bicycle_seat_sniffer
Smells like chicken
I got offered LT for him and turned it down
![pot kettle :potkettle: :potkettle:](/data/assets/smilies/8potkettle8.gif)
That would be a steal for you.I offered up Steve Smith NYG+ Heath Miller for Jennings+Owen Daniels, then I canceled it cause I got scared. I am putting it back up now.
Well it's about time. Let's crank up this bandwagonBetter get him now becasue he's #####ing and has every right to do so.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports what Packers WR Greg Jennings said Monday about his lack of production couldn't have been more clear unless he conducted his interview with Keyshawn Johnson's book, "Just Give Me the Damn Ball!" propped up in his locker. "They know how I feel," Jennings said of the coaching staff. "As a competitor, I would hope they know that I want the ball. When I'm in the meeting and I'm looking at myself running wide open and I'm not getting the opportunity, yes, I am pissed - get me the doggone ball . . . no (just kidding). I feel like that when I get the ball in my hands, good things happen. Period. I mean, it's not an arrogant statement. It's not an 'I better get the ball' type deal. It's fact.And we always talk about being a real team, and what are the facts? Those are the facts. When we get the ball in our hands, we make plays."
:irony:I waswhen I saw him on our WW. Quickly grabbed him and sent Royal to the WW
Some owners are just to quick to drop.
:irony:I waswhen I saw him on our WW. Quickly grabbed him and sent Royal to the WW
Some owners are just to quick to drop.
Not really. If you had choice, and rest of your roster was on lock, you'd rather hold onto royal over jennings?!? Me thinks not...Ted Lange as your Bartender said::irony:towney said:I waswhen I saw him on our WW. Quickly grabbed him and sent Royal to the WW
Some owners are just to quick to drop.
Where did you see me imply that Royal > Jennings?Not really. If you had choice, and rest of your roster was on lock, you'd rather hold onto royal over jennings?!? Me thinks not...Ted Lange as your Bartender said::irony:towney said:I waswhen I saw him on our WW. Quickly grabbed him and sent Royal to the WW
Some owners are just to quick to drop.
Seems like they are wanting to get back to some things that were successful in 2007 and 2008.Hope this is big for Jennings and that crew. Though, they might also spread it around some.So on Monday, position coach Jimmy Robinson implored his receivers to recommit to the YAC.
"Most of our plays have been taking shots," said Green Bay receiver Donald Driver. "I mean, all season long we've been trying to take shots. When you have so much success on the deep ball, you want to try everybody. And we've been killing people on the big plays.
"We just haven't been killing people on the quick plays, and I think that's where our game is at. Everybody knows that once the ball is in our hands, we're a dangerous team."
Headed into the game against Detroit on Sunday, Green Bay may change the strategy just a little.
"Obviously, we're still going to take chances down the field, but I think you'll see a lot more (short, quick passes)," said Packers receiver James Jones. "We start throwing our little stuff, our YAC should skyrocket. But we need to do it. Starting now."
I offered Lynch + Hester and the Jennings owner is thinking it over.Told him I might even go PThomas + Hester.In dynasty good WR's are hard to come by.I think he will return to top-10 status soon.LOCO said:trade bradshaw and hester for jennings.....![]()
![]()
![]()
Im speechless. Talk about falling in love with your players.I was just offered Jennings + Forte for Steve Smith (NYG) + Chicago D/ST in a non-PPR league. All the stats say to go for it, but my gut tells me not to make this deal.
The sunk cost concept is a tough one for most to grasp.Jennings seems to be still fetching a pretty steep price I must say
Only if you drop him is it a sunk cost.The sunk cost concept is a tough one for most to grasp.Jennings seems to be still fetching a pretty steep price I must say
hhaha, ur crazy dude. make the deal.I was just offered Jennings + Forte for Steve Smith (NYG) + Chicago D/ST in a non-PPR league. All the stats say to go for it, but my gut tells me not to make this deal.
