Even if he never throws for 3,000 yards in a season, he can still be a great QB. He just may not fit your idea of what makes a QB great.
I agree. People have very different ideas of how to measure a great QB. IMO, calling Vick a poor QB because he's a poor passer is like calling Bill Russell a bad center because he was a poor shooter. There are many facets to the game, and you don’t have to be great at ALL of them to be a great player. Vick may not pass like Manning, CPEP or even Kerry Collins, but he is winning; the same way Jason Kidd wins even though he cant shoot – is he an “average” player too? The Falcons record over the years speaks for itself:In 2001, the year before Vick won the starting job, the Falcons finished 7-9. In 2002, with a healthy Vick running the team as a first-time starter, the Falcons went 9-6-1 and beat the Packers in the Playoffs at Lambeau In 2003, with an injured Vick missing most of the year, the Falcons fall to 5-11.In 2004, with a healthy Vick, the Falcons are 11-3.Anyone pushing Big Ben for NFL MVP should also be lobbying for Vick - hes also led his team to a magnificent record, only Vick has been more instrumental in his teams success.As for todays game, Vick was simply amazing - I dont care what the box score reads. He led his team to an early lead and caused fits for a ferocious Panthers D. When the FAlcons coaching staff went conservative on the playcalling, Carolina crawled back into the game. Then with the game on the line, Vick took over and willed the team to victory. Jeez, he doesnt have to break Marino's TD record to be considered a good QB.