bradshaw could play into their 40s with the lack of wear and tear on their bodies!Mainly because his last name was Manning. He would have been a mid first rounder if his name was Eli Johnson.Wasn't Eli a guy that was a no doubt #1 overall pick and considered can't miss?