Never thought of it that way. I was offered Jennings and LT for Calvin and Jamal Lewis and turned it down as I traded Fitz for Calvin 2 weeks before (guy that drafted my team when I was away had the epiphony to draft all 3 AZ WRs for me...lol). Anyway, this was before the CJ speculation of missing the GB game. Both me and the other owner are 1-4, so I might as well give it a shot again...I just don't believe in Jennings (especially in PPR), and LT is really on the LJ, Jamal Lewis heap at this point.Do you think it is worth it to offer Calvin for him? Calvin is probably out this week and has bye next week ....Jennings already past his bye so you get the extra 2 weeks production.
Huh?I traded S Jax & B Berrian for Jennings and Felix Jones.
I am tied at 5-1 with the team I traded.
I have AJ, Holmes, Jennings & Hester as my starting WR corp (0.5 ppr)
Mark Clayton & Chaz Schilens are riding pine for when needed and able to contribute.
I like that he spoke out and glad it was not in an Ocho or TO style.
It shows me he has motivation for the team and himself.
I like the situation Jennings offers.
Not really. If you had choice, and rest of your roster was on lock, you'd rather hold onto royal over jennings?!? Me thinks not...:irony:I waswhen I saw him on our WW. Quickly grabbed him and sent Royal to the WW
Some owners are just to quick to drop.
Uh - how is that a steal - you need to let us know if it is a PPR - if it is then keep SmithThat would be a steal for you.I offered up Steve Smith NYG+ Heath Miller for Jennings+Owen Daniels, then I canceled it cause I got scared. I am putting it back up now.
The GREAT thing would be if teams start covering Finley and the rest of the guys more so that Jennings is f'in open. Then it's just a matter of Rodgers LOOKING his way... not so sure on that part but crossing my fingers.What will really scare people is if Finley puts up another 100 yards on more deep pass attempts this week.
Read above re: signing an olineman this week and the return of Clifton. Two new tackles could = relatively instant positive impact... depending on how much time it takes for the line to gel.He's a big name sure...but Rodgers has no time to toss the deep ball this year. I say he has a down year and is a good sleeper in next years draft after the Packers address the o-line issues.
:fingerscrossed:Also have to think that coming out of the bye the game plan is adjusted to get their most explosive offensive player the ball more. I think you'll see more intermediate routes and a very strong game from Jennings even if the line is marginally better.Read above re: signing an olineman this week and the return of Clifton. Two new tackles could = relatively instant positive impact... depending on how much time it takes for the line to gel.He's a big name sure...but Rodgers has no time to toss the deep ball this year. I say he has a down year and is a good sleeper in next years draft after the Packers address the o-line issues.
2 new tackles? Well, sort of.CLifton started the year and got hurt in game 2.Tauscher will be new for this year...but not new.Once he is in shape, I doubt it takes long to gel given his number of years on that team, with that offense, and with all but Sitton on the line.NatronIsMean said:Read above re: signing an olineman this week and the return of Clifton. Two new tackles could = relatively instant positive impact... depending on how much time it takes for the line to gel.Darko M said:He's a big name sure...but Rodgers has no time to toss the deep ball this year. I say he has a down year and is a good sleeper in next years draft after the Packers address the o-line issues.
Appreciate the insight --2 new tackles? Well, sort of.CLifton started the year and got hurt in game 2.Tauscher will be new for this year...but not new.Once he is in shape, I doubt it takes long to gel given his number of years on that team, with that offense, and with all but Sitton on the line.NatronIsMean said:Read above re: signing an olineman this week and the return of Clifton. Two new tackles could = relatively instant positive impact... depending on how much time it takes for the line to gel.Darko M said:He's a big name sure...but Rodgers has no time to toss the deep ball this year. I say he has a down year and is a good sleeper in next years draft after the Packers address the o-line issues.
lol Jennings >>> Smith the creme will rise to the top.horadadude said:Uh - how is that a steal - you need to let us know if it is a PPR - if it is then keep SmithThat would be a steal for you.I offered up Steve Smith NYG+ Heath Miller for Jennings+Owen Daniels, then I canceled it cause I got scared. I am putting it back up now.